Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MUDAWALI
Title Page
Table on Content
A. Introduction
B. Expertise in Teaching
C. Acquiring Teaching Expertise
D. The Importance of Teacher Professionalism in Education
E. Conclusion
References
Teaching Expertise and Its Urgency for Being Professional Teacher
By Mudawali
Introduction
The Results of teacher competence test or Uji Kompetensi Guru (UKG) 2015 that was held in
November 2015 already released. Based on the information circulating that the result of UKG 2015 was
generally still below passing grade that have been determined. The result of National UKG average of
53.02, while the government is targeting average grade at 55. In addition, the average number of
subject matter competency 54.77, while the average grade of pedagogical competency 48.94. UKG
2015 results were achieved above-average grade that have been targeted previously only 7 provinces,
namely West Java, Central Java, Yogyakarta, Jakarta, Bali, East Java, and Bangka Belitung. In other word,
there were 27 provinces below the passing grade (Sergur.kemdiknas.go.id , 2016). Furthermore, Based
on the result of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012, Indonesian students at
the age of 15 years have low abilties at Math, Sains and Reading. Indonesia was in the rank 64 from 65
participant countries. The everage score of Math, Science and Reading of Indonesian students are far
below average score of OECD countries.
Despite the fact that the result of UKG is still below the expected passing grade, it has to be
admitted that people have high expectation on teachers for good quality of education. The success or
failure of education is often addressed to the teachers. The expectation of society can be understood
as the teacher is a crucial aspect in successful education. Even though a school has best curriculum,
facilities, infrastructure, but if the the teachers are not the expert, it is difficult to achieve high quality
educational outcomes. Therefore,it is important for the teacher to acquire teaching expertise in order
to improve education quality. In this essay, i would like to discuss teaching expertise and its urgency for
being profesional teacher.
Expertise in Teaching
Learn the way to learn is useful because it makes individual learn more effective and efficient.
If an individual eagers to be an expert, he or she needs to learn how to be an expert. Therefore, it is
important for teachers to learn on expertise in teaching because it can contribute to their own
knowledge in delevoping their competencies. Ropo (2004) stated studies on expertise have made an
important contibution to our thinking about profesional knowledge and skills. The teacher
competencies are related with the students achievements. Teaching expertise of the teachers is critical
to help students abilities such as from ignorance to knowing, dependence to independence, unskilled
become skilled and from receiver of knowledge to active learner through teaching leaning process.
According to Amon and Levin (1993) expertise in teaching can be defined as effectiveness in bringing
about desired learning outcomes in students. Ropo (2004) argued that teachers have important role
in organizing studying, directing the conversation and affecting the students live in many other ways
in school. Therefore, it can be argued that teacher expertise in such partly intuitive and artistic, partly
learned interventions, can be assumed to make a difference in student learning.
I argued that it is important to know how expert teachers perfomance in teaching as compared
to novice teachers. The differencies between expert teacher with novice can provide informations to
be analized about how the expert teacher obtain and develop their expertise. Furthermore, it is useful
for novice to learn and develop their competency to approach expert teachers performance.
Tsui described 4 characteristics of expert teachers comparing with novice teacher . First, in the planning
process, Expert teachers excecise more autonomy to make decision and respond flexibly to contextual
discrepancies. Second, expert teacher more efficient in lesson planning. They spend less time for
planning, and yet their planning is often more effective. This is because expert teacher have in store well
established outines that they can call upon when planning. Third, expert teacher are much more
responsive to contextual cues, and much more ready to make changes to their plan accordingly. Fourth,
in the planning thoughts of expert teachers refelct a rich and integrated knowledge base. They can
integrate their knowledge to deal with many consideration of the school (Tsui, 2003).
Reflection is a process where teachers evaluate their teaching practise and analizing how to
improve their teaching for better learning outcomes. Reflection is an important part to develop
teaching expertise. According to a study by Farrell (2013), reflection is also a key component of
understanding teacher expertise because it can act as tool for teachers to bring this usually
unarticulated concept to a greater level of awareness. Reflection is widely recognised as a crucial
element in the professional growth of teachers. It is assumed that reflection is intrinsically good and
that reflective teachers will improve as teachers (Calderhead and Gates, 1993). Shulman (2004) argued
that critical reflections are at the heart of learning and that reflection is the key to teacher learning and
development.
Teachers require to have certain knowledge to in teaching. Teacher at least should own
knowledge about subject matter, social competency, pedagogical competency and personality
competency. According to Ammon and Levin (1993) there are probably many kinds of understandings
that are required for true expertise in teaching such as subject matter, about interpersonal relations,
and about moral and societal issues involved in teaching. Most central and unique to teaching,
however, are understandings about pedagogy. We interpret understanding here as knowledge.
Furthermore, there is bases knowledge in teaching for teacher regarding subject they teach.
Shulman (2004) has been classified into seven categories of teachers knowledge (at a minimum). First,
content knowledge, it is refer to the amount and organization of knowlege on the subject in the mind of
the teacher. it includes the knowledge contain of the subject it self. Second, general pedagogical
knowledge. It is refer to organisation , strategies and classroom management. Third, curriculum
knowledge. It is refer to knowledges of the programmes, material resources designed for the teaching
of specific subjects. Fourth, pedagogical content knowledge. It involve knowledge of ways of
representingand and formulating the academic content for teaching to learners. Fifth, knowledge of
learners. It is knowledge characterics of students. Sixth, knowledge of educational contexts. It refer to
knowledge of socio-cultural and institutional context. and, Seventh, knowledge of educational ends. It
refer to values, purposes, philosopical and historical grounds.
References
Ammon, P.A., & Levin, B.B. (1993). Expertise In Teaching From A Developmental Perspective: The
Developmental Teacher Education program at Berkeley. Learning and Individual Differences, 5 (4),
319-326. [online] Available from
https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/B_Levin_Expertise_1993.pdf.[accessed on 20 april 2016]
Calderhead, J and Gates, P (1993) .conceptualizing reflection in teacher development, London: Falmer
Press
Farrell, T. & Bennis, K. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices: A case study.
RELC Journal, 44(2), 163-176.
Harrison, C and Killion, J (2007) Educational Leadership, Oxford: National Staff Development Council
Ropo, E (2004). Profesional Learning Gaps and Transitions on The Ways From Novice to Expert, New
York: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Calderhead, J and Gates, P (1993) .conceptualizing reflection in teacher development. London: Falmer
press
Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.