Reyes v Ines-Luciano
February 28, 1979 | Fernandez
Petitioner: Manuel J.C. Reyes
Respondent: Hon. Leonor Ines-Luciano (Judge of the Juvenile & Domestic
Relations Court, QC), the Court of Appeals, Celia Ilustre-
Reyes
DOCTRINE
Art. 61, FC. After the filing of the petition for legal separation, the
spouses shall be entitled to live separately from each other.
The Court, in absence of a written agreement between the spouses,
shall designate either of them or a third person to administer the
absolute community or conjugal partnership property. The
administrator appointed by the court shall have the same powers and
duties as those of a guardian under the Rules of Court.
Art. 62, FC. During the pendency of the action for legal separation,
the provisions of Article 491 shall likewise apply to the support of
the spouses and the custody and support of the common children.
FACTS
1. Celia Ilustre-Reyes filed in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of
Quezon City a complaint against her husband Manuel J.C. Reyes for legal
separation on the ground that he had attempted to kill her:
a. 3/10/1976 he punched her, held her head, and bumped it
several times against the cement floor. He also pushed her at
the stairway of 13 flights, and swung at her abdomen which got
her half-unconscious. It was her father who saved her.
b. He doused her with grape juice, kicked her several times, and
was saved this time by her driver.
1The Court shall provide for the support of the spouses, the support and
custody of the common children. Paramount considerations = moral and
material welfare of the children, their choice of parent
2. She filed for support pendente lite2 for her and her 3 children.
Manuel opposed this by saying that his wife committed adultery with
her physician.
RTC
- Granted, P5000 per month (from June 1976) P4000
CA
- Dismissed Manuels petition for the annulment of the RTC order
- Manuel appears to be financially capable of giving the support
ISSUE: WON adultery can be used as a defense in an action for support YES,
QUALIFIED (not in this case)
RATIO
1. The alleged adultery must be established by competent evidence.
Adultery is a good defense if properly proved.
2. Manuel did not present any evidence to prove his allegation.
3. He still has the opportunity to adduce evidence on this alleged adultery
when the action for legal separation is heard on the merits before the
Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of QC.
4. However, it is doubtful whether adultery will affect her right to alimony
pendente lite she is asking for support to be taken from their
conjugal property, not Manuels personal funds.
ISSUE: WON in determining the amount of support it is enough that the Court
ascertain via affidavits or other documentary evidence YES
RATIO
1. Mere affidavits may satisfy the court to pass upon the application for
support pendent lite; it is enough that the facts be established by
affidavits/other documentary evidence.
2. Celia submitted documents that the corporations controlled by
Manuel have entered into multi-million contracts in projects of the
Ministry of Public Highways.
2 Pending the litigation; support to provide for the lower income spouse as the
legal process moves ahead