Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLIENT
PROJECT MANAGER
Project Name
DOCUMENT NUMBER
Type Discp Job SJ Seq Format PAGES
A4 1 OF 75
Client Logo
DESIGN CRITERIA Contractor Logo
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Record of Revisions
Rev. Date Revision Description
A Issued for Clients Approval.
B Revised as per clients comments.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sr. Page No.
Description
No.
1. 1.1. Introduction 5
1.2. Scope 5
1.3. Units of Measurement 6
1.4. Site Conditions 6
1.4.1. Ground water level 6
1.4.2. Reference level 6
1.4.3. Wind 6
1.4.4. Earthquake 6
2. Applicable Standards and Codes of Practice 6
3. LOADS 6
3.1. Dead Loads (DL) 6
3.2. Imposed Loads (IL) 6
3.3. Surcharge Loads 6
3.4. Earth pressure (EL) 6
3.5. Hydrostatic loads (HL) 6
3.6. Crane loads (CL) 6
3.7. Wind load (WL 6
3.8. Seismic load (SL 6
4. Method of Analysis 6
5. DESIGN 6
5.1. Concrete works 6
5.2. Foundations 6
5.3. Block work 6
5.4. Structural Steel Works 6
5.5. Soil Improvement 6
5.6. Detailing requirements. 7
6. Annexure
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
1. DESIGN CRITERIA
1.1. Introduction
This document is to provide the general guidelines to the Civil structural team to carry out the design
and detailing works for the proposed _________________ civil/ structural works, which consists of
the following facilities.
a) Tank foundation
b) Tank bund wall, floor slab, Access stair ways, Platforms, drain sumps, and pipe supports
foundations
c) Pump manifold and 2.0 tonnes capacity crane girder and associated walkway, cage
ladders and platforms
d) Pipe culverts
e) Pipe rack structure, pipe sleepers structures and its foundations
f) MCC Building .RCC framed structure
g) Office Building extension from the existing ____ Office Building
h) Foam Skid structure.
i) Miscellaneous Items like Roads, Oil water drainage scheme, Storm water drainage
scheme fire water pipe line, thrust block and anchor block, fire water pipe supports and its
foundation, lighting pole foundation etc.
j) Security office.
k) Thermal oil storage vessel foundation.
l) Nitrogen storage vessel foundation.
m) DG set Foundation.
n) Firewater Pump house.
o) Slop tank foundation.
1.2. Scope
This document describes the general requirements and various design parameters that shall be
considered and agreed between engineering team and client for the design of Civil /
Structural works of above listed various facilities pertaining to the --------- phase expansion project.
Refer DOCUMENT NO. DESIGN CRITERIA CIVIL & STRUCTURAL WORKS for as noted.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
investigation indicates that the existing ground layers are not suitable for the intended
structure loading and soil improvement will be required.
The tank foundations shall have minimum net allowable bearing pressures of 300 kPa (with
factor of safety 3.0) for Tank farm 6 and 7, at the required founding level for the tank shell
loading as well as immediately under the tank bottom plate area shall also be achieved with
settlement criteria as out lined in API 650 Eleventh Edition 2008. The maximum allowable
settlement shall not exceed 50 mm under the tank plate. It is proposed to set the bottom of
tank annular plate at an elevation of +5.750 FMD.
For the remaining all other facilities the Sub-contractor shall achieve minimum net allowable
bearing pressure of at least 175 kPa (with factor of safety 3.0) at +4.00 FMD for isolated
footing size of 3.0 x 3.0 m with a maximum allowable settlement of 25 mm. For raft type
foundation, also Sub-contractor shall achieve minimum net allowable bearing pressure of at
least 175 kPa (with factor of safety 3.0) at +4.00 FMD with a maximum allowable settlement
of 50 mm
The Pump manifold No 4 structure, which will be at least 2.50 M to 3.00 M below from the
proposed finished grade level. The Sub-contractor shall achieve the minimum net allowable
bearing pressure of at least 175 kPa (with factor of safety 3.0) at +2.00 FMD for isolated
footing size of 3.0 x 3.0 m with a maximum allowable settlement of 25 mm. For raft type
foundation also the Sub-contractor shall achieve minimum net allowable bearing pressure of
at least 175 kPa (with factor of safety 3.0) at +4.00 FMD with a maximum allowable
settlement of 50 mm.
The Sub-contractor may also choose soil improvement such as Dynamic Compaction (DC) or
Vibro Stone Columns (VSC) The chosen method of soil improvement shall be in such a way
that the existing Terminal facilities and associated equipment shall not get damaged due to
impact or vibration forces exerts during the course of soil improvement activities. The Sub-
contractor shall propose a renowned Geotechnical specialist for the soil improvement work.
