LOAD CALC spreadsheet

Bridge Name: Jim Creek

Bridge No. : 42

Purpose: Provide a calc tool to assemble loading data needed for foundation calcs or as needed.
Loading: DEAD LOADS

Input:

Geometry: Reference:
Span 112 ft
Width 50 ft
Girder width 5.5 ft
Total Bridge Area 5600 sf

Material:
Reinforced Concrete 155 pcf TA 3.5.1-1
Steel 490 pcf
asphalt 140 pcf

Superstructure:

Type Bulb-tee girder Railing type Steel - snoco rail

Girder ID W 53_DG Railing Dims:
Girder SW 1000 plf W_avg 320 plf
Overlay_max 6 in L 224 ft

Curb Bike rail Included above

Ht 0 ft Size HSS 2 x 0.125
W 0 ft Wt 0 plf
L 0 ft L 224 ft

Diaphragms: 1/3 points Sidewalk

Spacing 37.33333 ft Ht 0 ft
Ht 4 ft W 0 ft
W 1 ft L 112 ft

Substructure:

Abutment / pile cap: Wingwall:

Ht 20 ft Ht 20 ft
W 3 ft W 3 ft
L 55.5 ft L 20 ft

Calc:
DL_girder 182 psf 1018 kip
DL_acp 70 psf 392 kip
DL_rail 320 plf 72 kip
DL_sidewalk 0 plf 0 kip
DL_curb 0 plf 0 kip
DL_diaphragm 4 psf 23 kip
DL_bike rail 0 plf 0 kip

Total Super DL 1504 kip

Super DL @ Support 752 kip

DL_abutment 1032 kip 1032 kip

DL_wingwall 372 kip 372 kip

Total Sub DL (both ends) 1404 kip

Total Sub DL (one end) 702.15

Total Support DL 1454 kip

DL / ft @ footing Total DL / abutment width 26.2 k/ ft

Approach Slab:
Depth 1.083333 ft
Length 15 ft
Width 49 ft
Total Slab DL 123.4188 k
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42

Purpose: Provide a calc tool to assemble loading data needed for foundation calcs or as needed.
Loading: LIVE LOADS
Code: AASHTO 2010 Bridge Design Specifications

Input: Reference:

Out-to-out width 37 ft
Sidewalk 0 ft
Bridge rails 3 ft
Pedestrian lane no
L_span 108 ft

Curb-to-curb width 34 ft
No. of vehicle lanes 2 Lanes AASHTO 3.6.1.1.1
Total lanes 3 Lanes

Factors:
Multiple Presence Factor calc: 0.85 AASHTO 3.6.1.1.2
Dynamic Load Allowance, IM: 1.33 AASHTO 3.6.2.1

Vehicle Live Load:

Design Truck:

14' 14' to 30'

8k 32 k 32 k

LL_truck_1 8 k AASHTO 3.6.1.2.2, 3

LL_truck_2 32 k

Design Tandem

4 ft

25 k 25 k

LL_tandem 25 k AASHTO 3.6.1.2.3

Design Lane Load

LL_design lane 0.64 klf AASHTO 3.6.1.2.4

LL Combinations: AASHTO 3.6.1.3.1

1. Design Tandem + Design Lane Load All spans

or
2. Design Truck + Design Lane Load All spans
or
3. 90% two trucks over interior support + 90% lane load Multiple span only

CASE 1 - DESIGN TANDEM

25k 25k
s_1 s_2
LL_tandem AASHTO 3.6.1.2.3

R_max

s_1 4 ft
s_2 104 ft

R_tandem_max 25k + (s_2 / L_span ) x 25k 49 k

CASE 2 - DESIGN TRUCK

32k 32k 8k
s s
AASHTO 3.6.1.2.3

R_max

s 14 ft

R_truck_max 32k + 32 (L-s/L) + 8 (L- 2s / L) 66 k

LL CALC CHECK: CASE 2 GOVERNS

LL_max truck 66 k / lane / end

DESIGN LANE LOAD

LL_lane L_span (LL_design load) / 2 ends 36 k / lane / end

DESIGN LANE LOAD + DESIGN TRUCK

LL_lane+truck LL_max truck * IM + LL_lane 123 k / lane / end

Total Support LL LL_max lane ( Total lanes) (MPF) 314 k / end

LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42

Purpose: Provide a calc tool to assemble loading data needed for foundation calcs or as needed.
Loading: SEISMIC

References: Snoco geotech report dated 12/09/2009.

