UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT,

Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-CEH-TGW

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;

KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;
RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;
RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;
JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,
Defendants.

NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS & CORRUPTION

INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION,
AND FORGED AND VOID judgments and orders
____________________________________________________________________________/

MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION OF SATISFACTION OF $24.30,

FINAL MANDATE, MONEY JUDGMENT, DOC. # 365, 2:2007-CV-00228

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION WHY THE CLERK IS NOT SUBMITTING E-MAIL

MESSAGES TO PLAINTIFFS AT jrbu@aol.com and bhtjw@aol.com

OBJECTIONS TO DEF. T. G. WILSON’S FRAUDULENT “report & recommendation”

DOC. # 67, AND MOTION TO STRIKE AS FACIALLY CORRUPT, PERVERTED, AND
NULL AND VOID AS A MATTER OF LAW

NOTICE OF FALSIFICATIONS OF “claim”, PRIMA FACIE SCAM “O.R. 569/875”,

AND FORGED foreign “$5,048.60” “money judgment” AFTER APPEAL CLOSURE,
CH. 712; 95; 73, 74; 55; §§ 695.26, 695.09, 689.01, 55.10, 55.509, FLORIDA STATUTES,
FLORIDA ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT ACT
 MULTI-FACETED OBSTRUCTION OF DUE PROCESS
1. Pursuant to 11th Circuit “orders” of record, the Clerk of said U.S. Court was instructed to
“discard” any and all of Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse’s submissions to said Appellate Court.
2. After recorded refusal to accept $24.30, Doc. # 365, 2:2007-cv-00228, and execute
satisfaction by the Clerk of Court, Drew Heathcoat, and David M. Owen, Attorney for
Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Dr. Jorg Busse demands clarification by this Court:
a. To whom to pay said $24.30 final mandate/money judgment, Doc. # 365;

b. Where to pay said $24.30 final money judgment, Doc. # 365, 2:2007-cv-00228;

c. How to pay said $24.30 final money judgment, Doc. # 365, 2:2007-cv-00228.

OBJECTIONS TO FRAUDULENT “report and recommendation” [DOC. # 67]

3. The Plaintiff unimpeachable record owners of and holders of indisputable
unencumbered title to Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, S-T-R-A-P 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, hereby
appeal from the publicly recorded prima facie Government racketeering and extortion of
“$5,048.60” and falsified “$5,000.00 attorney’s fees” and their accreted riparian Gulf-front
Lot 15A [by criminal means of Doc. # 67] as perfectly conveyed and legally described,
Plaintiffs’ publicly recorded WARRANTY DEED, INSTR 4450927, Collier County
Public Records, INSTR 2010000171344, Lee County Public Records, 2 pages:

“… Lot 15A, private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision, as recorded

and legally described in Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912), Public Records of Lee County,
Florida, U.S.A.

Property I.D./S.T.R.A.P.: 12-44-20-01-00015.015A

[“A” for “Accreted”; see PB 1, PP. 48, 51, 52]

TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments, appurtenances, publicly

recorded natural accretions and riparian rights thereto belonging or in anywise
appertaining.

GRANTORS further warrant the within described riparian accreted Gulf-front

property is not presently homestead property and that the Grantors’ legal address is:
Post Office Box 7561, Naples, FL 34101-7561.

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever.

2
 AND the Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantees that the Grantors are lawfully
seized of said riparian upland and adjoining riparian street land on the Gulf of
Mexico in fee simple; that the Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell
and convey said riparian Gulf-front upland and street land on said Gulf as legally
described in reference to said private 1912 Subdivision Plat; that the Grantors
hereby fully warrant the unimpeachable record title to said riparian accreted street and
up-lands on the Gulf of Mexico and pursuant to the Lee County, State of Florida, and
Federal Public Records have defended and will defend their marketable record title
against the lawful and unlawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and in particular,
against the prima facie unlawful and criminal claims of Lee County, the State of
Florida, and the United States of America, and their corrupt Agents, Officials of
record, and the Defendants in their private individual capacities of record such as,
e.g., Joel F. Dubina, Charlene E. Honeywell, Sheri Polster Chappell, Gerald B.
Tjoflat, John E. Steele, Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Tony West; and that said accreted
riparian street and up-lands on the Gulf of Mexico are free of any legitimate and valid
encumbrances and/or judgments, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31,
2010; zoning, building code and other restrictions legitimately imposed by lawful
governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas, mineral, and or any other interests of
record, if any; and private riparian water-front easements of record, restrictions, if
any, and unimpeachable private implied street and alley easements of record as
conveyed in reference to said 1912 Plat.”
DEF. WILSON’S ADMISSION OF INCOMPETENCE & OBJECTIVE PARTIALITY

4. Doc. # 67, mailed on 08/19/2010, indisputably proved that Def. objectively partial and

Crooked Judge Thomas G. Wilson “had no familiarity with any of the facts.”

