4 THE SOVEREIGNS OF THE EARTH HAVE COMMITTED WHORING WITH HER - REV 18:3
“And in her was found the blood of
prophets and set-apart ones, and of all
who were slain on the Earth.” Rev 18:24
“As much as she esteemed herself and
lived riotously, so much torture and
grief give to her, because in her heart
she says, ‘I sit as queen, and I am not
a widow, and I do not see mourning at
WHAT INSTITUTION ARE WE TO “COME all.’” Rev 18:7 ROMAN CATHOLICISM IS MODERN
OUT” FROM IF NOT THIS MOTHER, MOLOCH WORSHIP - AND IT HAS “DAUGHTERS”.
SPAWNED BY THE CHURCH FATHERS?
men cry on Mount Ephrayim, ‘Arise, and let Our commission as Natsarim is to teach
us go up to Tsiyon, to Yahuah our Elohim.’ ” Torah to the nations, thus increasing Israel.
The word “watchmen” is the Hebrew word The dragon hates this idea, the Covenant, and
NATSARIM, and means guardians, protectors, the Natsarim. The Covenant is between Ya-
preservers, and also means “branches”, as in huah and His bride (Israel); it’s a marriage.
“descendants”. Immediately, we see the con- The dragon was never fond of Israel, and this
nection with Yahusha’s words about Him being sentiment was present in the church fathers
the Root, and His students the “branches”, the and those doctrinal descendants of them.
off-spring of His teachings. The name by which When false teachers say, “Gentiles don’t
we are called has no Greek roots; the Hebrew have to obey, the Torah is for the Jews”,
roots of our name are profound. they have been influenced by false teachings
keeping them imprisoned in a stronghold (a
We guard Yahuah’s Name and His Word, the
mental fortress of false belief, stemming from
Covenant with Israel.
Replacement Theology, a foundational error of
The 1945 Encyclopedia Americana has this to
Christianity).
say under to topic "GOD":
"GOD (god); Common Teutonic word for A sophisticated religious architecture exists,
personal object of religious worship, for- designed to promote a culture of rebellion.
merly applicable to super-human beings of Unknowingly, the human combatants’ energies
heathen myth; on conversion of Teutonic have been harnessed to perform the will of their
races to Christianity, term was applied to enemy – a classic Sun Tsu maneuver,
Supreme Being." Natsarim do not refer to (The Art Of War) – implemented by Jesuitism.
Yahuah by any Pagan titles or names, they use
THE GREAT COMMISSION
His true Name, being careful to guard it and not
Matthew 28:18-20:
allow it to be destroyed (not using it destroys it). “And Yahusha came up and spoke to them,
Torah is a relationship, not a religion. This saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me
relationship is the code of conduct for the gov- in Heaven and on Earth. Therefore, go and
ernment or kingdom of Yahuah, to reign with make taught ones of all the nations, immers-
His bride, Israel. Human religion seeks to “re- ing them in the Name of the Father and of
bind” the rift between our Creator and mankind the Son and of the Set-apart Spirit, teaching
with contrived efforts and rituals invented by them to guard all that I have commanded
men, often inherited from Pagan cultures (not you*. And see, I am with you always, until
ordained by Yahuah). Torah is the foundation the end of the age.’”
for the relationship, and the Creator consis- *His Natsarim, those following Him, the Mediator
tently refers to Torah as a marriage Covenant of the Covenant. Any who obey Torah become
between Himself and Israel. citizens of Israel, Yahuah’s Covenant people.
