Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RUNX1c-overexpression in HEPs We believe that our findings advance our knowledge of how human embry-
activates a pro-inflammatory signa- onic hematopoiesis occurs and they could help to improve current protocols
ture in accordance with recent in for hematopoietic differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells.
vivo results.
Lausanne, Switzerland). HEK-293T cells were tency was analyzed as described[30]. Briefly, 1-2105
transfected with pRRL-EF1-PGK-NEO (Empty Vector: hPSCs were subcutaneously implanted into the flank of
EV) or pRRL-EF1-EGFP-2A-Flag-RUNX1c-PGK-NEO 6-8-week-old NOD/SCID IL2R-/- mice (NSG) (The Jackson
(RUNX1c) together with packaging plasmids (psPAX and Laboratory, Bar Harbor, MA). Teratoma growth was
pMD2.G, from Addgene) by standard calcium- monitored weekly. Mice were sacrificed at 8-10 weeks
phosphate transfection[25]. Supernatants were post implantation and teratomas were removed, fixed
collected 48 hours after transfection and concentrated in formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, sectioned and
by ultracentrifugation. AND1 and HS181 were infected stained with hematoxylin/eosin or by immunocyto-
overnight on the day of passage with concentrated virus chemistry[31].
supplemented with polybrene (8 g/mL; Sigma-Aldrich).
The viral supernatants were removed on the next day OP9 hematopoietic differentiation system
and infected hESCs were washed and maintained in hESC-OP9 co-cultures were performed as described[25,
culture. Transduced cells were selected with G418 (150 32, 33]. Briefly, OP9 stromal cells were plated in gelatin-
g/mL; Invitrogen) from day 3 to day 15. RUNX1c coated 10-cm dishes in MEM basal medium supple-
expression was confirmed by quantitative real-time mented with 20% non-heat-inactivated FBS for eight
polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western days. hESCs grown in Matrigel-coated flasks were pre-
blotting. pared as a suspension of small aggregates using colla-
genase IV followed by gentle scraping in differentiation
Characterization of pluripotency markers in medium (DM: MEM basal medium, 10% non-heat-
hPSCs by flow cytometry inactivated FBS, 100 M monothioglycerol and 50
hPSC colonies were dissociated with TrypLE Express g/mL ascorbic acid). One fifth of the cell suspension
(Invitrogen) and the cell suspension was stained with was plated on top of the OP9 stroma in 10 mL of DM
PE-conjugated TRA-1-60 and SSEA3, APC-conjugated and cells were fed with fresh DM the following day.
TRA-1-81 and SSEA4 and FITC-conjugated OCT-4 anti- From day 4 to 10 of co-culture, a half-volume medium
bodies (BD Bioscience) for 30 minutes. Cells were change was performed every other day. Hematopoietic
washed and stained with 7-aminoactinomycin D (7AAD) specification was analyzed by flow cytometry (at days 6,
(BD Bioscience) and live cells identified by 7AAD exclu- 8 and 10 of co-culture) and CFU assays (at day 8 of co-
sion were analyzed using a FACS Canto II flow cytome- culture). OP9 cells were stained with anti-mouse CD29-
ter[25]. FITC (AbDSerotec, Dsseldorf, Germany) to exclude
mouse cells. The percentage of human HEPs
RNA isolation, RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis (CD31+CD34+CD45-), primitive blood cells (CD34+CD45+)
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen)[25]. and total blood cells (CD45+) was analyzed as
cDNA was generated using the SuperScript First-Strand described[25].
Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) and analyzed
by qRT-PCR using Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR Green Feeder-free hematopoietic differentiation
QPCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies, La Jolla, CA) on system
the Mx3005P QPCR System (Agilent Technologies). Feeder-free hematopoietic differentiation was per-
Gene expression levels were calculated using the (2-CT formed as previously described[26]. Confluent hPSC
method) and GAPDH was used to normalize data [29]. cultures were disaggregated into single cells with Try-
Where indicated, the relative gene expression was also PLE and plated (0.5-3105 hPSCs) onto six-well plates
calculated using the CT method and GAPDH as refer- coated with 0.5 g/cm2 ColIV in E8 media supplemented
ence gene. Primer sequences are listed in Table S1. with 10M Y27632. Next day, the medium was changed
to IF9S medium containing 50ng/mL BMP4, 50ng/mL
Western blotting FGF2, 15 ng/mL Activin A and 2 mM LiCl. On day 2, me-
hPSCs were dissociated with TrypLE Express and cells dia was changed to IF9S containing 50 ng/mL FGF2 and
lysed in RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) containing com- 50 ng/mL VEGF, and on day 4 to the media was changed
plete protease inhibitors cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzer- to Differentiation medium 3 (IF9S containing 50 ng/mL
land) and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell FGF2, 50 ng/mL VEGF, 50 ng/mL SCF, 50 ng/mL TPO, 50
lysates were electrophoresed on 12% SDS-PAGE and ng/mL IL6 and 10 ng/mL IL3 [all cytokines from Pepro-
transferred to PVDF membranes. RUNX1c protein was tech]). Cell cultures were maintained in hypoxia (5% O2,
detected with the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li- 5% CO2) for the first 6 days. From day 6 onwards, cells
cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) with an anti-RUNX1 anti- were maintained in Differentiation medium 3 in
body (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). An anti--actin antibody normoxia. The frequency of hemogenic (CD43+) and
(Sigma-Aldrich) was used as loading control. non-hemogenic (CD43-) HEPs (CD34+CD31+KDR+CD45-)
were analyzed at day 6 and 8 of development.
