Author

A uthor :A Anandro
nandro A Amellonado
mellonado
SSite
ite SSupervisor
upervisor : JJan
an WWillem
illlem M
Markvoort
arkkvoort
SSchool
chool SSupervisors
upervisoors :M Michiel Parlevliet,
ic h ie l Parlevlie Dyah
et, D yah IIriani
riani
Reader
Reader : Eric
Eric Boer
Boer

Alternatives of Dredging Method Based on

Interpretation of Soil Investigation in The
North Kalibaru Project


C
D
M
W
WEEKLY
REDGIN
DREDGING
CONCLUSION
ONCLUSSION
NG M
IINTRODUCTION
NTRODUCTION
METHODOLOGY
ETHODOLOGY
CONTENT

METHODS
ETHODS
EEKLY PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION OF
OF THE
THE EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNATIV
RN IVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S

2
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

INTRODUCTION
PRET
PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET

NNORTH
ORTH K KALIBARU
ALIBARU P PORT
ORT EEXPANSION
XPANSION
NTER
NT
INT

C Client
lient : IPC
IPC ; Main
Main Contractor
Conttractor : PP
PP
D ON INTERPRETATION

Deepening
eepening port,
port, expanding
expanding andand deepening
deepening access
access channel
channel
SED
SE

D
BASE
BA
D BASED

R Reclaiming
eclaiming landlandd for
for the
thee new
new container
containeer terminal
terminal area
areaa
HOD
HO

OBJECTIVE
BJECTIVE
ETHO
ET

O
MET
M

to figure
to figurre the
the most
most effective
effective dredging
dredgingg method
methood in
in The
The North
North
h Kalibaru
Kalibaru
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
GING
GI

Project
Project
EDGI
ED
DRED
DR

COPE
SSCOPE
OF DREDGING
ES OF

xample to
EExample to calculate
calculate weekly
weekly production
production
IVES
IV
ATIV
AT

ocus on
FFocus n basins
basinss and
and jetties
jettties
RNAT
RN
TERN
TE

R Rough
ough volume
volume calculation
calculation
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

W Without
ithoutt slope
slope stability
stabilityy
C Comparative
omparative study study

26.06.13
 INTRODUCTION
LLocation
ocation
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
4

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 INTRODUCTION
source
source : w
www.vanoord.com
ww.vanoord.com
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
5

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 INTRODUCTION
source : internal memo
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
6

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 INTRODUCTION
source : internal memo
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
7

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 METHODOLOGY
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
8

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 METHODOLOGY
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
9

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

METHODOLOGY
NTER
NT
INT PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

NTERPRETATION
IINTERPRETATION
SE
BASE
BA D ON INTERPRETATION
SED

SPT
S PT Value
Vallue Strength
Strrength IInterpretation
nterpre
etation
HOD
HO D BASED

0<N<4 Very
V ery ssoft
oft tto
o ssoft
oft Soft
S of t
ETHO
ET
MET
M

4<N<1 15
5 ffirm
irm
m ttoo sstiff
tiff Medium
Medium
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
GING
GI

15
1 5<N>3 300 Very
Very sstiff
tiff tto
ohhard
ard H
Hard
ard
DR EDGI
ED
DRED
OF DREDGING
ES OF

VOLUME
OLUME CALCULATION
CALCULATION
IVES
IV

V
ATIV
AT
RNAT
RN

Volume
Volume : area
arrea * thickness
th
hickness of
of layers
layers
TERN
TE
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

Contour.pdf
Contour.p
pdf

10
1

26.06.13
 METHODOLOGY
EEQUIPMENT
QUIPMENT
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
11
1

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

METHODOLOGY
NTER
NT
INT PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION R
RATE
ATE
D ON INTERPRETATION

Weekly
Week
Weekly
ek ly Production
Pro
P rodu
roduct
ductio
ct ion
ion Ra
Rate
te ((in situ
in ssit
itu
itu m3/w
/week)
/wee
eek)
eek)
SED
SE

