Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Olga Palagia
409
Olga Palagia
Fig. 18.1: Interior of Vergina Tomb I with painted Rape of Persephone. From
Drougou and Saatsoglou-Paliadeli 1999, fig. 71.
Fig. 18.2: Reconstructed façade of Vergina Tomb II with painted hunting frieze. From
Drougou and Saatsoglou-Paliadeli 1999, fig. 60.
410
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
Macedonian tombs, the Tomb of the Palmettes and the Judgement Tomb
at Lefkadia, are generally acknowledged to belong to members of the court
rather than royalty.5 What constitutes a royal tomb as opposed to a tomb of
the nobility? This question will be discussed in connection with some peculiar
aspects of tombs at Vergina and at Agios Athanasios near Thessaloniki.
411
Olga Palagia
storage.16 The total number of human remains from Tomb I now amounts
to seven individuals, one adult male, one adult female, four infants and a
foetus. Further study is being carried out to determine which of these
belong to primary burials. The attribution of Tomb I to historical
personalities, at any rate, remains sub judice.
The adjacent Tombs II (Fig. 18.2) and III belong to the category of
tombs known as Macedonian tombs. They were found with their contents
intact, being rich in gold and silver jewellery and vessels, chryselephantine
weapons and furniture, as well as iron and bronze arms and armour.17 All
burial goods are of exquisite quality. Philip II and one of his last wives were
Andronikos’ favourite occupants for Tomb II, which housed the cremated
remains of a couple.18 A rival view attributing this tomb to Philip II’s son,
Philip III Arrhidaios and his wife Adea Eurydike, seems to have been gaining
ground in recent years.19 An alternative view questions the connection of
these tombs with royalty, challenging the identification of Vergina with
Aigai.20 However, the controversy is far from being resolved. Tomb III, known
as the Prince’s Tomb, contained the cremated remains of an approximately
13–14 year old boy, also accompanied by lavish burial goods. He is usually
identified with Alexander the Great’s son, Alexander IV.21
To resume the question posed earlier in this chapter: what makes these
tombs royal? Tomb I was plundered and there is nothing specifically royal
about the iconography of its frescoes. The dazzling array of luxury burial
goods found in the unplundered Tombs II and III is not enough evidence
of royalty, considering that a similar wealth of offerings came to light, for
example, in the distinctly non-royal tombs at Derveni, dating from the
closing years of the fourth century.22 Their wealth can be attributed to the
spoils of Alexander’s conquest of the Persian Empire. Two objects in
particular, found in the main chamber of Tomb II, have been seen as
entailing royal connotations: a silver gilt diadem and the hand-guard of a
torch.23 The silver gilt diadem has been interpreted as a priest’s headgear,
thus appropriate for a Macedonian king who performed priestly duties.24
Painted versions of similar diadems have been found in two non-royal cist
graves at Pydna and Aineia.25 The problem is compounded by the fact that
the tomb at Aineia belonged to a woman. This raises questions about the
function of such diadems. As for the hand-guard of a torch, it is so far
unique in Macedonia and can have no particular significance until further
information becomes available.
That Tomb II may be royal can be more readily supported by the
iconography of the lion hunt painted on its façade (Fig. 18.2).26 Despite
the strong idealisation of the hunters’ features, this is usually recognised as
a historical not a mythological scene.27 The lion hunt episode forms part of
412
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
a multiple quarry hunt involving mounted and pedestrian hunters, dogs,
deer, a boar, bears and a lion. The frieze has been interpreted in various
ways, but this much is clear: the lion can only be hunted by a king. The
iconography of royal lion hunts was established in the ancient Near East
by Assyrian palace reliefs;28 in the fourth century the lion hunt appears as
a funerary motif on the sarcophagus of one of the kings of Sidon, who was
effectively a satrap of the Persian Empire.29 In the visual arts of the
Successors lion hunts acquired a symbolic significance for these dynasts,
as they struggled to establish their claims on Alexander’s empire by
demonstrating that they had played an active part in his lion hunts and by
implication, his conquests.30 The painted lion hunt on Tomb II seems to
introduce on this side of the Aegean the non-mythological mounted lion
hunt with royal connotations, inspired by Asian prototypes. In any case, if
Tomb II is a royal tomb, then Tombs I and III must belong to members
of the same dynasty, since they were all covered by the Great Tumulus
after they were damaged in antiquity.