In vivo teratoma formation
Animal protocols were approved by the Animal Care
Committee of the University of Granada. In vivo pluripo-
Colony-Forming Unit (CFU) assay Gene Expression Hybridization kit and Agilent Whole
Human clonogenic progenitor assays were performed Human Genome Oligo Microarray, 860K (Agilent Tech-
by plating 5104 cells from OP9-hESC co-cultures into nologies). Two independent samples per condition and
methylcellulose H4436 (Stem Cell Technologies, Van- cell line were labeled and hybridized. Candidate genes
couver, Canada). Cells were incubated at 37 C in a hu- with a fold change >2 and a P-value <0.01 were consid-
midified atmosphere and colonies were counted be- ered differentially expressed. Functional analysis and
tween day 10 and 12 using standard morphological cri- canonical pathway studies were performed using the
teria[25, 34]. Panther public web tool (www.pantherdb.org) and In-
genuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (Ingenuity Systems,
Cell cycle analysis of HEPs www.ingenuity.com) as described[37, 38].
OP9 co-cultures were harvested at day 8 of devel-
opment, fixed in 70% ice-cold ethanol, and stored over- Statistical analysis
night at -20 C. The next day, cells were washed and All data are expressed as meanSEM. Statistical com-
incubated with anti-CD31-FITC and anti-CD34-FITC (Mil- parisons were performed with a paired Students t-test
tenyiBiotec) for 15 minutes. After washing, the cells with the exception of the CFU score analysis, where
were resuspended in propidium iodide (PI) buffer con- Walds test was applied. Values were considered statis-
taining 50 g/mL PI and 100 g/mL RNAase in PBS. Cell tically significant at P<0.05.
cycle distribution was analyzed using a FACSCanto-II
cytometer equipped with Modfit software (Verity Soft- RESULTS
ware House, Topsham, ME)[25, 35].
Expression of RUNX1 isoforms during hema-
Apoptosis analysis of HEPs topoietic differentiation of hPSCs
hESCs cultured over OP9 stromal cells were harvested We first differentiated hPSCs towards the hematopoiet-
at day 8, washed with Annexin V-binding buffer, and ic lineage[25, 32, 33] and analyzed the expression pat-
incubated with anti-human CD31-FITC and anti-CD34- tern of RUNX1a, b and c isoforms by qRT-PCR. HEPs
FITC (MiltenyiBiotec) and Annexin V-APC (Becton Dick- emerged at day 6 of OP9-coculture and then differenti-
inson) antibodies for 20 minutes. After washing, the ate into CD45+ cells from day 8 onwards[25, 37].
cells were resuspended in Annexin V-binding buffer RUNX1a and RUNX1a/b isoforms expression did not
with 7AAD and apoptotic cell death was detected in the increase until day 10 of hematopoietic differentiation,
CD31+CD34+CD45- cell population by flow cytometry whereas the RUNX1c isoform was readily induced at
using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer. day 6, paralleling the appearance of HEPs, and its ex-
pression progressively increased throughout differentia-
Mouse transplantation and analysis of en- tion (Fig. 1a). We then analyzed the expression pattern
graftment of the key hematopoietic transcription factors
NSG mice were housed under sterile conditions. Cord SCL/TAL1, GATA1 and PU.1/SPI1 by qRT-PCR (Fig.1a,
Blood (CB)-derived CD34+ HSPCs (3104 cells in 50 L), S1a). SCL, a master factor for HEPs specification[25] and
as well as EV (1-2.5105 cells in 50 L) or RUNX1c hESC a direct activator of RUNX1[39, 40], was the earliest
derivatives (1-2.5105 cells in 50 L) purified from day 8 induced gene. RUNX1c either preceded or paralleled
differentiating OP9-co-cultures were transplanted in- the induction of GATA-1 and PU.1, both RUNX1
trahepatically into newborn NSG mice[25, 36]. Mouse targets[41, 42].