The Geotechnical specialist shall have at least 10 years of experience in the proposed soil
improvement type in the Gulf Region. Moreover the type of soil improvement proposal shall
be suitable to the existing soil profile and ground conditions.
5.6. Detailing requirements: Detailing requirement for concrete structures like expansion joint,
contraction joint, construction joint, slopes, laps etc. shall be as per BS 8110. Detailing
requirement for steel structures like welding, splicing, bolt end and gauge distance, bolting
xx-x-xxxx-xx-xxxx-REV xx - Civil-Structural Design Basis.doc
Page 7 of 75
Client Logo
DESIGN CRITERIA Contractor Logo
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
ANNEXURE 1
Design Criteria for tank foundations.
1. The foundation load data is taken from the Data given by Static tank department in the following
format .
Typical Load data.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
D/2
D/2
D
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
D
(( OL ) )
FOS 2 1 .5
Eh H
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Further to this calculations client has requested to check bearing pressure below
annular plate and tank bottom separately, so the calculations are produced as follows.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
<60 T/m2 (or 60 x 1.33 for WL/EL) for < The value of allowable
Cohesion less soil, Dense gravel, or bearing pressure after soil
Remark. dense sand and gravel As per Table 1, improvement as given by
Clause 1.2.3 and 1.2.4. Of BS 8004. M/S Keller. (290kN/m2 for
Tank farm 6 and 340kN/m2
for Tank farm 7).
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
0.5 x
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
cd '
Where C1 the correction to account for strain relief from excavated soil, C1 1
2P
cd' = effective overburden pressure at tank bottom is 0 Hence C1= 1.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
P = 300 kN/sqm
C
t 1 + 0.2 log(10.t )
op' Depth of centre of layer x density of soil. At each 10m layer depth below ground the overburden
pressure as follows.
At 5m (mid of 1st 10m layer) = 5 x 18 = 90 kN/sqm.
At 15m (mid of 2nd 10m layer) = 15 x 18 = 270 kN/sqm.
At 25m (mid of 3rd 10m layer) = 25 x 18 = 450 kN/sqm.
At 35m (mid of 4th 10m layer) = 35 x 18 = 630 kN/sqm.
At 45m (mid of 5th 10m layer) = 45 x 18 = 810 kN/sqm.
At 55m (mid of 6th 10m layer) = 55 x 18 = 990 kN/sqm.
At 65m (mid of 7th 10m layer) = 65 x 18 = 1170 kN/sqm.
At 75m (mid of 8th 10m layer) = 75 x 18 = 1350 kN/sqm.
At 85m (mid of 9th 10m layer) = 85 x 18 = 1530 kN/sqm.
At 95m (mid of 10th 0m layer) = 95 x 18 = 1710 kN/sqm.
z = thickness of soil layer is assumed equal to 10m for the calculations.
P
Izp 0 . 5 + 0 . 1( )
op '
op' = effective overburden pressure at depth of Izp. For circular tank it is at B/2 ~ D/2.
For lets say 45m dia tank op' = 22.5 x 18 = 405 kN/sqm.
P
Izi 0 .5 + 0 .1( ) shall be worked out of each layer. And substituting the values,
oi '
C 1 . Ct . P .
10
1
[ ]
zi
Esi
( Izi )
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
69mm (~ 70mm) and for 32.7m tank it is (45+42)/2 x 1.2 = 43.5mm (~50mm) value for Initial Hydro-
test settlement is shown on the drawing.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
ANNEXURE 2
Design Criteria for Dyke wall/Bund walls.
Ha1
Ha3
Ha2
( W + W 1 + W 2 + W 3 + W 4 ).
= FOS 1 . 5 (FOS against sliding)
Pa1 + Pa 2 + Pa 3
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Max
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Maximum moment and shear will be calculated and the RCC design shall be done as per BS 8110
Part-1
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Provision of shear key shall be made, whenever required from sliding check
i.e FOS is less than 1.5.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
ANNEXURE 3
Design Criteria for Buildings
1. General: MCC building, Office building & Security building are designed by STAAD Pro. latest
edition. 3D analysis and design of structure has worked out as per below loadings and BS
design codes. Here as a typical building MCC building design basis is shown, the same
philosophy will be applied to other building like office building, security building, foam skid,
firewater pump house shed and oil heater shed. RCC frame structure will be analysed as
skeleton structure only. Diaphragm action of RCC roof slab is ignored (to be on conservative).
RCC bldg will be designed as per BS-8110 & Steel bldg will be designed as per BS-5950.
