Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interview Decisions
Varun Aggarwal
varun@aspiringminds.in
June, 2009
AMCAT Results Mimic interview Decisions PAGE 2
Varun Aggarwal
varun@aspiringminds.in
©2009 All rights reserved by Aspiring Minds Assessment (P) Ltd aspiringminds
AMCAT Results Mimic interview Decisions PAGE 3
Introduction
assessment is used just as a criterion to
Aspiring Minds is an assessment
filter the not so appropriate candidates,
company which conducts aptitude, skill
in other cases, it is also used as a hiring
and personality assessment for judging
input for the interviewer to make the
employability of candidates. It has a
hiring decision.
battery of Computer Adaptive Tests which
are taken by several thousands of fresh For any organization, a decrease in
graduates every year and whose results interview time leads to savings in cost and
are accepted by companies such as HCL, time, leading to scalability and
MphasiS, Evalueserve, etc. to make hiring organizational efficiency. This can happen
decisions. if an objective assessment can act as an
accurate proxy for the interview.
During the second quarter of 2008,
Aspiring Minds worked with a Bangalore- The following reasons are generally cited
based Web 2.0 product company (COM) for the inadequacy of assessment
helping them hire candidates from three solutions for this purpose.
Most assessment different campuses across India. The
Most tests are designed to work as
solutions are
candidate was expected to have very
considered to be screens: Firstly, most assessment
good ‘screens’, strong computer programming and
solutions are considered to be good
but not good for algorithm skills together with strong
guiding the final ‘screens’, but not good for guiding the final
hiring decision. analytical skills and communication skills.
hiring decision. Basically, tests are
The current case is about how Aspiring considered good to eliminate the bad
Minds’ superior assessment helped COM candidates, but inadequate to differentiate
hire with minimum interview burden and amongst the better candidates. This is
objective assessment criteria. because most check the minimum stuff
the candidate should know for the
Assessment and Interviews
position, but not test the stuff he/she
Across the world, most hiring at entry- should know to do well in the job. Thus
level use an assessment followed by they act as ‘screens’ to eliminate, but not
interview(s). Whereas in some cases, the good ranking tools otherwise. The ranking
©2009 All rights reserved by Aspiring Minds Assessment (P) Ltd aspiringminds
AMCAT Results Mimic interview Decisions PAGE 4
etc., which are not well-assessed in the adjusts its difficulty level to the
©2009 All rights reserved by Aspiring Minds Assessment (P) Ltd aspiringminds
AMCAT Results Mimic interview Decisions PAGE 5
framework, which implies that the score of AMCAT is an objective test with multiple
the candidate is judged by how hard a choice questions. However it does have a
question he/she was able to answer. majority of application-based questions
rather than knowledge-based questions.
The adaptive nature of AMCAT helps not
This tests the candidate’s ability to apply
only screen the inappropriate
the concepts and knowledge to real-world
candidates, but give accurate ranking
problems rather than assessing
for the high-ability candidates. This is
knowledge or rote learning.
depicted in Figure 1. This addresses the
first objection against objective testing We concede that an objective test cannot
The Skill modules solutions. provide many abilities which are only
tests particular
measurable subjectively, creativity being
skills needed for Secondly, AMCAT goes beyond being a
job success, while general aptitude test to include Skill
one. The question remains however how
the Personality dominant are these skills for the final
Assessment modules and Personality Assessment.
measures whether hiring decision and job-performance. Our
The structure of AMCAT is shown in
the candidate has view is that this would vary from job-to-job
the right Figure 2. Whereas the Skill modules tests
disposition for the and needs to substantiated empirically.
particular skills needed for job success of
profile.
entry-level hires, the Personality Thus, there is enough reason to believe
Assessment measures whether the that AMCAT could be a good proxy to
candidate has the right disposition for the interviews once calibrated. The same
job. Currently, AMCAT contains Skill needs to be verified empirically.