Equipment
Equi
Equipm
ui pmen
pm entt
en
BASE
BA

Soft
So ft Medium
Me um Hard
Hard
HOD
HO D BASED

Grab
Grab 50,000
50,
50,00
0,000
000 50,
5
50,000
0,00
0,000
000 20,
2
20,000
0,00
0,000
000
ETHO
ET
MET
M

TSHD
HD 370,000
370,
370,00
0,000
000 155,00
15
155,000
000
000 135,
13
135,000
5,00
5,000
00
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
GING
GI

CSD
CSD 400,000
400,
400,00
0,000
000 150,
15
150,000
0,00
0,000
000 91,
9
91,000
1,00
1,000
000
EDGI
ED
DRED
DR

BULKING
BULLKING FFACTOR
ACTOR
OF DREDGING
ES OF

Bulk
Bulk ffactor
actor Equipment
Equipment
IVES
IV

Strength
Strength S oil
Soil b
Grab CSD
D TSHD
D
TSHD
ATIV
AT

Hard
Hard Clay/silt
C l ay/sill t 1.09
1.09 1.59
1.59
RNAT
RN
TERN
TE

Hard
Hard S and
Sand 1 1 1
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

Hard
Hard Claystone
C l aysto
on e 1 1
Medium
Me di um Clay/silt
Cl ay/sii l t 1.14
1.14 1.78
1.7
78 1
Medium
Me di um Sand
Sand
S of t
Soft Cl ay/sii l t
Clay/silt 1.1
18
1.18 2.25
2.25 1.55
1.55
Soft
S of t Sand
Sand 1 1
12
1

26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

WEEKLY PRODUCTION
NTER
NT
INT PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

DIONE
D IONE
D ON INTERPRETATION

Parameter
P arameter Duration
Duration Note
Note
SED
SE

Shifting
Shiffting aand
nd anc
anchoring
choring 30 min
mi
in
BASE
BA
D BASED

Lowering
Low
wering th
the
he mminutes
inutes aare
re
HOD
HO

Grabbing
G rabbing ccalculated o
alculated tto
115
115 m
min
in
ETHO
ET

Hoisting
H oiisting make o
make ne b
one argge
barge
MET
M

ffull
ull
Putting
Puttting tto
o tthe
he b
barge
arge
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
GING
GI

Change
C hange H Hopper
opper 10
1 0 min
min
EDGI
ED

Total
T otaal 155
155
5 min
min
IVES
IV
ATIV
AT DRED
DR
OF DREDGING
ES OF

Cycle
Cycle p
production
roducttion = produced
prod
duced load
loaad / cycle
cyclle time
time
RNAT
RN
TERN
TE

= 900
900 / 155
155 * 60
60
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

= 348.3871
348.3
3871 m3/OH/OH
OH/week
OH/week =1150
50 h
Weekly
Weekkly p
production
rodu
uction = 348.3871
348.3
3871 * 150
150
13
1
= 52,258
52,258 m3//week
week

26.06.13
 WEEKLY PRODUCTION

26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
14
1

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

WEEKLY PRODUCTION
PRET
PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET

URNING
NTER
NT
INT

TTURNING
AMOUNT
A MOUNT O
OFF TTURNS
URNS = TTOTAL
OTAL TRAIL
TRAIL LENGTH
LENGTH NEEDED
NEEDED / TRAIL
TRAIL
D ON INTERPRETATION
SED
SE

LENGTH
LENGTH
BASE
BA
D BASED

DISCHARGIN
NG
HOD
HO

DISCHARGING
ETHO
ET
MET
M
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
DRED
DR GING
GI
EDGI
ED
OF DREDGING
ES OF

Cycle p
Cycle roduction
production = produced
produced load
load / cycle time
cycle time
IVES
IV
ATIV
AT

25,5
566 / 3
= 25,566 18 * 6
318 0
60
TERNAT
RN
TERN
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

= 4,817
4,817 m3//OH
OH
OH/week
OH/week =1145
45 h
Weekly production
Weekkly p roduction = 4,817.88
4,817.88 * 145
14 5
= 698,593
698,593 m3//week
week 15
1