A further problem concerns a fourth structure that seems to complement
this cluster of tombs under the Great Tumulus: an overground rectangular
building adjacent to Tomb I (Fig. 18.3).31 Tomb I lies in fact between this
overground structure and Tomb II. The foundations of the rectangular
Fig. 18.3: Model of the tombs under the Great Tumulus, Vergina; from left to right:
foundations of overground rectangular structure, roof of Tomb I, Tomb II, Tomb III.
From Drougou and Saatsoglou-Paliadeli 1999, fig. 55.
413
Olga Palagia
414
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
Fig. 18.4: Main chamber of the so-called Tomb of Eurydike at Vergina with painted marble
throne and marble cinerary chest. From Drougou and Saatsoglou-Paliadeli 1999, fig. 83.
415
Olga Palagia
of the pyre were found before the tomb entrance. In addition, an Attic
red-figure pelike by the Eleusinian Painter, dating from 340/330, was
excavated inside the tomb.41 Panathenaics, however, were kept by their
owners for many years after their production date and cannot be used as
chronological indicators. The case of five Panathenaics of the 360s
maintained on display in the House of Mosaics at Eretria until the first half
of the third century is indicative of the prestige of these vessels as
heirlooms.42 The pelike by the Eleusinian Painter may well have been an
heirloom too. In addition, there is not enough evidence that a woman was
the sole occupant of the tomb. Fragments of a helmet were found in the
antechamber, indicating male occupancy and the remains of a gold and
ivory couch from the main chamber suggest a second burial;43 in addition,
it has been pointed out that the Panathenaic amphoras from the pyre are
probably more appropriate to a male burial.44 A post-Alexander date seems
more likely for the ‘Tomb of Eurydike’.45
A marble throne was also found in the adjacent so-called Tomb of
Rhomaios, which is equally located near the royal palace.46 This tomb has
been attributed to queen Thessaloniki on very dubious grounds.47 A third
marble throne came to light in the Macedonian tomb ‘Bella II’, which is at
a considerable distance from the palace and bears no indication of being
royal.48 Whereas the date of the so-called Eurydike Tomb is controversial,
the Rhomaios and Bella II Tombs both date from the first half of the third
century BC.
Fig. 18.5: Attendants carrying torches and banqueting equipment. Detail of the
banquet frieze painted on the façade of the Tomb at Agios Athanasios. From
Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, pl. 32a.
416
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
The proximity of a tomb to the royal palace probably indicates royal
connections but does the presence of a marble throne in a Macedonian
tomb indicate a royal burial? It has been argued that marble thrones in
Macedonian tombs may entail royal associations.49 The concept of the royal
throne as a seat of power was introduced to Macedonia by Alexander the
Great after his conquest of the Persian Empire, inspired by the throne of
the Great King of Persia. It may well be significant that the only funerary
thrones found in Macedonia so far are located in the old capital of the
Macedonians and may all date after the conquest of Asia, thereby signifying
royal burials.50
Fig. 18.6: Guest with escort arriving at the banquet. Detail of the banquet frieze
painted on the façade of the Tomb at Agios Athanasios. From Tsimbidou-Avloniti
2005, pl. 32b.
417
Olga Palagia
418
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
Fig. 18.7: Sideboard with naked youth serving wine. Tree in the background. Detail
of the banquet frieze painted on the façade of the Tomb at Agios Athanasios. From
Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, pl. 33a.
Fig. 18.8: Flute player, symposiast and animal head rhyton held by the deceased (who
is visible in Fig. 18.9). Detail of the banquet frieze painted on the façade of the Tomb
at Agios Athanasios. From Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, pl. 33b.
Fig. 18.9: Deceased holding rhyton, courtesan playing the kithara and Macedonian
king. Detail of the banquet frieze painted on the façade of the Tomb at Agios
Athanasios. From Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, pl. 34a.
419
Olga Palagia
Fig. 18.10: Three bodyguards. Detail of the banquet frieze painted on the façade of the
Tomb at Agios Athanasios. From Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, pl. 35a.
420
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
Fig. 18.11: Five royal pages. Detail of the banquet frieze painted on the façade of the
Tomb at Agios Athanasios. From Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, pl. 35b.
