Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chemistry
To cite this article: Dandan Chen, Xiuhua Wei, Ya Yang & Yifeng Tu (2016) The dual-
modes of QCM immunosensing for estradiol analysis via dynamic or round-off calibration,
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 96:14, 1389-1401, DOI:
10.1080/03067319.2016.1264582
Article views: 24
1. Introduction
Biosensor is a category of sensitive and selective analytical devices for chemical or
biological substances to convert the information of concentration into an electrical
signal [1]. Among those biosensors, the immunosensor oers high selectivity on account
of the immuno-recognition, which is also a kind of eective devices with low detection
limits [2,3]. In this subset, electrochemical immunosensors have been widely applied in
health care [46], food safety [7,8], environmental monitoring [9,10] etc.
Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), a very sensitive quantifying technic based on the
piezoelectric eect of quartz chip, linearly converts the mass change on its surface into a
frequency change as the output signal according to the Sauerbrey equation [11]. QCM-
Figure 1. (A) The schematic diagram of the fabrication of the immunosensor; (B) the EIS curves of (a)
bare chip; (b) modied by 3-MPA; (c) activated with EDC/NHS and bound with (d) 20 L of or (e)
enough E2 antibody; (C) the frequency output of (a) bare chip; (b) modied by 3-MPA; (c) activated
with EDC/NHS and (d) bound with enough E2 antibody.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1391
incubated with antigen, the performance of the sensing chip was evaluated by detecting
dierently concentrated antigens. Here, two detection modes were employed. The rst
one, called round-o mode, means the approach to acquire the result after the
accomplishment of immune-reaction. The second one, a dynamic mode, means the
realisation of measurement during the process of immuno-reaction before the achieve-
ment of equilibrium.
Although the immunosensor with round-o mode for detection exhibits high sensi-
tivity, its operation requires a long incubation time (approximately 1 h) to ensure the
nish of anity interaction between antibody and antigen. However, in clinical or other
related cases, a fast assay is expected to ensure the real-time quantifying within a few
minutes even seconds. The dynamic mode is promising to provide a rapid and sensitive
detection. The results showed that the measurement time could be greatly shortened to
several seconds based on the relationship between the responding slope and antigen
concentration, prophesying a novel approach for obtaining a time-saving immunosen-
sing manner. Thus, the meaning of our research is not only to develop an innovative
immunosensor, but also to open a new way to instantaneous immunosense.
As a model analyte, the estradiol, 17- estradiol (E2) [2325], was selected for
feasibility testing of the developed immunosensor. The E2 will be accumulated in
ecosystem through the food chain and then nally deposited into human body in fat
tissues, result in some long-term toxicity. Its hazards on biosomes, mostly on aquatic
organisms, are mainly in the reproductive system. It leads to accelerated synthesis of
vitellogenin in body, hence to induce the variation of sexual organs and the feminisa-
tion, and so on. Therefore, its level in female body, the addition in foods, cosmetics etc.,
is very signicant for current physiological, pharmaceutical or industrial researches.
Compared to currently employed methods for E2 testing including gas chromatogra-
phymass spectrometry [26], high performance liquid chromatograph [27], immunoas-
say [2830] or electrochemical methods [3133], the QCM immunosensor reported in
this paper oers advantages such as high sensitivity and selectivity, short sensing time,
small size, portability and low cost and simpler operation than part of other electro-
chemical methods.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and apparatus
E2 was purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co. Ltd (98%, Shanghai, China).
The E2 antibody was purchased from FengShou Industrial Co. Ltd (2 mg mL1, Shanghai,
China). 3-MPA (>99%) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were obtained from Alfa Aesar
(Tianjin) Chemicals Co. Ltd (Beijing, China). In our work, 0.01 mol L1 phosphate buered
saline (PBS) of pH 7.0 was used to dilute all of the solutions. EDC was obtained from
Sigma Aldrich Co. (98%, St. Louis, USA). NHS was purchased from Fluka (98%, Buchs,
Switzerland). The ultrapure water was used throughout and all reagents were used
without further purication.
