Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=
1+
ATTERBERG LIMIT All Disturbed and Liquid Limit, LL - Compression Index, (Skempton, 1944)
Undisturbed Sample Plastic Limit, PL = 0.009( 10)
Plasticity Index, PI - Liquidity Index
( )
=
where, LI ~ 1 (normally consolidated)
LI ~ 0 (over-consolidated)
MOISTURE CONTENT All Disturbed and Moisture Content, Wn (%) - Calculate for Soil Unit Weight/Bulk Density
Undisturbed Sample = (1 + )
1-DIMENSIONAL Undisturbed Sample Void Ratio, e - Recompression Index, Cr
CONSOLIDATION Compression Index, Cc = (5% 10%)
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv - Recompression Ratio, Rr
Pre-compression Load, kN/m2 =
1+
Water/Moisture Content, % - Calculating for Overconsolidation Ratio,
CONSOLIDATION UNDRAINED Undisturbed Sample Total Stress Effective Stress - Effective Stress parameters were used for
TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST, Cohesion, C Cohesion, C long-term analysis.
(C.I.U TEST) Angle of Friction, Angle of Friction, - Total Stress parameters were used for
short-term analysis
UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED Undisturbed Sample Apparent Cohesion, C - The parameters obtained were used on
COMPRESSION TEST (U.U TEST) Angle of Friction, short-term analysis.
DIRECT SHEAR BOX All Disturbed and Angle of Friction, - Use on short-term analysis
Undisturbed Sample
(Cohesionless soil
only)
UNCONFINED COMPRESSION All Disturbed and Unconfined Compression Rock Strength, - To calculate Rock Socket Friction,fs
ROCK STRENGTH TEST Undisturbed Sample quc or C (MPa) =
ROCK TEST
In cohesive soils, SPT N values are usually used to correlate with undrained shear strength, Cu and some of the correlations commonly used in Malaysia are
as follows:
From the Danish Code (Danish Standard DS 415) suggested that the value of C is better related to the undrained shear strength Cu because both shear
strength are influenced by soil structure and dilation. Based on the Danish Code, the drained shear strength is equal to 10 % of the undrained shear strength.
= 0.1
FRICTION ANGLE, ()
Based on insufficient data provided from S.I. (Soil Investigation), the friction angle need to be predicted using different approach. The approach was to
correlate the friction angle with the number of blows (SPT, N). Table 1 below show the correlation between SPT, N with the approximate friction angle, ().
0 to 4 < 30
4 to 10 30 to 35
10 to 30 35 to 40
30 to 50 40 to 45
> 50 > 45
Table 1: Correlation between SPT-N value and friction angle. (Meyerhof, 1956)
There is also other empirical equations relating the SPT N-value and () as described in below: