Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the course requirements in
Legal Profession
Topic 4: The Benefits of Fraternity or Sorority organizations in Law School and in Legal
Profession
Submitted by:
Arquero, David
Baluyut, Renzo
Buluran, Vhalerie
Demmel, Dianne
Guzman, Julius Edward M. Guzman
Submitted to:
Atty. Theresa S. Dizon
Date:
October 21, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Fraternity is a group of people associated or formally organized for a common purpose, interest 1 or
pleasure, or the quality or state of being brothers; while, sorority is a club of women formed for social
purposes2. In the Philippines, fraternities or sororities have always been labelled and branded to violence.
Moreover, some studies or critics say that fraternities breed elitism, nepotism and other undesirable traits 3.
Hence, in this country, joining such organization is being discouraged or sometimes being prohibited.
In order for an interested individual to join a fraternity or sorority. One must undergo a special initiation
called HAZING. It is the barbaric process in which the frat members, the applicants, usually blindfolded.
This is the most excruciating part of the entire process. Once the hazing starts, there is no backing out. The
applicants have only two alternatives - remain standing until the end of hazing and pass or be knocked out
or worse, die and fall. Some die while being initiated, either intentionally or accidentally. (An example of the
On February 10, 1991, the public was outraged over the death of Leonardo Lenny Villa a hazing victim
which led to a very strong clamor to put an end to hazing. The widespread condemnation prompted
Congress to enact a special, which became effective in 1995, that would criminalize hazing. The intent of
the law was to discourage members from making hazing a requirement for joining their sorority, fraternity,
organization, or association. Moreover, the law was meant to counteract the exculpatory implications of
consent and initial innocent act in the conduct of initiation rites by making the mere act of hazing
Why fraternities and sororities do still exists despite of the regulation of the government, prohibition of
schools and especially such organization not being accepted by the majority of the society?
The answer is simple, the Philippines a democratic country. According to Article XIII, Section 15 of the
1987 Constitution, provides, The State shall respect the role of independent people's organizations to
enable the people to pursue and protect, within the democratic framework, their legitimate and collective
interests and aspirations through peaceful and lawful means. People's organizations are bona fide
associations of citizens with demonstrated capacity to promote the public interest and with identifiable
leadership, membership, and structure5. It is clear that in our Constitution, it protects this kind of right to
join organization, in which, if the government prohibits the joining of such organization, this would be
1
Merriam Webster Dictionary
2
Id.
3
Ryan P. Olivia, Why Do Fraternities Still Exist? Available at http://www.esquiremag.ph/long-reads/notes-and-
essays/brotherhood-in-defense-of-fraternities/ (last accessed Oct. 19, 2017)
4
Villareal v People, GR No. 15128 (2012)
5
Phil Const., Article XIII, Section 15
unconstitutional. What the society and the State condemn is the initiation part when joining a fraternity or
sorority.
It is evidently in our society especially in our government, that most of the officials are fraternity or sorority
members. One great example, is our current President, President Rodrigo Duterte, who is a member of Lex
Talionis from San Beda College of Law. Mean to say that, fraternities or sororities have a great influence
in our society, especially in our education system, whether it be in colleges or law schools.
In this paper, the group will discuss the following effects of joining a fraternity or sorority in law school.
Hence, the group decided to have 5 parts for this paper, namely: (1) History of Fraternities or Sororities in
the Philippines; (2) Controversial Hazing Cases in the Philippines and other Cases which involves a
Fraternity Member; (3) Enactment of the Hazing Law; (4) Pros and Cons of Being a Fraternity or Sorority
The Odd Fellows and Freemasonry are considered the oldest fraternities in the Philippines and even in the
world. The first masonic lodge in the Philippines,"Primera Luz Filipina", was established sometime in 1856
but membership was only open to Spaniards. No native became members except those who went to study
The first fraternity to reach the Philippines during the Spanish-American war was the Odd Fellows sometime
in 1872. They became largely responsible for the petty insurrection the following year (Source: Major O.W.
Coursey, U.S. Volunteer, author of the History and Geography of the Philippine Islands). Members were
mostly military servicemen during that time. They held their meetings in Military and Naval base camps.
The first officially chartered I.O.O.F lodge (chapter) in the Philippines was Manila Lodge no.1 which was
instituted around 1898. The lodge ceased to operate during the Japanese-American War.
The Freemasonry in the Philippines that we know today reached the Philippines in the year 1877 and
considered as the second fraternity to reach the Philippine Islands during the Spanish-American war. At
first, they did not accept Filipinos and membership was only limited to a particular Nationality. The first
recorded lodge that accepted Filipinos was Nilad lodge no.1 which was instituted sometime in 1891. They
Founded in 1918 the official registered college fraternity in the Philippines is the Upsilon Sigma Phi
In all times and among all nations which have reached a sufficient level of cultural development, there have
always been fraternal associations formed for higher purposes. The development of Fraternities can be
traced from trade unions or guilds that emerged in England. These guilds were set up to protect and care
for their members at a time when there was no welfare state, trade unions or National Health Service.