2010 AASHTO Bridge Design Specs.

Input:
AASHTO:
PGA Acceleration Coefficient 0.33 g Fig 3.10.2.1-1
K_h Horiz. Accel coefficient / yielding wall 0.5 A
Dynamic rectangular pressure increment 4H
Site Class N = 100 blows/ft @ bedrock C TA 3.10.3.1-1

Site Factors:
F_pga Site factor @ zero period 1.07 TA 3.10.3.2-1

A_s Acceleration coefficient = PGA x F_pga 0.3531 3.10.9.1

EQ A_s x permanent dead load (DC, DD, DW) 4.7.4.2
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42

Purpose: Determine LC and factors required for abutment seismic design.

Load Combinations

Reference 2010 AASHTO Bridge Design Specs.

TA 3.4.1-1
NOTES
Wind loading at this location is generally low and will be neglected for abutment design.
Per 3.4.1 use Extreme event I for EQ event.

Per TA 3.4.1-2 determine load factor, gamma_p, for permanent loads.

max min
EQ - earthquake loading 1 1
DC - components / attachments 1.25 0.9
DW - wearing surfaces and utilities 1.5 0.65
EH - active 1.5 0.9
EH - passive 1.35 0.9
EV - stability 1 na
EV - abutments 1.35 1
WA, FR -- neglect
LL -- assume zero / 110 ft span / low ADT

Per TA 3.4.1-3 determine load factor, gamma_p, for permanent loads.

Load combinations:

Extreme event 1 1.0 E + 1.25 DC + 1.5 DW + 1.5 EH_active + 0.9 EH_passive + 1.0 EV
ssive + 1.0 EV
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42 W_super
V_2
Purpose: Calculate max applied bearing.
Reference: AASHTO Figure 11.6.3.2-1
beta

EQ
MATERIALS: notes: Reference
Service limit state, DL + LL Max allowable bearing pressure 20 ksf TA C10.6.2.6.1-1
Strength 1 limit state Ultimate bearing pressure = 1.5 x service 30 ksf TA C10.6.2.6.1-1
F_t
Retained fill

LOADS:
DL 752
LL 314
DL + LL 1067 k
LL_vehicle surcharge 0.250 ksf
Footing length 55.5 ft
Footing width 15 ft
Area 832.5 sf
P_super DL+LL 1.2812984621 ksf W_1 V_1
A_s Acceleration coefficient 0.3531
EQ_super DL 265.603104 k
EQ_wall DL 690.2508154 k h H
EQ_soil 80 psf
DL_wingwall 372 k

GEOMETRY:
toe 3 ft
wall 3 ft
heel 9 ft
ftg thickness 2 ft
B toe + wall + heel 15 ft
H max height 20 ft
h H + heel tan (beta) 20.3142869254 ft

toe W_2
CALCULATIONS:
beta angle of fill from horizontal 0.034906585 rad 2 % max grade
gamma unit weight , gravel borrow 130 pcf
delta friction angle between fill and wall 0.5235987756 rad 30 degrees TA 3.11.5.3-1
theta angle of back face of wall to horizontal 1.5707963268 rad 90 degrees
phi_f effective angle of internal friction 0.5585053606 rad 32 degrees assumes 1.5 x delta
Lambda calculated factor for k_a calc 2.8898038691 3.11.5.3-2
k_af active pressure coefficient for backfill 0.2873703567

Service check - TA 3.4.1-1 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 EH

V_1 weight of soil 1293.705 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 12.1590282755 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1954.8309697 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 258.075 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 427.81053 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 1.3430188402 ft OK
Is e > B/6 ? NO TRAPEZOIDAL DIST
Sigma_max sum V_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 6.4973931034 ksf Service limit OK
Sigma_min sum V_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 1.9561083932 ksf Service limit OK

Strength 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 1.25 DL + 1.75 LL + 1.5 EH

V_1 weight of soil 1679.56875 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 15.1987853444 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 2600.77737879 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 322.59375 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 641.715797176 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 1.4924007651 ft OK
Is e > B/6 ? NO TRAPEZOIDAL DIST
Sigma_max sum V_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 9.2338278467 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sum V_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 2.2357876202 ksf Strength limit OK

Strength 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 0.9 DL + 1.5 EH

V_1 weight of soil 1051.947 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 10.943125448 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1476.31827273 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 232.2675 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 641.715797176 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 1.9544774341 OK
Is e > B/6 ? YES TRIANGULAR DIST _+ UPLIFT
Sigma_max sum V_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 6.0032217675 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sum V_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 0 ksf Strength limit OK