health was monitored throughout the entire experi- To further characterize the expression pattern of the
ment. Mice were killed 6-8 weeks after transplantation RUNX1 isoforms, we FACS-purified HEPs
and bone marrow (BM), spleen, liver and peripheral (CD34+CD31+CD45-) and CD45+ blood cells at day 8 and
blood were collected and analyzed for human chimer- 10 of differentiation, respectively, and non-
ism. Cells were stained with anti-HLA-ABC-PE and anti- hematopoietic cells (CD31-CD34-CD45-) were also iso-
CD45-APC (BD Bioscience) antibodies to analyze human lated as a control (Fig. 1b, S1b). qRT-PCR analysis re-
chimerism by flow cytometry. vealed that all RUNX1 isoforms are highly expressed in
blood cells, while RUNX1c was the only isoform en-
Gene expression profiling and analysis riched in HEPs in comparison with non-hematopoietic
Undifferentiated hPSCs and 6, 8 and 10-day-old purified cells (Fig. 1c, S1c). Importantly, when HEPs were identi-
HEPs from hESC-EV and hESC-RUNX1c cells were sorted fied more exhaustively as CD45-CD43-CD41-
using a FACS Aria sorter (BD Bioscience) and total RNA CD34+CD31+CD73-CD184-)[16, 43] an identical trend
was isolated using Trizol. High quality RNA was con- was observed, confirming our initial sorting strategy
firmed using the Agilent 2100 Bionalyzer (Agilent Tech- (Fig. 1d). Collectively, RUNX1c is the isoform whose ex-
nologies). RNA samples were labeled (Agilent Low Input pression best parallels early human hematopoietic
Quick Amp Labeling kit, Agilent Technologies) with Cy3 specification in vitro, being the most enriched in HEPs.
following the manufacturers instructions. The hybridi-
zation procedure was accomplished using the Agilent
assessed the clonogenic potential of the hematopoietic ferentiation, expansion and function of macrophages,
progenitors in CFU assays we found that RUNX1c-/- and granulocytes and their progenitors[50]. Therefore, the
RUNX1c+/+ hESC-hematopoietic derivatives produced activation of the CSF1R signaling pathway could be re-
similar total number of colonies; however, RUNX1c-/- sponsible for the CFU-M/CFU-G skew observed in the
hESC derivatives had an increase in E, a decrease in M clonogenic assays upon RUNX1c over-expression (Fig.
and disappearance of G/GM colonies (Fig 3e), sugges- 2g).
tive of a more primitive hematopoiesis in the absence Pro-inflammatory signals including TNF, IFN and
of RUNX1c. Moreover, SCL, GATA1 and PU.1 were ro- IFN have been recently proposed as key in vivo regula-
bustly down-regulated in RUNX1c-/- hESC-derived CD45+ tors of definitive hematopoiesis in zebrafish and mouse
cells throughout hematopoietic differentiation (Fig. AGM[5154]. We used IPA to visualize the transcrip-
S7c). Taken together, RUNX1c is necessary for the gen- tional network formed by the key inflammatory regula-
eration of CD45+ cells from HEPs. tors and their known targets in RUNX1c HEPs over the
differentiation period. At day 6 of differentiation the
RUNX1c-HEPs show an activated pro- inflammatory regulators are predicted to be inactive
inflammatory transcriptional signature (Fig. S9), but at day 8 the network of inflammatory
To explore the potential mechanisms by which RUNX1c regulators has expanded and it is now predominantly
regulates EHT, we performed gene expression profiling activated, with a complex network including many
using microarrays in HEPs from EV- and RUNX1c-hESCs genes co-regulated by different factors. IFN appears as
at different time points of hematopoietic differentia- the most important factor, based on quantity of target
tion. We confirmed the expression levels of 20 selected genes and co-regulations (Fig. S10). At day 10 the in-
genes by qRT-PCR and found a significant concordance flammatory regulators remain activated; the relative
correlation coefficient (0.76) with the microarray data, importance of IFN now balanced by a high level of TNF
validating the global gene expression data (Fig. S8). To target genes and co-regulations (Fig. S11). Our results
explore the biological meaning of the changes in gene suggest that RUNX1c over-expression induces a gene
expression imposed by RUNX1c overexpression we used signature that recapitulates an activation of different
first the web tool Panther (www.pantherdb.org) and inflammatory signals that converge and form a complex
applied a statistical enrichment test to find the most network at the differentiation time when HEPs are un-
significant gene ontology biological processes altered in dergoing EHT.
