Chairman Report Part A Ug Tier I v0

PART A
Chairpersons Visit Report
Undergraduate Engineering Program
TIER-I
Name of the Institution

__________________________________
Name of the Program
_______________________
Visit Dates
___________________
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION

NBCC Place, East Tower, 4th Floor, Bhisham Pitamah Marg, Pragati
Vihar, New Delhi 110003
Tel: +91 112430620-22; 01124360654; www.nbaind.org
1
Team composition
Name of the Chairperson:______________________________________________________

Designation:_________________________________________________________________
Program 1:
Program evaluator 1 Name

Organization:

Organization:
Program 2:

Organization:

Organization:
Program 3:

Organization:

Organization:
Program 4:

Organization:

Organization:
Program 5:

Organization:

Organization:
2
Institute Details
Year of Establishment: _________________________
Physical Infrastructure and Ambience: __________________________________
Number of programs being run in the Institute*:
(i) UG- ____________________

(ii) PG - ____________________
Total Number of Students:
(i) In UG programs - _____________

(ii) In PG programs - _____________
Name of programs applied for accreditation
(i) ___________________________
(ii) ___________________________
(iii) ___________________________
(iv) ___________________________
(v) ___________________________
*to be verified from SAR
3
Information for Evaluation
Y=75% & Above; C=60% and < 75%; W=40% and <60%; D<40%.
Award of Accreditation (TIER I (UG))
1. Full Accreditation for Six years will be accorded to a program on

fulfilment of the following requirements:
i. If there is no Deficiency or Weakness in any of the criteria laid down
by NBA with at least 07 Criteria are fully compliant and Concerns in
the remaining criteria.
ii. Number of available Ph.D. in the department is greater than or equal to
30% of the required number of faculty for previous two academic years
including Current Academic Year.
iii. The admissions in the UG program at the program level are more than or
equal to 75% while at the institute level, the admissions are required to
be more than or equal to 60%, averaged over previous three academic
years including Current Academic Year.
iv. Faculty Student Ratio in the department is less than or equal to 1:15
averaged for the previous three academic years including current academic
year.
v. At least 2 Professors or 1 Professor and 1 Associate Professor (on a full-
time/regular basis) with Ph.D. degree are available in the respective
department for previous two academic years including current academic
year.
vi. The placement ratio (Placement + higher studies) is greater than or equal
to 40% averaged for the previous three academic years
vii. HOD of the program under consideration possesses Ph.D. degree.
#Y shall be >=7, #W and #D shall be Zero (0), where the symbol # has
been used to indicate the count.
2. Full Accreditation for six years may be considered for a program after
three months:
i. #Y shall be greater than or equal to 07
4
ii. #C shall be less than or equal to 02
iii. #W shall be less than or equal to 02
iv. #D shall be zero.
The institution is required to submit a compliance report to NBA describing
action taken in response to the identified Weakness (es) and Concerns.
3. Provisional Accreditation for Three years will be accorded to a program

on fulfilment of the following requirements:
i. #Y shall be greater than or equal to 04
ii. #D shall be less than or equal to 02
iii. At least two Professors or one Professor and one Associate Professor (on a
full-time/regular basis) with Ph.D. degree are available in the respective
Department for previous two academic years including Current Academic
Year.
iv. The faculty student ratio in the department under consideration is less
than or equal to 1:20 averaged for the previous three academic years
v. Number of available Ph.D. in the department is greater than or equal to
20% of the required number of faculty for previous two academic years
vi. The placement ratio (Placement + higher studies) is greater than or equal
to 40% averaged over previous three assessment years.
vii. The HOD of the program under consideration possesses Ph.D. degree.
In case of a D in Criterion V (Faculty Information & Contributions), the

program will not be considered for accreditation.
4. No Accreditation of the program

If the program fails to meet criteria for award of provisional accreditation for 3
years, the program will not be considered for accreditation.
5
Name of the Program 1:___________________________________________________________
Marks given by Evaluators:

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
Max. Marks Grade

S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded (Y, C, W, D)
Vision, Mission and
1. Program Educational 50
Objectives
Program Curriculum and
2. Teaching-Learning 100
Processes
Course Outcomes and
3. 175
Program Outcomes
4. Students Performance 100
Faculty Information and
5. 200
Contributions
Facilities and Technical
6. 80
Support
7. Continuous Improvement 75
TOTAL 780
B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