26.06.13
 WEEKLY PRODUCTION

26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
16
1

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 WEEKLY PRODUCTION

26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
17
1

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 C
EESP
SP

Qccut
ut
UTTIN
CUTTING

d = vh * T
NG P

deformation
deforrmation
= P/
P/ ESP
ESP

n rate
RODUCTION
PRODUCTION

rate = vccut
= f * cohesion

ut / d
cohesion *cohesion
*cohesion factor
factor
WEEKLY PRODUCTION
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S

1
18
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

26.06.13
 WEEKLY PRODUCTION
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
1
19

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 WEEKLY PRODUCTION

26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
20
2

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 WEEKLY PRODUCTION
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
2
21

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

WEEKLY PRODUCTION
NT
INTERPR
ER
NTER ET
PRET
PR ATIO
AT
ETAT
D ON INTERPRETATION

Production
Production Q [m
[m3//h]
h]
SED
SE
BASE
BA

Suction
Suction Prod
Production
ductiion 1,646
1, ,646
HOD
HO D BASED

Cut
C ut P
Production
roduction 11,440
,440
ETHO
ET

Haul
H aul P
Production
rodduction 9916
16
MET
M
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
ED
DRED
DR GING
GI
EDGI

Production
P roduction = 916
916 m3//hh
OF DREDGING
ES OF

OH/week
O H/week =1150
50 h
AT
RNAT
RN IVES
IV
ATIV

Weekly
W production
eekly p roduction = 916
916 * 150
1 50
TERN
TE
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

= 137,400
137,4
400 m3//week
week

22
2

26.06.13
 IINTERPRETATION
NTERPRETATION O
OFF SOIL INVESTIG
SOIL INVESTIGATION
GATION
DREDGING METHOD
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S

2
23
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

DREDGING METHOD
MET
M HOD
HO
ETHO
ET
NG METHOD BA SED
SE
BASE
D BASED NT
INTERPR
ER
NTER ET
PRET
PR ATIO
AT
ETAT
D ON INTERPRETATION
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
DR ED
DRED GING
GI
EDGI
OF DREDGING

Example
Example of
of volume
volume calculation
calculation
ES OF
IVES
IV

Interpretation
Interp
In rpre
rpreta
re tati
tation
ti on off Ba
Basi
Basin
sin
si nE
ATIV
AT

Layer
Laye
Layerr (+/-)
ye (+/-
(+ /-))
/- Area
Area below
bel
below
el ow reference
rref
efer
eferen
erence
ence Volume
Volu
Volume
lume dredged
dre
dredg
redged
dged
RNAT
RN

Soilil
So
From
From [[m]
m] To [[m]
m] [m]]
[m [m2] [m3]
TERN
TE
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

SOFT
SOFT Clay
Cl
Clay/Silt
ay/S
ay/Sil
iltt
il -6.6
.6 -7.0
-7.0 0.4
0.4 241,576
241,
241,57
1, 576
576
Clay/Silt
Clay
Cl ay/Siltt -7.0 -12.0
0 5.0
5.0 3,019,695
3,01
019,
019,69
9, 695
695
Clay/Silt
Clay
Cl ay/Sil
ay iltt
il -12.0
-12.
-12.0
2. 0 -14.0
-14
-14
14.0
.0 2.0
2.0 1,207,878
1,20
1, 207,
207,87
7, 878
878
603939
6039
603939
3939
Sand
Sa nd -3.6
-3.6 -6.6
-6.6 3.0
3.0 1,811,817
1,81
1, 811,
811,81
1, 817
817
MEDIUM
ME UM Clay/Silt
Clay
Cl ay/Sil
ay iltt
il -14.0
-14.
-14.0
4. 0 -14.6
-14
-14
14.6
.6 0.6
6 362,363
362,
362,36
2, 363
363
HARD Sand
Sa nd -14.6
6 -16.0
- 1.4
4 845,515
845,
845,51
5, 515
515
Tota
To tall
ta
Total 7,48
7, 488,
488,84
8, 844
84
7,488,844 4 24
2