Various secret signs and handshakes were created to serve as proof of their membership allowing them to
visit guilds in distant places that are associated with the guild they belong.
However, many of these Guilds were suppressed starting the 16th Century. In major cities such as in
London, some Guilds survived by adapting their roles to a social support function. Some of these groups
evolved in the 1700s into more philosophical organizations focused on brotherly love, charity and ethical
6
Louie Blake Sarmiento, Research studies and lectures on Philippine fraternalism, retrieved at
http://historum.com/asian-history/20182-how-fraternities-started-philippines.html (last accessed Oct. 21, 2017)
By the late 1700s to early 1800s, many of these Fraternal Orders were transported to America by English
immigrants. At that time, these groups served important social, philosophical and insurance purposes.
Later, the concept of brotherhood was established in colleges. The first among these are the Flat Hat Club
(1750) and P.D.A. Society (1773) focused on literary and scholarship. The oldest Greek-named fraternity
is Phi Beta Kappa founded on December 5, 1776 but this fraternity do not have any chapter in the
Philippines and also converted into an honor society rather than a social fraternity. By the mid-1800's,
fraternal organizations flourished in America and established lodges (chapters) in different parts of the
world.
In the Philippines, Spaniards and other colonizers established several Philosophical and Fraternal Societies
in our country as early as 1850'sbut these chapters only admitted Spaniards or their own race and did not
welcome the natives (Filipinos). In the book, History and Geography of the Philippine Islands (1908), author
The awakening of the Filipinos to a deep sense of injustice being practiced upon them by the colonizers
was the introduction of 'fraternal' societies in the Islands, and to the influence of higher education obtained
The book mentioned that the Odd Fellows Brotherhood spread in the Philippines in 1872. The Freemason
Brotherhood followed in 1877 brought by the Americans. The lodges (chapters) are also established mostly
by military men assigned in Manila. Most members were basically American Military men and their allies
who helped fought the Spanish-American war. The fraternity established their lodges (chapters) and held
The first brotherhood to be founded by Filipinos is the Katipunan, short for Kataastaasang
Kagalangalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan (Supreme and Venerable Society of the Sons of the
People), which was founded by anti-Spanish Filipinos in Manila in 1892. The primary aim of the fraternity
was to gain independence from Spain through revolution. As many of us know, the brotherhood already
disbanded.
In 1899, the ties between Filipino and Americans was disrupted and the Filipino-American war emerged.
When this war ended in 1902, fraternities started to rise again. Odd Fellows, Freemasons and even the
Later, college fraternities began to form especially when American Education (philosophy) reached our
shores. State Universities were the first to enjoy Fraternity Life, particularly in the University of the
Philippines, when the first College Fraternity Rizal Center, a brotherhood of Jose Rizal followers and who
viewed the hero in iconic fashion, was founded (This fraternity is already defunct). The first Filipino Greek
Letter Fraternity, Upsilon Sigma Phi, was founded in 1918. This fraternity is now considered the oldest in
Asia and continues to exist up until today but membership is exclusive only to UP Dilliman and UP Los
Banos students. The oldest sorority in the Philippines is the UP Sigma Beta Sorority founded on February
14, 1932. Membership is exclusive only to UP Dilliman, UP Los Banos, UP Iloilo and UP Davao students.
The progress of fraternities was again interrupted when Japan occupied the Philippines in 1941. W hen the
Filipino-American-Japanese war ended in 1944, Philippine fraternities started to rise up again and many
The peak of fraternalism in the Philippines was probably in the 1950's to 1990's when many fraternities
where founded. Several American fraternities were also imported to the country such as the Alpha Phi
Omega. Also, some locally founded fraternities made allies with some fraternities in the United States.
In 1954, the first recorded hazing-related death in the Philippines claimed the life of Gonzalo
Mariano Albert, a neophyte of Upsilon Sigma Phi based in the University of the Philippines-Diliman.7 Since
then, there have been at least 36 reported hazing victims ranging from 17-25 years old.8 The enactment of
Republic Act 8049 or the Anti-Hazing Act of 1995, a law which was intended to be a deterrent to hazing
activities, imposed graduated penalties ranging from prison correcional to reclusion perpetua, depending
on the gravity of the resulting injuries.9 As the following graph illustrates, such measure may be deemed
ineffective in serving its purpose, for at least 23 more fraternity hazing-related deaths occurred subsequent
to its passage.10 Such figure does not include unreported cases or unaccounted deaths which may have
been caused by acts of hazing. To date, the Anti-Hazing Act of 1995 has had only 1 conviction, which is in
relation to the case of Marlon Villanueva, who died during the initiation rites conducted by the Alpha Phi
5 Anti-Hazing
Act
4
Let us revisit a number of high-profile hazing cases and their corresponding effects to our legal landscape.
