Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Proposal
ENSC 26 A-4L
Mendoza, Monique Irish B.
Sabio, Joseph Angelo R.
I. Background of the Study
Beams must have an acceptable factor of safety from other forms of beam failure, which
may have great uncertainty towards predicting them. Shear failure or diagonal tension failure is
one type of beam failure that is difficult to predict properly despite the advances in technology.
Shear failure occurs so suddenly that there are no signs that this type of failure will occur soon.
Thus shear reinforcement is needed to make sure that if a beam is to be overloaded, flexural
Shear resistance in the beam can be due to the uncracked portions of the concrete, due
to the aggregate interlock, and the flexural rigidity of the dowels or tension members provided
in the beam as longitudinal reinforcement. However shear force due to each effect has not yet
been made, that is why shear capacity of the beam without reinforcements is estimated to be
equal to the total shear force due to the resistance of the aforementioned effects. That is why
reinforcement against shear is needed namely the stirrups. Stirrups are provided to ensure full
Stirrups are widely used as clamps to prevent spreading in shear cracks, and that only
shear occurs in the stirrups and not in the cracks of the concrete. These stirrups could carry the
shear force directly, prevents the cracks from getting bigger, and to increase beam strength and
ductility.
Based on the National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP), design of beams for shear
Equation 1
where: = total shear force applied at a given section of the beam due to factored loads
= nominal shear strength
= 0.75
Nominal shear strength is equal to the sum of the shear strength of the concrete and
= + Equation 2
The shear strength of the concrete is computed as shown in Equation 3 and shear
strength of the shear reinforcement or the stirrups is shown in Equation 4.
1
= Equation 3
6
= Equation 4
The critical section assumed for the design is the shear force at the cross section with a
distance d from the face of the support.
II. Sample Computations
Given:
Width, b = 350 mm
Height, h = 600 mm (effective depth, d= 535 mm)
Stirrup diameter = 10 mm
fc= 21 MPa
fy = 414 MPa
fyt= 275 MPa
Wu= 65 kN/m
L= 6 m
Simply supported beam
Solution:
(75/) (6)
= = =
2
Determine Vc
1
Vc = ( )
6
1
Vc = 0.75 ( 21(350)(535))
6
= .
Determine Zones
225
=
3000 535 3000
= .
Since Vc< Vud < 3Vc, there are 2 zones!
= 267.5
Vc 184.875 107.2609124
= = = 103.4854501
0.75
2
4 (102 )(275)(535)
=
103.4854501
= 223.3197124
For Zone B:
Length of zone B:
225 107.2609124
=
3000 3000
= 2991.955432
For Zone A:
6000 2(50) 2(14)(220)
=
260
= 1
Final Design
For both sides:
1 @ 50 mm
15 @ 220 mm
III. Sample Interface
Sample Result
IV. Flowchart
START
Yes No
Is Vu > Vc/2?
Compute Vc
Vc/2 Message:
3Vc No stirrups are
needed for the
beam.
Yes No
Is Vc/2 <
Vu Vc?
Zone A Exists!
Sa=smallest(d/2,600,3Avfyt/bw)
A
A
Yes No
Is Vc < Vu
3Vc?
Yes No
Is 3Vc < Vu
5Vc?
E
E
Yes No
Is Vu >
5Vc?
Message:
Section is too small to
accommodate stirrups.
Therefore increase beam
dimensions.
B C D
END