Contoh percakapan bahasa Inggris memberi nasehat

(giving advice / suggestion)

Contoh 1

Percakapan antara Andi dan Ibunya, Andi mendapatkan nilai C dalam ujian matematika.

Mother : Andi, I heard that you get C mark on Mathematics exam. Is that right?
Andi : Yes Mom, I get C mark on math. Im so sorry mom.
Mother : But, why? Dont you study hard lately?
Andi : I dont study hard lately mom. I stay at my room playing online game.
Mother : Oh my God.. Andi, my son.. It might be a good idea to put your computer outside of
your room, so we can control you.
Andi : Mommy.. please.. I promise I will study hard.
Mother : You have promise to me. You must fulfill it.
Andi : Yes mom.

Ibu : Andi, Ibu dapat kabar kalau kamu dapat nilai C di ujian metematika ya?
Andi : Iya bu, Aku dapet nilai C. Maafin Andi ya bu.
Ibu : Tapi kenapa? Bukannya akhir-akhir ini kamu rajin belajar?
Andi : Andi nggak belajar bu akhir-akhir ini. Andi di kamar itu main game online.
Ibu : Ya Tuhan.. Andi anakku. Ini mungkin ide bagus kalau computer kamu ditaruh di
luar, biar ibu dan ayah bisa mengontrol kamu.
Andi : Ibuu.. please.. Andi janji akan belajar giat deh.
Ibu : Kamu udah janji ya. Kamu harus menepatinya.
Andi : Iya bu.

Contoh 2

Percakapan antara Dara dan Tasya. Dara merasa dirinya sangat kesulitan dalam mempelajari
bahasa Perancis. Dara akhirnya minta nasihat dari Tasya yang memang terkenal pintar bahasa
Inggris. Berikut ini adalah contoh percakapannya.

Dara :Hi Tasya, Can you help me to solve my problem?

Tasya : With my pleasure, Dara. Whats your problem?
Dara : I am terrible in French and I think I should do something about it. What do you
advise me to do?
Tasya : I suggest you to try this book. It is a fantastic book for beginners.
Dara : It sounds nice, but do you have another book? Because frankly reading book is
boring for me.
Tasya : Hmm, let me think first. Anyway, why dont you try to watch French movie
without subtitle. In this way, not only wont get bored while learning but also you can
improve your listening skill.
Dara : its nice. Ill try to watch it without French subtitle.
Tasya : the most important thing is to keep our spirit light!.

Dara : Thanks, Tasya. Bisa bantu menyelesaikan masalahku gak?

Tasya : Dengan senang hati Dara. Ada apa?
Dara : Bahasa Perancisku sangat buruk dan aku berpikir harus melakukan sesuatu. Apa
menurutmu yang harus aku lakukan?
Tasya : Aku sarankan kamu baca buku ini. Buku ini sangat bagus buat pemula.
Dara : Ide bagus tuh, tapi ada buku yang lainnya nggak? Jujur saja, membaca buku itu
membosankan bagiku.
Tasya : Hmm, tak pikir-pikir dulu, gimana kalo kamu coba nonton film perancis tanpa
subtitlenya? Selain kamu nggak bakalan bosan sambil belajar, kamu juga kan bisa
meningkatkan kemampuan mendengarkan (listening) kamu.
Dara : Ide bagus nih. Aku akan mencobanya.
Tasya : hal yang paling penting adalah kita tetap menjaga semangat belajar kita!

Tania: Hi Arfan, how are you?

Arfan: Im very good. How about yourself?
Tania: Im bad today.
Arfan: Whats going on?
Tania: I have a problem and is it okay if I ask you a help?
Arfan: Yes, of course. Tell me what I need to help.
Tania: I will move to Bandung next week. But, I do not have a vehicle to carry all my stuff.
Would you mind if I use your truck?
Arfan: Wait.. You said, you will be moving next month, wont you?
Tania: Yes, that was my plan. However, it should be changed because I have to accompany
my sister in Bandung and she is going to move next week.
Arfan: What is about our plan for hanging out with some friends as a farewell party?
Tania: Oh, calm down. I will be back to Jakarta several days before it begins.
Arfan: Yes. Alright. I will be waiting for you to come back here.
Tania: Are you sad because Im going to leave you?
Arfan: Of course. We will miss you Tania.
Tania: Sure, Arfan. I also will miss all of you. Hey, what about your truck, may I borrow
it?
Arfan: Yes you may borrow that truck. Tomorrow I will tell my driver that the truck will
be borrowed next week.
Tania: Thank you Arfan.
Arfan: Youre welcome, Tania.