RUNX1c-HEPs vs EV-HEPs. Both at day 8 and day 10 of To validate these predictions we performed qRT-PCR
hematopoietic differentiation, the most relevant biolog- analysis of key genes of these inflammatory pathways in
ical processes, ranked by P-value, were associated with purified EV- and RUNX1c-HEPs at days 6, 8 and 10 of
Immune System Process and Immune/Defense Re- hematopoietic differentiation. Among the members of
sponses (Fig. 4a). To confirm this prediction, we used the interferon pathway, we found IFNB1, IFNA2, and
the software Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs) IRF7 and IRF1 up-
found that the category Hematological System Devel- regulated (Figs. 5a,b and Table S2). Type I interferon
opment & Function was consistently the most signifi- signaling is mediated by Janus Kinase proteins that re-
cant biological process affected in RUNX1c-HEPs and cruit and activate signal transducers and activators of
EV-HEPs (Fig.4b). Using IPA we analyzed in detail the transcription (STATs)[55]. All STAT genes analyzed were
biofunctions altered within this category, and found significantly up-regulated in late (day 10) RUNX1c-HEPs
many functions related to the migration, adhesion and (Fig.5c and Table S2). In addition, RUNX1c over-
differentiation of myeloid and lymphoid cells predicted expression also increased the expression of the NF-B
to be activated (z-score >2) in RUNX1c-over-expressing members NFKB1 and RELA (Fig.5d and Table S2) and
HEPs (Fig. 4c). TLR4 by day 10, while did not up-regulate TNF expres-
Next, we used IPA to identify which upstream regu- sion in HEPs (Fig.5e and Table S2). Interestingly, Blood-
lators could be responsible for the gene expression ChiP analysis reveals that most of these genes are direct
changes associated to RUNX1c over-expression in HEPs. targets of RUNX1 in human HSCs and we found a good
We could distinguish five different gene clusters of up- correlation between the genes modulated by RUNX1c
stream regulators predicted to be activated in RUNX1c over-expression in hESC-derived HEPs and promoter
over-expressing cells (Fig. 4d): i) regulators of macro- occupancy in HSCs (Table S4)[56]. We also sorted out
phage differentiation; ii) megakaryocytic/erythroid reg- HEPs from RUNX1c+/+ and RUNX1c-/- hPSCs and analyzed
ulators; iii) RUNX1 partners and RUNX1-regulated T-cell all pro-inflammatory signaling genes by qRT-PCR. Re-
development; iv) regulators of hematopoietic differen- markably, all were down-regulated or not expressed in
tiation from hPSCs[48, 49]; and v) components of in- RUNX1c-/- purified HEPs (Fig.5f and Table S3). These
flammatory signaling, which represent the biggest clus- data reinforces the hypothesis that RUNX1c over-
ter and agrees with the GO data presented in Figure 4a. expression imposes a gene expression profile that re-
IPA predicted that RUNX1c over-expression activat- flects an activation of pro-inflammatory signaling net-
ed CSF1 and CSF2 from day 6 to 10 and CSF1R at day 8 works which may contribute to in vitro hematopoietic
in HEPs (Fig.5d). CSF1 (M-CSF), CSF2 (GM-CSF) and their differentiation of hPSCs.
receptor CSF1R are necessary for the production, dif-
normal hematopoietic development because its expres- predicted the activation of several set of genes with
sion is significantly up-regulated in acute leukemia pa- different functionalities. The first cluster included genes
tients and its constitutive expression in murine BM cells controlling macrophage functions, specifically CSF1,
contributes to leukemogenesis[13]. Available evidence CSF2 and CSF1R. This activation could explain the slight-
suggests that RUNX1a and RUNX1c isoforms play differ- ly higher number of CFU-M in RUNX1c hematopoietic
ent roles throughout mammalian hematopoietic devel- progeny, a previously unrecognized function of RUNX1c
opment. in monocyte/macrophage development.