A CHI400A Electrochemical QCM Workstation (in conjunction with a 13.7-mm dia-
meter, 7.995 MHz AT-cut quartz crystal wafer with gold discs on its surfaces bilaterally in
1000 of thickness and 5.1 mm of diameter, and a 3-mL Teon detection cell) was
1392 D. CHEN ET AL.
obtained from Chenhua Instruments Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The QCM tests were
carried out on an electromagnetic shielded and shock proofed platform. The electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) detections were carried on with an RST5200
Electrochemical Workstation (Suzhou Risetest Instrument Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China). All of
the experiments were carried out with a three-electrode system, with QCM chip as
working electrode, a platinum wire as counter electrode and a saturated calomel
electrode as reference electrode.
achieved by estimating the slope of the rst linear segment of sensing signal versus
time, related to the E2 concentration in a rst-order anity interaction.
4000
a
3000 b
3000
2500
Ret /
Ret /
2000 2000
1500
1000
6 8 10 12 14 16 2 3 4 5 6
Time/h Time/h
d
c 90
4500
Ret / 103
60
Ret /
3000
30
0
1500
2:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 8:1 10:1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
CEDC:CNHS m /g
Figure 2. The optimised experimental condition of (A) the time of MPA self-assembly; (B) the
activation time of EDC/NHS; (C) the concentration ratio of EDC to NHS and (D) the loading amount
of antibody.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1395
Figure 2(d), the Ret increased from 3223 to maximal 84470 , and then, it did not
increase any more. It is reasonable that sucient antibodies were bonded on the
sensing chips.
As generally acknowledged, to block the unreacted succinimidyl group by BSA is a
good way to avoid non-specic conjunction of impurity proteins on sensor surface. We
had checked the dierence of frequency output before and after the blocking; it
presented a dierence less than 1%, which means almost fully saturated covering of
E2 antibody on chip surface. This result supports the verdict of excellent specicity of
resultant sensor.
Under these optimised experimental conditions, as shown in Figure 3(a), a constant
frequency of ~7991,223 Hz was gained at the resultant sensor (curve a), and this output
kept the same (~7991,222 Hz) after the sensor was placed in blank PBS for 1 h of
incubation (curve b). Then, the frequency output decreased to ~7991,208 Hz if the
sensing chip was incubated in an E2 solution (curve c). In this way, a calibration plot
was constructed based on the decrease of frequency obtained in dierent standard E2
solutions, as shown in Figure 3(b). The regressive equation is F 4:16 5:86CE2
Figure 3. (A) The frequency output of sensing chip for (a) background; (b) incubated in blank PBS
and (c) incubated in E2 solution (2 g mL1); (B) the calibration curve for E2; (C) the frequency output
of sensing chip during 7 days and (D) the frequency output of sensing chip with the interference of
coexisting substances (20 g mL1) for the determination of E2 (2 g mL1).
1396 D. CHEN ET AL.
(R2 = 0.9934) within a linear range of 0.110 g mL1 and a detection limit (LOD) of
0.04 g mL1 (according to IUPAC rule, after the detections of 20 times for blank
solution, the standard deviation [SD] could be calculated). Thus, the limit of detection
can be calculated from it and the sensitivity of the sensor (slope of the calibration curve,
S): LOD = 3 SD/S).
The reproducibility of sensor preparation was evaluated with ve parallel chips for
3.3% of RSD. Also, the output of the sensing chip does not show remarkable change
over a 7-day period (Figure 3(c)) by storing at 4C between every two tests, supporting
its good stability. Selectivity is an extremely important evaluation criterion of the
performance of immunosensor. Figure 3(d) shows the disturbance of some possible
coexistent compounds in cosmetic products on the determination of 2 g mL1 E2
including 1,3-propanediol, glycerol, polyethylene glycol, sodium dodecyl sulphate. The
values of F by E2 or doped with 10 times concentrated impurities had no dierence,
indicating that there was no interference from possible coexistent compounds with a
tolerance of at least 300.
As previously described, the sensing chip needed to be incubated in sample solution
for at least 1 h before the determination. Thus, there is a severe limitation in terms of the
timeliness of target assay. Alternatively, we successfully achieved to gain the sensing
output with a dynamic mode, fast and credible. While 30 L of solution was dropped on
the QCM sensor, it merely covers the chip as a thin liquid lm, the mass-transfer
eciency is greatly promoted by the high-frequency oscillation of quartz chip to rapidly
obtain an instantaneous response. The results are shown in Figure 4(a). In these experi-
ments, a proportionally decrease in frequency output with E2 concentration was
obtained in tens of seconds after the introduction of an antigen solution into the cell.