“… I had no familiarity with any of the facts.” Doc. # 67, p. 2.

Here in particular, Def. Wilson had “no familiarity with”, e.g.:

a. Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912);

b. Lee County INSTRUMENT 2010000171344; WARRANTY DEED;
c. Collier County Public Record, INSTRUMENT 4450927; WARRANTY DEED;
d. APPEAL from Case 2:2007-cv-00228;
e. 2006 STATE Court Case, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;
f. The falsified “July 29, 2009, judgment”;
g. The falsified “lien”;
h. The forged “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, 2:2007-cv-00228;
i. U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al.;
j. The unsubstantiated and falsified “$5,000 attorney’s fees” for extortion purposes;
k. The fabricated “rule 38 motion”, Fed.R.App.P., which Defendant Appellee K. M.
Wilkinson had admittedly NOT filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit.

OBJECTIONS TO FACIALLY FRAUDULENT “report and recommendation”, DOC. # 67

3
5. The Plaintiff Government corruption & crime victims object to Defendant Crooked

Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson’s premeditated

a. Cover-up of Government Officials’ crimes and corruption on the public record;

b. Fraudulent concealment of, e.g., Def. Officials’ extortion, fraud, obstruction of justice;

c. Extension of Government corruption, fraud, retaliation, and deliberate deprivations;

d. Extortion of Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, and money under fraudulent pretenses.

See Doc. # 67, mailed on 08/19/2010; Case 2:2010-cv-00089-CEH-TGW.

PLAINTIFFS CONTEST MAGISTRATE WILSON’S CORRUPTION, DOC. # 67

6. The Plaintiff unimpeachable record owners of and title holders to Lot 15A contest

Defendant Magistrate Thomas G. Wilson’s publicly recorded and well-proven:

a. Corruption;

b. Fraud, deception, and trickery;

c. Fraud on the Court;

d. Dishonesty;

e. Objective partiality;

f. Incompetence;

g. Perversion of the law and public record evidence.

DECEPTIVE DEF. JUDICIAL IDIOT & RACKETEER THOMAS G. WILSON

7. For criminal purposes of, e.g., case fixing, obstruction of justice, and extortion, Defendant

Thomas G. Wilson materially misrepresented:

“Obviously, the prior decisions were by a court of competent jurisdiction.”

See Doc. # 67, p. 5.

4
 Here, the Money Judgment in the amount of $24.30, Mandate, and Opinion of the U.S. Court

of Appeals could be found at docket entry # 365, Case 2:2007-cv-00228. Here, the Federal

Courts had fraudulently pretended the purported “lack of jurisdiction” and thus not

reached the merits. Said Case is under appeal, and no “final judgment on the merits” could

have possibly existed.

Here, Def. Wilson extended the pattern and policy of organized judicial crime & corruption:

“…such a dismissal constitutes a final judgment on the merits.” Id., p. 5.

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE WILSON’S FABLE & FABRICATION OF “res judicata”

8. It is a hackneyed truism that “res judicata does not preclude a litigant from making a

direct attack upon the judgment before the court which renders it. 1B J. Moore, Federal

Practice, § 0.407, at 282 (2d ed. 1991). In other words, a party may introduce evidence,

normally extrinsic in nature, "with the direct and primary objective of modifying, setting

aside, canceling or vacating, or enjoining the enforcement of the judgment.” C. Wright &

A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure at § 4406 (citing Intermill v. Nash, 94 Utah 271,

75 P.2d 157 (1938)).

PATTERN OF DECEPTION, TRICKERY, AND CASE FIXING FOR BRIBES

9. Here, absolutely nothing barred Plaintiffs’ direct attack of, e.g., the facially void

judgments, fraud on the Courts since 2006, organized Government crime and

corruption, racketeering and fraud. Here, Def. Wilson deceived the Court:

“In view of prior dismissals, this complaint is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.”

See Doc. # 67, p. 4.

DIRECT ATTACK OF BRAZEN FRAUD ON THE COURTS SINCE 2006

5
10. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record title holders to riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A

directly attacked publicly recorded organized judicial crime and corruption in Florida

Courts.

a. Here, the original Federal Case, 2:2007-cv-00228, is under appeal and attack for, e.g.,
publicly recorded Government racketeering, retaliation, extortion, fraud, fraud on
the Courts, and deliberate deprivations, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242;
b. Here, the purported “factual findings” by Crooked Magistrate Wilson are under direct
attack, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and conclusively controverted by U.S., Florida, and Lee
County Public Records;
c. Government corruption and crimes did not, and could not have possibly, created
“finality” but voided record deception, trickery, and fraud on the Courts since 2006.

COVER-UP, CONCEALMENT & CORRUPTION UNDER PRETENSES OF res judicata

11. Here under fraudulent and facially false pretenses of “res judicata”, Defendant Corrupt

Judge Thomas G. Wilson:

a. Covered up Crimes by Corrupt Officials and Defendants;

b. Concealed Organized Government Crime & Corruption;

c. Conspired with other Government Crooks to conceal and cover up.

