Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
One always does some social relationship with another one or group in
daily life. A social relationship between one and another usually called as social
interaction. A social interaction that we do with the society makes a social process
in the society. The social interaction is about value, ideology, and the tradition
social interaction that happens in the period of time that makes some pattern in the
the social life not always running well because all of the humans in the society
have the social problem in their life. The social problem happens in the social
and norm in the society with the individual in the society (Soekanto, 2009:105).
cultural unsure or society, where the incompatibility can affect a social life. In
short, a social process is a condition that born from the not ideal situation in the
society. The not ideal situation happen cause there is a discrepancy between hope
and reality in the society. Therefore, a social problem is a problem that appears
incompatibility between social value and social norm. A social problem also as a
1
result of the process of society development. In the society development, the
society has a desirability to change and their dissatisfaction of the society itself.
They want something new in their social life particularly for a developed country
problem in the society development. In this case, the problem appears cause of the
imbalance of the norm and social value in the society that makes the society do
the deviant behavior. One of the problems is sexuality. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and
The term of LGBT itself has long been used to replace the gay
Bisexual is someone who is sexually attracted to the sexes male and female.
whose gender identity does not line up with the gender they were assigned at
birth. This can include medically, socially and legally transitioning, if it desired
by an individual.
reason is because their behavior is not appropriate with the norm that applicable in
Indonesia (Winurini, 2016:11). All in all, if we are talking about LGBT, the
society will think that this is the social problem because it is not appropriate with
Indonesias norm. The problem which should be solved soon by the society itself.
2
Most of Indonesia society see the LGBT issues as the deviant behavior and should
be solved soon. They also underestimated the LGBT. So the consequences they
get are ostracism, scorn, and alienated by the society. The society gives the
punishment for them without seeing their background why they are like that and
how the society changes them as what the society want to be.
But most of them just see this issue as the usual issues. They think LGBT
has the same right with another one in Indonesia. They think that the LGBT do
not do the damage thing for the society. The society believed the LGBT do their
work causes they want to show the real of themselves not to be the other one. The
society who cares with LGBT believes with some views or argument that says
they are part of us, we cant reject them from our life, they do not want to be like
that, and it just they get the influences from the society. They also should get
respected by another one. The arguments affect the society emotion and they
believed what they feel without seeing the fact and associated with the logic. The
persuade the reader or hearer to agree with the speakers or writer point of view.
or more of the five criteria of the good argument, fallacies are categorized as the
3
criterion of a good argument that they violate (Damer, 2009:2). Fallacies are
short, a fallacy is a term that used cause of the ambiguous of language in arguing.
LGBT as the deviant behavior of the society is looking for the equality
from the society. They believe they should have the same right as the society
have. They need a confession that they are part of the society. LGBT in Indonesia
Far from the statement that states how the LGBT was formed in the
society itself, the society still believes that they are not part of the society because
they make a social problem and their behavior is not following the norm of the
society. The norm in the society is the rule that formed by society. Sexuality in the
society norm is they should like a male when they are a male and they should like
a female when they are a female. But LGBT doesnt have the same think. They do
and be what they want. They act like they believe. For instance, a lesbian will love
her women and a gay will love his man. Their views of what they believed are
encapsulated in their argument. Here, to analyze their argument we need the truth-
seeking principle to find whether what they argue is appropriate with the code of
to escort or research. Book has some information that we need and what we want
4
to access. describes that research book is the book that contains science
consistent, to tell the truth (Soekanto, 2009:132). Sometimes some of the research
books contain arguments from the author that has a logical fallacy. It can happen
because if the argument break the rule of a code intellectual principle. The Gay
Archipelago book by Tom Boellstorff contains some arguments that have the
logical fallacy. The Gay Archipelago book is the first book that explores Gay life
in Indonesia, a nation with the most residents to the four largest in the world. The
book research about how gay and lesbian identity in Indonesia influenced by
homosexuality in Indonesia, and how their identity was running in the society.
Tom in his research book tries to persuade the reader, especially to the Indonesian
globalization.
city in the United States. He moved to California when he was 18 years old to
HIV virus prevention in there. In 1992, when he was 23 years old he came to
Indonesia for the first time. He met and cooperate with gay people in Indonesia in
Tom Boellstorffs The Gay Archipelago Concerning Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and
5
Transgender (LGBT) and its argument is there are so many arguments that
convey from LGBT peoples mind is not appropriate with the logical fallacy
principle and the relevance principle in the code of intellectual conduct. Here
I was openly gay throughout my fieldwork; this certainly aided the process of
To analyze the argument above, whether it contains the logical fallacy or not, we
I (Tom) was openly gay throughout my fieldwork (Tom openly as gay people
themselves, it helps the process to become familiar with the gay society)
[premise]
This certainly aided the process of becoming familiar with those I was studying
[premise]
study, in this case, Tom is being a gay to help him in his study) [implicit premise]
Therefore, Toms view to be gay is the right choice to help him better understand
According to Toms view above his position as a gay help him better to
understanding his research object. In the other hand, the best way to analyze them
becomes a part of them. Tom is a gay and he believes that telling them about his
position as a gay will persuade them and influence their feeling to tell everything
that Tom need in his research. All in all, Toms argument above is included in the
logical fallacy named appeal to emotion. In the appeal to emotion the one who
6
states an argument use the emotion of the reader or the hearer (receiver) to make it
accepted. Appeal to Emotion as the logical fallacy that contains in the argument
above trying to convince the reader that his position as a gay will help him in his
study which is it will persuade the subject that becomes the object of his study, in
Besides that the another purpose when we know the fallacious argument
writing we need to be logic and based on the truth to make a good argument. We
need a good reasoning to make it relevance between the premise and the
or threat, appeal to tradition and appeal to self-interest and they are known as
common opinion is when a lot of people believe in one claim whether the claim is
following by the evidence or not. Appeal to irrelevant authority is when the truth
of the argument is decided by the author. If the author or people is qualified in his
field states some argument it must be true. But if the author or people is not
emotion is when the people states an argument and try to manipulate the emotion
of the people to accept it. Appeal to force or threat is when an arguer tries to
persuade another with threat them with undesirable action. Appeal to tradition is
7
happens in the society. Appeal to self-interest is when an argue try to persuade
other people with the consideration that it will give effect for the society in the
future, the relevance of the argument is no more important because the importance
Based on the description in the background, the writer formulated the research
question, as follows:
book?