To corroborate the relevance of RUNX1c during hu- RUNX1c-mediated hematopoietic specification of
man embryonic hematopoiesis we next completed OP9 hESCs involved a pro-inflammatory transcriptional sig-
differentiation with RUNX1c-/- hESCs generated by con- nature, consistent with recent studies in zebrafish and
ventional homologous recombination[28]. Intriguingly, mice demonstrating that pro-inflammatory signaling is a
specific deletion of RUNX1c did not impact HEP specifi- positive regulator of hematopoietic development[51
cation, but profoundly impaired the commitment of 54]. Our in silico analysis of the gene expression profile
HEPs into CD45+ hematopoiesis. In contrast, Elefantys imposed by RUNX1c showed that this profile is con-
laboratory has recently shown that RUNXc deletion sistent with an activation of several pro-inflammatory
does not affect the emergence of HEPs or CD45+ blood regulators, but we have no evidence that RUNX1c di-
cells using a spin-EB differentiation protocol[28]. The rectly regulates their expression. Expression analysis of
unaffected HEP compartment could be explained if: 1) RUNX1c-expressing and RUNX1c-/- HEPs confirmed that
RUNX1c is not required for its formation or 2) there is a several members of the type I interferon signaling
deficiency in a specific subpopulation that we are not pathway and the NF-B members NFKB1 and RELA were
able to detect because the limited resolution of the modulated by RUNX1c. Interestingly, BloodChiP analysis
panel of antibodies used. Intriguingly, RUNX1c-/-- reveals that most of these genes are direct targets of
hematopoietic derivatives displayed similar CFU poten- RUNX1 in human HSCs[56]. However, Dr Menendezs
tial to RUNX1c+/+ counterparts but distinct colony type lab has demonstrated that the addition of individual
distribution (absence of G/GM, reduced M and in- pro-inflammatory cytokines throughout hematopoietic
creased E) was observed in RUNX1c-/- hESCs compared differentiation in both EBs and OP9 systems is not suffi-
to RUNX1+/+ counterparts. Interestingly, Ng et al did not cient to potentiate definitive hematopoietic specifica-
observe differences in the CFU potential between tion of hPSCs in vitro[61].These results indicate that in
RUNX1c-/- and RUNX1c+/- hESCs[28]. Our results suggest vitro hPSC hematopoietic differentiation does not reca-
that RUNX1c deletion could block the progression from pitulate the microenvironmental signals present in vivo
primitive, where only erythrocytes, macrophages and in the embryo. For instance, primitive neutrophils origi-
megakaryocytes cells can be generated, to definitive nated in the yolk sac are necessary for the establish-
hematopoiesis in OP9-based hematopoietic differentia- ment of definitive HSCs in vivo in the AGM[51], but the-
tion systems. In line with this hypothesis Runx1c -/- mice se cells are absent in in vitro experiments. Further work
had altered definitive hematopoietic progenitor cell is required to biochemically and functionally confirm
number and only the primitive E, M and megakaryo- that RUNX1c orchestrates hematopoietic specification
cyte-CFU were obtained[15, 16]. Alternatively, it cannot of hPSCs in cooperation with pro-inflammatory signal-
be ruled out that cytokine cocktails present in spin-EB ing.
differentiation systems and methylcellulose cultures
might bypass RUNX1c deletion in vitro by activating CONCLUSION
signaling pathways downstream of RUNX1c. In OP9 co-
culture system the absence of those cytokines enhances We show that RUNX1c is an important transcription
the relevance of RUNX1c in the transition from HEPs to factor regulating human early blood specification, pos-
CD45+ blood cells. In addition, RUNX1c deficiency sibly in cooperation with pro-inflammatory signals. The
caused a drastic reduction in SCL, GATA1 and PU.1 ex- resolution of the spatio-temporal expression of these
pression, confirming RUNX1c over-expression results, immune regulators and the integration with other
and placing RUNX1c as a putative transcription regula- known hematopoietic regulators could serve as a plat-
tor of these 3 hematopoietic transcription factors. Col- form to efficiently activate a bona fide hematopoietic
lectively, our results suggest that RUNX1c is dispensable transcriptional program in HSCs derived from hPSCs.
for the generation of HEPs but is necessary for the gen-
eration of CD45+ blood cells from hPSCs[16, 21, 43]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Finally, to decipher the molecular mechanisms trig-
gered by RUNX1c that enhance hematopoietic differen-
We thank the Andalusian Bioinformatics Platform (PAB)
tiation of hESCs, we performed gene expression profil-
at the University of Malaga (www.scbi.uma.es) for
ing analysis of EV- and RUNX1c-overexpressing HEPs at
providing access to Ingenuity Pathway Analysis soft-
different time points. As expected, RUNX1c activates a
ware, Dr. J.L. Garca-Perez (GENyO, Granada, Spain) for
molecular signature related with the Hematological
the 2A-peptide vector (KJ-2A vector) and technical sup-
System Development & Function. A deeper analysis
port, Dr. D. Trono (Ecole Polytechnique Federale de
allowed us to discover that RUNX1c over-expression
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland) for the pRRL-EF1- by the MINECO (JCI_2012_12666). LL-O was a Marie
PGK-NEO vector, Dr. M. Alarcon-Riquelme and Dr. C. Curie Intra-European Fellow (FP7-MC-IEF-623806).