Raul was the second of three children whose father, Gilbert Camaligan (Gilbert), is a member of the
Integrated Bar of the Philippines. The Camaligan family already lost its mother even before Raul decided
to enter San Beda College of Law in 1991. Thereafter, he joined Lex Talionis Fraternitas with the
permission of his father, who likewise joined a fraternity during his time in law school. Gilbert however
could not have foreseen the events that transpired on September 8, 1991. On that fateful day, Raul died
7
GMA News Research, Hazing deaths in PHL, 1954present,
http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/specialreports/626256/hazing-deaths-in-phl-1954-present/story/,
September 18, 2017
8
GMA News Research, Id
9
Rep. Act No. 8049 (1995), sec. 4.
10
GMA News Research, Supra
11
Gaea Cabico, Anti-hazing law: 22 years, 1 conviction,
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/09/21/1740694/anti-hazing-law-22-years-1-conviction, September 21,
2017
of physical injuries inflicted upon him during the initiation rites conducted by the fraternity. 12 He was the
very first recorded casualty of hazing-related incidents in San Beda College of Law since its institution in
1948.
Eight members of the fraternity, including Al Argosino (Argosino) and Arthur Cuevas (Cuevas),
were charged and initially pleaded Not guilty to homicide charges. The eight accused later withdrew their
initial pleas and upon re-arraignment all pleaded guilty to a lesser offense of reckless imprudence resulting
in homicide. The trial court rendered judgment on February 11, 1993, convicting the accused on the basis
of their pleas and sentenced each of them a penalty of imprisonment of from 2 years, 4 months 1 day to 4
years.13 Argosino and Cuevas submitted their respective applications of probation to trial court, which were
subsequently granted by the same. Notwithstanding their previous criminal convictions, Argosino and
Cuevas were allowed to take the Philippine Bar Examinations which they passed in 1993 and 1996,
respectively. The Court however deferred their oath-taking rites on grounds that the practice of law is a
privilege extended to those morally fit for admission to the noble profession of law. The petitions of Argosino
and Cuevas to take the Lawyers Oath set a legal precedent in which the Court allowed fraternity members
involved in the hazing incident to take the Lawyers Oath and engage in the practice of law. In granting the
petitions, the Court gave weight to the evidence presented by the petitioners which attested to their moral
fiber. Such evidence, in the discretion of the Court, are proof that the petitioners have taken decisive steps
to purge them of deficiencies in moral character and atone for the unfortunate death of Raul I. Calamigan. 14
Lenny Villa was an Atenean freshman law student who was among six others who joined Aquila Legis Juris
fraternity. The neophytes were subjected to two days of brutal physical and psychological torture during
their two-day initiation rites which commenced on February 8, 1991. 15 On the last day of initiation, the other
neophytes were awakened by Lennys shivering and mumblings. When his condition worsened, he was
rushed to the hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival. Lennys death sparked national outrage
which called for stricter criminal penalties for fraternities involved in hazing activities.
The case set a jurisprudential contention that fraternity hazing is part of traditional rites.
Therefore, the Court can not impute the presence of intent, an essential element in the crime of homicide
or murder, in the acts which led to the untimely demise of Lenny. Hence, the fraternity members responsible
for the crime could only be convicted of a lesser offense of reckless imprudence resulting in homicide. 16
Nevertheless, the case of Lenny paved the way for the criminalization of hazing as mala prohibita. In 1995,
R.A. 8049 or the Anti-Hazing Act was passed with the firm hope of discouraging fraternities, sororities or
any associations from incorporating physical, psychological and sexual suffering of neophytes in their
12
In re Argosino, B.M. No. 712, July 13, 1995.
13
In re Argosino, Id
14
In re Cuevas, B.M. No. 810, January 27, 1998.
15
Villareal v. People, G.R. No. 151258, February 1, 2012.
16
Villareal v. People, Supra
initiation rites. The mere act of hazing, for as long as it results in at least physical injuries, is mala prohibita
Horacio, a freshman student of University of Sto. Tomas, is the most recent victim of fraternity
hazing. His death was caused by physical injuries sustained during the initiation rites by Aegis Juris
fraternity on September 17, 2017. The gruesome tale includes Horacios lifeless body covered with a
blanket, being dumped by his brods on a pavement in the streets of Tondo, Manila. His body bore bruises
in both arms, cigarette burns and drippings of candle waxes.17 News of the incident quickly spread across
various forms of social media platforms, re-igniting calls for more stringent measures to prevent further
The abovementioned high-profile cases are just some of the men who were senselessly deprived
of their lives. Much of our society have already forgotten the names and advocations of less prominent
victims but we must remain steadfast in our quest to put a definitive end to hazing deaths. While every
single one of the victims has a different story, all of them entered law school with the hope of one day
becoming an attorney and perhaps make a lasting change in our society. Let us not allow the hopes,
dreams and aspirations of young individuals to altogether vanish in the name of brotherhood.