Based on the research question above, the objectives of this study are:
8
1.4 The Significance of the Study
There are two significances that the writer expected in this study, those are
argument concept (logical fallacy) for those who are interested in the
2. To put deep attention for all who are interesting in the argumentative
In this research, the writer will use inductive and deductive standard of
appeal to tradition, appeal to self- interest, and appeal to emotion, and the writer
9
Therefore, the writer will apply all of the fallacies of irrelevant appeal to
conclusion.
10
CHAPTER II
sentence and make a meaning of it (Alwi, 2003: 42). Therefore, the discourse is
the organization of the sentences, forming and make something to state. Discourse
can also be meaningful of speech as a word that has a context and conveys an
the sentence. In other words, discourse analysis can define as the analysis of
linguistic science that focuses on analyze written, vocal, or sign language use, or
any significant semiotic event. Discourse analysis had developed in the 1970s and
concerned with the use of language in a running discourse (Abrams and Harpham,
2005:66). All in all, discourse analysis is the study of the use of language in the
11
There is some kind of discourse analysis in terms of communicating
kind of discourse that persuades the reader to do what the writer want. Descriptive
discourse is a kind of discourse that describes an object then the reader can
imagine what the object is. Expositive discourse is trying to explain the object to
make the reader understand it. Argumentative discourse is a kind of discourse that
tries to persuade the reader that the argument which states is a truth, whether it is
the truth or not. Sometimes the arguer uses the emotion of the reader to make an
from mass media to scientific forums, from coffee breaks to political debates; it is
so common to see individuals engaged in the activity of giving and asking for
reasons that arguing seems to be something particularly akin to our very way of
human language (Bermejo, 2011:1). Argumentation is not the new thing for us. It
related to our daily activity. Cause, every time we are speaking we sometimes
arguing also.
argument. The argument takes place not in a vacuum but in a specific context of
12
time and place and with a certain relationship to events that precede and follow
statement.
asserts a claim and then uses various rhetorical strategies to support that position
to persuade readers to agree with the writers point of view. The argumentative
such faulty reasoning, mainly because successful authors have learned how to
avoid such case (Carabelli, 2013:29). Effective writers begin generating ideas
about possible solutions during the brainstorming process, particularly if they are
convince others to believe in a set of values might not need claims of policy
(p.48). In the other words, the author of the book should pay more attention to
everything that he wants to write. Because what they write is persuasive text and
13
Up to a point, argumentative discourses can be considered good or bad
argumentative discourse can be said as good or bad is depend on the reader also.
propositions (called premises) that are intended to give reasons of some kind for
contains a statement that uses as the basic to taking the conclusion. Whether the
one or more of which, the premises, support or provide evidence for another,
action. Well, the argument can affect someones belief and emotion of something.
14
of course what they believed to influence their action in life. In brief, an
1959:112). In brief, if an argument is valid and if the premises are true, then the
conclusion must also be true. A valid argument is if and only if the premises are
true. And sound refers to a valid argument and the premises are indeed true. The
premises and supporting by the sound evidence. Some arguments are about
facts. These arguments deal with facts or definitions in controversy and attempt to
get the listener to believe in certain facts. Other arguments are about values. These
alternately, they may use given value systems to persuade the listener to accept
that claim (Damer, 2009:13). Here, if the claim that asserted do not support the
is a lack of evidence.
One of the most difficult is identifying which one the argument and the
argument and the expression of a personal belief or opinion. They use the words
ask someone for an argument of his belief on an issue, he will give us his opinion
15
about the issue rather than he gives an argument. As a simple, he gives us what he
The conclusion of the argument is opinion or judgment resulting from the process
the important aspect. Because arguments come in all shapes and forms, it will
Since (premise),
And (premise),
And (premise),
Therefore, (conclusion).
original source in clear, concise language that is consistent with the intention of
the arguer, with all implicit parts explicitly stated and with the premises and sub
16
premises ( if it is in a sentence), and conclusion. A premise as what the writer
the premise in the argument. Implicit premises refers to the essential meaning of
There are two main standards for evaluating an argument. The deductive
that the conclusion follows with logical necessity from its premises (Damer,
2009:20). So we may say if the premise is true, the followed conclusion must be
true. It also can describe the relationship between the premises and conclusion
All of the man who states they are LGBT in the USA at least thirty-five years old.
All of the man who states they are LGBT in the USA at least thirty-five years old,
(premise 1)
17
Therefore, John Barry is thirty-five years old or older. (conclusion)
According to the argument above, Premise 1 and premise 2 are true, then the
premises, the conclusion is not already contained in any of the premises even if
the premises are true. We may say that the truth of the premises in the inductive
The law of LGBT had been accepted by the government in the United States. That
is a good news for the LGBT in the United States. Michael is a big donator in the
LGBT organization in the United States. Michael works in the law government
LGBT law had been accepted in the USA by the government, (premise)
[LGBT idea is to make them accepted by the same society in the USA] (implicit
premise)
(premise)
18
From the argument above, the conclusion in the inductive argument is can be
An argument is valid if and only if it is not possible that all of its premises
are true and its conclusion false. Alternatively, one could say that its conclusion
must be true if its premises are all true (or, again, that at least one of its premises
must be false if its conclusion is false (Amstrong, 2010:57). In short, valid means
conclusion is following the true or false of the premises. Whether the premises is
true, the conclusion must be following it too. And if the premises are false the
Sound or soundness have two criterion. That are the argument must be
valid and the premises must be true. When an argument meets both of these
standards, it is said to be sound. If it fails to meet either one or the other, then it is
least one of its premises is false (Amstrong, 2010:60). All in all, sound means the
argument. But, in order to define the criteria to have a good argument, Damer
suggests there are five criteria in basic principles of argument to have a good
argument. The discussion below is the description of each criterion that proposed
19
1) The Structural Principle
One who argues for or against a position should use an argument that
an argument does not use reasons that contradict each other, that contradict the
Neither does it draw any invalid deductive inferences (Damer, 2009:31). Whoever
states or argue an argument, the reason should not contain the contradictions
between one and other. For instance, some premises are not appropriate with the
conclusion.