Maranon (GENyO, Granada, Spain) and Dr. L Espinosa
(IMIM, Barcelona, Spain) for providing reagents and Dr. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
M. Martinez-Bueno (GENyO, Granada, Spain) for his
assistance with statistical analysis. This work was fund- O.N.-M. performed most experiments, analyzed the
ed by the Junta de Andaluca/FEDER (SAS-111244 and data and wrote the manuscript. R.M., M.M. L.L-O., X.G.-
P10-CTS-6406 to P.J.R.), FIS/FEDER (PI10/00449) to P.M. C., T.R. and D.R.-M. contributed to the experiments and
(CP09/0063, PI12/01596 and CPII15/00018) to P.J.R. data analysis. V.A. and V.R-M contributed the experi-
(CP07/00059, PI11/00119 and PI14/01191) to C.B. and mental design, data analysis and wrote the manuscript.
(CP12/03175 and PI14/01412) to V.R-M., the MINECO C.B. contributed the experimental design and data anal-
(PLE-2009-0111 and SAF2013/43065) to P.M. and RYC- ysis. E.N., E.S. and A.E. provided important materials.
2015-18382 to P.J.R., Spanish Association Against Can- P.M. and P.J.R. conceived and supervised the project
cer Foundation (CI110023 to P.M. and CI15 to C.B.) and and wrote the manuscript.
Health Canada H9080-144541 to P.M. P.M also
acknowledges the support from the European Research DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Council (CoG-2014-646903) and the Obra Social La
Caixa-Fundacin Josep Carreras. RM is supported by the The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Postdoctoral Subprogramme Juan de la Cierva founded
Time Quantitative PCR and the 2CT 38 Toscano MG, Navarro-Montero O, stimulating factors (Gcsfs): 2 paralogous
Method. METHODS 2001;25(4):402408. Ayllon V, et al. SCL/TAL1-mediated cytokines and their roles in hematopoietic
30 Gutierrez-Aranda I, Ramos-Mejia V, transcriptional network enhances development and maintenance. BLOOD
Bueno C, et al. Human induced pluripotent megakaryocytic specification of human 2013;122(24):391828.
stem cells develop teratoma more efficiently embryonic stem cells. MOL. THER. 51 Espn-Palazn R, Stachura DL, Campbell
and faster than human embryonic stem cells 2015;23(1):15870. CA, et al. Proinflammatory signaling regulates
regardless the site of injection. STEM CELLS 39 Nottingham WT, Jarratt A, Burgess M, et hematopoietic stem cell emergence. CELL
2010;28(9):156870. al. Runx1-mediated hematopoietic stem-cell 2014;159(5):107085.
31 Montes R, Romero T, Cabrera S, et al. emergence is controlled by a Gata/Ets/SCL- 52 Li Y, Esain V, Teng L, et al. Inflammatory
Generation and characterization of the regulated enhancer. BLOOD signaling regulates embryonic hematopoietic
human iPSC line PBMC1-iPS4F1 from adult 2007;110(13):41884197. stem and progenitor cell production. GENES
peripheral blood mononuclear cells. STEM 40 Landry J-R, Kinston S, Knezevic K, et al. DEV. 2014;28(23):2597612.
CELL RES. 2015;15(3):614617. Runx genes are direct targets of Scl/Tal1 in 53 Sawamiphak S, Kontarakis Z, Stainier
32 Vodyanik MA, Bork JA, Thomson JA, et the yolk sac and fetal liver. BLOOD DYR. Interferon gamma signaling positively
al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived 2008;111(6):300514. regulates hematopoietic stem cell
CD34+ cells: efficient production in the 41 Yokomizo T, Hasegawa K, Ishitobi H, et emergence. DEV. CELL 2014;31(5):64053.
coculture with OP9 stromal cells and analysis al. Runx1 is involved in primitive 54 He Q, Zhang C, Wang L, et al.
of lymphohematopoietic potential. BLOOD erythropoiesis in the mouse. BLOOD Inflammatory signaling regulates
2005;105(2):617626. 2008;111(8):40754080. hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell
33 Choi KD, Vodyanik M, Slukvin II. 42 Huang G, Zhang P, Hirai H, et al. PU.1 is a emergence in vertebrates. BLOOD
Hematopoietic differentiation and production major downstream target of AML1 (RUNX1) 2015;125(7):1098106.