PLAINTIFF ATTACK DEF. WILSON’S FALSIFIED “factual findings”, DOC. # 67

12. The Plaintiffs hereby attack Defendant T. G. Wilson’s

a. Perversion of publicly recorded marketable title and ownership evidence, Ch. 712, F.S.;

b. Perversion of prima facie scam “O.R. 569/875” into an “instrument” of trickery;

c. Perversion and falsification of record real property tax payment evidence;

d. Alteration of official records and documents for criminal purposes of racketeering.

“RES PERVERTA”

13. On the public record, Def. Wilson is confusing “res perverta” and “res judicata”. Just like

criminal Catholic Church Officials conspired to “create finality”, cover up, and conceal

6
 organized Church crime and corruption, here Def. Wilson conspired to conceal rape of the

law under fraudulent pretenses of “res judicata” and color of office.

“With the federal defendants dismissed, and no federal claim having been alleged, the
court should not exercise …”, Doc. # 67, p. 9.

With the rapists dismissed, and rape having been proven, the victims bleeding.
the Church and court should now cover up, conceal, and continue their charade.

Here, Def. Wilson conspired with other Crooked Officials to pervert the law and “res

judicata”. Here as a matter of law, res judicata could not have possibly applied, because

a. The causes of action and claims for relief were DIFFERENT;

b. The causes of action could NOT have possibly arisen in the past;
c. The parties were DIFFERENT;
d. The U.S. Courts had DENIED jurisdiction, Case 2:2007-cv-00228, under APPEAL;
e. Pending APPEAL, there was of course NO “final judgment on the merits” and the issues
of the prima facie criminality and nullity of, e.g.:
Fake “land parcels”;
Fake “lot” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
Fake “block” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
Fake “park”; see PB 3 PG 25 (1912);
Falsified “plat”;
Fabricated “rule 38 motion”;
Falsified “$5,000 attorney’s fees”;
Fictitious “July 29, 2009, judgment”.
f. The Crooked Judges perpetrated FRAUD ON THE COURT.

14. Here, neither the publicly recorded fraud on the Courts nor the Plaintiff record title

holders and tax payers, Lot 15A, will go away. Here, objectively partial and corrupt Def.

Wilson conspired to keep the Plaintiffs away from the Court for illegal purposes of

obstructing any opportunity of justice and meaningful court access. See 28 U.S.C. § 455.

RECORD LACK OF “authority”, LOCAL RULE 6, 6.02

15. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Wilson lacked any “authority” to “report and recommend”,

e.g. (Doc. # 67):

a. Government corruption;

7
 b. Organized Government crime;

c. Cover-up;

d. Coercion of the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecution and defense of their perfect title;

e. Government malfeasance;

f. Perversion of the law;

g. Fabrication of “factual findings”.

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL FLORIDA LAW, LITIGATION, AND CORRUPTION

16. Here, Def. T. G. Wilson concealed and conspired to conceal that

a. The falsified elements of purported “res judicata” could not have possibly been present;

b. The Plaintiff property tax payers were entitled to own Lot 15A, Cayo Costa;

c. Plaintiff record Lot owners had the fundamental rights to exclude Governments from

their riparian Lot 15A and redress their Government grievances, 1st, 14th 4th, 5th, 7th U.S.

Const. Amendments;

d. Def. Judges J. E. Steele and S. P. Chappell had violated their own Local Rule 4.02;

e. § 86.011 Jurisdiction of trial court had entitled the Plaintiffs to the following:

86.011, Fla. Stat., Jurisdiction of trial court.

The circuit and county courts have jurisdiction within their respective jurisdictional
amounts to declare rights, status, and other equitable or legal relations whether or not
further relief is or could be claimed. No action or procedure is open to objection on
the ground that a declaratory judgment is demanded. The court’s declaration may be
either affirmative or negative in form and effect and such declaration has the force
and effect of a final judgment. The court may render declaratory judgments on the
existence, or nonexistence:
(1) Of any immunity, power, privilege, or right; or
(2) Of any fact upon which the existence or nonexistence of such immunity, power,
privilege, or right does or may depend, whether such immunity, power, privilege, or
right now exists or will arise in the future. Any person seeking a declaratory judgment

8
 may also demand additional, alternative, coercive, subsequent, or supplemental relief
in the same action.

