Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCERE
Tabelul 1
Mari baraje din Romnia. Date tehnice, geotectonice i seismologice asociate amplasamentelor
Nume baraj Curs ap Tip H Micri verticale IB ks/P100 IB MSK Formaiuni
(m) recente MSK
Falii regionale Tr = A F Tr = geologice
(100km) 50ani 100 ani
Climneti Siret P. 23 pe Falia Solca, la 89 B: 0,25 marne
contactul compart. argiloase i
carpatic n ridicare nisipoase,
(+1mm/an), Bloc argil gras
Platf. Scitic n
coborre
(-1-2mm/an);
Falii active: Trotu,
Sf. Gheorghe,
Peceneaga-
Camena, Britaru
Cerna Cerna Anroc. 110 pe Falia Cerna 6 D: 0,16 8 Granite de
compartiment n F: 0,08 Cerna,
ridicare (+1mm/an) gnaise
cuaritice.
Paragnaise
Colibia Bistria Anroc. 92 Zon de ridicare 6 F: 0,08 Aglom.
Ardeleneasc (+2mm/an), Falia vulcanice,
Drago Vod. interc.
andezitice
Gura Apelor Rul Mare Anroc. 168 Zon de ridicare 6 F: 0,08 isturi
(+1mm/an), cuaritice,
F. Cerna filitice
Gura Rului Cibin C.F. 73.5 Zon relativ stabil 7 E: 0,12 Gnaise,
(0+1mm/an); micaist.
Faliile:Mure Sud- biotitice
Transilvan, Cozia,
Cerna
Herculane Cerna Arc 58 Zon n ridicare 78 E: 0,12 8 Granite de
(0+1mm/an); -D: 0,16 Cerna
F. local activ
Mehadia, F. reg.
Cerna, Craiova,
Tinosu
Izvorul Bistria G 127 Ridicri (+2mm/ 7 E: 0,12 77% gresii
Muntelui an); Falii active 17% isturi
Bicaz seismic: Solca, argiloase
Trotu, Peceneaga
Camena
Mneciu Teleajen P 78 Bloc Mii Bucegi 8 B: 0,25 Fli, gresii
ridicare micacee
(+5mm/an); Falii: argil., isturi,
Capidava-Ovidiu, congl.,
Perani, Cozia, marne
Intra-Moesic
84 Gabriela Polonic, Dorel Zugrvescu, Ion Toma 6
Tabelul 1 (continuare)
Paltinu Doftana Arc 108 Compart. Bucegi, 8 B: 0,25 Gresii,
ridicare (+5mm/ microcongl.,
an); Falii: Intra- argile
Moesic, Tinosu, marnoase
Cozia, Capidava-
Ovidiu, Peceneaga-
Camena
Pecineagu Dmbovia Anr. 105 Bloc Mii Bucegi 7 D: 0,16 8 Paragnaise,
Buzu ridicare (E: 0,12) gnaise, isturi
(+5mm/an); Falii micacee
active:Trotu, cuaritice
Cozia, Intra-
Moesic,
Peceneaga-
Camena
Poiana Uz C.F. 82 Ridicri 7 D: 0,16 8 Gresii,
Uzului (+2mm/an); Falii (E: 0,12) isturi,
active seismic: marne, fli
Solca, Trotu
Porile de Dunre G, P 60.6 Z. relativ stabil 7 E: 0,12 8 Gnaise
Fier 1 (0-1 mm/an) ; cuaritice,
F. active: Cerna, biotitice,
Mehadia, Craiova, paragnaise
Tinosu
Porile de Dunre G, P 30 Z. relativ stabil 7 E: 0,12 8 Marne
Fier 2 (0 - 1 mm/an); argiloase
Falii: Mehadia,
Cerna, Craiova,
Tinosu
Siriu Buzu Anr. 122 Bloc Mii Bucegi- 8 B: 0,25 8 Gresii,
Mii Buzu, ridicare microcongl.,
(+5mm/an) isturi
Falii-Capidava- marno-
Ovidiu, Peceneaga- argiloase
Camena, Trotu,
Intra-Moesic
Stnca- Prut P, G 43 Ridicri 7 E: 0,12 Calcare,
Costeti (+1mm/an), Falii: interc.
Solca, Bistria marne, argile
Vidra Lotru Anr. 121 Ridicri 6 E: 0,12 Gnais de
(+1mm/an), Falii: (F: 0,08) Vidra,
Cerna, Cozia, Interc.
Sud-Transilvan amfibolitice
Vidraru Arge Arc 166 Ridicri 7 D: 0,16 8 Gnaise
(+2mm/an), Falii: E: 0,12) cuaritice,
Cozia, Tinosu paragnaise
Legenda
Arc baraj de beton n arc; Anr. baraj de anrocamente; C.F. baraj cu contrafori; G baraj
de greutate din beton; P baraj din pmnt; Tr perioada de revenire, ani; ks coeficient seismic conform
P100-92, 93; AF zone ale ks, conform P100-92, 93; IB Intensitatea (MSK) n amplasament,
conform SR11100-1993, dac sunt afectate de indicii (1)-la Tr = 50 ani sau (2) la Tr = 100 ani.
7 Dinamica recent a blocurilor tectonice 85
3. CONCLUZII
BIBLIOGRAFIE
BOTT, M.H.P. (1990), Stress distribution and plate boundary forces associated with collision mountain
ranges. Tectonophysics, 182, 193200.
CORNEA, I., POLONIC, G. (1979), Date privind seismicitatea i seismotectonica prii de est a
Platformei Moesice. St. cerc. geol., geofiz., geogr. (Geofizic), 17, 2, 167176.