421
Olga Palagia
Figs. 18.12–13: The façade of the Tomb at Agios Athanasios, with bodyguards on the
left and right of the entrance, each with a painted shield hanging above his head. Note
the frieze at the top. From Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, plates 36–7.
422
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
The banquet scene, framed by the two military escorts, one armed, the
other weaponless, is reminiscent of a historic banquet recorded by Plutarch
(Demetr. 36). In 294 Kassandros’ youngest son, Alexander V, king of
Macedonia, called on Pyrrhos, king of Epirus and his uncle, Demetrios
Poliorketes, to aid him in the civil war against his brother Antipater II.71 By
the time Demetrios arrived at Dion and met Alexander, the conflict had
been resolved: Pyrrhos had departed and the kingdom had been divided
between Alexander and Antipater. Alexander no longer needed the services
of Demetrios, he therefore hatched a plot to do away with him during a
banquet. Having got wind of this, Demetrios arrived at the banquet at Dion
with an armed escort who stayed with him throughout. He then announced
his departure. Alexander escorted his uncle as far as Thessaly, still intending
to do away with him during dinner. But first he had to accept a dinner
invitation from Demetrios at Larissa. He participated in the banquet
unarmed, leaving his escort outside in order not to arouse suspicion.
Demetrios anticipated him and Alexander was cut down by his uncle’s
bodyguards on leaving the symposion. His attendants who came to the
rescue were also killed (presumably being weaponless and unprepared).
We do not know to what extent Macedonian funerary paintings record
historic occasions. The question of their historicity should be considered
in connection with the hunting frieze painted on the façade of Vergina
Tomb II (Fig. 18.2). I have argued elsewhere that the frieze does indeed
reflect historic hunts and that it is not a continued narrative but a
compendium of scenes.72 But the interpretation of the hunting frieze is
controversial and can only offer a tentative parallel. That the lion hunt is a
royal hunt and can therefore be interpreted as a court scene is argued in
section 1 above.
Would it be legitimate to identify the tomb at Agios Athanasios as the
last resting place of Alexander V without any further evidence? The royal
pages attending the symposion, the aristocratic bodyguards guarding the
tomb’s entrance and the royal devices of the shields hanging above their
heads give us food for thought. The fact that the tomb is not located in the
royal capital, Pella, where we would expect to find the burials of the
Antipatrid dynasty, may be partly explained by the fact that the dynasty
was uprooted by Demetrios. Would Demetrios, as Alexander V’s uncle
and successor, be expected to take charge of his nephew’s burial? Who
was responsible for the choice of the banquet theme which subtly
combined the iconography of the funerary banquet with historical
banquets at the Macedonian court? All this belongs to the realm of
speculation. The tomb’s wall-paintings, at any rate, may serve as an
illustration of a court scene in the period of the Successors and the painted
423
Olga Palagia
3. Conclusion
The social position of the king of Macedon as first among equals is
reflected in the elite burials of Macedonia, where the tombs of courtiers
may be as lavish as that of their sovereign. The evidence at our disposal
only allows for conjecture, judging, for example, by the proximity of a
tomb to the royal palace, the inclusion of a marble throne (which may well
carry royal connotations), the iconography of painted friezes which may
suggest a royal hunt or a royal banquet and finally, by the context, e.g. the
inclusion of tombs in the same tumulus as a royal burial. Such suggestions,
however, may be treated as preliminary, pending further discoveries in
Macedonia.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Andrew Erskine and Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones for the
invitation to a very stimulating conference. My thanks are also due to
Yannis and Maria Akamatis, Beth Carney and Panos Valavanis for advice
and suggestions, to Theodore Antikas for information on the human
remains of seven individuals from Vergina Tomb I, and to Panagiotis
Faklaris for placing at my disposal his manuscript on the so-called Tomb
of Eurydike prior to publication.
Notes
1
For palaces, see the chapters in this volume by Morgan, Engels (section 4) and
Hardiman.
2
For a list of painted Macedonian tombs, see Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 172–80.
3
Cf. Touratsoglou 2010, 116–27.
4
Hatzopoulos 1996, 487–96 (based on the epigraphical evidence); Paschidis 2006;
Ma 2011, 524. This obviously did not apply to Alexander III’s court: cf. Spawforth
2007.
