Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recent years have seen inereasing interest in the consequences of culture for global mar-
keting and advertising. Many recent studies point at the necessity of adapting branding
and advertising strategies to the culture of the eonsumer. In order to understand cultural
differences, several models have been developed of which the Hofstede model is the
most used. This article describes elements of this model that are most relevant to brand-
ing and advertising, and reviews studies that have used the model for aspcxts of inter-
national branding and for advertising research. It provides some cautious remarks about
applying the model. Suggestions for more cross-cultural research are added.
Introduction
The study of culture for understanding global advertising results from the
global-local dilemma: whether to standardise advertising for efficiency
reasons or to adapt to local habits and consumer motives to be effective.
Only recently have studies included performance criteria and several have
demonstrated that an adaptation strategy is more effective (Dow 2005;
Calantone etal. 2006; Okazaki etal. 2006; Wong & Merrilees 2007). As a
result, understanding culture will be viewed as increasingly important. In
the past decades, various models have emerged of which the Hofstede
model has been applied most to global marketing and advertising.' Geert
Hofstede's dimensional model of national culture has been applied to vari-
ous areas of global branding and advertising, and the underlying theories
of consumer behaviour. The model has been used to explain differences
' When we use the term global marketing and advertising, we refer to advertising worldwide, not to
standardised advertising
Consumer
The self
Personality
Identity, Image
Cultural values
Information processing
Categorisation
Absfract-concrete
1
Advertising style
Brand positioning
Advertising strategy
Advertising appeal
86
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
87
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010. 29(1)
88
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
89
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010, 29(1)
health by focusing on fitness and sports (De Mooij & Hofstede 2002; De
Mooij 2010).
Long- versus short-term orientation is 'the extent to which a society
exhibits a pragmatic future-orientated perspective rather than a conven-
tional historic or short-term point of view'. Values included in long-term
orientation are perseverance, ordering relationships by status, thrift, and
having a sense of shame. The opposite is short-term orientation, which
includes personal steadiness and stability, and respect for tradition. Focus
is on pursuit of happiness rather than on pursuit of peace of mind. Long-
term orientation implies investment in the future. An example is the
relationship between LTO and broadband penetration (De Mooij 2010).
Broadband asks for large investments by business or governments.
90
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
Personality
Personality generally is defined as unique and cross-situationally consist-
ent and is usually described in terms of traits such as autonomy or socia-
bility. In eollectivistic cultures, people's ideal characteristics vary by social
role, and behaviour is influenced by contextual factors (Church 2006).
Easterners believe in the continuous shaping of personahty traits by situ-
ational influences (Norenzayan///. 2002).
The Western habit of describing oneself and others in terms of abstract
characteristics has led to the development of characterisation systems of
personal traits. ^Fhe most used set of personality traits is the Five-Factor
Model, also called *Big Five' (McCrae 2002). Although these five factors
are found in many different cultures, they vary in weight across cultures
and these variations relate to Hofstede's cultural dimensions (Hofstede
& McCrae 2004). Although research using the same set of questions has
resulted in similar five-faetor structures across cultures, this doesn't imply
that these are the only existing conceptions of personhood; it merely
91
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010, 29(1)
92
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
93
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING. 2010, 29(1}
(De Mooij 2004, 2010). More research should be done to find different
categor>' motives and the relationship with culture.
Emotion psychologists have argued that emotions are universal. An
argument in favour of universal basic emotions is that most languages
possess limited sets of central emotion-labelling words, such as anger,
fear, sadness and joy. However, display and recognition of facial expres-
sions, intensity and meaning of emotions vary and are culturally defined.
Emotions arc, for example, more subdued in high power distance and col-
lectivistic cultures (Kagitibasi 1997). East Asian coUectivists try to display
only positive emotions and tend to control negative emotions. Probably
this is the reason why, in emotion-recognition studies, Chinese people are
less able to identify expressions of fear and disgust (Wang et aL 2006). A
comparison of emotion expression across 32 countries showed a significant
correlation with individualism for overall emotion expressivity and in par-
ticular expressing happiness and surprise (Matsumoto et al. 2008). People
also weigh facial cues differently. When interpreting the emotions of oth-
ers, the Japanese focus more on the eyes, whereas Americans focus on
the mouth. This difference may explain why emoticons differ between
Japan and the United States (Yuki et al. 2007). Researchers using emoti-
cons - assumed to be more neutral than the faces of real people - should
be aware of these differences. As the same expressions may have different
meanings in different cultures, this should be an important research area
for international advertising researchers.