26.06.13
 DREDGING METHOD
DREDGED
D REDGED VOLUME
VOLUME
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
25
2

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

DREDGING METHOD
NTER
NT
INT PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

OPTION
OP T IO N 1
Without
ithout CSD
CSD
D ON INTERPRETATION

W
SED
SE
BASE
BA

O One
ne Hopper,
Hopper, two
tw
wo grabs
grab
bs
HOD
HO D BASED

etties o
JJetties only
nly by
by grab
grab
ETHO
ET
MET
M

uitablee as
SSuitable as sand
sand blankets
blankket s foundation
foundatio
on
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
GING
GI

torage ccapacity
SStorage apacity of
of Option
Option 1
EDGI
ED
DRED
DR

Reclamation
Reccl amati on
n area
are a Area
Areaa Average
A ve rage m LLWS
WS Volume
V olu
ume
OF DREDGING
ES OF

depth
d e pth [[m
m3]
IVES
IV
ATIV
AT

Container
Conttai ne r yard
yaard 1B
1B 1,700,124.70
1,700,1224.70 4.94
4.94 -1.00
-1.000 6,698,491
6,6988,491
RNAT
RN
TERN
TE

D
Disposal
i sposal A 525,428.50
525,428.50 5.14
5.14 -1.00
-1.00 2,175,274
2,175,274
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

D isp
Disposal
posal B 1,148,2008.58
1,148,208.58 4.65
4.65 -1.00
-1.00 4,1900,961
4,190,961

xtra sand
EExtra san
nd is
is required
reequired
d
26
2

26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

DREDGING METHOD
NTER
NT
INT PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

xample of
EExample of bulked
bulked volume
volume
D ON INTERPRETATION
SED
SE

Basin
Basi
Ba sin
n B (North
(Nor
(North
or th Part)
Par
Part)
t)
Strength
Stre
reng
rength
ng th Soil
So il Equipment
Equi
Eq uipm
uipmen
pmentt
en Bulk
Bu lk factor
ffac
actor
ac Dredged
Dred
Dr edge
edged volu
ge volume
lume
lume Dumping
Dump
Dumpin
mp ingg area
in ar Bulked
Bulk
Bulked volume
vol
olum
ol umee
um
BASE
BA

To
D BASED

[m3]
[m dumped
dump
du mped
mp ed [m3]
[[m3
m3]]
m3
From
Fr om [m]
[m] [m]]
[m
HOD
HO

-4.80
-4.8
-4 .80
.8 0 -6.30
-6.3
-6 .30
.3 0 Soft
Soft Sand
Sa nd Grab
Gr ab 1 144,128
144,
14 4,12
4,1288
12 Disposal
Disp
Dispos
sp osal
os al A 144,128
144,
14 4,12
4,1288
12
ETHO
ET

-6.3
-6 .3 -7.0
-7 .0 Soft
Soft Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il Grab
Gr ab 1.18
1.18 67,260
67,2
67 ,260
,2 60 Disposal
Disp
Dispos
sp osal
os al A 79,366
66
MET
M

-7.0
-7 .0 -13.
-1
-13.5
3.5
3.5 Soft
Soft Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il TSHD
TSHD 1.55
1.55 624,553
624,
62 4,55
4,5533 Offshore
Offs
Of fsho
fs hore
hore dump
ddum
umpp
um 968,057
968,
96 8,05
8,0577
05
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT
GING
GI

-13.5
-13.
-1 3.55
3. -16.
-1
-16.0
6.00
6. Medium
Medi
Medium
dium Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il TSHD
TSHD 1 240,213
240,
24 0,21
0,2133
21 Offshore
Offs
Of fsho
fs hore
hore dump
dum
dump
ump 240,213
240,
24 0,21
0,213
21 3
EDGI
ED