For RCC bldg, full weight of conc block work has been considered as transferred directly to
plinth beam/intermediate beam. Foundation will be designed for SBC 175 KN/m2.
2. LOADING DATA :
a. Live load :
Roof with access for maintenance only = 1.5 kN / m2
b. Dead Load :
As per Para 3.1.
c. Wind Load :
Wind :
As per BS - 6399 - Part - 2
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Pi = qs x Cpi x Ca
Where :
Cpi = Internal pressure coefficient for the building surface.
= -0.3
or 0.2
( Whichever gives the larger net pressure coefficient across the wall. )
Ca = Size effect factor. = 1
Cluase : 2.1.3.3 - Net surface pressure. = P
P = Pe - Pi
Seismic Load :
Zone = 2A
Soil profile type - " D "
UBC - 1997, Table - 16 I
Seismic Zone factor = 0.15
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
STAAD Pro -2007, RCC space frame 3D model (Typical for MCC Building)
xx-x-xxxx-xx-xxxx-REV xx - Civil-Structural Design Basis.doc
Page 30 of 75
Client Logo
DESIGN CRITERIA Contractor Logo
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
STAAD Pro -2007 Software has used for 3D Frame analysis and design of RCC members.
BS Design code has used for design of RCC members and roof slab.
STAAD model showing Applied Load,
LOAD COMBINATION = (DL+LL+WL_Z) X 1.2
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
If the building is structural steel the member design is as per annexure -4 part 4 and for concrete
design is as per Annexure-5 Part 4.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
ANNEXURE 4
Design Criteria for Pipe rack and bridge.
1. Overall Geometry: The pipe rack outside terminal is planned like a pipe bridge of 25m span.
The main reason for adopting 25m span is to have fewer disturbances to existing facilities below
the pipe rack. Modular construction with each module of 25m span is designed as shown in
Pipe rack Typical Bridge for 25m Span.
Pile and pile-cap are also modeled with steel rack. As a conservative approach of 5 times dia. of pile
for fixity level below grade level has been considered for analysis.
xx-x-xxxx-xx-xxxx-REV xx - Civil-Structural Design Basis.doc
Page 33 of 75
Client Logo
DESIGN CRITERIA Contractor Logo
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Main girder out to out depth is 3.0m and the bottom member will not directly support the pipes, but
one intermediate beam will be run to support the pipes. This arrangement is done to get higher depth
of main load carrying girder for reducing the deflection and member sizes.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Top and bottom cord member of Main Girder are braced in both the direction to avoid buckling of
main members and to transfer the lateral loads perpendicular to main girder plane.
EL +13.30M FMD
1800
EL +11.50M FMD
500
6m clear below
PILE DIA girder beam
(d) 900mm
Ewewwrrwf
EL +13.30M FMD
EL +11.50M FMD
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Notes:
a) All members are modeled at TOS Level considering it as as centre line.
b) All bracing will be actually welded at level 50 mm below the TOS of members it is connected, but
in model, those are modeled at same level.
c) All bracing are released for moment (rotation) in the plane of load and triangulation. In the
direction of no moment and triangulation is not done it is kept unreleased.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
d) All connections will be profile welded except where is not possible shall be connected with
gusset plate. All welding will be shop welding.
e) Support:
FIXED SUPPORT
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
2. Loads:
a. Seismic loading: In Staadpro Seismic loading shall be modeled as the first load case.
Response reduction factor Rw-x and Rw-z is considered equal to 5.6 as per the UBC
1997 table 16-N as the structure framing type is Steel/Concrete Ordinary moment
resisting frame. Remaining factors as per
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
b. Pipe operating load: Pipe full of liquid weight is considered with pipes full of water as
all the lines here are carrying liquid having density less than water except may be few
line will be having higher density of 1.2 kN/cum and this will get compensated with
difference between density of product (~0.8 kN/cum) and water density.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
c. Pipe thermal load: Lateral anchor load given by piping stress group is 336.6kN.
Load per meter at top and bottom tier beam is = 336.6/ 8.25 x 2 = 20.4 kN/m.
Other direction (Z) total thermal force given by piping stress is 136.50 kN.
So at each tier load is = 136.5/2 = 68.25kN.
This is guide load and applied at required location given by piping group.
Refer the figure on next page.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
d. Pipe friction load: Pipe friction load is considered equal to 10% of the pipe operating as
per Industry practice.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
The net pressure coefficient is 2.0 for sharp edged sections, so wind pressure per meter length
of bridge members is = 2 x 3.413 x width of the member = 6.826 x width of the member.