Extreme Event 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 0.9 DL + 1.5 EH + 1.0 EQ (active pressure / no passive pressure)
V_1 weight of soil 1051.947 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 10.943125448 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1476.31827273 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 232.2675 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 641.715797176 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 5.4546278119 ft OK
Is e > B/6 ? YES TRIANGULAR DIST _+ UPLIFT
Sigma_max sum V_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 16.2762562104 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sum V_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 0 ksf Strength limit OK

Extreme Event 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 0.9 DL + 0.9 EH - 1.0 EQ ( active pressure / no passive pressure)
V_1 weight of soil 1051.947 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 10.943125448 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1476.31827273 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 232.2675 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 385.029478306
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 -3.9299062786 OK
Is e > B/6 ? YES TRIANGULAR DIST _+ UPLIFT
Sigma_max sum V_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 9.3249657789 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sum V_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 0 ksf Strength limit OK
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42

Purpose: Check prestress beam design.

Date: 10/14/2011

Material: Notes:
f'c 6.5 ksi Beam compressive design compres
f's 270 ksi Prestressing strands design tensile
f'ci 5.5 ksi Compressive strength @ initial pres
Wc 150 pcf Concrete density
Ec 4887.7334 ksi Wc^1.5 x 33 (f'cs)^0.5
W_acp 140 pcf Asphalt density
fci 3.3 ksi 0.6 f'ci, temp stress limit prior to loss
fi 556.21489 psi 7.5 (f'ci)^0.5, tension stress limit prio
fcs 2.6 ksi 0.4 f'c, compression strength limit a
fts 241.86773 psi 3 (f'c)^0.5, tensile strength limit afte

Loads:
W 1000 plf beam weight
Wcp 314 plf Curb and parapet weight
Ws 384.66667 plf Superimposed deal load. Assume 4

Geometry:
W_girder 6 ft Max girder width
H_girder 4.4166667 ft Girder height
I_girder: 651022 in4 T-beam moment of inertia
S_t: 33952 in3 T-beam section modulus (top)
S_b: 19247 in3 T-beam section modulus (bottom)
L_span 110 ft Bridge span

Calcs:
Distribution factor:
S_max 5.75 ft
Distribution factor: 1.0454545 S/5.5, per old AASHTO code
2010 AASHTO:
K 2 TA 4.6.2.2.2b-1
W 50
L 110
C 0.9090909 CALC 'D' Use D = 11.5 - NL K(W/L)

D:
N_L 3 no. of lanes
D 8.5
Distribution factor: 0.6764706 S/D
Multiple Presence Factor: 0.85
Impact load factor: 1.33
M_o 1512.5 k-ft w_t beam x l^2 / 8
M_sdl 474.925 k-ft w_acp+parapet x l^2 / 8
M_HS20 TRK 1703.6 k Use Table (PPI pg 63)
M_trk train 968 k-ft 0.64 klf x l^2 / 8

V_o 55 k wxL/2
V_sdl 17.27 k w_acp+parapet x L / 2
V_HS20 TRK 61.2 k
V_trk train 35.2 k

M_L+I 1510.1219 k-ft (M_HS20 + M_trk train)/2 wheel line

M_DL 1987.425 k-ft M_o + M_sdl
V_L+I 54.4901 k (V_HS20 + V_trk train)/2 wheel line
V_DL 72.27 k V_o + V_sdl

M_u 5245.7258 k-ft 1.25M_o + 1.5Msdl + 1.75M_L+I

V_u 190.01268 k 1.25 V_o + 1.5 V_sdl + 1.75 V_L+I

E_c 4887.7334 ksi Modulus of Elasticity

F_strand: Determine max force for 1/2", seven

Ultimate strength 189 ksi 70% of max tensile stress 270 ksi =
A_1/2" seven wire 0.153 in2
F_strand 28.917 k

Total no. of strands 32

% harped 33%
No. of harped strands 11
Harped c-g from t/slab 6 in
As_harped 1.683 in2
No. of straight strands 21
Straight c-g from t/slab 49.5 in
As_straight 3.213 in2
Span 110

Station L(x) e_harped As_harped x e_harped e_straight

0 0 6 10.098 49.5
0.05 5.5 11.4375 19.2493125 49.5
0.1 11 16.875 28.400625 49.5
0.15 16.5 22.3125 37.5519375 49.5
0.2 22 27.75 46.70325 49.5
0.25 27.5 33.1875 55.8545625 49.5
0.3 33 38.625 65.005875 49.5
0.35 38.5 44.0625 74.1571875 49.5
0.4 44 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.45 49.5 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.5 55 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.55 60.5 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.6 66 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.65 71.5 44.0625 74.1571875 49.5
0.7 77 38.625 65.005875 49.5
0.75 82.5 33.1875 55.8545625 49.5
0.8 88 27.75 46.70325 49.5
0.85 93.5 22.3125 37.5519375 49.5
0.9 99 16.875 28.400625 49.5
0.95 104.5 11.4375 19.2493125 49.5
1 110 6 10.098 49.5
pressive design compressive strength
g strands design tensile strength
e strength @ initial prestress

p stress limit prior to losses

5, tension stress limit prior to losses
pression strength limit after losses (after concrete cure)
ensile strength limit after losses

arapet weight
sed deal load. Assume 4" max overlay.