Total
Tota
To tall
ta 1,076,152
1,07
1,076,
07 6,15
6,1522
15 1,431,763
1,43
1,431,
43 1,76
1,7633
76
DRED
DR
OF DREDGING

otal bulked
TTotal bulked volume
vo
olume
IV
ATIV
AT ES OF
IVES

Bulked
Bulk
Bulked
lked Volume
Vol
Volum
ol ume [m3]
um
RNAT
RN

Equipment
Equi
Equipm
ui pmen
pmentt
en
TERN
TE

Hard
Ha rd Medi
Me dium
di
Medium um Soft
So ft Tota
To tall
ta
Total
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

Grab
Gr ab 1,21
210,
21 0,92
0, 920
92
1,210,920 0 1,68
680,
68 0,87
0,8755
87
1,680,875 9,78
9,783,
78 3,542
3,
9,783,542 12,675,337
12,6
12 ,675,3
,6 ,337
37
CSD
CS
SD - - - -
TSHD
TSHD - 1,439,246
1,43
1, 439,
43 9,24
9,2466
24 10,816,063
10,8
10 ,816
,8 16,0
16 ,063
,0 63 12,255,310
12,2
12 ,255
,2 55,3
55 ,310
,3 10
Total
Tota
To tal
ta 24,930,646
24,9
24 ,930,646
,9 46
27
2
Overview
O verview o
off O
Option
p t i on 1 : O
Overview
verview o
option.docx
ption.docx
26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

DREDGING METHOD
NTER
NT
INT PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

OPTION
OP T IO N 2
D ON INTERPRETATION

C CYY 1B
1B until
until final
final level
level
SED
SE
BASE
BA

One
ne grab,
grabb, o
one
ne C
CSD,
SD, one
onne hopper
hopper
D BASED

O
HOD
HO
ETHO
ET

etties o
JJetties only
nly by
by grab
grab
MET
M

ess suitable
suiitable as
as sand
sand blankets
blanket s foundation
foundation
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

LLess
GING
GI
EDGI
ED

torage ccapacity
SStorage apacity of
of option
option 2
DRED
DR
OF DREDGING

Reclamation
Re cl amati on area
are a Area
Are a Average
A ve rage m LLWS
WS Volume
V ol ume
ES OF
IVES
IV

d e pth
depth [m
m3]
ATIV
AT
RNAT
RN

Container
C ontai ne r yard
yard 1B
1B 1,700,124.70
1,7
700,12
24.7
70 4.94
4.94 1.50
1.5
50 10,948,803
10,94
48,803
TERN
TE

D
Disposal
i sposal A 525,428.50
525,428.50 5.14
5.14 0.95 3,199,860
0.95 3,199,860
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

D isp
Disposal
posal B 1,148,20
08.58
1,148,208.58 4.65
4.65 0.9
0.95 6,42
29,968
95 6,429,968

xtra sand
EExtra saand is
is not
no
ot required
required 28
2

26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

DREDGING METHOD
ER
NTER
NT PR
ERPR ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

xample of
of bulked
bulked volume
volume
INT

EExample
Basin
Basi
Ba sin
sinE
D ON INTERPRETATION

Strength
Stre
St reng
rength
ng th Soil
So il Equipment
Equi
Equipm
uipmen
pmentt
en Bulk
Bu lk Volume
Volu
Vo lume
lume Dumping
Dump
Dumpin
mp ing
ing area
area Bulked
Bulk
Bulked
lked volume
vol
v olum
ol umee
um
SED
SE

factor
fact
fa ctor
ctor dredged
dred
dr edged
ed d [m
[m3]
3] dumped
dump
du mped
ed [m3]
[[m3
m3]]
m3
From
Fr om [m]
[m] To [m]
[m]
BASE
BA
D BASED

-3.6
-3.6 -6.6
-6 .6 Soft
Soft Sand
Sa nd CSD
CSD 1 1,811,817
1,81
1,811,
81 1,81
1,8177
81 Disposal
Disp
Dispos
sp osal
os al A 1,811,817
1,81
811,
81 1,81
1,8177
81
HOD
HO