DEF. WILSON CONCEALED JUDICIAL PERVERSION OF LOCAL RULE 4.02

17. Here, Def. Wilson concealed and conspired to conceal the judicial Defendants’ alteration

of official records and documents for criminal and illegal purposes of racketeering and

extorting Lot 15A and Def. Wilkinson’s falsified fictitious “$5,000 attorney fees” without

any authority. Here in particular, Def, Steele and Chappell perpetrated fraud on the Court

when they removed BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA from the Lee County Circuit Court to

Federal Court, 2:2008-cv-00899, in violation of LOCAL RULE 4.02, Florida M.D.:

LOCAL RULE 4.02 REMOVAL OF CASES FROM STATE COURT [FLA. M.D.]
(a) All cases removed to this Court from the courts of the State of Florida shall be docketed
and assigned, in accordance with Rule 1.03 of these rules, in the Division encompassing the
county of the State in which the case was pending.
(b) The party effecting removal shall file with the notice of removal a true and legible copy of
all process, pleadings, orders, and other papers or exhibits of every kind, including
depositions, then on file in the state court.
(c) When a case is removed to this Court with pending motions on which briefs or
legal memoranda have not been submitted, the moving party shall file and serve a
supporting brief within fourteen (14) days after the removal in accordance with Rule
3.01(a) of these rules, and the party or parties opposing the motion shall then comply
with Rule 3.01(b) of these rules.
TARNISHED REPUTATION AS JUDICIAL CRIMINAL(S) – COURT OF FAKES

18. Florida Middle District Judges, and including Def. Wilson, who cover up for other crooked

Def. Judges tarnished the reputation of this Court as a judicial crime and corruption

organization which faked, e.g.:

a. FALSIFIED “law”, scam ”O.R. 569/875”;

b. FALSIFIED “legislative act”, scam ”O.R. 569/875”;
c. FALSIFIED “resolution”, scam ”O.R. 569/875”;
d. FALSIFIED ”land parcels”;
e. FALSIFIED “rule 38 motion”;
f. FALSIFIED “frivolous appeal”;
g. FALSIFIED “$5,000 attorney’s fees”;
h. FALSIFIED “$5,048.60 bill of costs”;
i. FALSIFIED ”O.R. 569/875”; “July 29, 2009, judgment”.

9
 DEF. WILSON CONCEALED DESTRUCTION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS

19. Here, Defendant Wilson concealed and conspired to conceal that the 11th Circuit destroyed

and discarded Plaintiff(s)’ records and official documents pursuant to its orders in violation

of the law.

DIRECT ATTACK OF REAPPOINTMENT

PUBLIC NOTICE OF “REAPPOINTMENT COMMENTS”

20. Hereby, the Plaintiff record indisputable title holders, land owners, and tax payers, riparian

Lot 15A, directly attack:

a. Def. Wilson’s fraudulent “report and recommendation”, Doc. # 67, 2:10-cv-00089;

b. Def. Wilson’s reappointment as Magistrate Judge;

c. Def. Wilson’s publicly recorded case-fixing;

d. Def. Wilson’s concealment of Government extortion of Lot 15A & money ($5,048.60).

See Local Rule 6, 6.02, 28 U.S.C. § 636.

“STRIKING” THE PUBLIC RECORD EVIDENCE IN ORDER TO CONCEAL

21. “Striking” the publicly recorded Government scandal as “scandalous” has been for illegal

and criminal purposes of concealing the record extortion of money & Plaintiffs’ Lot 15A:

“In light of that circumstance, the allegations of fraud, bribery, and conspiracy
should be stricken as impertinent and scandalous.” Doc. # 67, p. 3.

In light of that circumstance, we shall agree that the patently clear proof of rape
should be concealed and covered up; otherwise the scandal will strike the Judges
and priests in our crime organization.

DEF. WILSON’S CRIMINAL CASE-FIXING IN FAVOR OF DEF. OFFICIALS

10
22. With intent to, and for criminal purposes of, case fixing and obstruction of justice,

Defendant Wilson “reported and recommended”, Doc. # 67:

“A dismissal for failure to state a claim for relief … will not do, since such a
dismissal typically warrants an opportunity to amend. Rather it is fitting [for the
criminal purposes of case-fixing and obstruction of justice] to consider dismissal
on the dispositive ground of res judicata…” See Doc. # 67, p. 4.

Here on the public record, Def. Wilson expressed his criminal intent to obstruct any

“opportunity” of justice and perpetrated fraud on the Court. Here with intent to

deliberately deprive and defraud, Wilson chose his “conclusion” independent of the

material facts and law, but with the criminal objective of case-fixing, obstructing justice,

and injuring the Plaintiffs.

23. Here, accepting Plaintiffs’ conclusively proven allegations within the four corners of their

Complaint as true would have necessarily resulted in just and speedy adjudication in favor

of the Plaintiff record owners.

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL FAKE “land parcels”

24. In particular, Defendant Wilson conspired with other Officials and Defendants to conceal,

e.g.:

a. Fake “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

b. Fake “land parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
c. Fake “judgment”;
d. Fake “July 29, 2009, judgment”;
e. Fake un-recorded “$5,048.60 judgment”, Doc. ## 386, 432;
f. Fake “lien”;
g. Fake “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425;
h. Fake “resolution 569/875”, “O.R. 569/875”, “Lee County Public Records”, Doc. # 338;
i. Non-existence of fictitious “08/22/2008” “Rule 38 Motion”, Doc. # 386.

