What’s the problem, Terry?

Why do you need a continuance.

This is all simple shit, right?

I’m just a pesky negro who “moves from state to state looking for lawsuits.”
Like I was looking for your client to attack me.
You’re a tool.
 See the KingCast Commentary immediately following this Report
The Report protects a biased Hearing Officer as well as Respondent Rattan
and his “lawyer” Terry E. Johnson, who never signed the Pleadings. Johnson is on an OLR Panel BTW.

The system hates Attorney Nora. She uses established legal principles to fight unlawful foreclosure.

I was a residential closing attorney and run a website “Mortgage Movies.” I know these banks are full of shit.

Text

I was ejected exactly one other time in 200+ hearings over 7 years. They ended up paying me for Defamation. Can’t say the amount here.

I don’t have to be impartial. Also, she still has to obtain the official transcripts. My purpose was to film the filth.
 Well that is exactly what I had done. He started attacking me for no fucking reason whatsoever.

The conference room is not small at all. It took Rattan 8 seconds to traverse the room to attack my camera and me.

No camera was ever in anyone’s face, dammit.

 That is exactly right. Also the Hearing Officer kept changing his mind about whether I should stand or sit when taking still photos.

Again, it is not a small room and taking a few photos is perfectly fine. He didn’t need to remind me because I ALWAYS turn it off.

Remember, the camera is 3.5” long. The Report ignores this.

Rattan clearly uttered “Oh, I am touching your camera,” and the entire camera screen went black but the Report fails to mention this.

Fact: In response to the Referee admonishment, I immediately stated “I have been.”

The fact of the matter is, I never once violated a single goddamn rule he set down. Not once.
 These officers were derelict in their duties and did not take official statements nor did they even file a report.

That is called…. HEARSAY. And it is false. I told them there was contact but because
my pinky is already tweaked from other injuries I could not tell if i incurred any
additional damage. This is all in the file.

Bullshit. I had not actually taken ANY picture. I was in fact checking focus. I did not swear
Also, the Referee only ejected me when I told him I was going to exercise at such time
a goddamn motherfucking Constitutional Right to bring the matter to the Supreme Court. but I am now.

True. But his putative Lawyer, who sits on an OLR panel, never signed the filings. This invalidates the filings per established case law..

The only indignities suffered were occasioned against me by this arrogant Oaf.

True.

I turned my camera to face the arrogant, hegemonic oaf who raised the issue. That is what a videographer does. Duh.
Exactly. Throw the book at this arrogant bastard. The simple fact of the matter is, I am not present at these hearings to be liked.
I don’t give a shit. I am there to run a video camera and to take a few still photos of a public event.
You leave me alone and everyone gets home alive. You fuck with me, and this is what you get.

Yep. I engaged in principled discouse the whole time. Watch the unedited video.

Yep. And while he’s giving up probably 7 years to me I’m giving up 40 lbs and 3” in height to him.
Had I retaliated I am 99% certain that Referee Winiarski would have thrown me out and called the police.
He is a racist, hegemonic pig who will be sued for unlawful chilling conduct inimical to the First Amendment.

Let’s not forget this tidbit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nJ7XjK37C4
1:10 – 2:24

ME:
“I haven’t stuck a camera in anyone’s face. I’ve remained seated. I just took three stills just now, I may take fourth.
When a new witness is called I take a few pictures. I have not taken a picture of this witness yet.

BIGOT WINIARSKI:
“OK now you’ve taken three and I think that’s enough. A limited picture or two, yes but it can be very intimidating
so perhaps you’ll want to stand up and stand over there when you are taking pictures.”

ME:
“With all due respect I didn’t want to stand up because you admonished me for standing up earlier.”

The point is, I never violated ONE GODDAMN FUCKING THING that this pig told me to do. I followed his fucking directives to a T, then I fucking GOT ASSAULTED
and then he FUCKING DID NOTHING about it…. But when I told him I would follow up with the Supreme Court that motherfucker THREW MY BLACK ASS OUT.”

And that is why I can’t wait to sue that sack of shit.

And believe me, I will.

 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

4 January 2018

Re: Reply to Racist and Hegemonic Preliminary Report and Recommendations
On Christopher King a/k/a/ KingCast- Mortgage Movies v. Mark Rattan.
Unlawful Chilling of First Amendment Rights, Privileges and Immunities.
Case No. 2017MA496

I. Relevant Background
Complaining Party was absolutely correct when he argued that Respondent’s filings must be
stricken from the Record and when he argued that the Reviewing Committee was biased

I noted in an email back on 25 September 2017:

........Respondent Johnson’s cozy relationship with the OLR is Disconcerting.

