You are on page 1of 5

Bainite However, it was also clear that bainite formation

kinetics exhibit characteristics of a nucleation and


Bainite is a microstructural product of eutectoid growth process and differ drastically from martensite
decomposition; it forms when a high-temperature formation kinetics.
phase decomposes into two different phases on cool-
ing. It is distinguished from pearlite, another eutectoid
decomposition product, by its morphology. Bainite is 2. Displacive Mechanism
a nonlamellar mixture of the two product phases that
evolves when these phases grow at different rates. Proposed mechanisms for the bainite reaction have
Pearlite is a lamellar mixture that forms when the evolved along two lines of reasoning: the displacive
product phases grow cooperatively. Bainitic micro- hypothesis that emphasizes similarities between
structures have significant commercial value because bainite and martensite, and the diffusional hypoth-
they can be produced economically with simple pro- esis that emphasizes commonalties between bainite
cessing, and they provide some alloy steels and cast and proeutectoid ferrite. The displacive model, first
irons with an attractive combination of mechanical articulated by Robertson and by Davenport and Bain
properties. and later developed by others, envisioned bainite
Although bainite is found in many nonferrous formation as a two-step process: an essentially marten-
alloys, research on the subject since the early 1900s has sitic change of crystal structure that produces carbon
focused primarily on alloy steels. A brief description of supersaturated ferrite followed almost immediately by
some of the intriguing phenomena associated with carbide precipitation (Robertson 1929, Davenport
bainite in ferrous alloys is provided with an emphasis and Bain 1930). Early versions of this theory supposed
on the physical metallurgy of bainite. A more complete the ferrite forms in carbon-poor regions of austenite,
introduction to the subject is available in several with the ferritic component inheriting the carbon
publications (Bainite 1990, 1991, Pacific Rim 1994, concentration of the carbon-poor austenite. However,
Hillert 1995). carbon-poor regions in austenite on the size scale of
bainite crystals have not been observed experimentally
and they do not appear plausible on statistical
grounds, so this aspect of the theory was eventually
1. Introduction
discarded.
The first systematic investigations of the intermediate Zener provided a thermodynamic basis for the
product, now called bainite in honor of Edgar C. Bain, displacive hypothesis in a seminal paper on ferrous
began with observations of steel microstructures pro- transformations published in 1946. His model assum-
duced by isothermal decomposition of austenite ed the ferritic component of bainite (i.e., bainite before
(Hultgren 1920, Robertson 1929, Davenport and Bain carbides appear) inherits the full carbon concentration
1930). These workers used optical microscopy to show of the parent austenite. This approach identified the Bs
bainite (i) has an acicular structure, (ii) contains temperature as the critical temperature below which it
carbides, and (iii) appears mainly at temperatures is possible to convert austenite to ferrite without a
below the range for pearlite. Early work showed it is composition change. The model distinguished bainitic
found in many alloy steels and its appearance varies ferrite from martensite by supposing bainite forms as
considerably with temperature and composition a strain-free product while martensite forms with
(Griffiths et al. 1939, Hultgren 1947). accompanying strain energy.
The first data on the kinetics of bainite formation Zener suggested transformation stasis could arise
came from Germany. Magnetization and dilatometry from a loss of driving force for ferrite growth as
measurements on alloy steels obtained during aus- carbon leaks out of ferrite and into the surrounding
tenite decomposition show bainite forms rapidly at austenite. As was then noted in the published dis-
first but then stops well before the parent austenite is cussion accompanying Zeners paper (Troiano 1946),
completely consumed (Wever and Lange 1932, Wever this explanation for stasis is not satisfactory because it
and Jellinghaus 1932). This behavior, which is limited requires a change in the ferrite composition during
to the higher temperatures at which bainite forms, is growth, thereby violating Zeners initial assumption
called the incomplete reaction phenomenon or trans- that ferrite and austenite have identical compositions.
formation stasis. The amount of bainite present when It was also noted that the calculated Bs temperatures
transformation ceases increases from zero at the did not agree with existing data. Predicted Bs tempera-
uppermost temperature of bainite formation (desig- tures in FeCMo and FeCCr alloys have been
nated the bainite start or Bs temperature) to nearly shown to lie as much as 200 mC above actual bainite
100% as the transformation temperature decreases. start temperatures (Enomoto and Tsubakino 1991).
Based on the etching characteristics of bainite, early More sophisticated displacive models for bainite
workers speculated the ferritic component of bainite growth include strain energy contributions to bainite
incorporates an increasing amount of carbon from and incorporate partial carbon supersaturation in
austenite as the transformation temperature decreases. ferrite during growth (Hsu 1990, Bhadeshia and