17
Julliane de Jesus, UST urged to take lead in seeking justice for law students death,
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/931453/law-student-death-justice-hazing-fraternity-gatchalian-horacio-castillo,
September 18, 2017
CHAPTER IV: ENACTMENT OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8049 OR THE ANTI-HAZING
LAW
Prior to the 1995 Anti-Hazing Law, there was to some extent a lacuna in the law; hazing was not
clearly considered an intentional felony18. There was no law defining and penalizing hazing. Nullum crimen,
nulla poena sine lege. In 1991, the death of Leonardo Lenny Villa shed light on the practice and led to the
enactment of the Anti-Hazing Law in 1995.19 The Congress deems it wise to create a special law penalizing
hazing under the principle of mala prohibita; making the act of hazing punishable. In the case of Villareal v.
People, it was stated that the even the Congress itself recognized that hazing is uniquely different from
common crimes. It recognize that in hazing, one important element of a felony is difficult to prove. The
element of intent especially the animus inuriandi or malicious intent to injure is usually absent. Hence, the
enactment of a special law and not an amendment in the Revised Penal Code was in order.
The Anti-Hazing law, as stated in its title merely regulate hazing and not absolutely prohibits it.
It is composed of seven sections only. R.A. 8049 gave the definition of hazing which provides that:
Since it merely regulate hazing, there are instances and ways were an initiation can be legitimize.
Sec. 2 is considered to be the meat of the law since it provides how is hazing is being regulated.
Additional to this requirement is that at least two (2) representatives of the school or organization, as the
Life imprisonment will be imposed on individuals involved if initiation rites result in death, rape,
sodomy or mutilation.
(1) If the person subjected to hazing or other forms of initiation rites suffers any physical injury or dies
as a result thereof, the officers and members of the fraternity, sorority or organization who actually
18
Villareal v. People, (2012)
19
Jodesz Gavilan, What you need to know about the Anti-Hazing Law. September 25, 2017, available at:
https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/183279-fast-facts-anti-hazing-law-philippines.
(2) The parents, if held in the home of one of the officers or members of the fraternity, group or
organization;
(3) The officers, former officers, or alumni of the organization, group, fraternity or sorority who actually
(4) Officers or members of an organization group, fraternity or sorority who knowingly cooperated on
carrying out the hazing by inducing the victim to be present thereat shall be liable as principals;
(5) Fraternity or sororitys adviser which is present when the acts constituting the hazing were
committed and failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring;
Meanwhile, those who have actual knowledge of the hazing conducted but did not do anything about it
such as owners of the place where it was held, school authorities, and other members of the organization
In the 22 years since the law was enacted, there has only been one conviction. The Supreme Court
(SC), in 2015, found two Alpha Phi Omega (APO) members guilty of violating the law for the hazing and
death of University of the Philippines-Los Baos (UPLB) student Marlon Villanueva in 2006. 21 One of the
most high-profile hazing cases in recent years was that of Marc Andrei Marcos, a first year law student in
San Beda who died in the hands of his fraternity brothers. Anti-hazing law charges were dismissed by
Cavite Regional Trial Court Branch 90 Judge Perla Cabrera Faller in 2013 for lack of probable cause and
ample evidence. 22 This decision led to the dismissal of Judge Faller for exhibiting bias in deciding said
case. In 2016, Makati Regional Trial Court Branch 53 Judge Honorio Guanlao also dismissed the charges
in the case involving the death of De La Salle-College of St Benilde student Guillo Cesar Servando in
2014.23 Many congressman and professors of law think that R.A. 8049 needs improvement and an
amendment should be in order. It is not enough that there is law regulating hazing activities as it is shown
that victims of hazing did not really stop upon its enactment.
Former law professor and now Supreme Court spokesperson Theodore Te wrote that by not
defining hazing as a criminal act per se, subject to specific very narrowly-drawn exceptions, the law itself
guarantees that hazing will continue. 24 He analyze Sec. 2 of R.A. 8049 and states that there are two
absolutely strange and incomprehensible things about it. The first is that there is no penalty provided for its
violation or any consequence that attends the failure to comply with this simple requirement. The second is
that there is no provision that mandates that the notice needs to be approved. Hence, it is meaningless,
20
Ibid.