Complaining Party took it upon himself to do some deep diving and discovered that
Respondent Johnson is on a reviewing committee with Paul Schwarzenbart, Esq. – the same
man who helped to orchestrate Complaining Party’s unlawful ejectment from the Nora
Hearing. As such, Respondent is naturally concerned about his flippant suggestions that the
deceitful misuse of his letterhead does not constitute an ethical violation. See overleaf.

As such, I am putting the OLR on Actual Notice that I do not trust the integrity of this
process any further than I could throw Attorneys Rattan or Johnson underwater. The issue
is clear.....

*********

The purpose of requiring a handwritten signature on pleadings, made by the attorney of
record, is not only to clarify who is accountable for an invalid claim, but also to guarantee
that an attorney who is familiar with the procedural and substantive laws of state has read
the claims and has made an assessment of the claims' validity. Schaefer v. Riegelman (2002)
639 N.W.2d 715, 250 Wis.2d 494. Pleading 288

*505 ¶ 17 Section 802.05(1)(a) clearly lays out the basic requirements for a sufficient
signature on a complaint. The signature must (1) be handwritten; (2) be the signature of an
attorney of record; and (3) be in that attorney's name. Although the signature in this case
was handwritten, it was not the signature of the attorney of record in that attorney's own
name.

Because no attorney of record signed the pleadings in accordance with § 802.05(1)(a), the
pleadings were defective.

To the extent that Novak left anything less than clear, Shaefer was unambiguous:
(5) defect in pleadings was fundamental and, thus, circuit court lacked jurisdiction over
attorney, overruling Novak v. Phillips, 246 Wis.2d 673, 631 N.W.2d 635.
 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f


Schiessle v. Karls 2010 WL 7746448 (Dane Cty 2010) is inapposite: There was no basis for
Prejudice because the case had just been initiated and no legal theorems had been argued.
That is vastly the opposite from this case, in which Complaining Party raised the issue
months ago only to have Respondent chortle at him and attempt to mock him, repeatedly.
i.e. 13 Nov.

Sorry—you are only permitted to get one substantive comment from me in one day.
Terry E. Johnson

He thinks he funny, big boss man, well-connected. I get it.
However, regardless of Attorney Johnson's insouciant commentary, complaining Party and
the Integrity of the system itself have (again) been thwarted in the pursuit of Justice
because Attorney Rattan is not the expert in the field that Attorney Johnson purports to be.
We have absolutely no guarantees that a lawyer “who is familiar with the procedural and
substantive laws of state has read the claims and has made an assessment of the claims'
validity.”

As an expert then, he must now recognize that both of Respondent’s responsive filings as
tendered in this case are completely invalid and must be stricken from the Record.

We live in a Nation of Laws: To the extent that Respondent and his purported
attorney believe it worthwhile to reach into extrinsic matters of a failed indictment of
Complaining Party and a Bar Suspension that was the result of “racism, ignorance and
reactionary politics” according to Professor Lou Jacobs, we now turn the focus of this
case right back to where it belongs:

1. The fact that Respondent Rattan disrupted a peaceful public legal proceeding by
alighting from his chair, traversing an entire room, and attacking Complaining Party
and his camera, in direct contravention of the Standing Law and Rule of the Case.

2. The fact that the absence of a valid attorney signature on a filing renders such
filing as defective and properly stricken from the Record.


II. The Specific Paragraphs.

First of all CP reiterates all that came before and notes that the Respondent has not officially
filed ANYTHING pursuant to cited 800 series case law that obviously applies here.

Next, the additions and modifications below are by no means exhaustive in light of the fact
that I’m busy saving yet another homeowner from unscrupulous (read: Fraudulent)
business practices on behalf of these banksters as noted elsewhere in this filing dealing with
reporter bias.

CP will not even delve too far into all of this nonsense except to say that it is obviously
written in a way to minimize CP’s point of view.
 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f


Paras dealing with reporter bias.
First of all there is a rule that the Hearing Examiner must not demonstrate bias, and he
failed resolutely with that issue.

There is no rule of the First Amendment that a reporter has to be neutral.