5
Tomb of the Palmettes: Rhomiopoulou and Schmidt-Dounas 2010; v. Mangoldt
2012, 183–6; Judgement Tomb: Petsas 1966; v. Mangoldt 2012, 177–81.
6
On the tombs of Vergina, see Ginouvès 1994, 128–77; Drougou and Saatsoglou-
Paliadeli 1999, 36–71; Drougou 2011, 253; Kottaridi 2011e; v. Mangoldt 2012, 275–84,
291–4.
7
Andronicos 1984.
8
Andronikos 1987; v. Mangoldt 2012, 291–4, pl. 112, 5–6; Faklaris forthcoming
with further references.
9
Andronicos 1984, 86–95.
10
Musgrave 1990, 274, 280.
11
Andronicos 1984, 87. For the position of the bones, see Andronikos 1994, 45, fig. 10.
424
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
12
Andronicos 1984, 66.
13
Borza 1987, 118–119; Borza and Palagia 2007, 82–3. According to Diod. Sic.
17.2.3, Philip’s and Kleopatra’s child was only a few days old at his assassination.
Kleopatra and her daughter were put to death by Olympias shortly afterwards: Paus.
8.7.7; Plut. Alex. 10.8; Just. Epit. 9.7.12. See also Carney 2000, 74.
14
Kottaridi 2011b, 103, 142.
15
Carney 2000, 60–1.
16
Antikas 2015; Grant 2017, 768.
17
Andronicos 1984, 62–217.
18
Andronicos 1984, 226–33. For a recent summary of the arguments in favour of
Philip II, see Lane Fox 2011, 1–34 (with earlier references).
19
See now Borza and Palagia 2007 (with earlier references). A stylistic date for
about half the silver vessels from Tomb II in the last quarter of the 4th century is
suggested by Zimi 2011, 104.
20
Faklaris 1994 and 2011, 347 n. 10; Themelis and Touratsoglou 1997, 143, 202.
The identification of Vergina with Aigai is defended by Drougou 2011, especially
p. 255 with fig. 19, showing a stamped tile with goat’s head from Vergina as a symbol
of the city.
21
Musgrave 1990, 281. For Tomb III, see Andronicos 1984, 198–217; Kottaridi
2011c, 142, figs. 154, 163–4; Kottaridi 2011e, 106–25.
22
Cf. Themelis and Touratsoglou 1997, 158–60, 202. Quantities of silver vessels
were placed in tombs of the elite in the late 4th and early 3rd centuries, cf. Zimi 2011,
21–6.
23
Andronicos 1984, 171, 174–5, figs. 138–9 (diadem); 168, fig. 132 (torch);
Kottaridi 2002, 80.
24
Cf. Tsigarida 2002. On the priestly duties of the Macedonian king: Christensen
and Murray 2010, 440–1.
25
Pydna (Makrygialos): Besios 2010, 197. Aineia: Vokotopoulou 1990, 74–5, fig. 37.
26
Illustrated in Andronicos 1984, figs. 58–9; Borza and Palagia 2007, col. pl. 7;
Franks 2012, figs. 4–12. For a detailed analysis of the hunting frieze, dating it to 316,
see Borza and Palagia 2007, 90–103. For a different view, dating it to 336: Saatsoglou-
Paliadeli 2004; Lane Fox 2011, 10–13. The debate focuses on the question of the
existence of lions in Macedonia in the 4th century: if they existed, then the royal hunter
can be Philip II (Saatsoglou-Paliadeli; Lane Fox); if not, then the hunt takes place
during Alexander’s expedition to the East and the king can be identified as Philip III
Arrhidaios (Borza and Palagia). Franks (2012, 115–26) is undecided about the date of
Tomb II.
27
With the exception of Franks 2012, who interprets the hunt as an episode from
the life of Karanos, mythological founder of the Argead dynasty. For a critical review,
see Palagia 2014.
28
Palagia 2000, 181; Borza and Palagia 2007, 96 with earlier references.
29
Istanbul, Archaeological Museum 369. Palagia 2000, 181–2, figs. 6–7; Borza and
Palagia 2007, 97.
30
Palagia 2000; Carney 2002; Borza and Palagia 2007, 97–8; Seyer 2007, 93–171;
Sawada, 2010, 400–2.
31
Andronicos 1984, 65–6. Drougou and Saatsoglou-Paliadeli 1999, figs. 52, 55.
