Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AS INTEGRAL
COMPONENT IN
HOME MAKING :
A CASE STUDY OF
LOW-COST HOUSING
IN BANGSAR
Background
• Minimum dwelling space of low-cost housing forces life of its residents to spill outdoors
• However, outdoor space provided is always in bad condition and its role is often abused for other purpose
• This affects the process of home making among the low-cost residents
RESEARCH'TOPIC
LITERATURE'REVIEW
IDENTIFY'RESEARCH'PROBLEM
RESEARCH'AIM:
To'study'the'usage'of'outdoor'spaces'at'lowFcost'housing'that'can'contribute'to'the'wellbeing'of'the'residents'
FIELD'OBSERVATION
QUALITATIVE
METHODOLOGICAL
STAGE
DATA'COLLECTION'F ANALYSIS
VALIDATION
QUALITATIVE +'INTERPRETATION
COMPARATIVE'ANALYSIS:
EVALUATE'&'COMPARISON
ANALYSIS' STAGE
RESEARCH'OUTPUT:
CONCLUSION'&'RECOMMENDATION
FINAL'THESIS
OUTPUT'STAGE
Literature Review
- Mee, (2007)
Low-cost Housing in Malaysia
FIELD'OBSERVATION
QUALITATIVE
METHODOLOGICAL
STAGE
DATA'COLLECTION'F ANALYSIS
VALIDATION
QUALITATIVE +'INTERPRETATION
• Behaviours of the residents of each site • Conducted with random residents with
are recorded and mapped by researcher RESEARCH'OUTPUT:
various profiling found at outdoor space of
CONCLUSION'&'RECOMMENDATION
at four predetermined time periods; each site, done during the predetermined
morning (9am to 10am), afternoon (2pm time periods to obtain the perceptual data
FINAL'THESIS
to 3pm), evening (5pm to 6pm) and at of the residents.
OUTPUT'STAGE
night (9pm to 10pm), covering all seven • Has a set of predetermined questions
days of a week. which the researcher devised based on the
• Checklist formulated from the literature three attributes to home making which are
reviews is used during the field appropriation, attachment and identity.
observation. Behaviours of the residents • However, researcher is free to move the
observed are categorized as social and conversation in any direction of interest
non-social activities that may come up.
• The questions are altered to easy
comprehendible terms considering the
residents’ knowledge preparedness.
Research Area
Image
Site Plan
Outdoor
Space
Research Findings
• No dustbin provided, hence very dirty. Residents • Dustbin provided, however refuse chamber nearby • Dustbin is not provided, hence very dirty at all
Cleanliness
seem okay with the poor environment creates an eyesore and foul smell outdoor spaces
• Playground has been vandalised and some play • Playground has recently been refurbished, hence the • Playground is in decent condition. Outdoor court
Aesthetic
structures are not functioning and are dangerous condition is still good and visually pleasing serves its function, less on aesthetics
• Vibrant. People tend to greet each other when they • Vibrant. People tend to greet each other when they
• Vibrant. People tend to greet each other when they bump into each other bump into each other
Social
bump into each other • When in use, a lot of activities happening, especially in • Location of outdoor space has made it possible for
the evening social interaction between residents
• Very sunny and warm at times because less shady • Well shaded with shady trees and residential blocks,
• Well shaded with shady trees, possible to use outdoor
trees planted possible to use outdoor space even if the weather is
Environment space even if the weather is hot
• Regardless of poor environment, residents still utilise hot
• Nice environment due to well-maintained facilities
the outdoor space provided • Poor environment due to rubbish
Research Findings
Age: 62
Interview Analysis R1
Gender: Male
Occupation: Retiree
Duration of Stay: 30 years
Marital Status: Married with kids
Residency: Permanent
• Conducted with random residents with S1
various profiling found at outdoor space of Age: 43
each site, done during the predetermined Gender: Female
Occupation: Housewife
R2
time periods to obtain the perceptual data Duration of Stay: 20 years
of the residents. Marital Status: Married with kids
Residency: Permanent
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Occupation: Housewife
R3
Duration of Stay: 13 years
Marital Status: Married with kids
Residency: Permanent
S2
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Occupation: Not working
R4
Duration of Stay: 5 years
Marital Status: Married with kids
Residency: Permanent
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Occupation: Admin clerk
R5
Duration of Stay: 5 years
Marital Status: married with kids
Residency: Renting
S3
Age: 12
Gender: Male
Occupation: Student
R6
Duration of Stay: 6 years
Marital Status: Single
Residency: Permanent
Research Findings
Interview Analysis
No. Question Site Answer Keyword No. Question Site Answer Keyword
Yes Yes
Playing carom and checkers Due to nice neighbourhood
Chit chat Don’t want to move out
S1 S1
Yes Yes
Looking after kids at playground Due to good community spirit
Chit chat Want to move out if can afford
Do you frequently use the Frequency Do you feel proud being a resident
1 Yes Neutral
outdoor space provided? Usage 6 here? Have you ever thought of moving Identity
S2 Looking after kids playing Want to move out if can afford
Yes to other places? S2 Neutral
Sometimes Want to go back to kampong but inconvenient
Looking after kids at playground No
S3
Yes Only renting so will move out one day
Play with friends S3
Neutral
No But prefer not to move out due to friends
Due to bad condition, however appreciate the gazebo Good
No Know each other, Malay majority and strong community
S1
Due to bad condition, not well shaded, no protection, no spirit
bench, however appreciate the gazebo and patrolling S1 Good
guard Know each other
Are you satisfied with the Yes There’s community welfare group
2 Satisfaction
outdoor space provided? Nice playground and well maintained Manage event together (wedding etc.)
S2
Neutral Moderate
Enjoy the gazebo but no facilities for elderly Don’t really communicate with each other
Yes Prejudice towards immigrants
But location is not at centre to all blocks, unfair Is the neighbourhood good? How is
S3 7 S2 Moderate Attachment
Yes your relationship with your neighbours?
But a bit dirty Don’t really communicate with each other
Prejudice at immigrants at first but better after spend time
• Refurbish/ repair playground
with them
• Provide dustbin
• Repair playground Not really
S1
• Redesign layout for protection People minding their own business
• Provide bench and dustbin People tend to stay inside because prejudice towards
In your opinion, what can be
• Plant more trees S3 immigrants
3 done to improve the outdoor Improvement
• Install fence at court for protection Not really
space? S2
• Add facilities for elderly Parents won’t let play outside if no company because of
• Provide dustbin prejudice towards immigrants
• Install fencing at playground for safety Yes
S3
• Provide dustbin Due to small house and can mingle with other residents
• Bigger space to play S1 Yes
Yes
S1 Due to hassle to go to park outside and can mingle with
As a resident here, do you Yes other residents
feel responsible to take care Yes Maybe
4 S2 Appropriation In your opinion, do you think outdoor
and maintain the outdoor Yes
8 space can contribute to the wellbeing Plenty of residents working during daytime Wellbeing
space provided? No S2 No light at night
S3 and joy of living here?
Maybe Yes
Yes
Allows people to communicate
Due to nice neighbourhood and feels like family Maybe
S1
Yes
Allows for social interaction
Due to nice neighbourhood S3
Yes
Yes
Can play with friends, more enjoyable
Do you enjoy living here? Due to great location
5 S2 Attachment
Why? Not really
Prefer kampong life but starting to feel okay
Not really
Due to less time spent interacting with neighbours
S3
Yes
Because of friends and near to Mid Valley
Discussion
What
When
These transactional process eventually contributes
to home making at low-cost housing
• Almost all the time when the weather and
commitments permit
Conclusion