Modules in Computer Programming,
COM’s Job Requirement
Electronics Semiconductor, Computer
Literacy, Computer Infra and Finance. COM is a Bangalore based companies
the scientifically validated five factor for Web 2.0 product development. Their
model of personality, which has shown salary range is 4.0L to 5.0L per annum.
dimensions of a person’s ability and interview and the convert rate range
The convert rate disposition to be able to predict job between 1 in 15 to 1 in 20 of those they
at COM ranged interview.
between 1 in 15 success and be a proxy to the interviewer
to 1 in 20 of those with regard to content coverage. This They require candidates with very strong
they interview.
covers the second objection raised in the computer programming skills and ability to
last section. apply data structure and algorithm
concepts in solving complex problems.
They also want the candidates to have
©2009 All rights reserved by Aspiring Minds Assessment (P) Ltd aspiringminds
AMCAT Results Mimic interview Decisions PAGE 6
very good communication and analytical After detailed examination of the job
skills. function with the COM team, Aspiring
Minds team hypothesized that English
The interview at COM comprises of
Comprehension and Logical Ability
making students write programs for
were screening criteria for COM,
particular complicated problems. If the
whereas Computer Programming and
candidate is unable to solve the problem,
Quantitative Ability were differentiating
they provide hints and help the candidate
criteria within the good candidates.
progressively solve the problem. They
desire to check the approach and thought The cut-offs used for different modules
process of the candidate towards solving are present in Table 1. After applying the
computer programming problems. On the cut-offs for screening candidates, the
other hand, they test analytical skills by eligible candidates were sorted basis the
asking subjective puzzles to candidates. sum of their standardized Computer
Programming and Quantitative Ability
Till now, COM was making decisions of
Score. COM was provided with the list
interviewing or not interviewing candidates
of eligible candidates in order of
basis the resume of the candidate. They
priority and also the list of ineligible
were not using any assessment tests. As
candidates.
cited before their convert rate ranged
between one-in-fifteen to one-in-twenty. Event 1: The first event for COM was
conducted at a reputed engineering
AMCAT for COM Hiring
campus in Bangalore, India. A total of 53
COM decided to use AMCAT for entry- candidates took AMCAT. These consisted
level hiring in March 2008. Experts at students with B.tech., M.Sc. and MCA
Aspiring Minds decided to use the degrees.
following modules for assessing
Cut-off Cutoff
applicants to COM: Module (Absolute (Nationwide
Score) Percentile)
⇒ English Comprehension
English 550 60
⇒ Quantitative Ability
Logical Ability 500 50
⇒ Logical Ability
Quantitative Ability 500 50
⇒ Computer Programming.
Computer 600 75
Programming
The Computer Programming test has a
mix of basic programming questions, Table 1
©2009 All rights reserved by Aspiring Minds Assessment (P) Ltd aspiringminds
AMCAT Results Mimic interview Decisions PAGE 7
AM provided a list with ranking of the 30 MCA students took the AMCAT. Using
same to COM. The COM team distributed the filtering criteria, 6 students were
the 15 candidates to be interviewed by shortlisted and provided to COM with
their technical team for the first round of rankings. After the interview process,
interview. The technical team was blind to COM hired candidates with rank 1 & 2.
the AMCAT scores.
Observations
As a result of the first round of interview, 7
The following observations were made in
candidates were shortlisted. All
the hiring done for COM.
candidates below AMCAT rank 11 were
rejected by the interviewers. The marginal In all events, the candidate ranked first
selects were rank 8 and 11. Thus the on basis of AMCAT was selected by
result of the first round of interview closely interviewers. This clearly showed that
©2009 All rights reserved by Aspiring Minds Assessment (P) Ltd aspiringminds
AMCAT Results Mimic interview Decisions PAGE 8
©2009 All rights reserved by Aspiring Minds Assessment (P) Ltd aspiringminds