Max. Marks Grade Remarks
Criteria
S. No. Marks Awarded (Y, C, W, D)
8. First Year Academics* 50
9. Student Support Systems 50

Governance, Institutional
10. support and Financial 120
Resources*
TOTAL 220
GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.
Total Grade:
No. of Y: ___________, C: ___________________, W: __________________, D: ______________________
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
6
Name of the Program 2:___________________________________________________________
Max. Marks Grade

Vision, Mission and
Objectives
Processes
Course Outcomes and
3. 175
Program Outcomes
5. 200
Contributions
6. 80
Support
TOTAL 780

S. No. Criteria

Resources*
TOTAL 220

Total Grade:
No. of Y: ___________, C: ___________________, W: __________________, D: ______________________
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
7
Name of the Program 3:____________________________________________________________
Max. Marks Grade

Vision, Mission and
Objectives
Processes
Course Outcomes and
3. 175
Program Outcomes
5. 200
Contributions
6. 80
Support
TOTAL 780

Criteria
S. No. Marks Awarded (Y, C, W, D)

Resources*
TOTAL 220

Total Grade:
No. of Y: ___________, C: ___________________, W: __________________, D: ______________________
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
8
Max. Marks Grade

Vision, Mission and
Objectives
Processes
Course Outcomes and
3. 175
Program Outcomes
5. 200
Contributions
6. 80
Support
TOTAL 780

S. No. Criteria

Resources*
TOTAL 220

Total Grade:
No. of Y: ___________, C: ___________________, W: __________________, D: ______________________
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
9
Max. Marks Grade

Vision, Mission and
Objectives
Processes
Course Outcomes and
3. 175
Program Outcomes
5. 200
Contributions
6. 80
Support
TOTAL 780

S. No. Criteria

Resources*
TOTAL 220

Total Grade:
No. of Y: ___________, C: ___________________, W: __________________, D: ______________________
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
10
Overall Observations
1.
Student-
Name of the Intake Admissions Placement
S. No. Faculty
Program (last year)
Ratio
2. About the progress since last accreditation (to be filled for institutes who have applied for re-
accreditation)
Kindly mention the changes made as recommended by NBA, since the previous visit.
3. Observation on general facilities and about the programs.
Kindly mention general observations about facilities like labs, library etc. and a general review about the
programs.
1st year
Academic Ambience
Student Support Systems
Strengths, Weaknesses, Concerns, Suggestions
4. Status of imbibing of outcome based accreditation. For Example:
Formulation of PEOs, PSOs, COs and mappings carried out and implemented
Methodology for assessing the attainment of outcomes
Continual improvement process status
Stakeholders (especially the faculty, HOD, students etc.) awareness about the process
11

Chairman Report Part A Ug Tier I v0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chairman Report Part A Ug Tier I v0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PART A

Chairpersons Visit Report

Undergraduate Engineering Program

Name of the Institution

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION

Name of the Chairperson:______________________________________________________

Program evaluator 1 Name

Program evaluator 2 Name

Program evaluator 1 Name

Program evaluator 2 Name

Program evaluator 1 Name

Program evaluator 2 Name

Program evaluator 1 Name

Program evaluator 2 Name

Program evaluator 1 Name

Program evaluator 2 Name

Physical Infrastructure and Ambience: __________________________________

Number of programs being run in the Institute*:

(i) UG- ____________________

Total Number of Students:

(i) In UG programs - _____________

Name of programs applied for accreditation

*to be verified from SAR

Award of Accreditation (TIER I (UG))

1. Full Accreditation for Six years will be accorded to a program on

3. Provisional Accreditation for Three years will be accorded to a program

In case of a D in Criterion V (Faculty Information & Contributions), the

4. No Accreditation of the program

Marks given by Evaluators:

Max. Marks Grade

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

9. Student Support Systems 50

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks Grade

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

9. Student Support Systems 50

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks Grade

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

9. Student Support Systems 50

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks Grade

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

9. Student Support Systems 50

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks Grade

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

9. Student Support Systems 50

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

3. Observation on general facilities and about the programs.

4. Status of imbibing of outcome based accreditation. For Example:

Continual improvement process status

You might also like