of mature myeloid cells from human in adult mouse hematopoiesis. NAT. GENET. 55 Capobianchi MR, Uleri E, Caglioti C, et al.
pluripotent stem cells. NAT PROTOC 2008;40(1):5160. Type I IFN family members: similarity,
2011;6(3):296313. 43 Ditadi A, Sturgeon CM, Tober J, et al. differences and interaction. CYTOKINE
34 Montes R, Ayllon V, Gutierrez-Aranda I, Human definitive haemogenic endothelium GROWTH FACTOR REV. 2015;26(2):10311.
et al. Enforced expression of MLL-AF4 fusion and arterial vascular endothelium represent 56 Chacon D, Beck D, Perera D, et al.
in cord blood CD34+ cells enhances the distinct lineages. NAT. CELL BIOL. BloodChIP: a database of comparative
hematopoietic repopulating cell function and 2015;17(5):58091. genome-wide transcription factor binding
clonogenic potential but is not sufficient to 44 Kaufman DS. Toward clinical therapies profiles in human blood cells. NUCLEIC ACIDS
initiate leukemia. BLOOD using hematopoietic cells derived from RES. 2014;42(Database issue):D172-7.
2011;117(18):47464758. human pluripotent stem cells. BLOOD 57 Ran D, Shia W-J, Lo M, et al. RUNX1a
35 Bueno C, Montes R, Melen GJ, Ramos- 2009;114(17):35133523. enhances hematopoietic lineage commitment
Mejia V, Real PJ, Aylln V, Sanchez L, Ligero G, 45 Slukvin II. Hematopoietic specification from human embryonic stem cells and
Gutierrez-Aranda I, Fernndez AF, Fraga MF, from human pluripotent stem cells: current inducible pluripotent stem cells. BLOOD
Moreno-Gimeno I, Burks D, Plaza-Calonge advances and challenges toward de novo 2013;121(15):288290.
Mdel C, Rodrguez-Manzaneque JC MP, generation of hematopoietic stem cells. 58 Real PJ, Navarro-Montero O, Ramos-
Bueno C, Montes R, et al. A human ESC model BLOOD 2013;122(25):40354046. Mej??a V, et al. The role of RUNX1 isoforms in
for MLL-AF4 leukemic fusion gene reveals an 46 Ramos-Meja V, Navarro-Montero O, hematopoietic commitment of human
impaired early hematopoietic-endothelial Aylln V, et al. HOXA9 promotes pluripotent stem cells. BLOOD
specification. CELL RES 2012;22(6):9861002. hematopoietic commitment of human 2013;121(26):52502.
36 Navarro-Montero O, Romero-Moya D, embryonic stem cells. BLOOD 59 Uchida H, Zhang J, Nimer SD. AML1A
Montes R, Ramos-Meja V, Bueno C, Real PJ 2014;124(20):306575. and AML1B can transactivate the human IL-3
MP, Navarro-Montero O, Romero-Moya D, et 47 Vo LT, Daley GQ. De novo generation of promoter. J. IMMUNOL. 1997;158(5):2251
al. Intrahepatic transplantation of cord blood HSCs from somatic and pluripotent stem cell 8.
CD34+ cells into newborn NOD/SCID- sources. BLOOD 2015;125(17):26418. 60 Zhen F, Lan Y, Yan B, et al. Hemogenic
IL2R(null) mice allows efficient multi-organ 48 Yu QC, Hirst CE, Costa M, et al. APELIN endothelium specification and hematopoietic
and multi-lineage hematopoietic engraftment promotes hematopoiesis from human stem cell maintenance employ distinct Scl
without accessory cells. CLIN. IMMUNOL. embryonic stem cells. BLOOD isoforms. DEVELOPMENT
2012;145(2):8991. 2012;119(26):624354. 2013;140(19):397785.
37 Aylln V, Bueno C, Ramos-Meja V, et al. 49 Smith BW, Rozelle SS, Leung A, et al. The 61 Giorgetti A, Castao J, Bueno C, et al.
The Notch ligand DLL4 specifically marks aryl hydrocarbon receptor directs Proinflammatory signals are insufficient to
human hematoendothelial progenitors and hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion and drive definitive hematopoietic specification of
regulates their hematopoietic fate. LEUKEMIA differentiation. BLOOD 2013;122(3):37685. human HSCs in vitro. EXP. HEMATOL.
