Professional Documents
Culture Documents
G o m m u n i s t Labor t e a m h a s been awarded to the b r i c k p r e s s - At the Yauskiy Dolomite Combine the title of Communist
ing t e a m headed by S .S. Marehenko and also to the t e a m Labor shift has been awarded to the shift headed by foreman
headed by P . K . D e m s k e n k o , an e x c a v a t o r o p e r a t o r , which N.I. Sidorov. In 1960 the shift completed its program by
fulfills h i s quota by 110-115%. 103.5% and increased the output of first-grade production.
PRODUCTION
TECHNOLOGY OF L I G H T W E I G H T BRICK
The technology of lightweight f o r s t e r i t e p a r t s u s i n g tained from sea water with the addition of wood shavings
m a g n e s i u m s i l i c a t e s with f e r r o u s c o m p o s i t i o n s and p r o p - (2). In the Polish People's Republic these parts used to be
e r t i e s h a s been developed o v e r a n u m b e r Of y e a r s (1). made by the foam method from magnesite, fireclay and
lime. The initial materials were ground fine enough to
The mixture for forsterite lightweight parts used to be pass through a 0.2 mm mesh, cast in metal molds, dried
obtained by mixing asbestos waste (fiber length O .8 mm) with and fired at 1450 ~ for three hours, after which they were
crude magnesite in a rolling mill in the proportion of 7:1, polished (3). The properties of forsterite foam light-
and wetting to 8 - 10%. weight are compared with other types of lightweight in
Table 1.
The g r e e n m a t e r i a l was p r e s s e d in hydraulic p r e s s e s
at 700 - 800 k g / c m 2, and fired at 1300 ~ a f t e r d r y i n g . On At the Ukrainian Research Institute, the writers of
account of the high d e g r e e of s h r i n k a g e , which often r e a c h e d this article developed a method of manufacturing fors-
11-12%, it was n e c e s s a r y to polish the p a r t s . terite lightweight using combustible additives and press-
ing by the semidry method.
In B r i t a i n they u s e the plastic method of making f o r s t e r i t e
lightweight p a r t s with fired s e r p e n t i n e and m a g n e s i u m ob- A d e s c r i p t i o n of the r a w m a t e r i a l u s e d is given in Tables 2 and 3.
164 V . D . T s i g l e r and B . Y e . P i n d r i k
TABLE 1
Content, % I
Method of
production
Semidry
SlO= 1 ~zO
Additional
s h r i ~ a g e at
Not d e t e r m i n e d
i650 ~ , %
ISpaliing r e s i s -
itaace a i r cool-
ing heating c y c l e s
Porosity,
%
41,0
Bulk
g/cm3
I
density,
compres-
sive
strength
k~lom~
1,89 100--150
'
[ll*
.
TABLE 2
The mixtures were mixed in laboratory rolling mills The effect of the c o m b u s t i b l e additive on the p r o p e r t i e s
and moistened with sulfite-eellulose liquor (1% per dry of the lightweight w a s studied in a s e r i e s of c h a r g e s with
residue} with the addition of w a t e r . C u b e - s h a p e d s p e c i - the addition of 10, 20, 30 o r 4 0 % oil c o k e w i t h a 4:1 r a t i o of
m e n s with a 50 m m edge and p r i s m s 110 x 30 x 30 m m w e r e c r u d e dunite to f i r e d m a g n e s i t e . The dunite and oil coke
p r e s s e d at 250 k g / e m 2 , d r i e d at 110-'40 ~ and fired in a u s e d w e r e f i n e r than 1 r a m , while the m a g u e s i t e was l e s s
m a z u t - f i r e d kiln at 1500~ than 0~ r a m . The v a r i a t i o n in the p r o p e r t i e s of the
Technology of Lightweight Brick 165
TABLE 3 rlSb
I
Uktus dunite
Fired magnesite
3 326 51
98
f69o.~gL
Ovrueh quartzite 3 97
Oil coke 39 17
Coke dust screenings... 34 34 32 e~
t650 ~3~
~o ~ o 2 I ["""~
lightweight as a function of the addition of oil coke is 0 fO 20 30 ~0
shown in F i g . 1. When up to 40% oil coke is added to the
c h a r g e , the r e f r a c t o r i n e s s of the lightweight is not reduced;
the addition of 30% e n s u r e s s a t i s f a c t o r y p o r o s i t y and bulk
d e n s i t y , but the s t r e n g t h of the lightweight is insufficient Fig, 1. P r o p e r t i e s of lightweight as function of
in this c a s e . addition of oil coke:
1 -- total l i n e a r shrinkage; 2 -- bulk density; 3 -- c o m -
To i m p r o v e the s t r e n g t h of the m a t e r i a l , duaite and oil
p r e s s i v e s t r e n g t h ; 4 -- r e f r a c t o r i n e s s ,
coke of a different g r a i n composition w e r e t r i e d out, and
quartzite was a l s o added. The addition of finely d i s p e r s e d
quartzite h a s a good effect on the s i n t e r i n g of the p a r t s (4) characteristics of lightweight when using oil coke with grains
and also on the f o r m a t i o n of f o r s t e r i t e (5,6). finer than I and 0.5 mm make it possible to recommend a
fraction less than i ram. With this grain composition in
A s e r i e s of c h a r g e s to which 30% c o m b u s t i b l e additive the dunite and coke, the compressive strength is raised from
had been added w e r e u s e d to study the effect of the g r a i n 9 to 24 k g / c m 2 .