See Eph. 2:8-13
This article by brother Lew White
PO BOX 436044, Louisville, KY 40253
www.fossilizedcustoms.com
CHECK SITE FOR SEMINARS
502-365-2285
REPRINTS PERMITTED
ORDER QUANTITIES AT TORAHZONE.NET
THE ORIGINAL FOLLOWERS OF YAHUSHA OF NATSARITH:
NATSARIM - GUARDIANS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
The Catechetical School of Alexandria, Egypt and the
“church fathers” who were trained and taught there, devel-
oped what ultimately became Christianity, and later Roman
“Universalism”, Catholicism. What these early “church
fathers” of Alexandria wrote about a certain “sect”, the
Natsarim, may be of interest to those who want to trace back
to the roots of their beliefs. Many of these early “Christians”
were former sun-worshippers that adopted a belief in the
Mashiach (Messiah) of Yisrael, Yahusha. They worked pre-
dominantly with Greek texts, yet from reading their Greek
letters, we quickly discern that they despised the
“Natsarim”, whose existence seemed to threaten their
teachings. One of these church fathers’ indicated that these
Natsarim possessed the writings of MattithYahu (Matthew),
and stated that they were in Hebrew letters, as they had
been originally written! These facts, and more to follow,
clearly contradict what many people today have been led to ORIGEN OF ALEXANDRIA TAUGHT AT THE
believe about the original followers of Yahusha. Due to the
CATECHETICAL SCHOOL OF ALEXANDRIA. HE
church fathers, the Hebrew/Israelite roots of the faith were SUCCEEDED CLEMENT AS HEAD OF THE SCHOOL.
SELF-CASTRATED, AND A VEGETARIAN LIKE
suppressed, and only the Greek roots were developed. The
CLEMENT, ORIGEN LIVED FROM 185 TO 254 CE.
most uniform trait among all the church fathers was their TERTULLIAN & IRENAEUS WERE CONTEMPORAR-
IES OF ORIGEN. BEING CLASSICALLY EDUCATED
condemnation of the Natsarim, and their rabid anti-Semitism. IN PAGANSIM, MUCH ERROR WAS ADOPTED.
Modern seminaries (seed-plots) promote the dragon’s hatred of the Natsarim:
teachings of the “church fathers”, the Greek and Rev 12:17 “And the dragon was enraged
Egyptian men that sought to eliminate the former with the woman, and he went to fight
Natsarim. The Natsarim were spoken against with the remnant of her seed, those
by those in authority in the days of Shaul (Paul): guarding the commands of Elohim and
"And we think it right to hear from you possessing the witness of Yahusha Mes-
what you think, for indeed, concerning siah.” REV 12:17 NOTE THE WORD “GUARDING”
this sect, we know that it is spoken Obeying the Commandments, and possessing
against everywhere." (ACT 28:22). the witness of Yahusha, are not what the church
fathers did, and they weren’t going to stand for
This sect, the NATSARIM, was suppressed by
anyone else doing so either. The 4th century
the early church fathers, and by the developing
church father, Jerome, described the Natsarim
hierarchy at the earliest formal school of Christi-
as “those who accept Messiah in such a way
anity, THE CATECHETICAL SCHOOL OF ALEXANDRIA.
( FOUNDED CIRCA 190 CE ) that they do not cease to observe the Old
Law.” This was in stark contrast with them!
The term by which the early followers of Ya-
husha of Natsarith were called is found at Acts That “Old Law” is the Torah, the 10 Command-
24:5, misspelled “Nazarenes”. The reason they ments, guarded by the Natsarim. The dragon
were so despised by everyone is simple to un- (Rev 12) pursues the offspring (Natsarim) of the
derstand. This entire planet is under the influ- Woman (Israel) through systematic persecutions
ence of a supremely dark force that has been in because of doctrinal competition and control.
charge over mankind for the last 6000+ years, The “Hebrew roots” of the fig tree (Israel) remain
since Adam & Chuah lost sovereignty over a threat to this dragon’s “bad tree”, but Yahusha
Earth. This dark force is called “the dragon”, and has given His Natsarim His Torah, and this is the
we see in the following verse two reasons for the “axe” (Sword, His Word) that will become the
2 IRENAEUS was a mid-2nd century “church father”, and was perhaps the
least error-ridden of all, but the few errors he made were magnified by
others after him. He held that the bishops provided the only safe guide
to interpretation of Scripture, laying a pathway toward papal primacy.
Also, in his battle against Gnosticism, and in the interest of unity, doc-
trinal authority had to be solely established by Episcopal “councils”.