1
Bainite

Christian 1990, Olson et al. 1990). However, these


models remain to be tested against available data from
a series of alloys.
Attempts have also been made to determine the
carbon concentration in bainitic ferrite before carbides
appear, but most have relied upon indirect methods or
yielded a wide range of concentrations (Aaronson et
al. 1990). This important question remains to be
resolved.
In 1952 Ko and Cottrell made observations of
polished surfaces subsequently transformed to bainite
to show bainite produces a surface relief similar to that
of martensite. They also employed hot-stage micro-
scopy to follow bainite formation in situ and found
bainite grows much more slowly than martensite.
They reasoned bainitic ferrite grows by a martensitic
mechanism but at a rate paced by the removal of
carbon from ferrite. Carbon removal was suggested to Figure 1
occur by diffusion into austenite, by precipitation of Variation in eutectoid microstructures with ratio of the
carbides in ferrite, or both. In contrast to Zeners product growth rates, G\G, and nucleation rate of the
approach, Ko and Cottrell argued the carbon had to slower growing product, J *, when the volume
fraction of the slower growing phase is small (after Lee
be removed from ferrite during growth (rather than et al. 1988).
after growth) in order to reduce the dilatational strain
when ferrite forms and to provide sufficient driving
force to overcome the shear strain associated with a
martensitic transformation mechanism. The finding Electron microscopy observations of bainite and
that bainite grows slowly was verified by bainite pearlite have led to a mechanistic basis for this
lengthening and thickening kinetics measurements approach. The resulting, more detailed, model articu-
made later with other techniquesthe measured rates lates the circumstances under which bainite and
were often slower than rates calculated on the basis of pearlite form during a general eutectoid reaction (Lee
carbon diffusion in austenite (Aaronson and Hall et al. 1988). This model relates the internal mor-
1994, Hillert 1995). phology of a eutectoid product to two factors: (i) the
The suggestion that the bainite structure change is relative growth rates of the eutectoid phases, and (ii)
essentially martensitic has not been supported by the rate at which the slower-growing phase renucleates
experiment. Unlike martensite, whose interfacial on the boundary between the faster-growing phase
structure is glissile (Sandvik and Wayman 1983), and the parent (Fig. 1). An attractive feature of the
carbide-free bainite has a sessile interfacial structure model is its ability to explain a variety of bainite
that is incapable of moving in martensitic fashion morphologies (Fig. 2) in terms of simple factors that,
(Rigsbee and Aaronson 1979, Li et al. 1988). In at least in principle, can be measured or estimated. For
addition, single-crystal plates of ferrite have been example, the model has been applied to interpret
shown to produce tent-shaped surface reliefsa type transitions in internal morphology and in aggregate
of relief wholly incompatible with a martensitic trans- shape of evolving eutectoid structures (the external
formation mechanism (Hall and Aaronson 1994). morphology) as a function of transformation tem-
perature and carbon concentration in a series of
FeC2 wt.% Mn alloys (Spanos et al. 1990 a, b). By
considering how the nucleation and growth rates of
3. Diffusional Mechanism
ferrite and cementite change with temperature and
Following a systematic investigation of microstruc- carbon concentration, it is possible to explain the
tures in a series of alloy steels, Hultgren proposed a relatively sharp transition between upper and lower
diffusional hypothesis for bainite formation. He sug- bainite and the more gradual changes from upper and
gested bainite evolved with the nucleation of pro- lower bainite to nodular bainite.
bainitic (acicular) ferrite, then nucleation of cementite Hultgrens original model of bainite formation also
particles on the ferrite\austenite boundaries, followed proposed an explanation for transformation stasis
by the cementite being surrounding by growing ferrite, (Hultgren 1947). Two types of ferrite were envisioned:
and eventually nucleation of new cementite particles. orthoferrite, which differs from austenite in carbon
In contrast to bainite, pearlite was suggested to concentration and in the concentrations of substitu-
develop by nucleation of a cementite plate, followed tional alloying elements, and paraferrite (paraequilib-
by an adjacent ferrite plate, and then coordinated rium ferrite), which differs from austenite in carbon
lengthening of the plates. concentration but not in alloy content. It was sug-

2
Bainite

Figure 2
Schematic illustrations of various bainite morphologies. The white constituent represents the majority eutectoid phase
(e.g., ferrite) and the dark constituent represents the minority phase (e.g., cementite). (a) Nodular bainite, (b) columnar
bainite along a prior matrix grain boundary, (c) a sheaf of upper bainite laths, (d) lower bainite, (e) grain boundary
allotriomorphic bainite, and (f) inverse bainite (after Spanos et al. 1990 b).