composition of dunite and oil coke, The dunite and m a g -
n e s i t e ratio was 4:1. It was d i s c o v e r e d t h a t the thinning of F u r t h e r i m p r o v e m e n t in the s t r e n g t h of the lightweight
the dunite h a s a good effect on the s t r e n g t h of the lightweight was achieved by partially replacing the dunite by f i n e -
m a t e r i a l . A content of about 50-65% dunite finer than 0.088 ground O v r u c h q u a r t z i t e (finer than 0. 088 m m ) i n c r e a s i n g
m m is found to be optimal 9 the addition of m a g n e s i t e (to keep the m a g n e s i t e - s i l i e a t e
modulus between 1.4 and t.72} and by r e p l a c i n g oil coke
The u s e of oil coke finer than 2.1 and 0.5 m m showed that by sifted coke d u s t (Table 4).
as the g r a i n composition b e c o m e s c o a r s e r , the bulk density
and c o m p r e s s i v e s t r e n g t h a r e i n c r e a s e d . The identical It was d i s c o v e r e d t h a t the m o i s t u r e content of the m i x t u r e s
TABLE 4
Composition of c h a r g e s and p r o p e r t i e s of lightweight
Composition, m m , % P r o p e r t i e s of lightweight
eo
b~0 q~ g~
~03
~ ~.~
~V ho
OD
i
@
~2
-~70 I
i 50
\
\
9
r~ #fOO -300 ~0~ 700 900 tI0# t300"~
I
"~ ~6 ~00 300 5O0 7O0 900 .oo t300 ~',,'W~'
should be about 7-8%, and the specific pressing pressure The phase composition of the lightweight was: 90-92%
should not be less than 200 kg/cm 2 . Having obtained forsterite~ 8-10% perieiase~ and less than 1% vitreous
positive results through the addition of quartzite, a series matter.
of specimens was prepared for the purpose of ascertaining
the possibility of producing lightweight directly from quartz- We studied the variation in properties of green material
ire and fired magnesite, using a combustible additive. from charges No. 43 and 51 over the range 100-1500 ~ . The
bulk density and loss of weight were determined from plates
The Ovruch quartzite and fired magnesite were used in 75 x 75 x 30 ram, the compressive strength was calculated
a fine-grotmd form (finer than 0.088 ram) while the additive in the heated state from cylinders 30 mm in diameter and
was finer than 1 ram, Charge No. 51 proved to be the best. length, the thermal expansion from cylinders 30 mm in
It contained: 45% rnagaesite, 25% quartzite and 30% oil diameter and 80 mm long. Results of the calculations are
coke. The synthesized forsterite lightweight fired at 1500 ~ given in Figs. 2-4.
showed a refractoriness of 1770 ~ , apparent porosity 61 ~176
bulk density 1.26 g/cm30 and compressive strength 55 T h e s h a r p v a r i a t i o n in bulk d e n s i t y and l o s s in w e i g h t
kg/cm2 o b e g a n w h e n t h e t e m p e r a t u r e r e a c h e d 300 ~ a n d w a s p a r t i c u -
l a r l y a p p a r e n t f r o m 500 to 900 ~ i , e . , b e f o r e t h e c o n t a i n e r
s i n t e r e d . Above 900 ~ t h e c h a n g e in p r o p e r t i e s is s l i g h t
T h e bulk of t h e l i g h t w e i g h t c o n s i s t e d of f o r s t e r i t e with on a c c o u n t of a l m o s t total c o m b u s t i o n of t h e c o k e . T h e
r e f r a c t i v e index 7 = 1 . 6 7 4 + 0 . 0 0 2 and a = 1 . 6 4 0 + 0 . 0 2 l o s s e s in w e i g h t a t 1500 a m o u n t e d to 32-34%; h e r e t h e bulk
a n d m a x i m u m g r a i n s i z e 0 . 2 m m ( g r a i n s 0,015 to 0 , 0 4 m m d e n s i t y d r o p p e d a c c o r d i n g l y f r o m 1 . 8 - 1.76 to 1.29 - 1.12
predominated). Among the periclase grains were segre- g/cm 3 .
g a t i o n s , 0 . 2 5 m m in s i z e , of a y e l l o w i s h - b r o w n c o l o r , w h i c h
b e l o n g e d to t h e p e r i c l a s e w h i c h h a d not r e a c t e d . V i t r e o u s The compressive strength declined sharply as the temper-
m a t t e r w a s a l s o p r e s e n t to a s l i g h t e x t e n t , a t u r e r o s e , r e a c h i n g 9 . 3 - 7 . 4 k g / c m 2 at 900~ at h i g h e r
T e c h n o l o g y of L i g h t w e i g h t B r i c k 167
TABLE 5
C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of m i x t u r e s .
NOTE: C o m m a r e p r e s e n t s d e c i m a l point.
TABLE 6
C e r a m i c p r o p e r t i e s of l i g h t w e i g h t .
NOTE: C o m m a p r e p r e s e n t s d e c i m a l point.
The mixtures were tempered in rolling mills, moistened It is clear from these figures that the production technique
with water with the addition of 1% sulfide-cellulose liquor based on semi-dry pressing of the mixture of dunite, magnesite,
168 V.D. T s i n g l e r and BoYe. Pindrik
TABLE 7
F Refractoriness
under load of
Chemical composition, % I k g / c m 2 ,~
No, Of
~harge
43 35.11 I, 75 6,38 1,06 30 54,3C 1,54 1750 1490 1545 O, 275 0,51
75
79
35,88 I ,71
34,60 2,65
7,02
2,82
1,06
0,66
Ii,45
I. 70
52,72 l ,47
57,5(] 1,66
1760
1770
1545
1420
1565
1440
O, 279
O, 280
0,57
0,63