How stupid and completely irrelevant. Our Commander in Chief (a/k/a “45”) claims that the
NYTimes is not neutral. Liberals claim that Fox is not neutral. Who exactly gives a flying
fuck? There are forums held in the forum State addressing bias, so what? From June, 2017:
http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/cap-times-talk-are-wisconsin-media-
biased/article_d679632b-ce67-5ef2-801b-6fa9e67f80b3.html
“Cap Times Talk: Are Wisconsin media biased?”

This whole argument is dumber than a box of rocks but it shows the racism and outright
hegemony manifest against CP in this case.

CP has experience managing a title company, working in State-sponsored mediation in
Washington representing homeowners pursuant to statute, and investigating dozens of
these cases. He has also won awards for related property work from American Tower Corp
and others involved in the management of wireless infrastructure, zoning and permitting as
Contract Specialist and Project Manager so don’t forget that for one stinking minute. CP
won’t allow you to do so.

CP’s opinions are typically validated as noted in this filing, including an email sent today
regarding current cases:

***********
Re: Your bullshit preliminary report
3 hours ago at 11:51 AM
To 27 recipients

Stay tuned by CoB today folks, with hard copies mail receipt to follow.

I’m busy with a pesky free negro who was the victim of racism and prosecutorial
malfeasance, fact. I knew this 8 years ago. Wait for his new video shortly.
http://darrelljonesinnocent.blogspot.com/?m=1

And a pesky free Jewish veteran getting screwed by a Trust that doesn’t even exist.
I’m right about this too.
http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2017/12/kingcast-and-mortgage-movies-
see-grinch.html?m=1

 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

I don’t have to be neutral. I just have to be right. Ask this Rhode Island homeowner
after I investigated the bullshit in her case and put her in a position to get Counsel
and sue. Can’t discuss the terms here but she smacked that ass GOOD.
http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2015/10/kingcast-mortgage-movies-see-
harmon-law.html?m=1

Along the way George Babcock, Esq. committed suicide. This is sad but this will
happen when you sell Your soul to the banksters by failing to zealously represent
your clients.

Ciao.
***********

The only issue is why in over 200 hearings or trials over the years has there been only 1
other ejectment, resulting in litigation that was indeed settled quite favorably for CP?1

Paras dealing with Referee Winiarski.

He is not a neutral Hearing Officer.CP will refer the Court to 5:08 of this video in which he is
already berating CP about “intimidating witnesses months before the hearing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmYatdpIlSU

“Let’s call him media in this instance,” he says in the current hearing.

Excuse me, but CP does not need Winiarski to determine his legitimacy as media. He
managed the Cincinnati edition of a statewide black newspaper, the Ohio Call & Post. He
was a daily reporter for the Indianapolis Star. To the extent that Respondent takes him to
task for a failed prosecution as NAACP legal chair inNew Hampshire, he holds a Mayoral
Commendation for work in the Spirit of the First Amendment AFTER such failed
prosecution.2

1 Respondent raised this issue himself, subject to the Motions to Strike and to Recuse. So now that he

opened the door, CP is going to slam it in his face with a resounding thud. As the settlement amount
was not subpoenaed all CP can say is that it was far from nuisance value, and CP slammed those
racist pig attorneys who lied and claimed that he had “issued a death threat.” More white people of
privilege thinking they can run a game on CP and they got embarrassed is what they got. Same here.
2 CP appeared for trial, flanked by Three Good White Men: His film maker and two attorneys. One of

these attorneys, David Horan, was the former LEAD PROSECUTOR for Hillsborough County. CP went
through Voir Dire. As he did so several excused Jurors walked by and actually shook his hand and
said “go get ‘em.” The State never started its Case-in-Chief but instead ran awayt and CP took NO
PLEA. The would rather nol-pross it so that CP couldn’t sue them. So they can piss up a rope, too.
BOO! As in, “jigga.” Nat Fucking Turner in control here folks. Don’ forget it.
 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

“That’s it, you’re outta’ here,” he bellowed when all CP had done was to:

a) ask why Respondent was not reprimanded for attacking his camera and,
b) tell the Hearing Examiner that he was going to exercise a LEGAL OPTION to “take
this matter up with the Supreme Court.” BOOM. There’s a lawsuit right fucking
there and he’s gonna fucking get one. Not my fucking fault. God Dammit. Get it
fucking straight. This guy can kiss my black ass. He’s never had a nigger step to him
like this but you know what, it’s high time it happened so he can just go piss up a
goddamn rope. Quote me on that. Don’t you ever threaten or punish me for stating
that I plan to exercise my goddamn fucking LEGAL RIGHTS. Ever.