See Case 2:2007-cv-00228; see Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912) on file.

DEF. WILSON CONCEALED LACK OF RECORD OF FALSIFIED “land parcels”

25. Def. Wilson knew that he or any intelligent, fit, and honest person in Wilson’s shoes could

11
 a. NOT find facially forged “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;\

b. NOT find facially forged “land parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;

c. NOT find any “Lee County” title to forged “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

d. NOT find any “Lee County” title to forged “land parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE WILSON PERVERTED THE 1912 PLAT, PB 3, PG 25

26. Plain and short, the attached 1912 Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat of Survey

a. Was devoid of falsified “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

b. Was devoid of falsified “land parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;

c. Was devoid of the falsified “Lee County” park.

Here, Def. Wilson knew that as a matter of law the fraudulently pretended conveyance of

said fake “land parcels” in reference to said 1912 Plat had been legally and factually

impossible.

WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL ORGANIZED JUDICIAL CRIME, DOC. # 67

27. Florida law prohibits fraudulent fabrication of a fake interest in fictitious “land parcels”.

Here, Plaintiff(s) had demanded judicial notice of, e.g.:

a. Ch. 95, Florida Statutes, ADVERSE POSSESSION;

b. Ch. 73, 74, Florida Statutes, EMINENT DOMAIN;
c. Ch. 712, F.S., self-enforcing FLORIDA MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT;
d. Article I, s. 10, Florida Constitution;
e. Article I, s. 2, Florida Constitution;
f. Article I, s. 9, Florida Constitution;
g. The recorded fraudulent violations of Florida Statutes and Constitution;
h. Def. K. M. Wilkinson’s publicly recorded fabrications and fraud on the Court.

DEF. CROOK WILSON CONCEALED DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS,

FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, 1st, 14th, 7th, 4th, 5th U.S. CONST. AMEND.

28. Article I, s. 9, Fla. Const., states that

"[n]o person shall be deprived of . . . property without due process of law . . . ."

12
 Art. I, s. 2, Fla. Const. states that

"[a]ll natural persons are equal before the law . . . ."

Art. I, s. 10, Fla. Const., states that

"No . . . law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed."

Here, the Plaintiffs had the fundamental equal rights to own their Lot 15A, Cayo Costa,

and exclude Defendant Governments from their riparian Gulf-front street and uplands, PB 3

PG 25, U.S. Constitutional Amendments. The Plaintiff record real property tax payers, Lot

15A, and title holders were entitled to defend their perfected unencumbered marketable

record title against Defendant Officials’ racketeering, extortion, retaliation, deliberate

deprivations, and obstruction of justice under fraudulent pretenses and color of office.

EXTENSION OF RECORD EXTORTION, FRAUD, DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS

29. Defendants’ facially frivolous allegations of said sham “land parcels” were

a. Legally incomprehensible;

b. NOT any valid defense or genuine claim;

c. For criminal purposes of, e.g., racketeering, retaliation, extortion, and fraud;

d. Controverted by the Lee County Real Property Grantor/Grantee Index.

e. Prohibited under

DEF. WILSON’S IDIOTIC, ARBITRARY, AND CAPRICIOUS “report”, DOC. # 67

30. Like a bungling Government idiot, Def. Wilson rambled incomprehensibly:

“The property may have been taken over by Lee County in some way.” Id., p.

Florida law does not recognize “take over” by Government.

31. Any “involuntary alienation” of property in Florida is strictly and necessarily a judicial

function and must follow due judicial process, Chapters 73, 74, 95, Fla. Stat. Here, no judge

13
 had ever ordered any “title transfer”, Lot 15A, against the Plaintiffs’ will. Here, no eminent

domain or adverse possession judgment or document had ever existed.

AMBIGUOUS AND VAGUE JUDICIAL TRASH, DOC. # 67, P. 2:

“GUESSING” GOVERNMENT CROOK THOMAS G. WILSON

32. On the public record, Doc. # 67, Defendant Wilson asserted his “guessing” game and judicial

charade:

“I guess something was appealed …” Id., p. 2.

PLAYING DUMB & DUMBER: DEFENDANT IDIOT THOMAS G. WILSON

“Upon reading of the complaint, I have no concrete idea what happened.” Id., p. 3.

“Other defendants had something to do with the record of title to the property.” Id., p. 2.

“Here is all that I could get out of it.” Id.

Here, Def. Government idiot T. G. Wilson “played so dumb” that he confused, e.g.:

a. Causes of action;

b. Claims for relief;

c. Parties;

d. Actions.

UNCONTROVERTED WARRANTY DEED & PLAT OF SURVEY, PB 3 PG 25 (1912)

33. Here, the Plaintiff record owners and holders of indisputable Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, can

only live in further fear of injury from, e.g., said publicly recorded judicial

a. Corruption;

b. Idiocy;

c. Ignorance;

d. Irrationality;

14
 e. Recklessness.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al.