Arti
Tania: Hai Arfan, apa kabarmu?

Arfan: Saya baik-baik saja. Bagaimana denganmu?

Tania: Saya tidak terlalu baik hari ini.

Arfan: Ada apa?

Tania: Saya mempunyai masalah. Bisakah saya meminta bantuanmu?

Arfan: Ya tentu saja. Katakan apa yang perlu saya bantu.

Tania: Saya akan pindah ke Bandung minggu depan. Tetapi, saya tidak punya kendaraan
untuk membawa semua barang-barang saya. Bisakah saya memakai mobil truk milikmu?

Arfan: Kamu bilang, kamu akan pindah bulan depan. Iya kan?

Tania: Rencana saya juga begitu. Tetapi, ternyata saya harus menemani kakak saya di
Bandung dan dia pindah ke bandung minggu depan.

Arfan: Bagaimana dengan rencana kita pergi bersama teman-teman sebagai acara
perpisahan?

Tania: Oh, tenang saja. Saya akan kembali ke Jakarta beberapa hari sebelum acara itu
dimulai.

Arfan: Ya. Baiklah. Saya akan menunggumu kembali ke Jakarta.

Tania: Apakah kamu sedih karena aku akan pergi?

Arfan: Tentu saja. Kami semua akan merindukanmu Tania.

Tania: Tentu Arfan. Aku juga akan merindukan kalian. Hey, bagaimana dengan trukmu,
bolehkah saya meminjamnya?

Arfan: Tentu saja. Besok aku akan memberitahu sopirku bahwa truk akan dipinjam minggu
depan.

Tania: Terima kasih Arfan.

Arfan: Sama-sama Tania.

Persuade Through Dialogue

P: Hey, have you seen the amicus brief that was written entirely as a cartoon?

S: A cartoon? You mean someone submitted a joke as an amicus brief?

 P: No, not a joke. The lawyer, Bob Kohn, lays out his argument in a series
of frames with characters and dialogue, like this. You can see the whole thing here.

S: Wow, did it work?

P: Not in the specific case. The judge went the other way just one day after receiving this
cartoon. But it may get better mileage in the court of public opinion, through media coverage
and in blog posts including this one.

S: Speaking of blog posts, why are we in dialogue mode rather than straightforward
exposition?

P: Glad you asked -- that is the interesting part of it. If you look at Kohn's complete brief, it
works not so much because of the imagery, but because it is a conversation - a dialogue. The
vast majority of the frames in the cartoon - 37 out of 45 - are just two people talking.

S: That is interesting. Why does dialogue work?

P: Because our brains respond to it. The simple back-and-forth is punchy, clear in purpose,
and easy to understand.

S: That's true. In just 800 words I was able to understand a pretty complex argument on
antitrust issues in the e-book market.

P: Right, the technique actually has more in common with the Socratic dialogues than with
modern graphics or conventional cartoons.

S: Okay, that is cool, but is there a larger point for legal persuasion?

P: Absolutely, there is a point for all litigators in and out of court. No, I'm not saying lawyers
can switch to cartoons or engage in imaginary 'Eastwooding' conversations in court. But
lawyers can apply many of the principles of dialogue to make their persuasion simpler and
more effective, and that's what the rest of this conversation will be about.

S: I figured.

P: The most important lesson of the amicus cartoon is that dialogue can aid explanation and
persuasion. And there are several contexts in which litigators can increase their effectiveness
by incorporating the principles of dialogue. That's actually an idea that ties together a lot of
the advice given in this blog.

S: That dialogue is more persuasive than monologue?

P: Exactly.

Oral Arguments

P: Let's start with the most direct interchange you'll have with your judge: oral argument.

S: Yes, it can be tough to stick to your prepared remarks when your judge is constantly
interrupting with questions and counterarguments.

P: No, a hot bench isn't a problem, it is an opportunity. Take the example of Paul Clement's
argument to the Supreme Court on healthcare. Nearly all arguments at that level are executed
as a dialogue with the judges and not as a monologue.

S: And the same principle applies to arguments with your local magistrate judge?

P: Yes, as long as the judge tells you, or you can estimate what the judge is thinking.

Jury Selection

S: Does that same principle apply to a jury?

P: Certainly, and especially during the one moment you can actually have a conversation with
them.

S: Attorney conducted voir dire.

P: Right. It should be a conversation, but too many attorneys use that opportunity to just ask
long questions that end with the potential juror saying "yes." Like, "Wouldn't you agree that
consumers have a responsibility to use a product safely?"

S: They're laying out their themes and 'priming' the jurors.