One who presents an argument for or against a position should set forth
only reasons whose truth provides some evidence for the truth of the conclusion
strong evidence, empirical can be justified scientifically that support the truth of
reasons that are likely to be accepted by a mature, rational person and that meet
20
4) The Sufficiency Principle
provide relevant and acceptable reasons of the right kind, that together are
followed by complete, sufficient and details reasons. If the reasons are not
appropriate (complete, sufficient and details) the argument will be arguing by the
other people.
argument that may be brought against it or against the position it supports (Damer,
explanation that can answer every objection from the other people. On the other
words, the reason can anticipate every critic from the other people.
As what the writer explain above that the relevance principle means that
one who argue or state an argument should give a relevance reason or evidence to
make his or her argument being accepted. This fallacy is divided into two basic
categories: (1) fallacies of irrelevant premise and (2) fallacies of irrelevant appeal
(Damer, 2009:92).
21
The fallacies of the irrelevant premise are those arguments that use
(Damer, 2009:93). Some arguers just state the premise to justify their position that
is not the real reason supporting their conclusion. Besides, An argument that
defines that Irrelevant appeals attempt to sway the listener with information that,
There are many different types of irrelevant appeal, many different ways
of influencing what people think without using evidence. The irrelevant appeal
by influence their emotion, belief, authority, fear and something sensitive from the
people to make them believe the claim. Arguments that use an irrelevant appeal
There are six Fallacies in the Fallacies of Irrelevance Appeal that are
argument, that kind of fallacies correlates with the argumentative discourse scales
previous section. The explanation and the example of each fallacy will be
22
1) Appeal to Belief
urging the acceptance of a position simply on the grounds that a large number of
people accept it or arguing the rejection of a position on the grounds that very
people accept it. Two other names sometimes given to this fallacy are bandwagon
fallacy and consensus gentium. The bandwagon notion suggests that an idea or
particular claim, we are often led to believe that it is true or worthy of our belief
also. However, the truth or merit of an idea or claim is in no way affected by the
For instance:
yesterdays Wall Street Journal, more than 60 percent of the adult American
Wall Street Journals published that more than 60 percent of the adult in America
Therefore, marijuana is not wrong because many people believe it is not wrong.
(conclusion)
23
From the argument above we can see that the benefits or dangers of smoking
marijuana cannot be ascertained by taking a poll. Polls may indicate what people
are thinking, doing, or anticipate doing, but very little regarding the merit of an
idea, claim, or action can be inferred from such surveys. Polling just indicates
what people believe and it doesnt have a correlation with the benefits or the
danger of marijuana.
2) Appeal to Authority
appealing to the judgment of one who is not an authority in the field, the judgment
I think that we should adopt this new curricular proposal. After all, it has been
unanimously endorsed by the colleges governing board. The people who are
entrusted with running the college should know what theyre talking about when it
[The colleges government is they are who entrusted to make the best curriculum
Then, the best authority to make the best curriculum for the school is from
24
From the argument above we can see that in virtually every college or university,
the governing board turns over the management of the curriculum to the faculty,
who are the experts on such matters. While members of governing boards may be
relevant authorities about fiscal or organizational matters, they are not relevant
3) Appeal to Emotion
emotions instead of presenting evidence for the position. There are five types of
emotional manipulation that are so common they even have their own names: the
appeal to pity, the use of flattery, assigning guilt by association, appeal to group
loyalty and appeal to shame. They tend to get us to believe or act in a certain way
for reasons that are not relevant to the truth of the supported claim. The example
The fact that you witnessed the gang rape doesnt matter, Gloria. When your own
brother-in-law is one of those accused, you just dont get up on the witness stand
and spill your guts. Its quite possible that you could help send a member of your
And fact that his brother become part of the gang rape, (sub premise)
25
One thing that Gloria should do is be quietly and do not tell anyone, (premise)
Because be quiet will help her brother to not go to the prison, (sub premise)
Therefore, to be loyalty to her family Gloria asks by her family to be quiet and act
We can see from the argument above that the appeal to Glorias feelings of loyalty
manipulate Glorias natural feelings for her family. The family member tries to
persuade Gloria from her feeling. If Gloria fails to recognize that the appeal is
evidence for ones view. However, if an arguer tries to force another to accept a
Student: Professor Boltwood, why do we have to attend the guest lecture tonight,
Since the student ask Professor Boltwood why they should attend the night class,
(premise)
26
And the night class is not written in the syllabus, (sub premise)
And Professor Boltwood tell them just come to the class because it is what his
required, (premise)
Therefore, the student should follow what the professor say and require.
(conclusion)
We can see from the argument above that the student is asking why the class
members are required to attend the extra lecture, but Professor Boltwood responds
force their compliance. His argument is fallacious, for it implicitly issues a threat
5) Appeal to Tradition
true that many traditions perform social functions of great importance. For
instance:
I just dont understand why you and Dan didnt have your baby circumcised. You
cant just abandon a tradition like that, Amy. Boys have usually been circumcised
in our culture, even when they arent Jewish. When Daniel is a little older and
realizes that he is out of step with the rest of the male world, whatever reason you
may have had for not having him circumcised is not really going to matter.
27
and an uncircumcised boy will sooner or later feel self-conscious about his body,
(premise)
We can see from the argument above, the reason given for circumcising non-
this case because there are several larger issues at stake that should take
override the physical pain and financial cost connected with the practice of
6) Appeal to Self-Interest
interest when a more important issue is at stake. An argument that appeals to the
important issues at stake is using an appeal that is not relevant to the merit of the
28
I really dont see how you can oppose the administrations bill to cut
income and capital gains taxes. After all, given your tax bracket, youll benefit
considerably from the cut, and if you sell any of that real estate and those stocks
you own, youre going to realize a lot more from the sale if the capital gains tax is
lowered.
Since the administrations tax bill cuts income and capital gains taxes, (premise)
because you have a high income and potential capital gains looming, (sub
premise)
We can see from the argument above, Although it may indeed be to the
advantage of the target of this argument to have lower taxes, there may be a more
important issue at stake here. Lowering income and capital gains taxes could have
national debt, or creating other more serious economic problems for the country.