ment of inertia
tion modulus (top)
tion modulus (bottom)

ld AASHTO code
apet x l^2 / 8

M_trk train)/2 wheel lines x Impact x MPF = max live load moment / beam

V_trk train)/2 wheel lines x Impact x MPF = max live load shear / beam

1.5Msdl + 1.75M_L+I
1.5 V_sdl + 1.75 V_L+I

max force for 1/2", seven wire strand

tensile stress 270 ksi = ultimate

As_straight x e_straight c-g (from top) e (from c-g)

159.0435 34.546875 15.372298729
159.0435 36.416015625 17.241439354
159.0435 38.28515625 19.110579979
159.0435 40.154296875 20.979720604
159.0435 42.0234375 22.848861229
159.0435 43.892578125 24.718001854
159.0435 45.76171875 26.587142479
159.0435 47.630859375 28.456283104
159.0435 49.5 30.325423729
159.0435 49.5 30.325423729
159.0435 49.5 30.325423729
159.0435 49.5 30.325423729
159.0435 49.5 30.325423729
159.0435 47.630859375 28.456283104
159.0435 45.76171875 26.587142479
159.0435 43.892578125 24.718001854
159.0435 42.0234375 22.848861229
159.0435 40.154296875 20.979720604
159.0435 38.28515625 19.110579979
159.0435 36.416015625 17.241439354
159.0435 34.546875 15.372298729
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42

Purpose: Explore TL-4 loading effects on Oregon and Colorado standard barrier connections.
Notes: For purposes of these calculations, simplified loading distributions will be assumed. Distributions
Reference: 2010 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications

Loading: AASHTO Table A13.2-1

Geometry:
H_e Effective vehicle height 32 in
L_t / L_l Distribution length, transverse / longitudinal 3.5 ft
L_v Vertical load distribution length 18 ft
H Height of rail 35 in
gage_t Bolt gage_t 9 in
gage_l Bolt gage_l 10 in

Loads:
Assumptions:
Loads in TA A13.2-1 are factored and represent ultimate loads.
F_t Transverse load 55 k
F_v Vertical load 4.5 k
F_l Longitudinal load 18 k
Mu_x F_t / 2 x H 962.5 in-kip
Vu_x F_t / 2 27.5 k
Mu_y F_l / 2 x H 315 in-kip
Vu_y F_l / 2 9 k

Bolt check:
T_u 1 E Mu / gage x 1/2 69.22 k
V_u 1 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k

T_u 2 Mux / gage x 1/2 48.125 k

V_u 2 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k

T_u 3 Muy / gage x 1/2 15.75 k

V_u 3 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k

T_u 4 By inspection --> compression 0 k

V_u 4 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k
er connections.
ill be assumed. Distributions are based on the assumption of continuous HSS 5x5 railing.

Notes / reference:

Prior to overlay. 32" minimum.

3 4

1 2
Calculation worksheet:
SPM
12/3/2017

Purpose: Summarize material properties

t
Input:
Winwall length, D 12 ft NA
Ftg thickness, typ 4 ft
Wingwall thickness, typ 2 ft
Ftg length 44 ft b

Moment of Intertia table: I = b_i x h_i ^3 / 12 + A_i x d_i ^ 2

Element Name b_i h_i A_i d_i I_i A d^2 I_t

1 footing 44 4 176 2 234.6667 704 938.6667
2 wingwall 2 12 24 6 288 864 1152
3 wingwall 2 12 24 6 288 864 1152

A_total 224 in2

A_i x d_i 640
NA Sum (A_i x d_i )/ Sum A_i 2.857143 ft

Moment of Inertia I_total 3243 ft4

Section Modulus S=I/c

c_t 2.857143 ft S_t 1135 ft3
c_b 9.142857 S_b 355 ft3
Bearing calc spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42

Purpose: Size rectangular steel reinforced elastomeric bearings.