21
Lim Buan, Whats happening to hazing cases in the Philippines?, February 18, 2017, available at:
https://www.rappler.com/nation/161836-hazing-cases-philippines
22
Ibid.
23
Ibid.
24
Theodore Te, Death and brotherhood, August 3, 2012, available at: https://www.rappler.com/thought-
leaders/9753-death-and-brotherhood
useless and absolutely irrelevant. Since Section 4 does not provide for penalties for violation of Section 2
the failure to give notice. The failure to comply does not amount to an illegal act. 25
Also, in order to give more teeth on the law, some bills were filed for the amendment of R.A. 8049.
Sherwin Gatchalian filed House Bill 4714 called the Servando Act after college student Guillo Cesar
Servando who died due to injuries from hazing which seeks to totally ban any form of hazing on applicants
of any organization.26 When elected in Senate, Gatchalian then filed Senate Bill 199 which does not only
seek to ban hazing, but also puts more responsibility on the schools who are supposed to accredit
organizations, as the current law does provide penalties for them in case a fraternity in their jurisdiction
Last 2016, Ako Bicol partylist Rep. Rodel Batocabe led the filing of House Bill (HB) 3731 that will
amend Republic Act 8049.28 He said that The State, as a declaration of policy, should condemn all acts of
fraternity-related violence, most especially those happening in an academic environment. This includes
initiation rites that subject the neophytes to intense physical and psychological torture.
brotherhood. R.A. 8049 intent may be noble but this nobility is not enough to put stop on all possible victims
of hazing. The number of cases being prosecuted and resolve are stagnant while the victims are constantly
increasing. Indeed, such barbaric acts should have no place in the modern society and our justice system
should provide not only a law but an effective and efficient law.
25
Ibid.
26
Jee Geronimo, Bill seeks to ban hazing in and out of schools, July 9, 2014, available at:
https://www.rappler.com/nation/62713-bill-total-ban-hazing
27
ABS-CBN News, Anti-Hazing Law still allows hazing, say senator, September 20, 2017, available at:
http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/09/20/17/anti-hazing-law-still-allows-hazing-says-senator
28
Charissa Luci, House bill toughens anti-hazing law, October 10, 2016, available at:
http://2016.mb.com.ph/2016/10/10/house-bill-toughens-anti-hazing-law/#y89KHoip3dSQ1UOP.99
CHAPTER V: PROS AND CONS
The schools allow organizations to be formed as they cannot interfere with the right to association or
organization of a person, guaranteed under the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, Art. III, Sec. 8 The
right of the people, including those employed in the public and private sectors, to form unions, associations,
or societies for purposes not contrary to law shall not be abridged 29. Membership in an organization allows
the student to have a sense of belongingness, which is conducive to learning, satisfies the need of a human
to socialize and fosters camaraderie30. All of which are part of the schools goal in forming and nurturing
the character of his students. The interests, motivation, health and happiness are inextricably tied to the
feeling that we belong to a greater community that may share common interests and aspirations. Isolation,
Loneliness and low social status can harm a persons subjective sense of well-being, as well as his
intellectual achievement, immune function and health.31 Fraternities or sororities recognized by the school
are acknowledged and given rules by law in terms of hazing or initiation rites under Republic Act No 8049.
The Sec. 2 of R. A. No. 8049 provides that hazing or initiation are allowed by the school given that a written
notice 7 days prior to the event is submitted and sec. 3 provides that the school must assign two (2)
Schools do not allow their students to join fraternities or sororities that they do not recognize, to help them
avoid incidents that may rise and involvement on unlawful acts such as death due to hazing and fraternity
or sorority wars. Upon enrollment, some law schools such as De La Salle-College of Law, supplies a waiver
form to the students, stating that they are not part of any sorority or fraternity and will renounce such
membership, in order to pursue his education at the school. In the Philippines, there are law schools such
as Graduate School of Law of San Beda College, which provide in their student handbook that membership
in an unrecognized fraternity or sorority, if proven, is a serious offense with the possible penalty for
expulsion.33 But such membership to an unrecognized fraternity or sorority cannot be fully monitored by the
school since meetings usually happened underground and outside the school premises.
29
CONST. art. VII
30
Glaiza Jarloc, UST law school dean frat brods act lawyers, par. 8, http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/local-
news/2017/09/26/ust-law-school-dean-frat-brods-act-lawyers-566086, September 25, 2017
31
Amanda Enayati, The importance of belonging, http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/01/health/enayati-importance-
of-belonging/index.html, June 1, 2012
32
Arellano Law Foundation, Rep. Act. No. 8049 An Act Regulating Hazing and Other Forms of Initiation Rites in
Fraternities and Other Organizations and Providing Penalties Therefor, Sec. 2-3,
http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1995/ra_8049_1995.html,
33
Ron Gagalac, What lures students to join law school frats?, http://news.abs-cbn.com/-depth/02/23/12/what-
lures-students-join-law-school-frats, February 24, 2012
Benefits of being a member of fraternity in law school and in practice
As a student, the benefits of being a member of a fraternity or sorority, more often than not, are promised
by the members of such organization, as shared by a Lawyer that we had the chance to interview. Usually,
first year law students are still deficient of knowledge and strong character to get through to law school.