The potential personal benefits may be tempting, but they are not relevant to
2.5 LGBT
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people who often feature together as a
29
a whole. Lesbian, gay and bisexual refer to sexual orientation transgender refers
female-identified people. This term refers to a woman who loves another woman
whether in physical, sexual, emotional and spiritual. Gay is widely accepted term
refers to a man who is attracted to another man. Bisexual refers to someone who is
sexually attracted to the sexes male and female. Bisexual marked by the people
who attracted to the same sexes or different sexes. Bisexual also refers to the
romantic attracted, sexual attracted and sexual attracted to the man or woman.
whose gender identity does not line up with the gender they assigned at birth. This
identity or gender expression differs from their assigned sex at birth or any
LGBT in their movement has a rainbow flag to marked them. The color
of the flag consists of pink, red, orange, yellow, green, blue turquoise, blue indigo,
and purple. Each of the colors has their own meaning. Pink means sexuality, read
refers to life, orange meaning healing, green refers to nature, yellow meaning
sunlight, turquoise meaning art, indigo means harmony and purple mean spirit.
30
2.5.1 History of LGBT in The World
The deviant behavior in the society, in this case, LGBT known happens
for the first in the prophet Luth A.S era. The deviant behavior in this era mostly
known as Homosexual. Homo means same and sexual means attracted to the
sexuality. Homosexuality means attracted to the same sex. Prophet Luth A.S
people named Sodom are related to the homosexual. Narrated in Al-quran in sura
Hud verse 26, it states that when Luth A.S offering his daughter to the man in the
society, the man is rejected prophet Luth A.S offer. They prefer to choose in
marriage with the same sex. At the time happen God destroy their place and their
life.
The second history of Sodom people happens again in the Italy, Pompei
city. God destroy and burn Rumawi people at the time. Their behavior is doing the
same sex (male with male and female with female). The disaster happens in the
August 24th 79 AD. The Vesuvius mountain erupts in 24 hours and it burns all of
the city.
homosexuality term. Homo derived from Greek means same, and sex refers to
sexual. This term refers to one who attracted with the same sex, a man attracted to
man and woman sexuality in America. Kinsey collects the science data about
sexuality that completely free from the value and norm in the society.
31
At 1955, the first biggest association to woman homosexual was
also called the DOB. It was conceived as a social alternative to lesbian bars,
At 1969 in New York City riots happen. It happens when transvestite and
gay people protest raids by the police in the Stonewall Inn, Greenwich Village
area at the June 28th of the middle in the night. The demonstration is broadly
known as the most important event that makes a gay liberation movement and a
development in this era happen in the 80s and 90s and bow out in 20s till now. At
the past time, we may know Sentul and Kintil but know mostly known as Butchy
and Femme.
The LGBT goal is want to demand their equality in the society. They believed that
they have the same right with the other people. They wont discriminate by the
society. Many of arbitrary injustice that they get from the society make them go
The lesbian and gay community can provide support for teens and is a
source of friendship, romantic relations, role models, and social norms. In general,
its more important to have someone to talk to than someone to socialize with
32
Communication, Cultural Competence , and Patient- and Family- Centered Care
for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender ( LGBT ) Community- A Field
Guide (2005:1) she states that the LGBT community is as diverse as the nation
and includes members of every race, ethnicity, religion, mental capacity, physical
ability/ disability, age, and socioeconomic group. One of the oldest LGBT
Lambda Indonesia and another organization founded in the 1980s and 1990s.
Now, the primary association of LGBT in Indonesia are GAYa Nusantara, Arus
Pelangi, Ardhanary Institute, GWL INA and etc. Their activities are organized the
social meeting, increase the human awareness and make some bulletins. They also
Indonesia national law does not forbid intersex relation and homosexual
relation. The government considers their action is not a criminal, neither they are
not breaking the rule such as children law, morality law, pornography law, and
by the adult, personal, not sharing to the other people, non-commercial and they
like each other. But the government considers not to give them the same equality
tolerated and are found in many social settings. What is not realized is that many
33
of these people may be tolerated but they have not necessarily been accepted by
their own families. Acceptance means transgender persons can take part in all
family and social life without reservations, whereas tolerance is usually expressed
very complicated. Cross-dressing is not accepted, illegal and public tolerance had
There are some previous studies that deal with LGBT views and another
about Logical Fallacy. Some studies about LGBT views are by Donald P Haidel-
Marker and Joslyn (2008). Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and
Support for Gay Rights. Mrs. Laura A. Markowe (2002). A study of Lesbian and
Gay identity: European Perspectives. Some studies about Logical Fallacies are by
Nirvan Ghovin (2015). The Fallacy of Chinese. So Young Shim (2011). Critical
Thinking on a Logical Fallacy. Another studies deal with Logical Fallacy and
LGBT but not containing the argument of LGBT views. Rena M. Lindevaldsen
(2010). The Fallacy of Neutrality from Beginning to End: The Battle Between
Quinn (2012). Queering The American Family: Belief, Fallacy, and Myth.
To make clear, the writer review the previous studies about LGBT views
and Logical Fallacy above. First, Donald P Haidel-Marker and Joslyn (2008).
Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and Support for Gay Rights. Haidel
34
and Joslyn analyze about the origin of LGBT belief, the cause is controllable
this studies are talking about LGBT from its origin (biologically or formed) and
socially. The research focus on LGBT as the object, None of them talking about
Other Studies talk about Logical Fallacies are Nirvan Ghovin (2015). The
Fallacy of Chinese. He analyzed how china government thinks that their ability
will make them as a superpower. But Ghovin tries to explain with his argument to
understanding how the limit of Chinas rise avoids them to be a superpower. This
study is more focus how a good argument can prove a big power like Chinas
Logical Fallacy. His focus his study on the analyze of ad hominem as part of the
using in linguistics perspectives. Both of this study are talking about an argument
in the political and linguistic aspect but none of them talking about an argument in
The studies that containing logical fallacy and LGBT views but not
35
(2010). The Fallacy of Neutrality from Beginning to End: The Battle Between
analyzed is focused on the homosexual context. How people can see the
homosexuality from the religion and social perspectives. The other studies are
Fallacy, and Myth. He analyzes how the homosexual fought their belief. How
they conduct and make their own family. Both of them talking about how logical
fallacies concept applies in the LGBT as the subject, one in religion aspect and
another one in family aspect. None of those studies talking about LGBT and
None of the previous studies above that analyze about LGBT views in
the argumentative aspect. Most of the researcher just analyze about LGBT views,
Logical Fallacy, and Logical Fallacy in the LGBT views but none of the research
above talk about Logical Fallacy in the LGBT views in terms of argumentative
aspect. Here, the writer tries to analyze and investigate LGBT views in terms of
argumentative aspect.