There was no apparent frequency change obtained in a blank solution (curve a); mean-
while, the frequency decreased accordingly as curve b (0.2 g mL1) to f (1 g mL1)
upon the increased concentration of E2. In this mode, a calibration was established
between obtained F in those standard E2 solutions, as shown in Figure 4(b). At the
same time, we found that the slope of the rst linear segment of sensing curves in
Figure 4(a) also increased along with the arising E2 concentration. When the slope of
each curve was calculated within the rst 5 s in Figure 4(a), a linear calibration plot is
obtained as shown in Figure 4(c). The regress equation is k 0:135CE2 0:0502,
r = 0.989 (here, the k represents the slope of output signal of the rst 5 s, F/t), with
a detection limit of 0.06 g mL1, only a little attenuation to 0.04 g mL1 estimated
using the round-o mode. On the whole, it is accordance with the rule of rst-order
reaction (obeys to Langmuir equation [35]); so, there is a constant reaction rate during
the early stage of incubation then gradually reduced. As we all know, this reaction rate is
linearly proportional to the reactant concentration in solution, thus to be picked up from
sensing output to quantify the antigen concentration.
There are already many reports about the detection of estradiol, as listed in Table 1.
Compared to them, our sensor exhibits a medial sensitivity but wider linear range and
better reproducibility. In report of that QCM sensor [36], the E2 antigen (regarded as a
hapten) required to be coupled with the protein to form the holoantigen, via a complex
pre-derivation, thus to promote the sensitivity of mass-sensing. As the case of direct
sensing for hapten in our work, although the sensitivity is somewhat lower, but our
sensor provides a second rate fast response with dynamic mode detection, especially
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1397
a f b
18 20
e
d 15
F/ Hz
F/ Hz
12
c
10
6 b
5
0 a
2 4 6 8 10
0 40 80 120
-7 -1
time/s CE2 10 g/mL
c
1.2
k / Hz/s
0.8
0.4
0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10
-7 -1
CE2 10 g/mL
Figure 4. (A) The frequency output of sensing chip with a dynamic mode for 30 L of (a) PBS, (bf)
2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0 and 10 107 g mL1 of E2; (B) the calibration plot of f upon E2 and (C) the
calibration plot of the responding slope in rst 5 s versus E2.
adaptable for point-of-care usage. It meet the requirements of The hygienic standard
for cosmetics of China for detection of estrogen (in this standard, the detection limit of
E2 by HPLC is 40 g g1) [37]. On other hand, even if there is the requirement of
detection for those lower concentrated samples, the sensor is still useful by the jointing
with suitable enrichment technic such as SPME, LPME and so on. Compared with other
electrochemical methods, the sensor we reported here does not need any electroche-
mical reactive probe and, meanwhile, can be implemented with simplest operation and
fastest achievement.
The feasibility of acquired sensing response within several seconds would allow the
application of developed immunosensor for rapid, real-time or in situ uses. As we all
know, the most remarkable advantage of immnosensing technique is the specicity
from the anity reaction between antigen and antibody. Also, the high sensitivity of the
QCM technique will enhance the sensing capability based on high-performance mass
transduction. But, the shortage of detection time is a crucial obstacle for its real
application. From our research, it is possible that we can seek a balance between
them to achieve a high-quality immunosensor with good specicity, fast response and
ample sensitivity.
1398
D. CHEN ET AL.
4. Conclusion
An immune QCM-sensing chip was developed to recognise E2 antigen by its antibody
based on anity interaction. The change of resonance frequency is related to corre-
sponding concentration of antigen. The results indicate that detection limit of the
sensing chip reached the level of 40 ng mL1 with good stability and reproducibility,
with estradiol as the model in round-o mode. Moreover, the results of detection in
dynamic mode with an LOD of 60 ng mL1 demonstrate that the sensing response time
could be shortened to several seconds to realise the rapid detection. Both detection
modes can be employed for targeted applications.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the nancial supports of this research from National Natural Science
Foundation of China: (grant numbers 21175096 and 21375091).