“Episcopal” means governed by bishops; so we can see that these
ideas laid a foundation for later Nicolaitanes and a hierarchical chain of
command, culminating in the fascism known as the Roman Catholic
Church. Catholic means “universal” in Latin, so Irenaeus’ vision for
unity of doctrine became a reality; if only the doctrines mandated had
been based on the TORAH of Yahuah, rather than men’s lust for power.
MONKS, NUNS, POPES, SACRAMENTS, HOLY WATER, HALOES, BELLS, STEEPLES, CATECHISMS, ALTARS,
SPIRES, PULPITS, CATHEDRALS, STATUES, SUN-DAY, EASTER, CHRISTMAS, CANONIZING SAINTS, INDULGENCES,
SCAPULARS, MASSES, — AND NO ONE NOTICED THESE BEING ADDED TO SCRIPTURE, OR THEIR TRUE ORIGINS?
3
“And whatever is concealed shall be revealed, and whatever is hidden shall be known.” Luk 12:2
The teachings hatched at the Catechetical School of Alexandria persist in every modern “Seminary” today. The
apostasy (falling-away from Torah) became institutionalized, and men’s traditions were set up to conceal their
former Pagan origins. Yahuah’s clean festivals reflect the redemption plan for Israel, but were forsaken (Dan
7:25). All the nations of the Earth are invited to “engraft” into the commonwealth of Israel through the Covenant
(Eph. 2:8-13), but the “spin” put upon obeying the Covenant is very deceptive (calling it legalism). If we are
“legal” then we are true citizens of Israel; if we are practicing lawlessness (illegalism), we are imposters, usurping
what is not ours to claim. We cannot simultaneously claim to be Yahusha’s followers and not obey Torah.
If we claim to know Him, then we obey the Commandments! 1 Yn. 3 THE NATSARIM? THEY’RE NOT CASTRATED MONKS!

downfall of the false system (Roman beast)
ridden by the Great Prostitute, which has made
the nations drunk from the golden cup of
abominations (like “sacraments”) she holds
them in her control with.
Yahusha’s cousin, Yahuchanon, said:
“And even now the axe is laid to the root of
the trees. Therefore every tree that does not
bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into
the fire.” Luk 3:9
Worldwide, there are about 1 billion people
living (producing bad fruit) according to the
doctrinal errors (a bad tree) of a few men called
the “church fathers”. These men molded the
patterns of early Christianity, and in their own
words declare they were not Natsarim, but
rather suppressed the Natsarim as heretics
and accused them of perversion for obeying
the Commandments. These “church fathers”
were men who failed to adopt the Covenant,
but instead pursued control over doctrines as
they interpreted them. Some castrated them-
selves and others, became monks, took vows
of poverty, celibacy, silence, and condemned
the Natsarim for holding to the Torah while
professing belief in Yahusha.
False doctrine is like leaven, and their false
doctrines have filled the whole Earth (the whole
lump of dough). Those whose thinking has
been affected by the false doctrines of these
early apostates view the Natsarim today as
heretics also, and it is the same “spirit of error”
that possessed the church fathers that is at the
root of the bad tree, producing bad fruit. The
good fruit is the obedience of the set-apart
ones, because obeying the Covenant produces
love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness,
faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control; this
tree will not be cut down! The tree that is
against the Covenant (lawless) will be elimi-
nated, and be left with neither root nor branch
(offspring). Condemnation is derived from
ones’ own words; so let’s see what the early
church fathers had to say concerning Natsarim:
The fourth century Church Father, Epiphanius,
gave a detailed description of the Natsarim:
“We shall now especially consider heretics
who.. call themselves Nazarenes; they are
mainly Jews and nothing else. They make
use not only of the New Testament, but they
also use in a way the Old Testament of the
Jews; for they do not forbid the books of the
Law, the Prophets, and the Writings... so
that they are approved of by the Jews, from
whom the Nazarenes do not differ in any-
thing, and they profess all the dogmas per-
taining to the prescriptions of the Law and
to the customs of the Jews, except they
believe in Messiah. They preach that there is
but one God, and His Son Yeshua the Mes-
siah. But they are very learned in the He-
brew language; for they, like the Jews, read
the whole Law, then the Prophets...They
differ from the Jews because they believe in
Messiah, and from the Christians in that
they are to this day bound to the Jewish
rites, such as circumcision, the Sabbath,
and other ceremonies. They have the Good
news according to Matthew in its entirety in
Hebrew. For it is clear that they still pre-
serve this, in the Hebrew alphabet, as it was
originally written”. Obviously, Epiphanius
would “forbid” the Law, Prophets, and Writings
(TaNaK), often referred to by Yahusha. The
Sabbath observance (a day blessed at Crea-
tion) was observed by Yahusha, yet those who
“walk” as He walked are heretics. This record
hits on how doctrinally arrogant things had
become very early, and why Christian doctrines
are so different from the REAL first followers of
Yahusha. After Irenaeus, a new flagrant error
crept in called “Apostolic Succession”, along
with the idea that the “church” hierarchy could
supersede (trump) any Commandment, and
usurp the title “Israel” for itself.