32
Plut. Pyrrh. 26.6; Andronikos 1994, 33–4.
425
Olga Palagia
33
Drougou et al. 1996, 47–8.
34
Karamitrou-Mentesidi 2008, 50–1, 56–7 (interpreting both tombs as royal).
35
Chrysostomou 1987; Lilimpaki-Akamati 1989–1991, 143–4, pls. 59–61.
36
Andronikos 1987; Ginouvès 1994, 154–61; Kottaridi 2007, 38–44; Kottaridi
2011a, fig. 16; 2011b, fig. 92; Kottaridi 2011c, figs. 165–6; v. Mangoldt 2012,
291–4, pl. 112, 5–6; Faklaris forthcoming.
37
Andronikos 1987.
38
The attribution of Macedonian tombs with thrones to women was based on a
pair of seats that passed as thrones in the Macedonian Tomb of the Erotes at Eretria,
inscribed with women’s names. Cf. Sismanides 1997, 197–9. On the Tomb of the
Erotes, see Huguenot 2008, 53–201. These seats, however, are more likely stools as
they have no backs and no armrests.
39
For example, Vergina Tomb II (Fig. 18.3) and Amphipolis Tomb I. For
Amphipolis, Tomb I, see Lazarides 1997, 68–71.
40
Aeschines 2.27–29. Palagia 2010, 38.
41
For the sherds of archon Lykiskos, see Kottaridi 2011c, fig. 168. For the
amphoras of Lykiskos, see Eschbach 1986, 88–9; Bentz 1998, 175. The pelike by the
Eleusinian Painter is illustrated in Kottaridi 2011b, fig. 83.
42
Bentz 2001.
43
Palagia 2010, 38 n. 23; Faklaris forthcoming. Lane Fox (2011, 8) suggests that the
helmet belonged to a tomb robber. Why would a tomb robber wear armour? For the
gold and ivory couch, see Kottaridi 2007, 39.
44
Palagia 2002, 4; Huguenot 2008, 118–19; Valavanis forthcoming; Faklaris
forthcoming.
45
Palagia 2002.
46
Ginouvès 1994, 176–7; Galanakis 2011, 50, fig. 36; v. Mangoldt 2012, 270–3, pls.
107 and 108, 1–2.
47
Kottaridi 2011b, 142.
48
Ginouvès 1994, 175–6.
49
Huguenot 2008, 115–19. Contra, Paspalas 2005, 88.
50
The argument that the royal throne in Macedonia was introduced by Alexander
and that the funerary thrones may indeed be royal, is developed in detail in Palagia
forthcoming.
51
On this tomb, see Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 89–171; Palagia 2011, 484–7;
v. Mangoldt 2012, 71–74.
52
Borza 1983. Macedonian banquets are further studied by Carney 2007; Sawada
2010, 393–9; Carney 2015, 263–4.
53
Curt. 8.1.43–52; Plut. Alex. 51.8–9; Arr. 4.8.8; Just. Epit. 12.6.3; Carney 2007,
168–70. For violence at royal Macedonian banquets in the 5th century, see Carney
2007, 164.
54
Plut. Demetr. 36.3–6.
55
Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2011.
56
Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 125–6, 134–5, 141–2. She subsequently revised the
date of the tomb to the last quarter of the 4th century on no clear evidence (Tsimbidou-
Avloniti 2011, 351).
57
The deceased as symposiast holding a rhyton in Lycian funerary iconography:
a) banquet frieze of the Nereid Monument from Xanthos in the British Museum:
426
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
Jenkins 2006, 196, fig. 190; b) rock-cut tomb relief of the 4th century at Myra: Bruns-
Özgan 1987, 267, F 17, pl. 14,1. See also Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 142. No rhyta in
precious metals have been found in excavations in Macedonia so far but their existence
is known from literary references and inscriptions: Zimi 2011, 16.
58
Kottaridi 2011d, 323, 327, figs. 32a–b.
59
Diod. Sic. 17.16.4. Spawforth 2007, 92–3. On royal tents, see Morgan this
volume.
60
Plut. Alex. 70.3; Athen. 12.538b–539a; Spawforth 2007, 94, 97–8, 112–13.
61
Chares, FGrH 125 F 4 (Athen. 538b–539a). See also Aelian, VH 8.7; Spawforth
2007, 112–13, 118.
