From: Lance Cassino <lancecassino@msn.

com> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 9:58 AM

To: Cynthia.Lowery-Graber@bryancave.com
Subject: RE: Request for Chase to record very soon 2 releases in the Jeffco land records on vacant 5.1 acres parcel with
part of neighbor’s home on it: 1st release for .4 acre and 2nd release for 4.7 acres per Minor Adjustment

Monday, May 8th, 2017

Cynthia Lowery-Graber
Bryan Cave LLP
1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4100
Denver, CO 80203-4541
303-866-0331
303 866 0200 F
Cynthia.Lowery-Graber@bryancave.com

RE: Request for Chase to record very soon 2 releases in the Jeffco land records on vacant 5.1 acres
parcel with part of neighbor’s home on it: 1st release for .4 acre and 2 nd release for 4.7 acres per Minor
Adjustment

Hello Cynthia,

First I am pro se on the matters discussed in this email so far – I am not currently represented by an attorney.

To solve the problem for my neighbor’s home being partly on my vacant 5.1 acre (see Exhibit 1 – 5.1 acre
Survey showing encroachment), I filed lawsuit for encroachment in Jefferson County District Court in March
2016 Case Number: 2016CV-30409.

This encroachment was not discovered until October 2012 Chase paid for a survey of the property by Evergreen
Surveying, Inc. (Bob Feroldi 303-674-3444 evergreensurveying@msn.com).

The lawsuit was settled out of court October 18th, 2016 - with the Jordan’s and their builder buying .4 acres of
the Cassino’s 5.1 acres and paying for the costs in doing a “Minor Adjustment” with Jefferson County Planning
& Zoning - to get new legals recorded in the land record for the .4 acre piece for the Jordan’s to solve their
encroachment problem. The remaining 4.7 acre free of the encroachment solves Cassino’s problem in having a
marketable property that can have a home built on it (this also solves Chase’s alleged problem (see Exhibit 2
Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Minor Adjustment email dated March 27, 2017).

Background on this for you, Bryan Cave and Chase.

Chase made a partial “settlement agreement” with me in March 2013, paying $10,000 of my attorney’s fees to
avoid jury trial and my quiet title counterclaim.
This was due to my attorney Steve Navarro pointing out to the judge and the 2 law firms representing
Chase www.KutakRock.com (lead attorney Jeremy Peck) and www.KarshFulton.com (lead attorney Fred
Gabler) that the Chase/MERS self-assignment – Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust dated 9/28/2011 – is a
totally fraudulent robo-signed and robo-notarized photo shop creation. And, that there is no legal Chain Of
Title with matching legal Chain Of Custody Of Note – the paper trail v. money trail. So, no legal interest by
Chase means no injury, meaning no standing as PETE.

The alleged “settlement agreement” to reform the deed of trust (which only has legal for 5.1 vacant acres)
was an illegal contract, worthless paper my attorneys say, as Chase had no capacity, interest or standing to
enter it.
The previously mentioned 2 law firms that created the alleged “settlement agreement” then later withdrew from
representing Chase. And, the law firm involved in filing the false and fraudulent Notice of Election and
Demand 3/17/2011 and the false Chase/MERS corporate assignment of deed of trust - Aronowitz &
Mecklenberg - was ordered to shut down by the Colorado Attorney General 2014. Chase v Cassino and
Cassino v Chase has been in a stalemate since.

Because the 2 law firms that created the alleged “settlement agreement” withdrew from representing Chase it
made it impossible for Cassino to complete an already illegal agreement that Chase was to pay half of the
Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Minor Adjustment or Subdivision costs all to be done within a one year
period or no deal. So, Chase really did a “fake phony no deal” settlement agreement to sandbag the Cassino’s
with another 4 years of financial injuries - which my attorney Steve Navaro had correctly predicted.

Bottom line, because Chase is not successor in interest to WaMu loans per major Federal court cases of self-
admission – meaning the courts will need to rule for getting into discovery - as Chase has no supporting chain
of title on the paper trail plus no supporting chain of custody of the note on the money trail.

With all of the above in mind Cynthia, I am requesting your assistance in getting Chase to record very soon
release/s in the land records with new legals on both the .4 acre and 4.7 acres so that any title companies
involved right now or in the future can issue title insurance policies to the Jordan’s .4 acre sale and the
McSweeneys 4.7 acres sale with who I have an accepted counter offer (see Exhibit 3 – Cassino’s Counter
Proposal accepted by McSweeneys on vacant 4.7 acre parcel dated 4/11/2017).