gested that the Bs temperature is the temperature tend to be those in which ferrite growth is significantly
below which paraferrite appears, and transformation slower than predicted under paraequilibrium (Shiflet
stasis just below the Bs temperature is caused by a slow and Aaronson 1990). The ability of specific solute
reaction rate associated with the upper portion of the species to slow ferrite growth is widely attributed to a
C curve of paraferrite on the TTT diagram. This solute drag effect, or solute drag-like effect, depending
explanation for the Bs temperature and transform- on how one describes the origin of the drag force
ation stasis does not explain subsequent experimental (Reynolds et al. 1990 a, Purdy and Brechet 1995,
results. Partitioning data and measured growth Enomoto 1999). Efforts to ascertain the degree of
kinetics from a variety of FeCX alloys indicate the solute adsorption at ferrite\austenite boundaries have
transition to paraferrite occurs at temperatures well yielded somewhat mixed results, although the presence
above the range of observed Bs temperatures of molybdenum accumulations at these boundaries in
(Aaronson et al. 1988). Also, the amount of ferrite FeCMo alloys now appears certain (Aaronson et al.
found during transformation stasis in FeCCr and 1990, Aaronson et al. in press). There is, however, a
FeCMo alloys is well below the metastable fraction large body of microstructural and kinetic evidence for
expected to form under paraequilibrium (Enomoto the solute drag effect in steels, and investigations into
and Tsubakino 1991). interactions between solutes and growth interfaces are
A promising framework for understanding trans- likely to be a productive area for research.
formation stasis was built on the effects of alloying The central assumption needed to explain trans-
elements on ferrite growth. Measured transformation formation stasis below Bs is that the solute drag effect
kinetics in ternary alloys (e.g., Reynolds et al. must be strong enough to slow markedly or stop ferrite
1990 a, b) have shown transformation stasis is not a growth. This is feasible when sufficient concentrations
general property of bainite, but rather a characteristic of carbon and of an effective solute are present, the
of particular alloying elements and concentrations. In reaction temperature is relatively low, and ferrite
general, alloys that exhibit transformation stasis also boundaries have migrated far enough to pick up the