P: Yes, but it is usually pretty transparent, it doesn't truly 'commit' jurors to anything, and it is
better to use that time to actually learn something about your panelists that would inform a
strike or cause challenge.

S: And, let me guess, you do that through dialogue - actually talking with them and listening.

P: Bingo.

Opening Statement

S: If only that conversation could extend into opening statement.

P: Well, in a way, it can. No, you can't talk with them, and no, you can't just rely on their
non-verbal responses, but you can base your opening on the questions you expect jurors to
have.

S: The opening should just tell the story in a way that favorably frames your client's case,
right?
P: Right, but you can move the story along using rhetorical questions reflecting jurors'
genuine needs for information.

S: Like beginning a section by asking, "What actions did the company take to minimize the
risks of accident?"

P: Right, these rhetorical questions reflect what jurors might be asking themselves already,
and help to frame a key part of the story.

Closing Argument

S: So, I'll bet closing is potentially a dialogue too, but in a different way.

P: That's right. In closing arguments, the story you're telling isn't a story about what
happened, but is a story about the upcoming deliberations.

S: The questions the jurors will be asking themselves in order to reach a verdict?

P: Yes, and that includes the questions on the verdict form, as well as all the questions they'll
be asking themselves in order to get to these answers.

S: And closing argument can help jurors prepare for that dialogue?

P: It can and it should. Instead of using your one opportunity to argue as a time to just hurl
arguments at the jury, it is more effective to position yourself as a guide. Jurors feel they're
reaching their own conclusions instead of yours if you are leading jurors through the right
questions and the right information that helps them answer the questions in the right way.

Witness Examination

S: An earlier example of the need to get the right questions answered in the right ways is
direct examination.

P: Right, that truly is a dialogue, and rather than just walking a fact or expert witness through
the elements of her testimony...

S: ...like checking items off a checklist...

P: ...It is better for the examining attorney to act as the "voice of the jury" by asking what
they'd ask, and puzzling over the same things they would puzzle over. That way, the jury
vicariously participates in the dialogue during direct.

S: Not much dialogue during cross though.

P: Not usually, but there can be. When witnesses restrict themselves to just "yes," "no," "I
don't know," and "I don't remember," then it really is a monologue by opposing counsel. And
that's not good. If the witness is trained to fight back effectively in cross, you have a good
shot at a dialogue that includes your side.

Briefing
S: So let's go back to the example we began with -- a brief. Surely a lawyer's written product,
at least when it isn't in cartoon form, is an argument in a single voice.

P: No, not necessarily. The style of briefing that just says, "Here are my arguments," is dry to
write and boring to read. If, instead, the brief is a back-and-forth between "Here is what
they've said or will say" and "Here is why they're wrong," then it is more engaging.

S: And more effective, because it tracks the judge's own evaluation and decision making.

P: Right. And if blog readers had infinite patience, we could keep going. Graphics,
instructions, mediations, and just about every other aspect of the legal persuasion process is
better when it is conceived as dialogue.

S: I love it when a theme ties everything together!

P: Yep, If you want to persuade, think dialogue.

____________________

S: What are some other posts on interesting modes of persuasion?

P: Try some of these:

Example Dialog Expressing persuading , encouraging , preventing (part3)

This dialog is between boy and girl

Girl : Why are you look so confuse ?
Boy : Well , i have a national exam next week , but i havent any prepare for it
Girl : Why dont you just study ?
Boy : It useless, i know that even ive study hard, the result is the same.
Girl : What do you mean of the same ?
Boy : You know everytime i have exam no matter how hard ive study but at the end , i
always
get the bad mark.
Girl : Come on , dont be like that please, you have to keep on positif thinking ...
Im sure that you can do it if you study seriously
Boy : But im not sure
Girl : Listen to me ,and look at my eyes ,im telling you that you can through this ,
just believe in yourself keep it up .
the next day ....
Boy : Girl , see what ive told you ... i listen to you yesterday to study seriously , but look at
me
now , theres nothing hanging in my mind
Girl : Whattt ? seriously ?
Boy : Absolutely , but i have already prepare a better idea for my next day exam
Girl : What is it ? tell me
Boy : A simple idea , cheating
Girl : you shouldnt do that if you cheating , you are not gonna get anything even you
passed this exam . it would not be certain for you to passed the next exam
the only way is study and pray by your own

http://www.batikjirolupat.com/blog/macam-macam-gambar-motif-batik-yang-ada-di-indonesia/
http://www.dinomarket.com/PASARDINO/33017914/Jual-Batik-Tulis-Solo/