62
Diod. Sic. 19.22.
63
Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 142–7.
64
The three men were interpreted as bodyguards by Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 139.
65
According to Arrian (4.13.1), the institution of the royal pages was introduced by
Philip II. Royal pages continued to serve Macedonian kings until Perseus (Livy 45.6.7–9).
Their function was to attend the king at symposia and hunting expeditions, stand
guard outside his bedroom and bring his horse before battle (Curt. 5.1.42). On royal
pages, see Carney 2008; Sawada 2010, 403–6; Carney 2015, 222–3.
66
That the female kithara player is so far unique in Greek and Macedonian
representations of symposia was observed by Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 135.
67
So Tsimbidou-Avloniti 2005, 136.
68
See now Ogden 2011.
69
Wheatley 2003; Ogden 1999, 177, 241–2; Ogden 2011, 227–31. See also
K. Buraselis in this volume.
70
Tsimbidou-Avloniti (2005, 137) suggests that the two riders and the man leading
the horse are all guests and that they arrive in the middle of the dinner party.
71
Hammond and Walbank 1988, 214–17.
72
Borza and Palagia 2007, 90–103, col. pl. 4.
Bibliography
Andronicos [Andronikos], M.
1984 Vergina: The Royal Tombs and the Ancient City, Athens.
Andronikos, M.
1987 ‘Βεργίνα. Ανασκαφή 1987’, Το Αρχαιoλογικό Έργο στη Μακεδονία και Θράκη
1, 81–8.
1994 Vergina II. The ‘Tomb of Persephone’, Athens.
Antikas, T.
2015 Letter to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, dated 27 July, 2015,
posted in www.academia.edu/TheodoreAntikas.
Bentz, M.
1998 Panathenäische Preisamphoren, Antike Kunst Beiheft 18, Basel.
2001 ‘Die Preisamphoren aus dem Mosaikenhaus in Eretria’, Antike Kunst 44,
3–12.
Besios, M.
2010 Πιερίδων στέφανος: Πύδνα, Μεθώνη και οι αρχαιότητες της βόρειας Πιερίας,
Katerini.
427
Olga Palagia
Borza, E. N.
1983 ‘The symposium at Alexander’s court’, Ancient Macedonia 3, 45–55.
1987 ‘The royal Macedonian tombs and the paraphernalia of Alexander the
Great’, Phoenix 41, 105–21.
Borza, E. N. and Palagia, O.
2007 ‘The chronology of the Macedonian royal tombs at Vergina’, Jahrbuch des
Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 122, 81–125.
Bruns-Özgan, C.
1987 Lykische Grabreliefs des 5. und 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr., Tübingen.
Carney, E. D.
2000 Women and Monarchy in Macedonia, Norman, Oklahoma.
2002 ‘Hunting and the Macedonian elite: sharing the rivalry of the chase’,
in D. Ogden (ed.), The Hellenistic World: New Perspectives, London and
Swansea, 59–80.
2007 ‘Symposia and the Macedonian elite: the unmixed life’, Syllecta Classica 18,
129–80.
2008 ‘The role of the Basilikoi Paides at the Argead court’, in T. Howe and
J. Reames (eds), Macedonian Legacies. Studies in Ancient Macedonian History and
Culture in Honor of Eugene N. Borza, Claremont, 145–64.
2015 King and Court in Ancient Macedonia, Swansea.
Christensen, P. and Murray, S. C.
2010 ‘Macedonian religion’, in J. Roisman and I. Worthington (eds), A Companion
to Ancient Macedonia, Oxford, 428–45.
Chrysostomou, P.
1987 ‘Ο τύµβος Α1 της Ραχώνας Πέλλας’, in ΑΜΗΤΟΣ, τιµητικός τόµος για τον
καθηγητή Μανόλη Ανδρόνικο 2, Thessaloniki, 1007–25.
Drougou, S.
2011 ‘Vergina – the ancient city of Aegae’, in Lane Fox 2011, 243–56.
Drougou, S. and Saatsoglou-Paliadeli, C.
1999 Βεργίνα. Περιδιαβάζοντας τον αρχαιολογικό χώρο, Athens.
Drougou, S., Saatsoglou Paliadeli, C., Faklaris, P., Kottaridou, A., Tsigarida, E. B.