94
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
^ For corrclaiion analysis, [he Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is used. Correlation analysis
is one-tailed. Significance levels are indicated by *p < 0.05. "fl < 0.01 and *'*p < 0.005. Regression
analysis is stepwise. The coefficient uf determination or R' is the indicator ofthe percentage of variance
explained.
95
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010. 29(1)
Categorisation
How people categorise other people and objects varies with individu-
alism-collectivism. Collectivists tend to pay attention to relationships
between objects, whereas individualists categorise objects according to
rules and properties (Choi elal 1997). Chinese children will group items
together that share a relationship, whereas Canadian children will group
items together that share a category (Unsworth eral 2005). Such fmdings
explain variation of acceptance of brand extensions. American consumers
view a brand extension of a different product category as not fitting with
the parent brand. However, collectivists view the parent brand in terms of
the overall reputation of or trust in the company. So they perceive a higher
degree of brand extension fit also for extensions in product categories far
from those associated with the parent brand than individualists would
(Monga & Roedder 2007).
Information processing
How people acquire information varies with individualism-collectivism
and power distance. In coilectivistic and/or high powder distance cultures,
people will acquire information more via implicit, interpersonal commu-
nication and base their buying decisions more on feelings and trust in the
company, whereas in individualistic cultures of low power distance, people
will actively acquire information via the media and friends to prepare for
purchases. Frequent social interaction causes an automatic flow of com-
munication between people, who as a result acquire knowledge uncon-
sciously (De Mooij 2010). Cho elal (1999) state that, in China, consumers
rely on word-of-mouth communication because of the high contact rate
among group members. A 2002 consumer survey by Eurobarometer (14
countries) asked people to what degree they view themselves as well-
informed consumers. The answers 'well-informed' correlate with low
power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, and individualism; individual-
ism alone explains 61% of variance.
96
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
97
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010, 29(1)
98
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
99
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010, 29(1)
100
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
101
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING. 2010, 29(1)
Setting hypotheses
Sometimes researchers challenge the predictive value of the Hofstede
model because their hypotheses were not supported, instead of challeng-
ing the formulation of the hypotheses. Several aspects of the Hofstede
dimensions must be considered when formulating hypotheses: (1) Some
manifestations of each dimension are more work-related, whereas others
can be applied to consumer behaviour and advertising; (2) often it is a
configuration of dimensions that explains variation; (3) value paradoxes
have to be taken into account. It is not easy to recognise values in advertis-
ing as advertising appeals may reflect both the desired and the desirable
(De Mooij 2010). Other problems are; (4) misunderstanding the content
of a dimension, and (5) the effect of the researchers' cultural roots when
selecting and interpreting manifestations of the values of the dimensions.
Some examples are as follows.
102
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
103
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010, 29(1)
Conclusion
The number of cross-cultural consumer behaviour studies has been
increasing over the years. The Hofstede model of national culture has
proved to be a useful instrument for understanding consumer behaviour
differences across cultures. Applying the model to branding and advertis-
ing, which originally sought answers to work-related value differences,
needs conceptual insight in the various manifestations that are relevant to
these business areas. This paper has reviewed many recent studies that
help gain conceptual insight.
References
Aaker, J.L. & Maheswaran, D. (1997) The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion.
Journal of Consumer Re.'iearch, 24, pp. 315328.
Aaker, J.L., Benct-Martincz, V'. & Garolera, J. (2(X)1) Consumption symbols as carders
of culture: a study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs. Joumal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 81, pp. 492-508.
Albers, N.D. (1994) Relating Hofstede's dimensions of culture to international
variations in print advertisements: a comparison of appeals. Dissertation presented
to the Faculty of the College of Business Administration University of Houston,
May.
Albers-Miller. N.D. & Gelb. B.D. (1996) Business advertising appeals as a mirror
of cultural dimensions: a study of eleven countries. Joumal of Advertisings 15(4),
pp. 57-70.
Al-Olayan, F.S. & Karande, K. (2000) A content analysis of magazine advertisements
from the United States and the Arab world. Journal of Advertising, 29, pp. 69-82.