92 Gabriela Polonic, Dorel Zugrvescu, Ion Toma 14
DEMETRESCU, C., POLONIC, G. (1989), The evolution of the Pannonian Depression (Romanian
sector), as derived from subsidence and heat flow data. Tectonophysics, 164, 287299.
DRAGOMIR, V., ZUGRVESCU, D., JALB, N., FTULESCU, I. (1989), A geodynamic examination
of the territory of Romania by repeated high accuracy levelling (abstract). St. cerc. geol.,
geofiz., geogr. (Geofizic), 27, 95.
DRGOESCU, I., POPESCU, M.N. (1975), Harta micrilor crustale verticale recente n Romnia.
Institutul de Geologie i Geofizic, Bucureti.
HAUSER, F., RILEANU, V., FIELITZ, W., BL, A., PRODEHL, C., POLONIC, G., SCHULZE, A.
(2001), Vrancea99. The crustal structure beneath the south-eastern Carpathians and the
Moesian Platform, from a seismic refraction profile in Romania. Tectonophysics, 340, 233256.
LACHENBRUCH, A.M., MORGAN, P. (1990), Continental extension magmatism and Evolution, formal
relations and rules of thumb. Tectonophysics, 174, 3962.
LANDES, M., FIELITZ, W., HAUSER, F., POPA, M., Calixto Group (2004), 3D Upper crustal
tomographic structure across the Vrancea seismic zone, Romania. Tectonophysics, 382, 85102.
LZRESCU, V. (1972), Contributions to the palaeo-geodynamic study of the Carpathians in Pliocene.
Institutul de Petrol, Gaze i Geologie.
POLONIC, G. (1985a), Neotectonic activity in the Southern Carpathians and adjacent units with its
seismic implications. 3rd Intern. Symp. Analys. Seism. Seismic Risk, Prague, June 1722, 271277.
POLONIC, G. (1985b), Neotectonic activity at the Southern border of the Pannonian Depression and
its seismic implications. Tectonophysics, 117, 109115.
POLONIC, G. (1986), On the seismotectonic relations in the Moldavian Platform and adjacent units.
Rev. roum. gol., gophys., gogr. (Gophysique), 30, 1117.
POLONIC, G. (1988), Neotectonic and seismogenic peculiarities of the East-European Platform and
adjacent units borders in Romania. Rec. Seism. Investig. in Europe, 8695.
POLONIC, G. (2000), Neogene dynamics of some crustal compartments on the Romanian territory.
Rev. roum. de Gophysique, 44, 3556.
POPESCU, M.N., DRGOESCU, I. (1986), The new map of the recent vertical crustal movements in
Romania. Rev. roum. gol., gophys., gogr. (Gophysique), 30, 319.
RDULESCU, F. (1998), Seismic models of the crustal structure in Romania. Rev. roum. gol.
gophys., gogr. (Gophysique), 32, 1317.
SNDULESCU, M. (1984), Geotectonica Romniei. Ed. Tehnic, 336 p.
SNDULESCU, M. (1988), Cenozoic history of the Carpathians. In: L.H. Royden, F. Horvath (Eds)
The Pannnonian Basin. A study in Basin evolution. AAPG. Memoirs, 45, 1725.
ZUGRVESCU, D., POLONIC, G., HOROMNEA, M., DRAGOMIR, V. (1998), Recent vertical
crustal movements on the Romanian territory, major tectonic compartments and their relative
dynamics. Rev. roum. de Gophysique, 42, 314.
ZUGRVESCU, D., POLONIC, G., HOROMNEA, M., DRAGOMIR, V. (1999), Crustal vertical
recent movemets and the geodynamic compartments on the Romanian territory. 2nd Congr. BGS,
July 59, Istanbul, Turkey, Abstract volume 300.
ZUGRVESCU, D., POLONIC, G., HOROMNEA, M., DRAGOMIR, V. (2000), A new drawing
mode of the recent vertical crustal movements map on the Romanian territory. XXV Gen.
Assembly of the EGS, Nice, France, April 2529.
ZUGRVESCU, D., POLONIC, G., TOMA, T., MOLDOVEANU, T., HOROMNEA, M. (2003),
Limite ale blocurilor tectonice/zone geodinamic active din Romnia. Amplasarea construciilor
hidroenergetice. Ses. A..T.R., Secia Ingin. Petrol., Geol., Secia Constr. Urban., Inst.
Geodinamic, 15 dec.
*** Romnia, Zonarea seismic, SR 11100/11993 MSK.
*** R.N.C.L.D., 2000, Dams in Romania.
15 Dinamica recent a blocurilor tectonice 93
The study develops the recent dynamics of tectonic blocks, with a special
attention on the possible implications of the geodynamic areas on the dam locations
from Romania.
The geodynamic active areas are situated at the limit between the tectonic
blocks involved in the recent vertical crustal movements (RVCM), where the
displacement values are the highest, due to the blocks limited elasticity. They are
expressed by crustal faults, with or without seismic energy eliberation, pointed out
by data corroboration, resulted from the major present-day tectonic processes,
namely the crustal recent movements and the seismicity.
The study offers details on the sense of the RVCM of the tectonic blocks
which include the main dams in Romania, or of the adjacent tectonic blocks, on the
velocity of the block displacements, on the relation with the active faults,
emphasizing the recent dynamics implication and importance in dam locations
selection and in their safety insurance.
Key words: geodynamically active area, recent vertical crustal movements, dams, Romania.