1996 Vergina. The Great Tumulus, Thessaloniki.
Eschbach, N.
1986 Statuen auf panathenäischen Preisamphoren, Mainz.
Faklaris, P. B.
1994 ‘Aegae: determining the site of the first capital of the Macedonians’,
American Journal of Archaeology 98, 609–16.
2011 ‘Και άλλα προβλήµατα του Τάφου ΙΙ της Βεργίνας: το µέγεθος και οι φάσεις
κατασκευής του’, in P. Valavanis (ed.), Ταξιδεύοντας στην Κλασική Ελλάδα,
Athens, 345–68.
Forthcoming ‘Προβλήµατα του λεγοµένου ‘τάφου της Ευρυδίκης’ στη Βεργίνα’,
Archaiologikon Deltion
Franks, H. M.
2012 Hunters, Heroes, Kings, Princeton.
Galanakis, Y.
2011 ‘Aegae: 160 years of archaeological research’, in Heracles to Alexander
the Great. Treasures from the Royal Capital of Macedon, a Hellenic Kingdom in the
428
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
Age of Democracy, exhibition catalogue, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford,
49–58.
Ginouvès, R. (ed.).
1994 Macedonia, Princeton.
Grant, D.
2017 In Search of the Lost Testament of Alexander the Great, Dexter, Michigan.
Hammond, N. G. L. and Walbank, F. W.
1988 A History of Macedonia III, Oxford.
Hatzopoulos, M. B.
1996 Macedonian Institutions under the Kings I, Athens.
Huguenot, C.
2008 Eretria XIX, La tombe aux Érotes et la tombe d’Amarynthos, Lausanne.
Jenkins, I.
2006 Greek Architecture and its Sculpture in the British Museum, London.
Karamitrou-Mentesidi, G.
2008 Αιανή. Αρχαιολογικοί χώροι και Μουσείο, Aiane.
Kottaridi, A.
2002 ‘Discovering Aegae, the old Macedonian capital’, in M. Stamatopoulou and
M. Yeroulanou (eds), Excavating Classical Culture, Oxford, 75–81.
2007 ‘L’épiphanie des dieux des Enfers dans la nécropole royale d’Aigai’, in
S. Descamps-Lequime (ed.), Peinture et couleur dans le monde grec antique, Paris,
27–45.
2011a ‘The legend of Macedon: a Hellenic kingdom in the age of democracy’, in
Heracles to Alexander the Great. Treasures from the Royal Capital of Macedon, a
Hellenic Kingdom in the Age of Democracy, exhibition catalogue, Ashmolean
Museum, Oxford, 1–24.
2011b ‘Queens, priestesses and high priestesses: the role of women at the
Macedonian court’, in Heracles to Alexander the Great. Treasures from the Royal
Capital of Macedon, a Hellenic Kingdom in the Age of Democracy, exhibition
catalogue, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, 93–125.
2011c ‘Burial customs and beliefs in the royal necropolis of Aegae’, in Heracles to
Alexander the Great. Treasures from the Royal Capital of Macedon, a Hellenic
Kingdom in the Age of Democracy, exhibition catalogue, Ashmolean Museum,
Oxford, 131–52.
2011d ‘The palace of Aegae’, in Lane Fox 2011, 297–333.
2011e Macedonian Treasures. A Tour Through the Museum of the Royal Tombs at Aigai,
Athens.
Lane Fox, R. (ed.)
2011 Brill’s Companion to Ancient Macedon, Leiden.
Lazarides, D.
1997 Αµφίπολις 2, Athens.
Lilimpaki-Akamati, M.
1989–1991 ‘Ανατολικό νεκροταφείο Πέλλας’, Arkhaiologikon Deltion 44–46, A’Μελέτες,
73–152.
Ma, J.
2011 ‘Court, king and power in Antigonid Macedonia’, in Lane Fox 2011,
521–43.
429
Olga Palagia
von Mangoldt, H.
2012 Makedonische Grabarchitektur, Berlin.
Musgrave, J. H.
1990 ‘Dust, and damn’d oblivion: a study of cremation in ancient Greece’,
Annual of the British School at Athens 85, 271–99.
Ogden, D.
1999 Polygamy, Prostitutes and Death. The Hellenistic Dynasties, London and Swansea.
2011 ‘How to marry a courtesan in the Macedonian courts’, in A. Erskine and
L. Llewellyn-Jones (eds), Creating a Hellenistic World, Swansea, 221–46.
Palagia, O.