Hard work alone sometimes proved to be futile in order to pass. This emotion adds to the attraction to bright
promises such as passing grades in their classes since the Professors are their brothers, access to
information, tutoring, leadership and responsibility development, camaraderie, tips on the questions of the
bar exam, mutual help from the brothers in the higher batch and alumnis, sense of belongingness,
protection from any group which may harm or bully him.34 Fraternities and sororities declare that
nonmembers are social outcasts and barbarians.35 Emphasizing on their preys that the blisters eventually
The benefits of joining a fraternity or sorority, does not stop even after graduation. There is a promise of
being hired in a good law firm, help and protection when they finally become a lawyer, when a clerk of court
or counsel is your brother, they may manipulate the case assignments to have it in your favor. 37 The
alumnis or members of such fraternities or sororities are influential people not only in the prosecutorial
practice, judicial branch but also in private practice, who will help with the appointment on a coveted public
or private position or promotion or in the field of business, when closing a deal or when present in a
bidding38. This promise of influential post became more popular and widely known when the Philippine
President Rodrigo Duterte announced that his bothers from Lex Talionis fraternity are his appointed
members in key government posts. 39 All reasons mentioned are tempting promise to achieve a spot in a
34
Josephus B. Jimenez, Why neophytes still join fraternities and sororities?, http://www.philstar.com/freeman-
opinion/2017/09/29/1743714/why-neophytes-still-join-fraternities-and-sororities, September 29, 2017
35
Joshua A. F. Dy, Hazing in law school a social epidemic, http://lifestyle.inquirer.net/60211/hazing-in-law-
schools-a-social-epidemic/#ixzz4vubttaNh , August 03, 2012
36
Joshua A. F. Dy, Supra
37
Josephus B. Jimenez, Supra
38
Josephus B. Jimenez, Supra
39
Fe Zamora, Bond of brothers: Lex Talionis frat members get key govt posts, Par. 2,
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/898071/bond-of-brothers-lex-talionis-frat-members-get-key-govt-posts, May 21,
2017
CHAPTER VI: INTERVIEW(S) OF FRATERNITY MEMBERS
Interview 1
Name: Anonymous
1. What were the advantages of being a member of a fraternity when you were studying?
As a member of the fraternity, I get to have access to some exclusive notes that is shared only within the
members of the fraternity. Also, the older members of the fraternity are there to guide or teach us our ways
around law school. As a first-year law student, this helped a lot in during the adjustment period. Also, they
also gave tips on how to answer during recitations and test. This was extremely helpful for me because this
was never taught in San Beda for we were immediately thrown into the lions den.
2. What were the advantages of being a member of a fraternity when you took the bar exam?
The fraternity has an exclusive Bar Operations strictly for members. Review materials, hotel
accommodation and food are free of charge as they are paid by the Alumnae of the fraternity. Also,
barristers are assigned 1-2 bar buddies that usually delivers their special requests and notes from different
3. If there are any, what are the disadvantages of being a member of a fraternity?
There is less time to spend with classmates since the fraternity sometimes requires services from its
members. With this, this lessens the opportunity of having possible future connections that might prove
useful or helpful. However, this is cancelled out with the connections gained through the members of the
fraternity. But still, it lessens the possible connections for future purposes.
4. Did you undergo any type of initiation rites? (If you could divulge it, may you give a glimpse of your
Yes. Will not go to the details. Add sauce to what you hear and it will suffice.
5. Do you think all forms of initiation rites should be completely prohibited? Why?
No. For Fratmen being a member of a fraternity is a privilege. The initiation rites is what separates a
regular organization from a fraternity or sorority. An applicant must undergo the initiation rites in order to
have the access to what the fraternity will offer. This also serves as fun memories during drinking sessions.
Interview 2
Name: Anonymous
1. What were the advantages of being a member of a fraternity when you were studying?
I always told my recruits that fraternity has little, if not none at all, benefits to us while we are still students.
At most, there are materials the fraternity can share, coaching, lectures and of course the brothers. But
really frat life while studying is a sacrifice, an investment of some sort, and the benefits are reaped at
2. What were the advantages of being a member of a fraternity when you took the bar exam?
All your needs and whims are given by the fraternity, not only the notes, lectures and other bar materials.
3. If there are any, what are the disadvantages of being a member of a fraternity?
It is a lifetime commitment.