-6.6
-6.6 -7.0
-7 .0 Soft
Soft Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il CSD
CSD 2.25
2.25 241,576
241,
24 1,57
1,5766
57 Disposal
Disp
Dispos
sp osal
os al B 543,545
543,
54 3,54
3,5455
54
ETHO
ET

-7.0
-7.0 -12.
-1
-12.0
2.0
2.0 Soft
Soft Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il TSHD
TSHD 1.55
1.55 3,019,695
3,01
3,019,
01 9,69
9,6955
69 Offshore
Offs
Of fsho
fs hore
hore dump
ddum
umpp
um 4,680,527
4,68
680,
68 0,52
0,5277
52
MET
M

-12.0
-12.
-1 2.0
2.0 -14.
-1
-14.0
4.0
4.0 Soft
Soft Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s ilt
il CSD
CS 2.25
2. 1,207,878
1,20
1,207,
20 7,87
7,8788
87 Disposal
Disp
Dispos
sp osal
os al B 2,717,726
2,71
717,
71 7,72
7,7266
72
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

-14.0
-14.
-1 4.00
4. -14.
-1
-14.6
4.66
4. Medium
Medi
Medium
dium Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il CSD
CSD 1.78
1.78 362,363
362,
36 2,36
2,3633
36 Container
Cont
Contai
nt aine
ainerr ya
ne yard
rd 1
1BB 645,007
645,
64 5,00
5,007
00 7
GING
GI
EDGI
ED

-14.6
-14.
-1 4.6
4.6 -16.
-1
-16.0
6.0
6.0 Hard
Ha rd Sand
Sa nd CSD
CSD 1 845,515
845,51
84 5155
51 Disposal
Disp
Dispos
sp osal
os al A 845,515
845,
84 5,51
5,5155
51
DRED
DR

Total
Tota
tall
ta 7,488,8444
7, 11,244,136
11,2
,244
44,1
44 ,136
,1 36
OF DREDGING

otal bulked
bulked volume
volume
ES OF

TTotal
IVES
IV
ATIV
AT

Bulk
Bu
Bulked
lked
lked Volume
Vol
Volum
ol umee [m3]
um
RNAT
RN

Equipment
Equi
Equipm
ui pmen
pmentt
en
TERN
TE

Hard
Hard Medium
Medi
Me dium
di um Soft
Soft Total
Tota
To tall
ta
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

Grab
Grab 365,
365,40
5, 405
40
365,405 4446
46,235
46
446,235 35 4,14
4, 143,41
14
4,143,4124122 4,955,052
4,955,0052
CSD
CSD 845,515
845,
845,51
5, 515
51 4,077,896
4,07
4, 077,
07 7,89
7, 8966
89 10,067,340
10,0
10 ,067
,067,3
67 ,340
,3 40 14,990,751
14,9
14 ,990
,9 90,7
90,751
,7 51
TSHD
TSHD - 231,
23
231,311
1,31
1, 311
311 9,86
9,
9,864,298
864,
86 4,29
4, 298
29 8 10,095,609
10,0
10 ,095
,0 95,6
95,609
,6 09
Total
To 30,041,412
30,0
30 ,041,4
,0 ,412
,4 12
29
2
Overview
O verview o
off O
Option
p t i on 2 : O
Overview
verview o
option.docx
ption.docx
26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

DREDGING METHOD
NTER
NT
INT PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

OPTION
OP T IO N 3
D ON INTERPRETATION

C CYY 1 B only
only by
by grab
grab
SED
SE
BASE
BA

wo grabs,
grab
bs, one
onee CSD,
CSD, one
one Hopper
Hop pper
D BASED

TTwo
HOD
HO
ETHO
ET

etties o
JJetties only
nly by
by grab
grab
MET
M

uitablee as
as sand
sand blankets
blanket s foundation
foundatio
on
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

SSuitable
GING
GI
EDGI
ED

torage ccapacity
SStorage apacity of
of option
option 3
DRED
DR
OF DREDGING

Reclamation
Re cl amati on area
are a Area
Are a Average
A ve rage m LLWS
WS Volume
V ol ume
ES OF

depth
de pth
IVES
IV

m3]
[[m
ATIV
AT

Container
Conttai ne r yard
ya
ard 1B
1B 1,700,124.70
1,700,124
4.70 4.94
4.94 -1.00
-1.00 6,698,491
6,698,4
491
RNAT
RN
TERN
TE