34. In their independent action for relief from, e.g., extrinsic fraud, fraud on the Court,

racketeering, retaliation, extortion, obstruction of justice, the Plaintiff record owners of Lot

15A attacked the prima facie nullity, illegality, and criminality of judicial determinations

regarding the record ownership of private “land” fraudulently “claimed as public land” under

facially false and deceptive pretenses of fake “law” and/or ”resolution”, scam “O.R.

569/875”. See U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al., 1:10-cv-321-JL, U.S. District Court,

District of New Hampshire.

RECORD “legislative-involuntary-alienation”-EXTORTION & FRAUD SCHEME

35. Here, Def. Wilson concealed the most elementary legal principle that any involuntary

alienation could not have possibly been a legislative function, and that the fraudulent “land-

transfer-by-resolution-scam” was a hoax and extortion scheme…

DEF. WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL FAKED “frivolous appeal” motion:

WILSON KNEW THAT WILKINSON ADMITTEDLY DID NOT file Rule 38 motion

36. Here admittedly, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Crooked Lee County Property

Appraiser, had filed a “Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rule 27-4”.

Here, Defendant Crooked Magistrate Wilson knew, fraudulently concealed, and conspired

with other Government Agents to conceal that Def. Wilkinson did not file a “Rule 38” or

“frivolous appeal” motion:

DEFENDANT WILKINSON FILED “RULE 27-4 motion [frivolous motion]”, DOC. # 386

15
 See Doc. # 386, 11/30/2009, p. 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.

DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO “grant” FAKE “rule 38 motion”

37. In the record absence of a “rule 38 motion”, the Defendant U.S. Appellate Court Judges,

11th Circuit, conspired with other Defendant Officials to fake and “grant” a non-existent

“rule 38 motion”, which they knew Defendant Wilkinson had admittedly not filed.

See Doc. # 386-4, 11/30/2009, p. 1 of 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.

CONSPIRACY TO FALSIFY “July 29, 2009, judgment”

38. In the record absence of any “rule 38 motion” (“frivolous appeal”), Defendant Wilson

conspired to

a. Pervert Fed. R. Appellate Proc. 38;

b. Pervert LOCAL RULE 4.18;

c. Pervert Fed. R. Civ. P. 54;

d. Fraudulently pretend a “frivolous appeal”;

e. Falsify a fictitious “July 29, 2009, judgment”;

f. Materially misrepresent “frivolity” for extortion & racketeering purposes.

16
39. Here, Def. Wilson knew Def. Lee County Property Appraiser’s claim of fictitious

“$5,000.00 for attorney’s fees” to be facially fraudulent and deceptive. Here, there was

trickery and extortion, because by his own assertions, Def. Wilkinson had not filed a “rule 38

motion”, but a “RULE 27-4 MOTION”.

CONSPIRACY TO FALSIFY “$5,048.60 judgment”

40. Def. Wilson knew that Plaintiff(s)’ Third Amended Complaint, Doc. # 282, 288, had been

a. Devoid of any “frivolity”, Case 2:2007-cv-00228;

b. Had been “screened” and found to be devoid of any “frivolity”;

c. Could not have possibly been “frivolous”;

d. Was fully supported by the indisputable and conclusive public record evidence on file.

41. In the record absence of any “rule 38 motion” (“frivolous appeal”), Defendant Wilson knew

and concealed that Def. Lee County Property Appraiser Wilkinson had

a. Never incurred any actual and necessary “$5,000 attorney’s fees”;

b. Never complied with LOCAL RULE 4.18;

c. Never been holder of any money judgment other than for $24.30, Case 2:2007-cv-00228,

under appeal:

RULE 4.18 APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS OR ATTORNEY'S FEES

(a) In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, all claims for costs or attorney's fees
preserved by appropriate pleading or pretrial stipulation shall be asserted by separate
motion or petition filed not later than fourteen (14) days following the entry of
judgment.
DEF. WILSON CONCEALED EXTORTION, COERCION, AND THREATS

42. Defendant Wilson knew and fraudulently concealed that Defendant Marshal Richard Jessup

had threatened the Plaintiffs in Naples, Florida, and coerced them to refrain from

prosecution of the Defendant Officials. Therefore, Def. Jessup was of course not entitled to

immunity.

17
 DEF. WILSON CONCEALED DEF. JACK NEIL PETERSON’S PERJURY

43. Here, Defendants Jessup and Wilson conspired to conceal perjury and the falsification of a

non-existent “July 29, 2009, judgment”, Doc. # 432-2, 05/21/2010, Case 2:2007-cv-00228:

DEF. WILSON’S BRAZEN PERVERSION OF FACTS & SUPREME LAW

44. Here, Def. Wilson brazenly perverted the indisputable facts and law. Here, there were

a. NO frivolity;

b. NO “frivolous appeal motion”;

c. NO “$5,048.60 judgment”;

d. NO “rule 38 motion”;

e. NO “frivolous appeal”;

f. NO “lien”;

g. NO “bill of costs”, fake “$5,048.60 attorney’s fees”.