Disclosure statement
The authors declare that there is no conict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Funding
We are grateful for the nancial supports of this research from National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant Numbers: 21175096 and 21375091)..
References
[1] A.P.F. Turner, I. Karube and G.S. Wilson, Biosensors: fundamentals and applications (University
Press, Oxford, 1987).
[2] B. Srinivasan and S. Tung, J Lab Autom 20, 365 (2015). doi:10.1177/2211068215581349.
[3] Y.H. Liao, R. Yuan, Y.Q. Chai, Y. Zhuo and X. Yang, Anal Biochem 402, 47 (2010). doi:10.1016/
j.ab.2010.03.015.
[4] D. Kyprianou, I. Chianella, A. Guerreiro, E.V. Piletska and S.A. Piletsky, Talanta 103, 260 (2013).
doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2012.10.042.
[5] E.B. Bahadra and M.K. Sezgintrkb, Talanta 132, 162 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.08.063.
[6] R.C.B. Marques, S. Viswanathan, H.P.A. Nouws, C. Delerue-Matos and M.B. Gonzlez-Garcaa,
Talanta 129, 594 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.06.035.
[7] C. Thiruppathiraja, V. Saroja, S. Kamatchiammal, P. Adaikkappan and M. Alagar, J Environ
Monit 13, 2782 (2011). doi:10.1039/c1em10372e.
[8] M.K.A. Kadir and I.E. Tothill, Toxins 2 (382) (2010). doi:10.3390/toxins2040382.
[9] D.J. Shirale, M.A. Bangar, M. Park, M.V. Yates, W. Chen, N.V. Myung and A. Mulchandani,
Environ Sci Technol 44, 9030 (2010). doi:10.1021/es102129d.
[10] X. Liu, W.J. Li, L. Li, Y. Yang, L.G. Mao and Z. Peng, Sens Actuators B 191, 408 (2014).
doi:10.1016/j.snb.2013.10.033.
[11] G. Sauerbrey, Z Phy A Hadrons Nucl 155, 206 (1959). doi:10.1007/BF01337937.
[12] S. Strola, G. Ceccone, D. Gilliand, A. Valsesia, P. Lisboa and F. Rossi, Surf Interface Anal 42,
1311 (2010). doi:10.1002/sia.3297.
[13] T. Joshi, Z.X. Voo, B. Graham, L. Spiccia and L.L. Martin, Biochim Biophys Acta 1848, 385
(2015). doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.10.019.
[14] L. Nowackia, J. Follet, M. Vayssade, P. Vigneron, L. Rotellini, F. Cambay, C. Egles and C. Rossi,
Biosens Bioelectron 64, 469 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.09.065.
[15] D.R.P. Morris, J. Fatissona, A.L.J. Olsson, N. Tufenkji and A.R. Ferro, Sens Actuat B 190, 851
(2014). doi:10.1016/j.snb.2013.09.061.
[16] H.K. Wayment-Steele, L.E. Johnson, F.Y. Tian, M.C. Dixon, L. Benz and M.S. Johal, ACS Appl
Mater Inter 6, 9093 (2014). doi:10.1021/am500920w.
[17] K. Ui-Rak, KSBB Journal 5, 417 (2002).
[18] X.X. Xiao, H. Li, M. Wang, K. Zhang and P. Si, Analyst 139, 488 (2014).
[19] L. Lu, J.C. Si, Z.F. Gao, Y. Zhang, J.L. Lei, H.Q. Luo and N.B. Li, Biosen Bioelectron 63, 14
(2015). doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.007.
[20] P. Liu, M. Liu, H. Yin, Y. Zhou and S. Ai, Sens Actuat B: Chem 220, 101 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.
snb.2015.05.058.
[21] T. Mukta, C. Achu, J. Tilak, P. Jai, V.V. Agrawal and A.M. Biradar, Appl Phys Lett 104, 154104
(2014). doi:10.1063/1.4871704.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1401
[22] R.K. Mendes, R.F. Carvalhal and L.T. Kubota, J Electroanal Chem 612 (164) (2008). doi:10.1016/
j.jelechem.2007.09.033.