Disposal
D i sposal A 525,428.50
525,428.50 5.14
5.14 0.95
0.95 3,199,860
3,199,8
860
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

Disposal
D ispoosal B 1,148,208.58
1,148,208
8.5
58 4.65
4.65 0.95
0.95 6,429,968
6,429,9668

xtra sand
EExtra saand is
is needed
neeeded 30
3

26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

DREDGING METHOD
ER
NTER
NT PR
ERPR ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET
PRET

xample of
of bulked
bulked volume
volume
INT

EExample
D ON INTERPRETATION

Jetty
Jett
Je ttyy 1A
tt
SED
SE

Strength
Stre
St reng
rength
ng th Soil
So il Equipment
Equi
Eq uipm
uipmen
pmentt
en Bulk
Bu Volume
Vo me Dumping
Dump
Dumpin
mp ingg Area
in Ar Bulked
Bulk
Bulked
ed volume
vvol
olum
olumee
um
BASE
BA

fa
factor dred
dr ed
dredged [m3]
edged [m3] dump
du mped
mp
dumped [[m3
m3]]
m3
ed [m3]
D BASED

From
Fr om [[m]
m] To [[m]
m]
HOD
HO

-3.4
-3 .4 -7.0
-7 .0 Soft
Soft Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il Grab
Gr ab 1.18
1.18 413,540
413,
41 3,54
3,5400
54 Container
Cont
Contai
nt aine
ainerr ya
ne yard
rd 11B
B 487,977
487,
48 7,97
7,9777
97
ETHO
ET

-7.0
-7 .0 -12.9
-12.
-1 2.9
2.9 Soft
Soft Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il Grab
Gr ab 1.18
1. 498,635
498,63
49 6355
63 Container
Cont
Contai
nt aine
ainerr ya
ne yard
rd 1B
B 588,389
588,
58 8,38
8,3899
38
MET
M

-12.9
-1 -18.0
-1 Medium
Medi
Medium
di Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/silt Grab
Gr 1.14 262,446
262,44
26 4466 Container
Cont
ntai
nt aine
ainerr ya
ne yard
rd 1B
B 299,188
299,
9,18
9,1888
18
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

-18.0
-18.
-1 8.00
8. -19.2
-19.
-1 9.22
9. Hard
Ha rd Clay/silt
Clay
Clay/s
ay/sil
/s iltt
il Grab
Gr ab 1.09
1.09 38,316
38,3
38 ,316
,3 16 Container
Cont
Contai
nt aine
ainerr ya
ne yard
rd 1
1BB 41,764
41,7
41 ,764
,7 64
GING
GI

-19.2
-19.
-1 9.2
9.2 -20.0
-20.
-2 0.0
0.0 Hard
Ha rd Sand
Sa nd Grab
Gr ab 1 20,584
20,5
20 ,584
,5 84 Container
Cont
Contai
nt aine
ainerr ya
ne yard
rd 11B
B 20,584
20,5
20 ,584
,5 84
EDGI
ED

Total
Tota
To tall
ta 1,233,521
1,233,52
1, 5211
52 1,437,903
1,437,90
9033
90
DRED
DR
OF DREDGING

otal bulked
bulked volume
volume
ES OF

TTotal
IVES
IV
ATIV
AT

Bulked
Bulk
Bulked
lked Volume
Vol
olum
ol umee [m3]
um
RNAT
RN

Equipment
Equi
Equipm
ui pmen
pmentt
en
TERN
TE

Hard
Ha rd Medi
Me dium
di
Medium um Soft
So ft Tota
To tall
ta
Total
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