36
2.7 Conceptual Framework
writer has a framework to describe how the theory works on the topic, as follows:
In the conceptual framework describe how the theory works in the topic
to answer the research question. First, the writer collects all of the data that
contain the logical fallacy. The data is from The Gay Archipelago book. Second,
the writer will apply the fallacies of irrelevant appeals theory in the data, finding
the most dominant logical fallacies and finally, it will answer the research
question above.
37
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
understand the social life in which we live and why things are the way they are.
collecting, classifying and analyzing the data. To make our research analysis
manner.
From some views above, it can point out that in a qualitative research, to
get the answer from the research question above the writer should collect the data
and related with the argument concept. Here the writer should collect the data,
38
make a list of the LGBT views in Europe, United States, and Indonesia. After that,
the writer should relate the data with the code principle conduct (the relevance
2009:6). Data are all facts and numbers which can be made into materials to find
information, and source of data is the subject in which data can be obtained
3.2.1 Primary data are the first data that will be analyzed by the writer. The
primary data of this study was the argument of the author containing
some logical fallacy or break the rule of code intellectual conduct (the
self- interest, and appeal to emotion) which were obtained from the
source of data, The Gay Archipelago book and the argument of Tom
39
3.3 Method of Collecting Data
herself with or without the help of other people (Moleong, 1990:17). The
instrument in research was equipment or facility used by the writer to collect the
data, so the research can be easier, and the results can be more accurate, complete
writer herself need some supporting instruments. They were a book for reading
the argument and for finishing this research. In the other hand, the writer needed
The Gay Archipelago book by Tom Boellstorff for analyzing for making this
research easy understanding. The writer needs Attacking Faulty Reasoning books
by Professor T. Edward Damer that contain the logical fallacy concept.The writer
also needs some journals that containing arguments of the LGBT in the Europe
2. Reading the book The Gay Archipelago for several times in order to
Taking the data from the argument in The Gay Archipelago book.
40
tradition and appeal to irrelevant authority) that contains in Tom
5. Finding out the dominant logical fallacies in The Gay Archipelago book.
7. Drawing conclusion from the results of the analysis and giving suggestions
In order to make easier the classification and analysis of the data in the
research, each data is marked by a code. The coding of data in this research can
be identified as follows:
Blue, green, purple, pink, orange and brown: refers to the logical fallacies
research is looking for problems in the society how the society behaves, including
41
relationships, activities, attitudes, views, and processes are ongoing and the effects
order to find out the logical fallacy in The Gay Archipelago book from Tom
Boellstorffs argument. There are some steps in analyzing and identifying data as
follows:
1. Classifying the data to find the argument that break the rule of Damers
Boellstorff.
suggestions.
42
CHAPTER IV
4.1 FINDINGS
In this section, the writer will desrcibe the argument in The Gay
interest, appeal to tradition and appeal to force). There are 97 arguments in The
Gay Archipelago book that containing the logical fallacies. But here the writer use
21 sample to explain the logical fallacies in The Gay Archipelago book. The data
containing appeal to force or threat. The following data will analyze by using
it should be the right argument whether the argument is true or not. Appeal to
43
The standard form of the argument above are:
Premise 2 the richer you are, the more you are affected by globalization, and
subpremise some people in Indonesia believe that the richer you are the more
Data Interpretation
The argument above used an inductive standard form of argument and using blue
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid. The first
and second premises are true and followed by the true conclusion. But the
argument above is unsound. We can see that Tom according to most people in
Indonesia states that the richer you are the more you get globalization and the
not happen not only for the rich people. Globalization is the inhabitant process
globalization also happen to all of the people in Indonesia. All in all, we can not
say that the proletarian do net get the affect from the globalization. Toms view
44
above use apepal to belief in his argument. Because he belives what some people
(2) When asked how she and Bonnie had sex, Jossie turned aside the
question by referring to mass media, saying "It's precisely like you have
seen in imported books (Boellstorff, 2005:63)
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using blue
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is not valid and
obviously unsound. The first premise and the second premise are true, but the
conclusion is false. A good standard of argument is valid and sound. But both of
the characterization is not in the argument above. If Jossie says the way ho they
do sex it would be the argument because the conclussion following the true
premises. We can see from the argument above that when Tom asked Jossie to
explain how they do their sexuality, Jossie tries to explain the situation with
saying what some lesbian believes. They believed that to do sex, they can refers
to the mass media ( like another people do). The first thing that Jossie should
share the way how they do sex not talkimg about the lesbian people believes.
45
Here, tom believed what the lesbian says. Here, Tom use an appeal to belief to
(3) The author of a report on lesbi women written in the early 1990s
stated that "Ten years. Dubbing Culture after their marriage, the echo
from the wedding of this female homosexual couple still reverberates.
Their marriage is the only lesbian marriage to ever go proudly public in
Indonesia (Boellstorff, 2005:64-65)
standard form:
Premise 1 The author of a report on lesbi women written in the early 1990s
Premise 2 the echo from the wedding of this female homosexual couple still
reverberates
public in Indonesia
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using blue
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid but
unsound. Both of the premises is following by the true conclusion. If we see the
argument for a while, the argument is sound. But if we have to see the another
side and fine the logical fallacy of the argument that make it unsound. From the
46
argument above we can see that the lesbian people proudly present their marriage
cause some people in Indonesia accept it. The echo of their marriage still
reverberates until now. Because they believed the echo of their marriage give
them a chance to go out from their hideaway and proudly present theirself as the
one who can be accepted by the society also. Here, Toms informant in this case
(4) This event is indeed unique, not least because it is the first time
something like this has occurred in Jakarta, maybe in Indonesia, or even
the whole worldthat the marriage of two people of the same sex is
formalized openly, without anything to co. It would have been no different
than a birthday party. (Boellstorff, 2005:64)
standard form:
Premise 1 This event is indeed unique, not least because it is the first time
or even the whole world that the marriage of two people of the
Premise 2 If the relationship by Jossie and Bonnie were tied together with
have done it
47
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using blue
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. This argument is invalid. The first
premises are true but the conclusion that followed is false. Suddenly, Tom states
that the bithday party has the same condition with wedding party. If we see the
argument above we can see that Tom make the same comparison. He makes the
same condition between birthday party and wedding party. Birthday party is that
party to celebrated someone birthday at the day. While, wedding party is more
than this. Wedding party is the party to celebrated a couple promise in life. The
wedding party is sacred because they declare the promise of marriage, live
together till the die. The similarity between both of the party are attended with
their closer people, parents and another invitation. Here, Tom use an appeal to
belief to make his argument being accepted. He uses the belief of everyone to
make one statement that iw can be accepted because some people believe in that.
(5) The article, entitled "I Indeed Embrace Devi Frequently," revolved
around accusations that Inneke was the lesbi lover of another actress,
Devi Permatasari: "To give the public certainty . . . [Devi] married [the
male actor] Candra Priatna. 'Society now has proof I'm not a lesbi
woman,' said Devi. But what about Inneke? For her the news of Devi's
marriage is already enough to disprove the gossip. 'What more proof do
you want. What's clear is that I'm a normal woman. (Boellstorff, 2005:64-
73)
48
The standard form of the argument above are:
another actress
Premise 2 Devi Permatasari: "To give the public certainty [Devi] married
[the male actor] Candra Priatna. 'Society now has proof I'm not a
Premise 3 But what about Inneke? For her the news of Devi's marriage is
Conclusion Therefore, Inneke said what more proof do you want. What's
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using blue
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is invalid and
unsound. Premise 1,2 and 3 are true but the conclusionj is false. If Inneke said she
is a normal woman and will prove it, it will be the valid argument. But, we can see
from the argument above, Inneke shows to the society that she is not a lesbi by
saying Devi Pertamatasari has marriage with the man automatically Inneke is not
a lesbi cause her friend marriage with a man. If Inneke is a normal woman she
should prove it also. Like Devi, she should marriage with a man also to prove that
she is not lesbi and does not have attracted feeling to the same woman. In this
49
case, what Inneke and another lesbian think that they can be proved by the real
woman if one of them (a lesbian couple) married. Inneke as Toms informant use
accepted. Appeal to emotion that founds in The Gay Archipelago book are:
Implicit premise they are gay and lesbi and they do not have the same
Indonesia
50
Data Interpretation
The argument above used an inductive standard form of argument and using
orange as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above persuade
another people feelings to accept it. Tom as the writer use appeal to emotion to
persuade the reader to accept the argument. Tom use the pity of the reader to feel
the same condition with gay and lesbi. By using unity and diversity, Tom states
that gay and lesbi should have the same acceptance with another Indonesian
people. unity and diversity means the difference of Indonesian ethnic should be
(7)I hope to leave the reader with some sense of the great camaraderie,
joy, and creativity of the gay and lesbi worlds, but these are also worlds of
heartbreak and pain, and what the future holds for gay and lesbi
Indonesians remains uncertain. Therefore, I have gone to great lengths to
protect the confidentiality of my interlocutors. All names except for that of
Dede Oetomo are pseudonyms, and details of persons, places, and
situations have been altered (Boellstorff, 2005:40)
standard form:
Premise 1 I hope to leave the reader with some sense of the great
but these are also worlds of heartbreak and pain, and what
uncertain
51
subpremise He hopes we can see the pain of gay and lesbi
Data Interpretation
The argument above used an inductive standard form of argument and using
orange as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid but
unsound. From the argument above, we can see that Tom as a gay, to protect all of
his gay interlocutor he should hide their identity and using the reader feeling to
make his argument being accepted. He use the pain of gay and lesbi and he
persuade us to feel the same way. In this case, Tom use appeal to emotion fallacy
(8) I have occasionally heard gay men or warias talk about how society
should accept them because bissus or waroks have existed for hundreds of
years" (Boellstorff, 2005:45)
standard form:
Implicit premises society is the only one place that Waria needs
52
conclusion Therefore,the society should accepted waria because
Data Interpretation
The argument above used an inductive standard form of argument and using
orange as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The premises are true and make
the argument valid. But, if we see the standard form of argument, it should be
have two characteristics. Valid and sound. The argument above is unsound. If
Tom explain how we can accepted waria in society it will the sound argument.
But, here Tom repeat his statement first and saying they are same with Bissu and
Warok. From the argument above we can see that Tom uses our emotion as the
reader to accepted the existence of Gay because Bissu and Wartok has the same
condition with the gay and they are accepted. Bissu and Warok is the tradition that
happen in Makassar society and being accepted at there. All in all we should
accepted the gay because they have the same condition with Bissu and Warok.
(9) If someone's used to using a woman, he'll feel less happy or a lack of
desire if he uses a man ... I feel happy with men ... For that reason I've got
to habituate myself to it, because that's the best thing for me . . . In this
way God is indeed a generous being towards His creatures. For all bad
things on this earth He has provided weapons to turn them into something
good (Boellstorff, 2005:50-51)
53
To analyze the argument above, we should reconstruct the argument into a
standard form:
Premise 2 I feel happy with men. For that reason I've got to
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using
orange as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The good argument should have
two characteristics. valid and sound. But the argument above not containing both
of them. The argument is invalid and unsound. The conclusion that following
those premises is not true. It makes the argument being invalid. If the argument is
invalid automatically the argument is unsound also. We can see from the
argument above that Tom is using the generous of the God to make his argument
being accepted. So, what is the corelation with the desire and the generous from
God. The desires that given from God to us is a normal desire. Man who have
desired with a woman and woman who have desired with a man. Gay who says
54
that God is the most generous because he gives both of the desire is totally wrong.
imported
open; they would read them and realize that 'I'm not
alone
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using
orange as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The structure of the argument
above is valid but unsound. The conclusion following both of those premises and
it makes the argument being valid but its not unsound enough.We can see from
the argument above that Tom tries to convince the reader who maybe Gay that
55
they are not alone. By the mass media, the story of Gay life in the west come to
Indonesia and make the gay feel that they are not alone. Here, Tom uses an appeal
o emotion to make his argument being accepted and make the feeling of the
standard form:
head of household
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using
orange as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is invalid
and unsound. It will be the good argument if Bonnie answer the question from the
reporter, how they family will live with Jossies unemployed status. If the
argument is invalid obviously the argument is unsound also. From the argument
56
above we cans ee that Bonnie as Toms informant says that the important thing in
their life is love. They want a true love. If we see in the real life for a new family
of the household Jossie should be has a job to give a life to the family. Bonnie to
make her argument accepted use an emotion, the eternal love. Whether she gives
the fact why she should maintain Jossie as the household. She prefer to choose
their feelings of reverence or respect for a tradition to make their argument being
accepted. Appeal to tradition that founds in The Gay Archipelago book are:
(12) Lesbi women have a hard time getting a job around here, especially
if they look masculine. It's hard for us to meet each other, find out about
each other, because women can't go out alone at night (Boellstorff,
2005:31)
standard form:
Premise 1 Lesbi women have a hard time getting a job around here,
Premise 2 It's hard for us to meet each other, find out about each
other
57
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using purple
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument is not good argument.