45. Here, Def. Wilson brazenly perverted the indisputable public record, Doc. # 365:

18
46. Here, Def. Wilson perverted the indisputable facts and law and brazenly concealed that

a. The “writ of execution” was falsified, Doc. # 425, and had expired;

b. The “writ”, Doc. # 425, was a prima facie fraud and extortion scheme;

c. NOT based on any authentic lien or judgment under Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.;

d. The fake “writ” was never legally served;

e. Had a false address:

47. Here, there was a pattern and policy of organized Government crime and corruption.

Here year after year, judge after judge, in layer after layer of Government deception, new

claims arose in this organized crime scheme and judicial corruption machine. Here, Def.

Wilson is merely the latest “edition” and/or “perpetrator” of unchecked judicial crime.

DEF. WILSON’S INCOMPREHENSIBLE UNSUPPORTED NONSENSE, DOC. # 67

19
48. Def. Wilson’s “report and recommendation”, Doc. # 67, is rambling incomprehensible

nonsense without any factual support. Here, Florida law did not recognize

49. Facially incomprehensible “O.R. 569/875”;

50. Said fake “land parcels”;

51. Fake colorless “land claim” in violation of Ch. 95; 73, 74, Fla. Stat.;

52. Fake non-domesticated “judgment”.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Government corruption and racketeering victims demand

1. An Order clarifying said $24.30 satisfaction of final mandate, Doc. # 365;

2. An Order instructing the Clerk to electronically mail communications to:

jrbu@aol.com and bhtjw@aol.com;

3. An Order recusing Def. Crooked U.S. Magistrate Thomas G. Wilson;

4. An Order striking Doc. # 67 because of said material misrepresentation, fraudulent

concealment, and case fixing;

5. An Order forwarding this Notice of Appeal to Sheryl L. Loesch, Clerk of Court, ATTN:

Magistrate Judge Reappointment Comments, U.S. District Court, Orlando, FL 32801;

6. An Order taking judicial notice of said Florida Statutes;

7. An Order taking judicial notice of CH. 712; 95; 73, 74; 55; §§ 695.26, 695.09, 689.01,

55.10, 55.509, FLORIDA STATUTES, and the FLORIDA ENFORCEMENT OF

FOREIGN JUDGMENT ACT;

8. An Order taking judicial notice of

a. Art. I, s. 10, Fla. Const., stating that "No . . . law impairing the obligation of contracts

shall be passed.";

b. Art. I, s. 2, Fla. Const. stating that "[a]ll natural persons are equal before the law. . .";

20
 c. Article I, s. 9, Fla. Const., stating that "[n]o person shall be deprived of . . . property

without due process of law…”.

See fake “lien”, fake “writ”; fake “land parcels”; fake “resolution/law”; fake “judgment”.

9. An Order declaring the facially fraudulent “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, violative of

Fed.R.Civ.P. 69 and null and void;

10. An Order declaring the lack of any genuine authentic foreign (out-of-Florida) judgment;

11. An Order declaring the falsified “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, 2:07-cv-228, null and void;

12. An Order recusing and disqualifying Defendant Crooked and objectively partial Judge

James S. Moody, Jr.;

13. An Order recusing Def. Crooked Charlene E. Honeywell because of publicly recorded

organized crime, racketeering, corruption, bribery, retaliation against the Plaintiffs, and

extortion of said money and Lot 15A in violation of Florida and Federal law;

14. An Order vacating and/or setting aside the prima facie unconstitutional and null and void

“pre-filing injunction”, Doc. # 245, which was for criminal and illegal purposes of, e.g.,

cover-up, concealment, and conspiracy to extort said money and land, Lot 15A;

15. An Order recusing Def. Crooked S. Polster Chappell, because she conspired to conceal

said falsifications and extend the record racketeering and retaliation;

16. An Order vacating and/or setting aside any and all orders by Defendants Sheri Polster

Chappell and Charlene Edwards Honeywell, because they were procured through fraud,

and falsification and destruction of official records, documents, and conclusive evidence;

17. An Order declaring that Defendant K. M. Wilkinson did NOT “have any lien”;

18. An Order declaring that Defendant Wilkinson did NOT “hold any $5,048.60 judgment” as

falsely pretended and falsified by said Defendant Wilkinson and Defendant Crooked

21
 Attorney JACK N. PETERSON [see falsified, fraudulent and deceptive “affidavits”

asserting a fake “July 29, 2009 judgment” in the Collier and Lee County Public Records;

19. An EMERGENCY Order suspending and enjoining as absolutely mandatory any

proceedings on any illegal and criminal execution in violation of, e.g., Chapters 55 and 56,

Fla. Stat., and the 4th, 14th, 1st, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendments, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 – 1968;

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242; s. 838.022, Fla. Stat.;