3
Bainite

dragging solute. Under these circumstances, re- Aaronson H I, Hall M G 1994 A history of the controversy over
nucleation of ferrite on immobilized ferrite\austenite the roles of shear and diffusion in plate formation above Md
boundaries (sympathetic nucleation) becomes feasible and a comparison of the atomic mechanisms of these
if sufficient undercooling is available. The temperature processes. Metall. Mater. Trans. 25A, 1797819
Aaronson H I, Reynolds Jr. W T, Shiflet G J, Spanos G 1990
below which copious sympathetic nucleation begins
Bainite viewed three different ways. Metall. Trans. 21A,
corresponds to the kinetic Bs temperature. The de- 134380
generate ferrite morphology found below the bay Bainite 1990 Symposium on international conference on bainite:
temperature results from a change from relatively parts I and II. Metall. Trans. 21A, 765893, 1343556
smooth, ledgewise migration of ferrite boundaries to Bainite 1991 Special issue on the bainitic transformation. Mater.
irregular startstop migration during which ferrite Trans. JIM 32, 631789
nucleates, grows until stopped by solute drag, and is Bhadeshia H K D H, Christian J W 1990 On bainite formation.
then forced to renucleate again (Reynolds et al. Metall. Trans. 21A, 76797
1990 a). Davenport E S, Bain E C 1930 Transformation of austenite at
constant subcritical temperatures. Trans. AIME 90, 11754
Enomoto M 1999 Influence of solute drag on the growth of
proeutectoid ferrite in FeCMn alloy. Acta Metall. 47,
4. Summary 353340
Enomoto M, Tsubakino H 1991 Morphology and thermo-
Hypotheses for the mechanism of bainite formation in dynamics of bainitic transformation in ferrous and non-
steels have been discussed in the context of available ferrous alloys. Mater. Trans. JIM 32, 64257
experimental evidence. Single-crystal ferrite plates Griffiths W T, Pfeil L B, Allen N P 1939 The intermediate
often exhibit complex surface reliefs that are incon- transformation in alloy steels. Second Report Alloy Steels
sistent with a displacive transformation mechanism. Research Committee, Special Report No. 24. Iron and Steel
The interfacial structure found on ferrite plates formed Institute, London, pp. 34367
at low temperatures is sessile and must migrate in a Hall M G, Aaronson H I 1994 Formation of invariant plane-
nonconservative fashion. Also, Bs temperatures calcu- strain and tent-shaped surface reliefs by the diffusional ledge
lated assuming a displacive growth mechanism for mechanism. Metall. Mater. Trans. 25A, 192331
ferrite are in poor agreement with the Bs temperatures Hillert M 1995 The nature of bainite. ISIJ Int. 35, 113440
of many steels. These circumstances indicate the ferrite Hsu T Y 1990 On bainite formation. Metall. Trans. 21A, 81116
Hultgren 1920 A Metallographic Study on Tungsten Steels.
component of bainite does not form by a displacive Wiley, New York
transformation mechanism. Hultgren A 1947 Isothermal transformation of austenite. Trans.
Features of the internal and external morphologies ASM 39, 91589
of bainite can be explained by considering the relative Ko T, Cottrell S A 1952 The formation of bainite. JISI 172,
nucleation rates and ledgewise, diffusional growth 30713
rates of the product phases. Measured ferrite growth Lee H J, Spanos G, Shiflet G J, Aaronson H I 1988 Mechanisms
kinetics significantly slower than those calculated of the bainite (non-lamellar eutectoid) reaction and a fun-
assuming paraequilibrium are found in alloys that damental distinction between bainite and pearlite (lamellar
exhibit transformation stasis. Slow ferrite growth in eutectoid) reactions. Acta Metall. 36, 112940
these alloys is ascribed to a solute drag effect. When Li C, Perovic V, Purdy G R 1988 Observations of the bainite\
potent, the solute drag effect is believed to be re- austenite interface in steels. In: Lorimer G W (ed.) Phase
sponsible for the appearance of copious sympathetic Transformations 87. Institute of Metals, London, pp. 3269
Olson G B, Bhadeshia H K D H, Cohen M 1990 Coupled
ferrite nucleation below Bs. If this initially takes place diffusional\displacive transformations: II. Solute trapping.
without significant interphase boundary carbide pre- Metall. Trans. 21A, 8059
cipitation, transformation stasis appears. Pacific Rim 1994 Proceedings of the Pacific Rim conference on
the roles of shear and diffusion in the formation of plate-
See also: Pearlite; Nucleation; Precipitate Growth shaped transformation products. Metall. Trans. 25A, 1758
Kinetics 2016, 2553673
Purdy G R, Brechet Y J M 1995 A solute drag treatment of
alloying elements on the rate of the proeutectoid ferrite
transformation in steels. Acta Metall. 43, 376374
Bibliography Reynolds Jr. W T, Li F Z, Shui C K, Aaronson H I 1990 a The
Aaronson H I, Enomoto M, Reynolds Jr. W T 1988 Influence of incomplete transformation phenomenon in FeCMo alloys.
the chemistry and structure of austenite:ferrite boundaries Metall. Trans. 21A, 143363
upon growth kinetics and composition of grain boundary Reynolds Jr. W T, Liu S K, Li F Z, Hartfield S, Aaronson H I
ferrite allotriomorphs in FeCX alloys. In: Embury J D, 1990 b An investigation of the generality of incomplete
Purdy G R (eds.) Adances in Phase Transitions. Pergamon, transformation to bainite in FeCX alloys. Metall. Trans.
New York, pp. 2036 21A, 147991
Aaronson H I, Fletcher H A, Smith G D W, Garratt-Reed A J, Rigsbee J M, Aaronson H I 1979 The interfacial structure of the
Reynolds Jr. W T, Purdy G R 2000 Effects of Mo on ferrite broad faces of ferrite plates. Acta Metall. 27, 36576
formation in FeCMo alloys. Steel Heat Treating in the New Robertson J M 1929 The microstructure of rapidly cooled steel.
Millennium. ASM International, Materials Park, OH J. Iron Steel Inst. 119, 391419

4
Bainite

Sandvik B P J, Wayman C M 1983 Characteristics of lath Troiano A R 1946 Discussion of kinetics of the decomposition
martensite: II. The martensiteaustenite interface. Metall. of austenite. Trans. AIME 167, 5835
Trans. 14A, 82334 Wever F, Jellinghaus W 1932 Transformation kinetics of
Shiflet G J, Aaronson H I 1990 Growth and overall trans- austenite: II. Dilatometry investigations of austenite decom-
formation kinetics above the bay temperature in FeCMo position. Mitt. Kaiser-Wilhelm-Inst. Eisenforsch. 14, 859
alloys. Metall. Trans. 21A, 141332 Wever F, Lange H 1932 Transformation kinetics of austenite: I.
Spanos G, Fang H S, Aaronson H I 1990 a A mechanism for the Magnetic investigations of austenite decomposition. Mitt.
formation of lower bainite. Metall. Trans. 21A, 138190 Kaiser-Wilhelm-Inst. Eisenforsch. 14, 7183
Spanos G, Fang H S, Sarma D S, Aaronson H I 1990 b Zener C 1946 Kinetics of the decomposition of austenite. Trans.
Influence of carbon concentration and reaction temperature AIME 167, 55083
upon bainite morphology in Fe-C-2 pct Mn alloys. Metall.
Trans. 21A, 1391411 W. T. Reynolds, Jr.

Copyright ' 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.


All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted
in any form or by any means : electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Encyclopedia of Materials : Science and Technology
ISBN: 0-08-0431526
pp. 453457

You might also like