Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jake Hyatt
113467998
Sec. 0202
November 16, 2015
One aspect of the Criminal Justice system that I feel is bias and is in need of
reform is the Parole system. The system is very bias because each state has different
boards that are assigned to decide if a prisoner can get let out of prison early and get put
conditional release of an offender from incarceration but not from the legal custody of the
state (Cole, Smith, & DeJong, 2014, p. 430). I think this idea is excellent in giving
deserving prisoner the right to leave prison early and under supervision allows them to
start their lives outside of prison. The problem with this system is there arent enough
parole officers and most released prisoners find their way back into prison within 5 years.
First, I will generally discuss the current structure of the parole system, as it is
different in every state. New York started the parole system in the United States in 1876
and by 1932, 44 states and the federal government adopted the parole system. Now every
state has some sort of process that can release offenders before the end of their sentence
(Cole, Smith, & DeJong, 2014, p.431). The goal of the parole system is to get deserving
prisoners out of prison while at the same time attempting to lower the prisons
population. Each state has some sort of board set up that has hearings with the prisoners.
Based on these hearing the board gets together and decides whether or not this prisoner
I think this system is bias because it is these groups of people that hold the power
in this system and get to decide if they think a certain prisoner should be let out. I feel as
this automatically will cause bias and thus supported in an article called Racial Bias in
the Decision to Grant Parole which states, Black parolees who were treatment
participants served a significantly longer portion of their sentence than did white
treatment participants (Carroll and Mondrick, 1976). In my opinion the U.S. need to
find a way so that the boards are focused on not being racially biased and giving every
The United States is trying to lessen the bias of this system by focusing on
computer automatically strips any kind of personal bias or judgment that someone may
be inclined to make. According to an article in The Wall Street Journal, The board
reached its decision using a computer software program called Compas, one of several
designed to predict whether individual convicts will return to prison (Walker, 2013).
The current trend, due to budged cuts, is to utilize these systems like Compas. These
programs show success because in the same article Walker states that there was a drop of
1% of the total prison population and these systems have a major affect on this number.
I think as of right now the system is set up to be exceptionally bias and it is hard to avoid
as long as there is a board in charge. I like the idea of moving more towards statistics and
Carroll, L., & Mondrick, M. (1976). Racial Bias in the Decision to Grant Parole.
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/271690377_Racial_Bias_in_the_Decisio
n_to_Grant_Parole
Cole, G., Smith, C., & DeJong, C. (2014). Policing: Contemporary Issues and
Learning.
Dickson, C. (2014, April 22). Americas Recidivism Nightmare. Retrieved November 17,
recidivism-nightmare.html
Walker, J. (2013, October 11). State Parole Boards Use Software to Decide Which
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1000142405270230462610457912125159524085