4. Did you undergo any type of initiation rites? (If you could divulge it, may you give a glimpse of your
Yes, No I cant.
5. Do you think all forms of initiation rites should be completely prohibited? Why?
No. Even Sec 2 of the hazing law recognize a valid initiation right. How would an organization streamline
At the beginning of every semester, I always ask my students about their reasons for going to law school.
Some of them answered they want to continue a family tradition. One student even had the audacity to say
that being a lawyer would make him well-connected and rich. Others replied that they want to fight for those
who cannot defend themselves. Their reasons range from the mundane to the sublime.
Similarly, the same is true for young men who joined fraternities. Some of them joined because their fathers,
uncles, and brothers are frat men. Most of them joined for connections that would propel their careers after
graduation. A number joined because they idolize heroes and martyrs associated with a particular fraternity.
When I entered UP as a college freshman, I had no intention to join any fraternity. My mother strongly
advised me against it: Dont associate with atheists. Dont join rallies. Never join a frat. As a dutiful son, I
complied.
In his book On the Good Side of History, journalist Nelson A. Navarro claimed that fraternities were nothing
new or alien to the national experience. He wrote: The Philippine Revolution of 1896, for instance, grew
out of home-grown secret societies of distinctly Masonic or anti-sectarian origins that were all proscribed
and severely punished by Spanish colonial authorities. Rizal, Bonifacio, del Pilar, the Luna brothers and
others were dedicated masons, some directly influenced or initiated by European lodges, for whom blood
compacts, secret codes, physical initiations and loyalty tests were deemed standard practices.
Indeed, the need to belong and the urge to be where the action is are deeply ingrained into the human mind
and that is the alluring and enduring power of fraternities. Millenials have a term for it: FOMO, or fear of
missing out. It was this fear of missing out that made me reconsider joining a fraternity. Thus, when an
invitation arrived from UP Alpha Phi Betaa fraternity based in the UP College of Law whose alumni include
historian Renato Constantino, former Chief Justice Reynato Puno, Senator Chiz Escudero, and Albay
Bakit ako sasali sa inyo e namatayan kayo, I asked them this question pointblank. I did my research
beforehand and I discovered that in 1998, neophyte Alex Icasiano died while undergoing initiation.
One of them answered me: Join us because we learned from it, we faced the music, and more importantly,
Alexs family forgave us. He said wryly: At kasama ako sa mga nakulong. But I also learned that there is
40
Oliva, Supra at page 1
Sensing his sincerity, I manifested immediately my intention to join their frat. The member who answered
Growing up in the frat, I realized that it was more than just FOMO or expanding my network that made me
join. I was looking for something elsea sense of purpose. All fraternities rest on a powerful idea: that men
could band together and stand up for something greater than themselves. A higher sense of purpose.
Fraternities offer not just personal connections but a feeling of being connected to a higher sense of
purpose. Senior brods would mentor the younger ones about their fraternitys traditions and values, both
the mundane and the sublime. It was like having a backstage access to a rock stars concert when I, just a
law student, was able to talk with then incumbent Chief Justice Puno and ask him for tips on how to succeed
in law school and how to find ones niche in the legal profession. He hastened to add that my efforts would
This higher sense of purpose drives fraternities and their members to take up leadership posts in
organizations, take part in campus politics, engage in philanthropy, uphold the standards of their respective
professions, among others. It would be nave, however, to believe that everything is pure and sublime.
Every fraternity could be anything its members would want it to be, for better or for worse.
Critics say that fraternities breed elitism, nepotism, and other undesirable traits. It would be wrong to
dismiss their claims but it would also be wrong to call for the abolition of fraternities. If fraternities were
banned, they would only go underground and as such, it would be harder for university officials to monitor
them and to identify their members in case they run afoul of the law.
Unfortunate incidents hounding fraternities remind us of a bitter truth about the human condition: noble
intentions could be perverted. There is, however, a silver liningthe point where the mundane meets the
Amongst the multitude of previously cited cases in this report, it is most important to note the
outcome of two cases. These are the separate petitions of Mr. Al Argosino and Mr. Arthur M. Cuevas to the
Supreme Court to allow them to take their lawyers oath. It is important to give premium to these decisions
in order for us to ascertain the gravity of the punishment meted out to these law students and if due to their
involvement in hazing incidents that lead to a death of another person, they were deprived from the
opportunity to practice law.
In Mr. Argosinos petition, the Supreme Court allowed him to take his lawyers oath provided that he
satisfy certain conditions of the Court. The ruling contained the following:
Mr. Argosino must, therefore, submit to this Court, for its examination and consideration,
evidence that he may be now regarded as complying with the requirement of good moral
character imposed upon those seeking admission to the bar. His evidence may
consist, inter alia, of sworn certifications from responsible members of the community who
have a good reputation for truth and who have actually known Mr. Argosino for a significant
period of time, particularly since the judgment of conviction was rendered by Judge
Santiago. He should show to the Court how he has tried to make up for the senseless killing
of a helpless student to the family of the deceased student and to the community at large.