Reference: AASHTO 14.7.5.1 / Method B

LOADS:
DL 752 k
LL 314 k
sigma_s (DL + LL) / Bearing Area 1.2345845 ksi OK
sigma_l LL / Bearing Area 0.3639784 ksi OK
1.66 x G x S 1.6 ksi max 1.3892491 ksi OK
0.66 x G x S 0.552352 ksi

GEOMETRY:
L, length of bearing parallel to longitudinal axis of girder 6 in
W, width of bearing transverse to longitudinal axis of girder 16 in
H, bearing height 3 in
S, shape factor LW / (2 h_i x (L+W)) 6.44
t, gage thickness of steel plate 12 gage steel 0.1046
n, number of plates 6
n_e, number of elastomeric layers n+1 7
h_i, elastomeric layer thickness 0.3389143 in
h_rt, total elastormeric thickness n_e x h_i 2.3724 in

MATERIALS:
G, Elastomer shear modulus 0.13 ksi Durometer 60
Temp zone C Figure 14.7.5.2-1
Min low temp elastomer grade 3

CALCS:
Initial bearing deflection:
delta_le, live load strain sigma_l / (6 G S^2) 0.0112596
delta_l, live load deflection Sum_i (delta_le x h_ri) 0.0267123 in OK Assume 1/8 in max
delta_de, dead load strain (sigma_t - sigma_l) / (6 G S^2) 0.0269321
delta_d, dead load deflection Sum_i (delta_de x h_ri) 0.0638936 in OK
Long-term dead load deflection:
a_cr, creep deflection / dead load deflection ref. TA 14.7.6.2-1 0.35
delta_lt, long-term dead load deflection delta_d + a_cr x delta__d 0.0862564 in

Shear deformation:
alpha thermal coefficient 0.0000067 1/deg F
T_max max design temp 100 deg F Fig 3.12.2.2-1
T_min min design temp 10 deg F Fig 3.12.2.2-2
delta_t, temperature displacement: alpha x L (T_max - T_min) 0.810432 in
delta_s, maximum shear deformation: 65% delta_t 0.5267808 in
h_rt min 2 x delta_s 1.0535616 in OK

Check combined compression and rotation:

theta_max @ service sigma_s (n / G S) (h_ri / B) ^2 0.023534 Uplift check per 14.7.5.3.5-1
delta max theta max / 2 * (L/2) 7.907429 in OK (by inspection)
theta_max @ service (sigma_s / 1.875 G S - 1) n ( h_ri / B )^2 0.0238119 Compressive stress check per 14.5.3.5-2

Stability check:
A 1.92 h_rt/L / (1+ 2 L/ W)^0.5 0.5738771 14.7.5.3.6-2
B 2.67 / ((S + 2) (1 + L/ 4W)) 0.2893148 14.7.5.3.6-3
sigma_s max G S / (A - B) 2.9409982 OK
Calculation worksheet:
SPM
12/3/2017

Purpose: Summarize material properties

Input:
Stem width 0.5 ft
Stem height 4.4166666667 ft
Bulb width 1.5833333333 ft
Bulb depth 0.5 ft
Bulb chamfer depth 0.25 ft
Bulb chamfer width 0.7916666667 ft
Flange width 5 ft
Flange depth 0.5 ft
Flange chamfer 1.7916666667 ft
Flange chamfer depth 0.25 ft

Moment of Intertia table: I = b_i x h_i ^3 / 12 + A_i x d_i ^ 2

Element Name b_i h_i A_i d_i I_i

1 stem 0.5 4.416667 2.208333 2.208333 3.58982
2 flange 5 0.5 2.5 0.25 0.052083
3 flange chamfer 1.791667 0.25 0.223958 0.583333 0.002333
4 flange chamfer 1.791667 0.25 0.223958 0.583333 0.002333
5 bulb 1.583333 0.5 0.791667 4.166667 0.016493
6 bulb chamfer 0.791667 0.25 0.098958 3.833333 0.001031
7 bulb chamfer 0.791667 0.25 0.098958 3.833333 0.001031

A_total 6.145833 ft2

A_i x d_i 9.820313 ft3
NA Sum (A_i x d_i )/ Sum A_i

Moment of Inertia

Section Modulus S=I/c

c_t 1.597881 ft
c_b 2.818785 ft
 t

NA

A_i x d_i ^ 2

A d^2 I
10.76946 14.35928
0.15625 0.208333
0.076208 0.078541
0.076208 0.078541
13.74421 13.76071
1.454138 1.455169
1.454138 1.455169

885 in2

1.597881 ft 19.17458 in

I_total 31 ft4 651022 in4

S_t 20 ft3 33952 in4

S_b 11 ft3 19247 in4