20. An Order sanctioning Defendant Attorney JACK N. PETERSON for recorded perjury and

conspiring with Def. Wilkinson and other Government Officials to extort, racketeer,

retaliate, and deliberately deprive Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott;

21. An Order declaring the final record mandate in the amount of $24.30 paid;

22. An Order vacating and setting aside the facially oppressive and unconstitutional “pre-filing

injunction”, Doc. # 245, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, which on its face was for criminal and

illegal purposes of racketeering, retaliation, intimidation, oppression, and “protection” of

the organized Criminals and criminal Defendants in this Court and the 11th Circuit;

23. An Order restraining and preventing the record violations of section 1962 under the RICO

civil provisions;

24. An Order declaring the lack of any recorded mandate and/or money judgment other than the

$24.30, which was “issued as mandate on June 11, 2009” and recorded on June 15, 2009

pursuant to the certified Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, U.S. District Court, M.D.

Florida, Fort Myers Division;

25. An Order declaring that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction

on 06/11/2009, as had also been evidenced by its own Case Docket, 08-13170-BB];

22
26. An Order sanctioning and punishing Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson for the publicly

recorded falsifications of, e.g., said fake “judgment”, “land parcels”, fake “resolution”,

extortion, and racketeering, all of which obstructed justice;

27. An Order declaring INSTRUMENT 4371834, O.R. 4517 PG 1914, Collier County Public

Records, and the equally fraudulent filing in Lee County part of a racketeering, extortion,

and fraud scheme

28. An Order restraining any further racketeering by Defendant Government Officials and in

particular the illegal forced selling of Plaintiffs’ said riparian Cayo Costa property, Lot 15A,

in the absence of any recorded “$5,048.60” “judgment”;

29. An Order dissolving and/or reorganizing the corrupt Government enterprise under, e.g., civil

RICO, and 18 U.S.C. 1964(a);

30. An Order removing the publicly recorded corrupting influence and make due provision for

said express fundamental rights of innocent persons under the Florida and Federal

Constitutions and, e.g., the 14th, 1st, 7th, 4th, 5th, and 11th U.S. Constitutional Amendments;

31. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked, Objectively Partial, and Unfit

Government Racketeer John E. Steele;

32. An Order making the Government enterprise of record subject of injunctive relief, because it

is designed to aid the illegal enterprise of, e.g., obstructing justice, retaliating and

punishing, and extorting money, Government fees, and property;

33. An Order enjoining said U.S. Courts from retaliating against the Plaintiffs because they

blew the whistle on Government crimes & corruption, rather than punishing the Defendant

Racketeers of record and providing remedies and relief to the Plaintiff racketeering and

corruption victims;

23
34. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked and Objectively Partial and Unfit

Judge C. E. Honeywell;

35. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Corrupt and Objectively Partial and Unfit

Judge S. Polster Chappell;

36. An Order for equitable relief;

37. An Order declaring Plaintiffs’ record title to Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, free & clear and

unencumbered;

38. An Order declaring fake “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-

00001.0000” falsified and prima facie forgeries as conclusively evidenced by the 1912

Cayo Costa Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25;

39. An Order for EMERGENCY relief from the publicly recorded public corruption, extortion,

coercion, fraud, and concealment in said Courts;

40. An Order for compensatory damages;

41. An Order for triple punitive damages;

42. An Order for triple punitive damages under, e.g., Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1964, 1964(c);

43. An Order for expenses, costs, legal expenses, and fees;

44. An Order enjoining any and all Governments and the Defendants and Officials from any

trespass onto the private undedicated “Cayo Costa” “Subdivision” as legally described in

reference to said 1912 Plat in PB 3 PG 25;

45. An Order declaring the prima facie forgeries of non-existent “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” fraudulent and criminal acts of record;

46. An Order permanently enjoining any and all entries and publications of any “resolution

569/875”, “O.R. 569/875”, “legislative act 569/875”, and non-existent “land parcels” “12-

24
 44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” from any and all Government

records and publications;

47. An Order permanently enjoining any and all Governments and Defendants from fraudulently

“claiming” “asserting” “publishing” Government ownership of the street lands along the

Gulf of Mexico as legally described and conveyed in reference to the Plat of the prima facie

private “Cayo Costa” Subdivision;

48. An Order enjoining and restraining any extortion of property and money and foreclosure

fraud by Defendants Eugene C. Turner, Richard D. DeBoest, II, Chene M. Thompson, and

Hugh D. Hayes.

___________________________
/s/Jorg Busse, M.D., M.M., M.B.A.
Private Attorney General; Plaintiff public corruption & racketeering victim
10 Benning ST # 135
West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402, U.S.A.
c/o International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
The Hague, Netherlands

_____________________
[/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott]
Private Attorney General; Plaintiff Government racketeering & corruption victim
10 Benning Street # 135
West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402, U.S.A.
c/o International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
The Hague, Netherlands

25