2015;29(8):174153. 50 Stachura DL, Svoboda O, Campbell CA, 2017;45:8593.e2.
et al. The zebrafish granulocyte colony-
FIGURE 1. Expression of RUNX1 isoforms in HEPs and blood cells derived from hESCs.
A) qRT-PCR analysis showing expression levels of endogenous RUNX1 isoforms (RUNX1a, RUNX1a/b and RUNX1c),
SCL, GATA1 and PU.1 throughout hematopoietic differentiation. B) Schematic representation of FACS sorting of HEPs
and hematopoietic cells (left panel), and representative flow cytometry dot plots showing how HEPs
(CD31+CD34+CD45-), hematopoietic progenitors (CD34+CD45+) and total blood cells (CD45+) are identified (right pan-
el). C) qRT-PCR showing expression levels of endogenous RUNX1a, RUNX1a/b and RUNX1c isoforms in isolated cell
populations in one representative hPSC line. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of endogenous RUNX1 isoforms in highly-purified
FACS-sorted HEPs (CD45-CD43-CD41-CD34+CD31+CD73-CD184-) in one representative hPSC line. Data represents
meanSEM of 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed with t-Students test. *P<0.05,
**P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.
FIGURE 2. Enforced expression of RUNX1c augments hematopoietic specification from hPSCs. A) Schematic repre-
sentation of the lentiviral vectors used to overexpress RUNX1c and the EV control. LTR, long terminal repeat; EF1,
elongation factor 1; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; NEO, Neomycin resistance cassette; EGFP, enhanced green fluo-
rescent protein; 2A, 2A self-cleaving peptide; Flag, Flag epitope. B) Representative qRT-PCR analysis of RUNX1c. Ex-
pression levels are shown normalized to GAPDH, used as reference gene. Data represents meanSEM of 3 independ-
ent experiments. C) Representative western blot detection of RUNX1c protein in hPSCs. -actin is used as a loading
control.
D) Kinetics of HEPs specification in two different hPSCs lines (HS181 and AND1) transduced with the empty vector
(EV) or RUNX1c-expressing vector (RUNX1c). E) Kinetics at day 5 and 8 of hematopoietic differentiation for CD43+
(hemogenic) and CD43- (non-hemogenic) HEPs in empty vector (EV) or RUNX1c-overexpressing (RUNX1c) hPSCs. F)
Emergence of hematopoietic progenitors (CD34+CD45+) and total blood cells (CD45+) from two different hESCs lines.
G) Number and colony distribution of CFUs per 10000 human cells and colony type distribution. H) Expression levels
of endogenous SCL, GATA1 and PU.1 in hPSC-derived cells. Data represents meanSEM of 3 independent experi-
ments. Statistical significance was assessed with t-Students test except for the CFU scoring data where the Walds
test was used. n.s. (non-significant),*P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.
FIGURE 4. Enforced expression of RUNX1c in HEPs induces a pro-inflammatory signaling signature. A) Top gene on-
tology biological processes (obtained by Panther) enriched in genes differentially expressed in RUNX1c-HEPs vs EV-
HEPs at day 8 and 10 of development. B) Top 15 biological functions of genes differentially expressed in RUNX1c-HEPs
as compared with EV-HEPs at day 6, 8 and 10 using IPA. C) Predicted biofunctions within the Hematological System
Development & Function activated in RUNX1-HEPs at day 6, 8 and 10. D) Highlight of the upstream regulators pre-
dicted to be activated (orange) or repressed (blue) by RUNX1-expressing HEPs at day 6, 8 and 10 of OP9-hESC cocul-
ture.
FIGURE 5. Enforced expression of RUNX1c in HEPs regulates the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators. A-E)
qRT-PCR analysis of several genes in RUNX1c-overexpressing HEPs at day 6, 8 and 10. Relative expression is shown
normalized to EV-HEPs. GAPDH is used as an internal control. qRT-PCR analysis of a set of IFNs(A), IRFs (B), STATs (C),
NFKB1 and RELA (D) and TLR4 and TNF (E) predicted to be activated by RUNX1cover-expression in HEPs at day 6, 8
and 10. F) qRT-PCR analysis of a set of IFNs, IRFs, STATs, NFKB1, RELA, TNF and TLR4 in RUNX1c-/- sorted HEPs at day 6
of hematopoietic differentiation. Relative expression is shown normalized to RUNX1c+/+ sorted HEPs. GAPDH is used
as an internal control. Data represents meanSEM of 3 independent experiments.
Graphical Abstract
The transcription factor RUNX1c regulates human early blood specification. RUNX1c, possibly in cooperation with
pro-inflammatory signals, enhances the emergence blood derivatives from hPSC cultures.