I will email you the 2 new legal descriptions this week when received from Evergreen Surveying.
To be clear on the seriousness of this email to you and Bryan Cave, if Chase refuses to comply with this
completely legal and lawful request - then the Cassino’s after over 6 years of multiple damages and injuries -
will be taking immediate legal actions.

One of which will be a personal injury lawsuit (mortgage malpractice, which is just like medical malpractice
resulting in several different kinds of injuries that juries do understand per recent favorable cases) for wrongful
foreclosure using fraudulent manufactured documents for several millions of dollars. These planned lawsuits by
the Cassino’s - if needed - will be far more effective than “Defendant Cassino’s Answer” with a counter claim
for quiet title in 2012 with Keith Gantenbein my attorney of record – again partially settled in March 2013 but
not fully till now - maybe - after 4 plus years of Chase intentional sandbagging.

Do understand and let Chase legal decision makers know that this email is not intended as a threat. I am just
stating the truth that I have in fact discussed my case worth several millions in damages and injuries a month
ago with one of the top PI attorneys in Colorado and will consult with another equally well known PI attorney
in CO this week.

For the record, besides my financial injuries these last 6 years to stop Chase from stealing another “free home”
for themselves - resulting in both lost income as a paralegal/web developer and the lost proceeds from being
able to sell the 5.1 now 4.7 acres to financially provide proper in the home CNA care for by 66 year old
wheelchair bound Brother and my 91 year old Mother who has been his 24x7 CNA for all this time – there is
also their emotional, mental and physical injuries suffered because I personally have not been able to help them
as much as needed – which is totally due to the Chase fraudulent foreclosure attempt in 2011 and the resulting
credit reporting damage > stopping any restructuring of my assets with banks to help my Mother and Brother
pictured below:
Six weeks ago, Lynn suffered a dramatic decline now losing his strength in upper body arms and hands so much
that he needs 7 days a week/3 hours a day CNA care to transfer in/out of bed to wheelchair and assistance with
daily bathroom and bathing. Last Wednesday 5/3 we retained Safe Home Care to provide CNA’s on a private
pay basis:

Cynthia, I know this is rather complicated - but the rest of this case and story is fully documented for my
attorneys, Chase attorneys, judges and juries at:

www.CassinovChase.weebly.com

www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com

www.CassinoTILAvChase.weebly.com

I will send you the 2 new legals soon. That is all for now.

Awaiting your reply on what Chase will do now with all the Cassino’s cards on the table.

Thank you.

Lance Cassino
303-838-0221
Lancecassino@msn.com

p.s. I am very fortunate in this case because of 2 good and honest attorneys I retained previously – one in 2010
and one in 2011. Both who flipped from representing foreclosing banks to representing homeowners like the
Cassino’s for either a legitimate loan modification - if Chase was really holder in due course of the note period
or if not quiet title. Both flipped due to fears of being RICO crime accessories, losing their licenses and more.
First was Mitch J. Stein & Associates in CA who really irritated the CA BAR and major banks for 6 plus mass
joinders he filed. Second was Keith Gantenbein formerly of the Castle Law Group in CO. Hopefully the Chase
attorney/s that will be the decision makers on this request will do the right thing finally as this is a prime RICO
case.

---------------------------------------------------------- Exhibits -----------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit 1 – 5.1 acre Survey showing encroachment

Exhibit 2 Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Minor Adjustment email dated March 27, 2017

From: Nathan Seymour nseymour@co.jefferson.co.us Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 11:26 AM
To: Lance Cassino
Cc: Paige Cybulski
Subject: RE: letter from Jeffco Planning & Zoning that says the remaining 4.7 acres is a buildable home site.
Re: 29310 S. Sunset Trail MA - 1st referral comments

Hey Lance,

You should wait until the Minor Adjustment is recorded prior to the sale of the property. Otherwise the new
owner would technically be required to sign the Minor Adjustment not you.

Once the Minor Adjustment is recorded the lot will be legalized. A note has been placed on the Minor
Adjustment talking to the approval of the Minor variation for lot size.
In addition, the Minor variation which I’ve attached and Paige previously sent to you is the document approving
the lot size. I would prefer not to write up another letter which summarized this memorandum. The first two
pages are really the only ones which are important, the last 4 are simply supporting documents and do not need
to be included.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.

Thanks,

Nathan Seymour
(303) 271-8751

Exhibit 3 – Cassino’s Counter Proposal accepted by McSweeneys on vacant 4.7 acre parcel dated 4/11/2017