2000 ‘Hephaestion’s pyre and the royal hunt of Alexander’, in A. B. Bosworth
and E. J. Baynham (eds), Alexander the Great in Fact and Fiction, Oxford,
167–206.
2002 ‘The “Tomb of Eurydice”, Vergina, plundered’, Minerva 13.1, 4–5.
2010 ‘Philip’s Eurydice at the Philippeum at Olympia’, in E. Carney and
D. Ogden (eds), Philip II and Alexander the Great. Father and Son, Lives and
Afterlives, Oxford, 33–41.
2011 ‘Hellenistic Art’, in Lane Fox 2011, 477–93.
2014 Review of H. M. Franks, Hunters, Heroes, Kings. The Frieze of Tomb II at
Vergina, Journal of Hellenic Studies 134, 2014, 255–6.
Forthcoming ‘Alexander the Great, the royal throne and the funerary thrones of
Macedonia’, in B. Antela Bernárdez and A. I. Molina Marín (eds), Alexander’s
Gaze. Studies in honor of A. B. Bosworth.
Paschidis, P.
2006 ‘The interpenetration of civic elites and court elite in Macedonia’, in A.-M.
Guimier-Sorbets, M. B. Hatzopoulos and Y. Morizot (eds), Rois, Cités,
Nécropoles, Athens, 251–68.
Paspalas, S. A.
2005 ‘Philip III Arrhidaios at court – an ill-advised persianism? Macedonian
royal display in the wake of Alexander’, Klio 87, 1, 72–101.
Petsas, P.
1966 Ο τάφος των Λευκαδίων, Athens.
Rhomiopoulou, K. and Schmidt-Dounas, B.
2010 Das Palmettengrab in Lefkadia, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts,
Athenische Abteilung, 21. Beiheft, Mainz.
Saatsoglou-Paliadeli, C.
2004 Βεργίνα. Ο τάφος του Φιλίππου. Η τοιχογραφία µε το κυνήγι, Athens.
Sawada, N.
2010 ‘Social customs and institutions: aspects of Macedonian elite society’, in
J. Roisman and I. Worthington (eds), A Companion to Ancient Macedonia,
Oxford, 392–408.
Seyer, M.
2007 Der Herrscher als Jäger, Vienna.
Sismanidis, K.
1997 Κλίνες και κλινοειδείς κατασκευές των Μακεδονικών τάφων, Athens.
430
The royal court in ancient Macedonia: the evidence for royal tombs
Spawforth, A. J. S.
2007 ‘The court of Alexander the Great between Europe and Asia’, in id. (ed.),
The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies, Cambridge, 82–120.
Themelis, P. G. and Touratsoglou, Y. P.
1997 Oι τάφοι του ∆ερβενίου, Athens.
Touratsoglou,Y. P.
2010 A Contribution to the Economic History of the Kingdom of Ancient Macedonia,
Athens.
Tsigarida, B.
2002 ‘Fourth century male diadems from Macedonia’, Revue Archéologique,
181–4.
Tsimbidou-Avloniti, M.
2005 Μακεδονικοί τάφοι στον Φοίνικα και στον Άγιο Αθανάσιο Θεσσαλονίκης,
Athens.
2011 ‘Αγιος Αθανάσιος, Μακεδονικός τάφος ΙΙΙ. Ο οπλισµός του ευγενούς νεκρού,
in νάµατα. Τιµητικός τόµος για τον καθηγητή ∆ηµήτριο Παντερµαλή,
Thessaloniki, 351–63.
Valavanis, P.
Forthcoming ‘Patterns of politics in ancient Greek athletics’, in A. Futrell and
T. Scanlon (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sport and Spectacle in the Ancient
World, Oxford.
Vokotopoulou, I.
1990 Οι ταφικοί τύµβοι της Αίνειας, Athens.
Wheatley, P.
2003 ‘Lamia and the besieger: an Athenian hetaera and a Macedonian king’, in
O. Palagia and S. V. Tracy (eds), The Macedonians in Athens, 322–229 B.C.,
Oxford, 30–6.
Zimi, E.
2011 Late Classical and Hellenistic Silver Plate from Macedonia, Oxford.
431