Ang, S.H. & Lim, E.A.C. (2006) The influence of metaphors and product type on
brand personality perceptions and iiiudes. Jourtial of Advertising, 35. pp. 39-53.
Calantone, R.J., Kim, D., Schmidt, J.B. 6c Cavusgil. S.T. (2006) The intluence of
internal and external firm factors on international product adaptation strategy" and
export performance: a three-country comparison. Joumal of Business Research, 59,
pp. 176-185.
Chang, P.L. & Chieng. M.H. (2006) Building eonsumer-brand relationship: a eross-
cultural experiential view. Psychology and Marketing, 23(11), pp. 927-959.
Chang, T.K., Huh. J., McKinney, K., Sar, S.. Wei. W. & Schneeweis, A. (2007) Culture
and its influence on advertising: a critical assessment of comparative advertising
research, 1975-2005. Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the American Academy of
Advertising, 12-15 April. Burlington. VT.
Cheung, F.M.. Cheung, S.K. Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F. & Yeh, K.H. (2008)
Relevanee for openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture. Joumal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), pp. 81-108.
104
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
Gho, B., Kwon, V., Gentry-, J.W., Jun, S. & Kropp, F. (1999) Cultural values reflected
in theme and execution: a comparative study of US and Korean television
commcrcih. Journal of Advertising 2S(4), pp. 60-73.
Choi, I., Nisbett, R.E. & Smith, E.E. (1997) Culture, category salience, and inductive
reasoning. Cognition, 65, pp. 15-32-
Chui, A.C.W. & Kwok, C.C.Y. (2008) National culture and life insurance
cou^nm^on. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, pp. 8S-10I.
Church, A.T.f/ff/. (2006) Imphcit theories and self-perceptions of traitedness across
c\x\i\\rcs. Journal of Cross-Cuitual Psychology, 37(6), pp. 694-716.
Crocus (Cross-Cultural Solutions) (2004) This was a cross-cultural study that
measured brand value (called 'brand pull') and provided a cultural explanation
of strong or weak brand value in different countries. It was conducted by the
research agency ehain Euronct, in cooperation with the advertising agency chain
Interpartners. Unpublished.
Cutler, B.D., Erdem, S.A. & Javalgi, R.G. (1997) Advertiser's relative reliance on
collectivism-individualism appeals: a cross-cultural study. Journal of International
Consumer Marketing, 9, pp. 43-55.
Cutler, B.D., Thomas, E.G. & Rao, S.R. (2000) Informational/transformational
advertising: differences in usage across media types, product categories, and
national cultures. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 12. pp. 69-83.
De Mooij, M (2003) Convergence and divergence in consumer behavior: implications
for global advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 22, pp. 183-202.
De Mooij, M. (2004) Consumer Behavior and Culture: Consequences for Clobal Marketing
and Adveriising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Mooij, M. (2010) Global Marketing and Advertising, Understanding Cultural Par-adoxes
(3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Mooij, M. & Hofstede, G. (2002) Convergence and divergence in consumer
behavior: implications for international retailing. Journal of Retailing, 78, pp. 61-69.
Douglas, S.R & Craig, C.S. (2006) On improving the conceptual foundations of
international marketing icsG^xch. Journal of International Marketing, 14(1),
pp. 1-22.
Dow, D. (2005) Adaptation and performance in foreign markets: evidence of
systematic under-adaptation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, pp. 212-
226.
Duncan, T. & Ramaprasad, J. (1995) Standardized multinational advertising: The
influencing factors. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 55-68.
Eurostat (2002) How Europeans Spend their Time. Data 1998-2002. Europe, nine
countries.
Faiola, A. & Matei, S.A. (2005) Cultural cognitive style and web design: beyond a
behavioral inquiry into computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-
Mediated Communication, 11(1), article 18.
Foscht, T , Maloles, III. C , Swoboda. B., Morschett, D. & Sinha. I. (2008) The
impact of culture on brand perception: a six-nation siudy. Journal of Product and
Brand Management. 17(3), pp. 131-142.
Gudykunst, W.B. & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988) Culture and Interpersonal Communication.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
105
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010. 29(1)
Han, S.-P. & Shavitt, S. (1994) Persua.sion and culture: advertising appeals in
individualistic and eolleetivistic soc\ee^. Joumal of Experimental Sodal Psychology,
30, pp. 326-350.