Grab
Grab 365,
5,40
5, 4055
40
365,405 446,23
44 235
23
446,2355 7,890,
7, 0,77
0,7788
77
7,890,778 8,702,419
8,702,
8, 2,41
4199
41
CSD
CSD 845,515
845
5,515 3,050,573
3,050,573 3,307,651
3,307,651 7,203,739
7,20
7, 203,
20 3,73
3,7399
73
TSHD
TS HD - 808,459
808,
808,45
8,459
45 9 11,023,716
11,0
11,023
,0 23,7
23 ,716
,7 16 11,832,175
11,8
11 ,832
,8 32,1
32 ,175
,1 75
Total
Tota
tall 27,738,333
27 33
31
3
Overview
O verview o
off O
Option
p t i on 3 : O
Overview
verview o
option.docx
ption.docx
26.06.13
 P
TTime
Planning.xlsx
lanning.xlsx
ime consequence
conssequence is
is the
the most
most important
DREDGING METHOD
importantt aspect
aspect in
in this
this project
project
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S

3
32
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

26.06.13
 ION
IO S
N OF SOIL

CONCLUSION
PRET
PR
ERPR
ER ATIO
AT
ETAT
ET

No.
N o. Parameter
Parameter Option
O ption 1 Option
O ption 2 Option
O ption 3
NTER
NT
INT

1.. Eq
1 Equipment
quipment 2GGrabs,
rabbs, 1 1GGrab,
rabb, 1 CSD,
CSD, 1 2GGrabs,
rabbs, 1 CSD,
CSD,,
Hopper
H opper Hopper
H opper 1HHopper
opper
D ON INTERPRETATION
SED
SE

2..
2 Working
W orking w
weeks
eeks ooff eeach
ach st
1 G Grab :138
rab :138 Grab
G rab :97
:97 st
1 G Grab :93
rab :93
BASE
BA
D BASED

equipment
eq
quipment [[weeks]
weeks] 2nd Grab
Grrab :125
:125 TSHD
TSHD :22 :22 2nd Grab
Grab :80
:80
HOD
HO

TSHD
TSHD : 32 32 CSD
C SD : 43 43 TSHD
T SHD : 28 28
ETHO
ET
MET
M

CSD
C SD : 27
27
NG METHOD
INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT

3..
3 Termination
T ermination n ooff tthe
he dr
dredging
redging December
D ecem
mber 22015
0155 March
Marcch 22015
015 February
February 22015
015
GING
GI

work
w ork
EDGI
ED
DRED
DR

4..
4 Total
Tot tal bbulked
ulked
d vvolume
olume [[m m3] 224,930,646
4,,9300,646 330,041,412
0,0411,412 227,738,333
7,7388,333
OF DREDGING

5..
5 Total
T otal ccapacity
apacity ooff ddumping
umping aarearea 113,064,727
3,064,727 220,578,631
0,578,631 116,328,319
6,3328,319
ES OF
IVES
IV

[mm3]
ATIV
AT

6..
6 Dumped
D umped vo volume
olume tto o ooffshore
ffshore 112,255,310
2,255,310 110,095,609
0,095,609 111,832,175
1,8332,175
RNAT
RN
TERN
TE

[[m
m3]
ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
AL

7..
7 Extra
E xtra ssand
and tto
o tthe
he ffinal
inaal llevel
evel rrequired
equirred nnotot nee
needed
eded rrequired
equirred
8..
8 Foundation
Foundation n ffor
or tthe
he sa
sand
and bblanket
lankeet suitable
su
uitabble lless
ess ssuitable
uitable ssuitable
uitable

OPTION
OPTTION 2 IISS CHOSEN
CHO
OSEN 33
3

26.06.13
26.06.13

ALTERNATIVES
ALTE
ALTERN
TERNAT
RN ATIV
ATIVES
IVES OF
OF DREDGING
DRED
DR EDGI
ED GING
GING METHOD
MET
METHO
ET HOD
HO D BASED
BASE
BA SED
SED ON INTERPRETATION
INT
NTER
NTERPR
ER PRET
PR ETAT
ETATIO
ATION
ION OF SOIL
S
3
34

INVESTIGATION IN THE NORTH KALIBARU PROJECT