Both of those premises are not followed by the right conclusion. From the
argument above we can see that for woman in Indonesia its hard to out from their
home in the night because they are woman and woman should always stay in the
home. In indonesia tradition, home is the only one place to stay because its the
safety place for woman. For lesbian woman who behave like a man, its too hard to
get a work because for Indonesian people woman is they are who act like a real
woman, have a long hair or wearing hijab and take care with their nails. In this
case, Tom use appeal to tradition to make his argument being accepted.
standard form:
58
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using purple
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid. The
Because it is not because the argument is based from the tradition in Makassar
society and it should be the right one. But we should see the truth of the argument
first. From the argument above we can see that the tradition in Makassar state that
they are not accepting waria in their society. Waria in Makassar traditiom taking a
bad luck for the society. Waria gives them a bad thing and they want to allowed
waria to come to their society. All in all, we should believe what the makassar
tradition said because it is from the society to save them. Here, Tom uses appeal
To analyze the argument, we should reconstruct the argument above into standard
form.
condemnation
59
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using purple
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is not agood
argument enough. A good argument should have more than one premises to make
a conclusion. Absolutely, the argument is invalid and unsound. We can see from
the argument above that Tom is using appeal to tradition to make his argument
entertainment is not a punishment. The young man who are not married yet can
have a sex with another man and they will not get a punishment. All in all, the
most important thing for the homosexuality is a satisfaction to the young man.
60
(wrongly married) entailed men's relations with animals,
that "the whole 'white caste' had gone stark raving mad
Data Interpretation
The argument above used an inductive standard form of argument and using
purple as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid.
But unsound enough. The conclusion in the argument is following both of the true
accepted in Balinesse society. We can see from the argument above that in Bali
young girl who not married yet, or with woman who have the high level, those are
forbidden. Whether it is not forbidden for Bali tradition if a man has the sexual
relationship with another man. Here, Tom use an appeal to tradition by using Bali
tradition to make his argument and the existence of homosexuality are being
accepted.
the judgment of on who is not an authority in the field. Appeal to authority that
61
(16) We have been biologically designed not to be biologically designed,
to be incomplete or unfinished animals who complete or finish ourselves
through culture and not through culture in general but through highly
particular forms of it (C. Geertz 1973:49) (Boellstorff, 2005:10)
To analyze the argument, we should reconstruct the argument above into standard
form.
designed
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using green
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid but
unsound enough. The premises are true and following by the true conclusion.
From the argument above we can see that one who states in Toms book named
backgorund in science, whether its biology. So, his argument above is notg
relevant with his authority. His authority is in the antropologist field not in the
62
biological field or the relationship between two of them. He has no an authority to
states the argument above. So, his argument is include in appeal to authority.
(17) In the first letters, "DP" describes befriending another man who
showered DP with kindnesses and invited DP to spend the night in a hotel,
where he seduced DP. In the second, "WA" describes feeling aroused by
seeing men in tight pants or underwear. Both ask the columnist, "Am I
homoseksual?" The columnist replies "No" to both, because the first was
"receiving intensive sexual stimulation" and the second because "just
because he likes a handsome man does not indicate that WA is
homoseksual." Emphasizing the importance of conditioning, the columnist
warns DP never to repeat his experience with another man and WA to
avoid seeing men in their underwear, lest either become habituated to
homosexuality (Boellstorff, 2005:74)
To analyze the argument above, we should reconstruct the argument into standard
form.
63
conditioning, the columnist warns DP never to repeat his
homosexualitas
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using green
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument is valid. The first and
second premises are true and following by the true conclusion but those are
unsound enough. From the argument above we can see that the gay in their letters
convey their gender status to a columnist. They are confuse whether they are gay
or not. In their case a columnist believes they are not gay because they get
"receiving intensive sexual stimulation from the other man and the second reason
he just like the handsome man. Gay means they are who attracted to another man
physically and mentally. From the first case DP get stimulating from the
another man and he likes it. The second case WA like the man with a tight
pants. Actuyally, both of the cas eif we correlated it with the definition of gay
they are include in the gay also. But here, Tom use an appeal to authority to
makes his argument being accepted. By using a columnist, someone who always
writing in the mass media, Tom states that botb of those case is not including in
gay.
64
(18)In most cases the references to homosexuality are negative-
psychologists presenting homosexuality as a pathology, crime exposes, or
disapproving gossip columns. (Boellstorff, 2005:74)
To analyze the argument above, we should reconstruct the argument into standard
form.
negative
Data Interpretation
The argument above used an inductive standard form of argument and using green
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is not good
enough based on the standard form of the argument. The argument is only consist
of one premise and following by the conclusion. A good argument should have at
least two premises and following by the conclusion. If the argument is not based
on the standard form of the argument it can be say that the argument also invalid
and unsound. the argument above also containing appeal to authority. Tom as the
writer of the book said that the physicology as the negative side states that
plays an important role in diagnosing the disease. The one who can states about
65
4.1.5 Appeal to Self-Interest
(19) Yet this very irreducibility to ethnolocality marks the gay and
lesbi subject positions as failures: exceeding the state's own discourse of
national belonging, they can never have the "traditional" diversity that
represents the raw material to be unified by the archipelago concept.
However, while gay and lesbi Indonesians are marginal to the body
politic, in one sense their subject positions are a kind of distillation of
national discourse, an ultimate achievement of the national project. In
another sense, their presence challenges the state's own mode of
governmentality. The gay and lesbi subject positions do not participate in
the ethnolocalized logic of territoriality: they do not hope one day to have
an island of their own because they belong to the archipelago .