Wind load on pipes is worked out using factor of 1.2 and largest dia. of pipe + 0.1 x width of
pipe rack, projected height. Only wind in transverse direction is considered.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
f. Load Combinations: As per clause No 5.3 above for strength and serviceability design.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
4. Design: The design is based on BS5950:2000 with limit state design. Structures are
designed and proportioned taking into consideration the limit states at which they become unfit for
their intended use. Two major categories of limit state are recognized - serviceability and ultimate.
The primary considerations in ultimate limit state design are strength and stability while that in
serviceability limit state is deflection.
Axial Tension: The tension capacity of the member is calculated based on the effective area as
outlined in Section 4.6 of the code. The tension capacity of a given member per this procedure,
based on a user supplied net section factor (NSF-a default value of 1, BS5950 does not have any
slenderness limitations for tension members.
Compression: compressive strength, which is a function of the slenderness of the gross section, the
appropriate design strength and the relevant strut characteristics. Strut characteristics take into
account the considerable influence residual rolling and welding stresses have on column behaviour
with use of four strut curves together with a selection of tables to indicate which curve to use for a
particular case. Compression strength for a particular section is calculated in STAAD according to
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
the procedure outlined in Annex C of BS5950. Note, a slenderness limit of 50 is still applied on
double angles checked as battened struts as per clause 4.7.9.
Axially Loaded Members With Moments: To check if the section is plastic or compact, plastic
moment capacities will constitute the basic moment capacities subject to an elastic limitation. The
purpose of this elastic limitation is to prevent plasticity at working load. For members with axial
tension and moment, the interaction formula as outlined in section 4.8.2 is applied based on effective
tension capacity.
For members with axial compression and moment, two principal interaction formulae must be
satisfied Cross Section Capacity check (4.8.3.2) and the Member Buckling Resistance check
(4.8.3.3 ). Members subject to biaxial moments in the absence of both tensile and compressive axial
forces are checked using the appropriate method described above with all axial forces set to zero.
Shear Load: Shear capacity is calculated using the procedure outlined in section 4.2.3, also 4.4.5
and Annex H3 if appropriate, considering the appropriate shear area for the section specified.
Other Design Parameters
(UNL, LY and LZ - Relevant Effective Length)
UNL or UNF and LY or KY values are required to define lateral torsional buckling and compression
effective lengths respectively. The former relates to compression flange restraint for lateral torsional
buckling while the latter is the unrestrained buckling length for compression checks.
(MX, MY, MYX and MLT Equivalent Moment Factors)
The values for the equivalent moment factors can either be specified directly by the user as a
positive value between 0.4 and 1.0 for MX, MY and MYX and 0.44 and 1.0 for MLT. The Soil
consultant shall do design of pile including structural design by the worst combination of load
transferred from the superstructure provided to him.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
ANNEXURE 5
Design Criteria for Manifold pit.
1. Overall Geometry: The manifold pit is modelled as box structure consisting of plates and
members. Bottom slab and side walls are modelled as plate of 250mm and 300mm respectively.
The edge of bottom slab is thickened to 300mm. The pipe rack columns along the manifold are
combined with manifold gantry columns. The footing level of pipe-rack and manifold are kept
same for ease of construction and to avoid pipe rack foundation load transfer to manifold wall as
a surcharge load.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
EL +13.00M FMD
EL +11.50M FMD
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Foundation system is uniform soil spring of stillness (sub-grade modulus) of 20mm settlement at
175kN/sqm bearing pressure is equal to = 175/ 0.02 = 8750 kN/sqm/m.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
2. Loading:
a. SELFWEIGHT Y -1, as per densities of material, steel 78.50, and concrete 25.00 kN/cum
respectively.
b. Pipe weight: there are 12 20 and 24 pipes in the manifold area. The weight of pipes is
as follows.
2 . 19 + 5 . 02 + 7 . 08
Average weight of pipes = Pav = = 4 . 76 kN / sqm ~ 5 kN / sqm
3
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
c. Pump Load: Assuming each pump weight of 16 tonnes and base-frame area of 2m x 4m
the pressure on the bottom slab is = 160/2 x 4 = 20kN/sqm.
Add weight of 0.5m thick foundation of concrete = 0.5 x 25 = 12.5 kN/sqm.