Paras Dealing with the actions of Respondent Rattan.
These paragraphs neglect to mention that Respondent had been specifically warned the
previous day that CP’s still camera was fully authorized pursuant to Law.

Despite that, he traversed the ENTIRE ROOM, it took him eight (8) full seconds to do so.
Count ‘em starting at 0:16 herein, in the accurate video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmYatdpIlSU3

King specifically told him “Don’t touch my camera… don’t touch may camera,” whereupon
Respondent can clearly be heard to utter, “Oh, I’m touching….(inaudible) at 0:24 and he
then placed his ENTIRE HAND over the 3.5” camera as clearly shown in CPs prior filings as
the screen went black. CP was indeed holding on to said camera so there was bodily contact.

3 These sleazebags tried to say that the video was somehow altered. The same sleazebags who didn’t
even sign the Filings, right. “Sleazy” was first used by Respondent Rattan toward CP, fact so noted.
 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

His actions, and his actions alone, caused a substantial disturbance in direct violation of
clearly-delineated Ethical Principles and Rules.

Note: He stands at least 3” taller than CP and have perhaps 30-40 lbs on him as well.
And everyone here knows that if CP had taken a physical response to this white man
of privilege CP would have been ARRESTED.

So instead CP did the legal thing, only to find yet more lawlessness in this very
process. Disgusting. CP hopes one day he tries that shit again to a real nigga’ will
whup his ever-loving ass, but good. That will teach him.

 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

III. Conclusion and Prayer for Relief.

CP does not give one flying fuck what any of you think about him. He is not here to be
especially polite at this time, either. He was being polite and it got him ASSAULTED, ab
initio. If you have a problem with him then report him – and this this entire situation with a
copy of this filing to the Ohio Bar. Whatever. One of my mentors Professor Christopher
Fairman, Esq. (R.I.P.) would respectfully say “Fuck You” anyway. He wrote a working paper
on the creative use of the phrase and sent it to me in support, fact.
All we are here to do today is to:

1. Rule on the fact that Series 800 applies to this case and that the filings must be
stricken as not in conformity with Law.

http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2017/11/kingcast-and-mortgage-movies-see.html
First of all, where is the statutory proof that SCR 22 in any way vitiates the requirement that
an attorney sign the pleadings and filings dictated by WIS Stat §802.05.?

In fact, SCR 22 directly references the 800 Statutes or what you didn't think I would notice
that? SCR 22.13 Service of the complaint.
(1) The complaint and the order to answer shall be served upon the respondent in the same
manner as a summons under section 801.11 (1) of the statutes Once you show me that one
vitiates the other -- and only then -- will I release this inquiry.

Further, even if you claim that Attorney Johnson need not sign the filings on behalf of his
purported client, I asked you to recuse him because of the obvious CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Conflicts of Interest are always germane under any legal proceeding are they not? If you
need help, I’ve extended the opportunity to review In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
Carroll 351 Wis.2d 686 (2013) Terry sits on an OLR Board.
Remember that? Now get back in your office and rule on THAT.

2. Strike or Recuse Attorney Johnson as Counsel as he is in derogation of the Rule and
Law in this case, as he was only hired because of his position on the OLR Reviewing
Committee in the first damn place. Everyone knows that.

3. Determine that when I sit my narrow black ass in my chair and run video about an
on-record issue raised by Respondent, that I have a right to do so without some
stupid oaf attacking my equipment or me. Anything else – other than the failure to
sign the pleadings on behalf of Respondent and the Motion to Recuse Attorney
Johnson -- is completely irrelevant as a matter of Fact and Law. See SCR 20:3.5(d)
and SCR 40.15 vis a vis SCR 20:8.4(g).

Submitted with all the Respect that is due,

/s/ Christopher King
__________________________________
Christopher King J.D.
cc: World Wide Web
 CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com
617.543.8085p
206.299.9333f

PS: You want to see a camera in some Wisconsin Lawyer’s face CP recommends you
take a look at Judge Colas in the goddamn elevator with CP. Was CP ejected from
Colas’ Court. Fuck nooooo…… bank shill that he is, even he knows the goddamn First
Amendment Law, thank you. 66,000 views and counting, ahem. Don’t ever challenge
CP on the First Amendment. The name of the blog is the name of the Game folks,
whether you like it or not. http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/