(Boellstorff, 2005:210)
66
positions do not participate in the ethnolocalized logic of
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using pink
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid argument
but not unsound enough. The conclusion is following the true of the premises. But
the argument above is not unsound enough because it is containing the logical
fallacy named appeal to self-interest. Tom as the writer tries convey his argument
with seeing the position of gay and lesbi. He states the gay and lesbi position is
challenge the government mode in the gender position. They make their own rule
and it make their nation position is marginalized. Tom states that even they are
67
Premise 2 since transgenderism can be made to fit within a
heterosexist logic
Conclusion where those who desire men must be effeminate and those
Data Interpretation
The argument above used a deductive standard form of argument and using pink
as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument above is valid because
the conclusion following the true premises both. But the argument above is
the Thailand but homosexuality is not. Their idea is a woman who has a desired
with man should be feminin and a man who has desired with a woman should be
Actually, the rules make us to think twice about trangender position in the nation.
We will think we have the same condition to be heterosexual and we will accept
them.
68
To analyze the argument above, we should reconstruct the argument into standard
form.
English language
language.
Data Interpretation
The argument above used an inductive standard form of argument and using
brown as the code in The Gay Archipelago book. The argument is valid. The
conclusion is following both of the true premises. But this not a good argument
his position as a linguist give him a possibility to create a new word in English
language. As we know that the creation of new language is not about an authority,
its about agreement reached. It means that its not about who you are but its about
69
what you have created and reached the agreement. All in all, Toms argument
above is included in appeal to force or threat. Because he use his position and
4.2 DISCUSSION
At 1992, when Tom was 23 years old, he went to Indonesia for the first
time. He feels lucky cause he can meet and make a work with gay people in
Indonesia. How they life and survive in the middle of the society. Tom need a
long time to make his research done. Tom when states his arguments can not
separate from the truth of the argument. The principle of truth argument is should
be valid and sound. The argument can be say as the valid and sound argument if it
Damers code of intellectual conduct it states that the argument should have the
good premises and following by the good conclusion also, and it can be said
following the rule in standard form of argument. Tom as the writer of The Gay
Archipelago, to make his argument being accpeted he should following the rule of
standard argument. Whether, Tom in his The Gay Archipelago has followed the
The discussion below deals with the logical fallacies (the fallacies of
70
that find out in the data analysis (The Gay Archipelago book). The following
Sales
Appeal To Belief
Appeal to Emotion
Appeal to Tradition
Appeal to Authority
Appeal to Self Interest
Appeal to force or threat
The Gay Archipelago book, the data have been analyzed consists of 21 arguments
arguments that containing appeal to belief. This logical fallacies focuses on how
Tom as the author of book telling his statements based on what more people
believes. There are 6 arguments that containing appeal to emotion that focuses on
how Tom uses his statement to influence the emotion of the reader to accepted his
argument. Tom also uses his informant statements to make his argument stronger
and accepted by the reader. In The Gay Archipelago book, there are 4 arguments
71
that contain appeal to tradtion. Here, Tom uses the tradition belief in Indonesia to
make his argument accepted. He states just because the tradition of one society
believe in one thing we should believe in that also. There are 3 arguments that
containing appeal to authority in The Gay Archipelago book. Tom as the author of
the book shows many author who are not in their authority states the argument.
Whether their argument is true or not, Tom still use their argument to support his
fallacies in In The Gay Archipelago book. Tom as the writer make states some
position and condition to make us believe and accepting the argument and this
fallacy in the book shows how Tom use some people importance to make his
force or threat. Here as the author of the book, he feels he can do and say what he
want to make his argument being accepted because he has an authority to make
the statement.
From the data analysis above we can see that the most dominant logical
There are 6 arguments from 21 sample above that containing the appeal to
emotion. It can be state that most of the arguments in The Gay Archipelago book
the argument. Tom in his most of the argument states that we should have the
same feeling with them to make we understand their position. Tom uses our pity
to makes we as the reader accepting the gay position in our society. Tom hopes
72
we can feel their pain as the marginalized subject position and their choice to be
gay is because of love. Love is a feeling that given by the God and they have the
same feeling of love with us. It makes them still convinced with they have
believed cause God is the only one who gives them this feeling and God is loving
them.
73
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
5.1 CONCLUSION
about fallacies of irrelevance appeal in Edward Damers logical fallacy, the writer
can conclude that on Damers fallacies of irrelevance appeal theory in The Gay
Archipelago book consist of 97 arguments that containing logical fallacy, but the
writer only takes 21 arguments that containing logical fallacies. From the sample
above the writer can see that how Tom Boellstorff as author of the book, he was
doing this research in a few years, become the volunteer and make the cooperation
with the LGBT community in Indonesia to help his research but most of his
argument still containing logical fallacy. Tom as the writer of The Gay
Archipelago book should be more attention with he had write because his works
become a reference to the other who interest with sexuality and Indonesia in this
case LGBT itself, the other researcher should be more pay attention to this case.
Tom in his research to make his argument should following the rule of standard
form argument to make his argument being valid and sound, and it will be
accepted. If the argument had accepted, he has a good argument and no one can
reject his statements. But, from The Gay Archipelago book the writer can found
97 arguments that containing logical fallacies and the argument is not good
enough.
The most dominant logical fallacies that is used in The Gay Archipelago
persuade the reader by using their feeling to make the argument being accepted.
74
Tom as the writer of this book believed that we should feel what the LGBT feels
state that if we have the same feeling with LGBT we can understand and
5.2 SUGGESTION
Archipelago book the writer only focuses on fallacies of irrelevance appeal that
small portion of the logical fallacy theory by Edward Damer. Therefore, the first
suggest from the writer to the next writer is to find the another logical fallacies in
The Gay Archipelago book. The writer suggests to take fallacies of irrelevnce
and using the wrong reason to the other writer who are interest witb this research
object.
The second suggestion is the writer hopes another writer can find the
influence of mass media from the other country to the LGBT in Indonesia.
Because there are a lot of arguments that conveys by Tom Boellstorff states that
LGBT in Indonesia get some influences from the mass media especially from the
magazine and television. They get influence from the mass media and feel they
The third suggestion is the writer hopes another writer can find a
correlation between the ideology of LGBT Europe, LGBT in the United States
75
and LGBT in Indonesia. Because most informants that Tom uses in his book is
from Europe and The United States. And he gets his identoty as a gay when he
The writer hopes another writer can find another interesting object from
literary works like movie, music, novel and etc to enriching the discourse analysis
study.
76