Mr. Argosino must, in other words, submit relevant evidence to show that he is a different
person now, that he has become morally fit for admission to the ancient and learned
profession of the law.
Finally, Mr. Argosino is hereby DIRECTED to inform this Court, by appropriate written
manifestation, of the names and addresses of the father and mother (in default thereof,
brothers and sisters, if any, of Raul Camaligan), within ten (10) day from notice hereof. Let
a copy of this Resolution be furnished to the parents or brothers and sisters, if any, of Raul
Camaligan.41
A subsequent decision by the Supreme Court also decided in the same manner. In Mr.
Cuevas case, the Supreme Court also held that he be allowed to take his lawyers oath as he
already satisfied all the conditions that were necessary as deemed by the Court. It held that:
Petitioner Arthur M. Cuevas, Jr.s discharge from probation without any infraction of the
attendant conditions therefor and the various certifications attesting to his righteous,
peaceful and civic-oriented character prove that he has taken decisive steps to purge
himself of his deficiency in moral character and atone for the unfortunate death of Raul I.
Camaligan. The Court is prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, taking judicial notice
of the general tendency of the youth to be rash, temerarious and uncalculating. Let it be
stressed to herein petitioner that the lawyers oath is not a mere formality recited for a few
minutes in the glare of flashing cameras and before the presence of select witnesses.
Petitioner is exhorted to conduct himself beyond reproach at all times and to live strictly
according to his oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility. And, to paraphrase Mr.
Justice Padillas comment in the sister case of Re: Petition of Al Argosino To Take The
Lawyers Oath, Bar Matter No. 712, March 19, 1997, the Court sincerely hopes that Mr.
Cuevas, Jr., will continue with the assistance he has been giving to his community. As a
41
In Re Argosino, B.M. No. 712, July 1995
lawyer he will now be in a better position to render legal and other services to the more
unfortunate members of society. 42
In both cases, the Supreme Court showed mercy by allowing the two lawyers to take their oath
despite previous convictions in the hazing-related cases filed against them.
CONCLUSION
During the course of our research for this report, we deemed it fair to gather information straight
from people involved in fraternities and sororities. This is so that we can get a first hand raw glimpse of their
reasons why they decided to join a fraternity.
At the onset, we tried to establish if they underwent any form of hazing during their initiation rites.
All of them said yes. However, when pressed to describe what happened to them, they would not expressly
state the procedure but some did imply that there was some physical form of hazing that they experienced.
For the benefits and advantages of being a part of the Greek society, most of them cited that the
usual perks of a law student would be that he would receive lecture notes and tips from upper classmen.
When it is time for them to take the bar exam, the perks are even raised higher to free accommodation and
food. Although most of them concede that the ultimate advantage would only be later reaped when they
are already practicing the law profession in that they get to broaden their network and connections. One
even stated that he got a good placement in a government firm due to his fraternitys connection.
From all of this, one can deduce that despite the probability of receiving or being subjected to
physical beatings, those that we interviewed deemed that the benefits outweighed it. It was their conscious
choice to choose to join despite knowing the possible outcomes. All of them in fact, disagreed that initiation
rites must be excluded in the requirements for one to become a member of the fraternity they were involved
in.
COMMENTARY
Due to the most recent hazing incident that led to the untimely death of Horacio Castillo III, there
have been some proposals from our Senators to further strengthen the Anti-Hazing Law. For instance, in
one of the Senate hearings on the matter, Senator Miguel Zubiri proposed to the Department of Justice and
the Supreme Court to study the possibility of including a provision in the law that would penalize all lawyers
and law students with debarment and perpetual exclusion from Law schools, respectively, should they be
involved in a hazing incident no matter how grave or how minute their involvement is. It is expected, that
the brilliant legal minds we have in our society that belong to the Greek club will be up in arms against this
proposal but this may merit a closer look.
There is nothing sadder that a life extinguished at the peak of its potential. Horacio, Lenny, Raul,
these are just some of the many men our society has lost due to hazing. They could have been lawyers
who would defend the marginalized and the oppressed, they could have been lawmakers who would fight
for the rights of those who have the least in life, and they could have been our future leaders who would
uplift and guard our countrys future. All of these, we now can never know for certain since the brotherhood
they wanted so badly to be a part of, ultimately, deprived them from their fathers, mothers, sisters and
brothers. To wit, we offer this comment, violence in initiation rites must not be a requirement to make boys
into men. Especially when this violence leads to the death of a human being.
42
In Re Cuevas, B. M. 810, January 1998