Total load due to pump on the base slab is = 20 + 12.5 = 32.5kN/sqm.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
As the pumps are dynamically, balanced rotating equipment the foundation size will be
decided on the general guidelines of code using weight of foundation equal to 3 to 5
times of weight of pump. Actual loading will be updated when final data will be available
from mechanical department.
d. Soil load: Soil load is applied on the sidewall with minimum surcharge load as specified
in clause 3.3 above of 10kN/sqm and it varies along the depth of soil. The density of soil
soil is as per clients soil investigation report and maximum value is adopted equal to
P h = 0 . 667 h
e. Frictional load: Frictional load due to each pipe supported at 1232mm and 3457 level
will be = 30% of vertical load
xx-x-xxxx-xx-xxxx-REV xx - Civil-Structural Design Basis.doc
Page 54 of 75
Client Logo
DESIGN CRITERIA Contractor Logo
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
This load is applied as follows, Actual loading will be updated when final data will be
available from piping stress analysis
f. Pipe thermal load: This load will be applied in similar manner as that of frictional load
and will be updated when final data will be available from piping stress analysis.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
g. Wind load: Wind load will act on pipe rack, Gantry girder and supporting beams/columns
section shall be same as that of applied for pipe rack in Annexure-3. On pit wall and
piping inside the pit no wind load is considered to be acting.
h. Seismic load: Seismic load will act on pipe rack, Gantry girder and supporting
beams/columns section shall be same as that of applied for pipe rack in Annexure-3. On
pit wall and piping inside the pit no Seismic load is considered to be acting because it is
not at the depth greater than as specified in UBC 1997.
i. Loading combination: Loading combination shall be as per clause 5.3 of this document.
Additionally following table from BS8110 part 1 is referred.
3. Analysis: Stiffness matrix analysis is performed to get the member and plate shear force and
bending moment. The sign convention for reading the plate force is as follows.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
So the moment about x axis that is MY is ranging from 35.2 to 64 kN-m range. Accurate input is
available from plate stress results as shown below which will be further used for design.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
4. Design calculations: Concrete design is done as per BS 8110 part 1, with following design
parameters,
a. Analysis and stress block parameter shall be as per 3.4.4.1 and figure 2.1.
b. Designs for flexure symbols for formulae are as per 3.4.4.3.
c. Design formula for rectangular beam section in flexure shall be as per 3.4.4.4.
d. Design for shear strength shall be symbols for formulae 3.4.5.1.
e. Shear stress in beams as per 3.4.5.2.
f. Shear reinforcement as per 3.4.5.3
g. Shear strength of concrete as per 3.4.5.4.
h. Shear stirrups design as per 3.4.5.5.
i. Bent up bars for shear design as per 3.4.5.6.
j. Concrete compression member design as per 3.8.1.6.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
ANNEXURE 6
Design Criteria for Pipe Culvert.
1. Overall Geometry: Box Culvert for Pipes is modelled in Staadpro, for width of 1m. Centre-to-
Centre dimensions are modelled and various loading is applied.
Foundation system is uniform soil spring of stillness (sub-grade modulus) of 20mm settlement at
175kN/sqm bearing pressure is equal to = 175/ 0.02 = 8750 kN/sqm/m.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
2. Loading.
a. Self-weight: Concrete self-weight of top and bottom slab and sidewall is for 300mm
thickness walls, wearing course is 100mm thick with density of 20kN/cum.
b. Pipe loading Operating. As per preliminary information from piping. Refer Annexure
4.2.b
c. Soil Load: on side walls: Refer Annexure 5.2.d for soil loading calculations.
xx-x-xxxx-xx-xxxx-REV xx - Civil-Structural Design Basis.doc
Page 60 of 75
Client Logo
DESIGN CRITERIA Contractor Logo
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
3. Analysis: Stiffness matrix analysis is done to arrive the bending moment and shear forces in the
sections.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
4. Design calculations: Design calculations shall be done as specified in Annexure-5 clause 4 for
the above bending moment, shear force and axial load.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
ANNEXURE 7
Design Criteria for Pipe sleepers and pipe supports.
1. Overall Geometry: Various types of pipe sleepers and supports are proposed as shown in
geometries below.
a. Pipe sleepers:
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
b. Pipe Supports
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Staadpro model.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
d. Load combinations:
Dead load + Pipe operating load + Pipe friction load + Pipe Thermal load + wind load X.
Dead load + Pipe operating load + Pipe friction load + Pipe Thermal load + wind load Z.
Dead load + Pipe empty load + Pipe friction load + Pipe Thermal load + wind load X.
Dead load + Pipe empty load + Pipe friction load + Pipe Thermal load + wind load Z.
3. Analysis.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
4. Design calculations:
a. Base plate design.
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
b. Footing Design.
((P))
FOS 1.5
H
Revision : Date:
Job No: Doc.
B
P Pe6
P max + 175kN / sqm Normal operating case, And 1.25 x 175
BxL B L2
kN/sqm. for Wind/seismic case
P Pe6
P min 0.0kN / sqm
BxL B L2