Hofstede, G. (2001 ) Cultured consequences (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2007) A European in Asia. Asian Joumal of Social Psychology, 10,
pp. 16-21.
Hofstede. G. & Hofstede, G.J. (2005) Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind
(2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede. G. & McCrae, R.R. (2004) Personalit\^ and culture revisited: linking traits
and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), pp. 52-88.
House, R.J. & Associates (eds) (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The
GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hsieh. M.H. (2004) Measuring global brand equity using eross-national survey data.
Joumai of Intemational Marketing, 12(2), pp. 28-57.
Inkeles, A. (1997) National Character. New Brunswiek, NJ: Transaction, pp. 45-50.
Kagitibasi, C. (1997) Individualism and collectivism, in Berry. J.W., Segall. M.H. &
Kagitibasi, C. (eds) Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology (Vol. 3). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon, p. 23.
Kluckhohn, F.R. & Strodtbeck, E (I%I) Variations in Value Orientation. Evanston, II:
Row. Peterson and Company.
Koak, A., Abimbola. T. & zer. A. (2007) Consumer brand equity in a cross-eultural
replication: an evaluation of a scale. Journal of Marketing ManagemefU, 23(1-2),
pp. 157-173.
Lee, C. & Green, R.L. (1991) Cross-cultural examination of the Fishbein behavioral
intentions model. Joumal of Intemational Business Studies, 22, pp. 289-305.
Magnusson, P., Wilson, R.T.. Zdravkovie, S.. Zhou, J.X. & Westjohn, S.A. (2008)
Breaking through the cultural clutter: a comparative assessment of multiple
cultural and institutional frameworks. Intemational Marketing Review, 25(2),
pp. 183-201.
Malhotra, N.K. & McCort, J.D. (2001) Across-cultural comparison of behavioral
intention models. Intemational Marketing Review, 18. pp. 235-269.
Markus. H.R. & Kitayama, S. (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition.
emotion and motivation. Psychological Revim, 98(6), pp. 224-253.
Matsumoto, D. (with 19 co-authors) (2008) Mapping expressive differences around
the world: the relationship between emotional display rules and individualism
versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39( 1 ), pp. 55-74.
McCrae, R.R. (2002) NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures, in Marsella, A.J. & MeCrae,
R.R. (eds) The Five-factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. Dordrecht, the
Netherlands: Kluwer.
McQuarrie. E.F. & Phillips, BJ. (2008) It's not your father's magazine ad: magnitude
and direction of reeent changes in advenising style. Joumal of A/ivertising, 37(3),
pp. 95-106.
Mindy, F.J. and McNeal, J.ll. (2001) How Chinese children's commercials differ
from those of the United States: A content analysis. Joumal of Advertising, 30(3),
pp. 78-92.
106
THE HOFS'lEDE MODEL
107
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010. 29(1)
108
THE HOFSTEDE MODEL
Watkins, D. etal. (1998) Cultural dimensions, gender, and the nature of self-concept:
a fourtecn-country study. International Journal of Psycholog, 33. pp. 17-31.
Wong, H.Y. & Merrilees, B. (2007) Multiple roles for branding in international
marketing. Inteniational Marketing Review, 24(4), pp. 384-408.
Vaveroglu, I.S. & Donthu, N. (2002) Cultural influences on the diffusion of new
pjoauQls. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(4), pp. 49-63.
Yeniurt, S. & Townsend, J.D. (2003) Does culture explain acceptance of new products
in a country? International Marketing Review, 20(4), pp. 377-396.
Yuki, M., Maddux, W.W. & Masuda, T. (2007) .Ve the windows to the soul the same
in the East and West.'' Cultural differences in using the eyes and mouth as cues to
recognize emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Experimental Socicjl
Psychology, 43, pp. 303-311.
Zandpour, K, Campos, V, Catalano, J., Chang, C , Cho, YD., Hoobyar, R.. Jiang,
S.-E, Lin, M.-C, Madrid, S., Scheideler, H. & Osborn, S.T (1994) Global reach
and local touch: achieving cultural fitness in TV advertising. Journal of Advertising
Research, 34(5).
Zhou, S., Zhou, P. & Xue, F. (2005) Visual differences in US and Chinese television
commercials. Journal of Advertising., 34{ I ), pp. 111119.
109
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2010, 29(1)
110
Copyright of International Journal of Advertising is the property of World Advertising Research Center Limited
and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.