There is evidence that the Natsarim Sect
continued to exist until at least the 13th century.
The Catholic writings of Bonacursus entitled
Against the Heretics refers to “Nazarenes”,
who were also called 'Pasagini'. Bonacursus
says: “Let those who are not yet acquainted
with them, please note how perverse their
belief and doctrine are. First, they teach that
we should obey the Law of Moses according
to the letter - the Sabbath, and circumcision,
and the legal precepts still being in force.
Furthermore, to increase their error, they
condemn and reject all the Church Fathers,
and the whole Roman Church.”
We were still around in the 13th century.
Indeed, we Natsarim still obey that “Old
Law” (the Covenant, as it is written), and we still
“reject all the church fathers, and the whole
Roman church”. We are accused of being
“Jewish”, but we are really made up of all the
lost tribes in captivity among the nations, as the
Prodigal Son found himself and returned to the
Covenant, the Father’s household (Torah).
In fact, we are those described at Rev 12 & 14;
1. We hold to the testimony of Yahusha (we
confess Yahusha and live according to what He
taught), and
2. We obey the Commandments of Yahuah.
For this, we are branded as perverse heretics.
We call on the true (and only) Name, Yahuah,
each time we utter the Deliverer’s Name,
Yahusha ha’Mashiach. We have never been
part of the accepted whole. Tertullus, a hired
accuser of Shaul, addressed the ruler Felix with
these words at Act 24:5:
“For we have found this man a pestilent
fellow, and a mover of sedition among all
the Yahudim throughout the world and a
ringleader of the sect (G139, hairesis) of the
Nazarenes (G3480) . . .” The Greek word
hairesis above gives us our word “heresy”
translated “sect”. So we know the “sect” being
spoken of was not the Christians, because
Christians developed later. The word chris-
tianos was used twice in the Greek text as a
device of scorn, since in the ancient world it
conveyed a much different sense than it does
today. The use of the word christianos did not
“name” the sect, but it was a derisive, scornful
label that meant they were like gullible, dumb
beasts, or “cretins”.
The word “christianos” (Latin, Christianus)
was a term of scorn, traced back through a
related word which history never “revised”:
cre·tin (krēt'n) n.
1. A person afflicted with cretinism.
Slang: An idiot.
[French crétin, from French dialectal, de-
formed and mentally retarded person found
in certain Alpine valleys, from Vulgar Latin
*christiānus, Christian, human being, poor
fellow, from Latin Chrīstiānus, Christian;
see Christian.] Source: The American Heritage®
Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Seminaries would not appreciated having this
shouted from the housetops, but it’s the truth.
WHY THE TERM “NATSARIM”?
The foremost reason is prophetic. We are
described as a remnant of the scattered tribes
by many prophets, but in the last days we are
called by the term “NATSARIM” as we cry out
on the “hills of Ephraim”, at Jer. 31:6:
“For there shall be a day when the watch-