[23] T.A. Eisenlohr-Moula, C.N. DeWall, S.S. Girdler and S.C. Segerstrom, Biol Psychol 109, 37
(2015). doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.03.016.
[24] D. De Catanzaro, Horm Behav 68, 103 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.08.003.
[25] B.W. Balzer, S.A. Duke, C.I. Hawke and K.S. Steinbeck, Eur J Pediatr 174, 289 (2015).
doi:10.1007/s00431-014-2475-3.
[26] M.J. Rocha, C. Ribeiro and M.F.T. Ribeiro, Int J Environ Anal Chem 91, 1191 (2011).
doi:10.1080/03067319.2010.496043.
[27] J.H. Lu, D.Y. Kong, L. Zhao and Q.S. Zhou, Int J Environ Anal Chem 94, 783 (2014).
doi:10.1080/03067319.2014.891108.
[28] H. Therese, S. Christian, H.F. Schler and R.J. Schneider, Water Res 40, 2287 (2006).
doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.028.
[29] M.L. Chiu, T.T.C. Tseng and H.G. Monbouquette, Appl Biochem Biotech 58, 75 (2011).
doi:10.1002/bab.5.
[30] H. Gurer-Orhan, J. Kool, N.P.E. Vermeulen and J.H.N. Meerman, Int J Environ Anal Chem 85,
149 (2005). doi:10.1080/03067310500042236.
[31] A. Florea, C. Cristea, F. Vocanson, R. Sndulescu and N. Jarezic-Renault, Electrochem
Commun 59, 36 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2015.06.021.
[32] X.Q. Liu, X.H. Wang, J.M. Zhang, H.Q. Feng, X.H. Liu and D.K.Y. Wong, Biosens Bioelectron
35, 56 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.bios.2012.02.002.
[33] B.C. Zhua, O.A. Alsagerbc, S. Kumard, J.M. Hodgkissbc and J.T. Sejdicac, Biosens Bioelectron
70, 398 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.03.050.
[34] S. Sam, L. Touahir, J.S. Andresa, P. Allongue, J.N. Chazalviel, A.C. Gouget-Laemmel, C.H. De
Villeneuve, A. Moraillon, F. Ozanam, N. Gabouze and S. Djebbar, Langmuir 26 (809) (2010).
doi:10.1021/la902220a.
[35] X. Chu, Z.H. Lin, G.L. Shen and R.Q. Yu, Chem J Chinese Univ 17, 1025 (1996).
[36] E. Ozgur, E. Yilmaz, G. Sener, L. Uzun, R. Say and A. Denizli, Environ Prog Sustain 32, 1164
(2013). doi:10.1002/ep.11718.
[37] Ministry of Health, P. R. China, The hygienic standard for cosmetics (2007), Part III, http://
www.chinacdc.cn/n272442/n272530/n272742/16081.html
[38] J.L. Zhao, G.G. Ying, L. Wang, J.F. Yang, X.B. Yang, L.H. Yang and X. Li, Sci Total Environ 407,
962 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.048.
[39] G. Judith, M.Z. Sonia and S. Isabel, Anal Lett 47, 1513 (2014). doi:10.1080/
00032719.2013.874015.
[40] I. Ojeda, J. Lpez-Montero, M. Moreno-Guzmn, J.M. Pingarrn, et al., Anal Chim Acta 743,
117 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.aca.2012.07.002.
[41] G. Volpe, G. Fares, F.D. Quadri, G. Palleschi, et al., Anal Chim Acta 572, 11 (2006). doi:10.1016/
j.aca.2006.05.008.
[42] R.M. Pemberton, T.T. Mottram and J.P. Hart, J Biochem Biophys Methods 63, 201 (2005).
doi:10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.05.002.
[43] D. Butler and G.G. Guilbault, Sens Actuators B 113, 692 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.snb.2005.07.019.
[44] X. Liu and D.K.Y. Wong, Talanta 77, 1437 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2008.09.027.
[45] X. Liu, P.A. Duckworth and D.K.Y. Wong, Biosens Bioelectron 25, 1467 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.
bios.2009.10.047.
[46] R. Schirhagl, J. Qian and F.L. Dickert, Sensor Actuat B-Chem 173, (585) (2012). doi:10.1016/j.
snb.2012.07.036.