You are on page 1of 80

Taking

Design
Patents to
Max Ciccarelli
the Next
Level max@tklaw .com

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


Clothing Food
Telecom

Firearms Sporting Equipment

Examples of Design Patents


Software High Tech
Footwear Manufacturing
Semiconductor
Devices House wares
Automotive
Electronics
Bottles
 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli
Electronics

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Automotive

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Footwear

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Firearms

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Food

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Clothing

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


High Tech Manufacturing

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Telecomm

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Semiconductor Devices

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Poison Bottles

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Sporting Equipment

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


House wares

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Computer Displays

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Outline

n Basics
n Broadening Protection
n Shortening the Application
n Miscellaneous Tips
n Computer Displays
n Photographs

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Who can get a design patent?

n “Whoever invents any new, original and


ornamental design for an article of
manufacture”

35 U.S.C. 171

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


What does a design patent protect?

The:
n shape,
n surface ornamentation, or
n a combination of each,
which is embodied in or on an article of
manufacture.

See 35 USC 171; see also Gorham Mfg. Co. v. White, 81


U.S. 511, 525 (1872); In re Blum, 153 USPQ 177, 180
(CCPA 1967).

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Test for Infringement

n Whether an ordinary observer,


n giving such attention as a purchaser
usually gives,
n finds the alleged design to be
substantially similar to the patented
design.

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


The Design Patent Application

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


The Specification

n “No description, other


than a reference to the
drawing, is ordinarily
required.”

37 C.F.R. 1.153(a)

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


The Claim

n The ornamental design for a _________, as


shown and described.
37 C.F.R. 1.153(a)

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Title, Claim, and Specification

Title

Claim

Spec.

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


The First Design Patent
November 19, 1842

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Broadening Protection

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


Broadening Protection

n Broken lines

n Multiple applications

n Embodiments

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Broken Lines

n The two most common uses of broken lines


are to
– disclose the environment related to the claimed
design
– and to define the bounds of the claim. . . .
n A broken line showing is for illustrative
purposes only and forms no part of the
claimed design or a specified embodiment
thereof.

MPEP 1503.02

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Broken Lines

Environment
Environment

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Broken Lines

Environment
Environment
A broken line showing is for
illustrative purposes only and
forms no part of the claimed
design or a specified
embodiment thereof.

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Broken Lines

Environment
Environment

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Broken Lines

Bounds
Bounds

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


What not to do

Elmer v. ICC
67 F.3d 1571
(Fed. Cir. 1995)

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


What not to do

Keystone v. Westrock
997 F.2d 1444
(Fed. Cir. 1993)

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


What not to do

Keystone v. Westrock
997 F.2d 1444
(Fed. Cir. 1993)

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Better?

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Broadening Protection

n Broken lines

n Multiple applications

n Embodiments

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Multiple Applications

Des. 356,772

Des. 356,757

Des. 363,561
 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli
Use of Multiple Applications

Des. 291,144 Des. 299,583

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Multiple Applications

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Multiple Applications

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Broadening Protection

n Broken lines

n Multiple applications

n Embodiments

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Multiple Embodiments

n It is permissible to illustrate more than one


embodiment of a design invention in a single
application. However, such embodiments may be
presented only if they involve a single inventive
concept and are not patentably distinct from one
another. Embodiments that are patentably distinct
over one another do not constitute a single
inventive concept and thus may not be included in
the same design application.

MPEP 1504.05

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Embodiments

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Embodiments

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Embodiments

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Embodiments

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Shortening the Application

(and saving money on draftsman fees)

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


“Mirror” Images

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Showing half the design

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Showing half the design

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Miscellaneous Tips

Positions
Details
Software Displays

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


Different positions

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Details

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Software Displays

n Old law (early 1990s): icons and typefaces not


deemed to be articles of manufacture.
See e.g., Ex pane Strijland, 26 USPQ2d 1259, 1262 (BPAI
1992)(computer icon alone is merely surface
ornamentation)

n New law (post 1996): the designs on these items


can be claimed by stating that the design is
displayed on an article of manufacture (e.g.
computer icon on a computer display).

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Software Displays
PTO: Icons without
representation of
PTO: Guidelines for
computer screen
Examination of
O.K. (Two Xerox
Design Patent
applications
Applications for
allowed)
Computer
Generated Icons

1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

PTO: Stopped
issuing patents for
computer generated
icons

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Software Displays

n PTO Guidelines:
– “Computer-generated icons are designs within
the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 171, but must be
embodied in an article of manufacture to satisfy
the statute.”
– “computer screen monitor, other display panel
or a portion thereof” necessary to meet the
article of manufacture requirement.

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Software Displays

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Software Displays

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Use of Photographs

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


Photograph

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Photograph – too much detail?

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Photograph – too little detail?

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Drawing – just right?

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Drawing – just right?
Claimed elements

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Illustration Options

n Drawings
– Black Ink [37 C.F.R. 1.84(a)(1)]

– Color [37 C.F.R. 1.84(a)(2)]

n Photographs
– Black and White [37 C.F.R. 1.84(b)(1)]

– Color [37 C.F.R. 1.84(b)(2)]

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Requirements for Photographs

Photographs are acceptable only in


applications in which
the invention is not capable of being
illustrated in an ink drawing or
where the invention is shown more clearly
in a photograph (e.g., photographs of
ornamental effects are acceptable).

MPEP 1503.02

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Photograph vs. Drawing

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Requirements for Photographs

n Color photographs and color drawings are not


permitted in design applications in the absence of a
grantable petition pursuant to § 1.84(a)(2).
37 C.F.R. 1.152

n Photographs submitted in lieu of ink drawings must


comply with 37 CFR 1.84(b). However, the
requirement of 37 CFR 1.84(b)(1) for a petition,
petition fee, and three sets of black and white
photographs has been waived, and only one set of
black and white photographs is now required.
See 1213 O.G. 108 (Aug. 4, 1998), 1211 O.G. 34 (June 9, 1998),
and MPEP 1503.02.

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


New Matter

n Removing OR Adding detail in the


drawings can result in a “new matter”
rejection.
n Practice tip: do not use informal drawings.

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Utility vs. Design

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


Utility vs. Design Patents

Utility Design
Term 20 yrs from 14 yrs from
Filing Grant
Maintenance Yes No
Fees
PCT Yes No
Foreign Priority Up to 1 yr. Up to 6 mos.
Avg. pendency 24 mos. 18 mos.
 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli
Searching for Design Patents

(And an example of a missed


opportunity)

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli


Design Patent Searching - USPTO

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


E.g. – Ruger design patents

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Ruger – 11 design patents

E.g.
E.g.
Rifle
Rifle
Pistol
Pistolbarrel
barrel
Handgun
Handgungripgrip
Revolver
Revolver
Pistol
Pistol

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Others – no firearm design patents

No
Nofirearm
firearmdesign
designpatents
patents

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Beretta – missed opportunity?

Beretta Taurus
(Knock-off)

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Ruger – good use of design patent

 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli


Summary

n Broadening Protection
– Broken lines
– Multiple applications
– Embodiments
n Shortening the Application
– “Mirror” Images
– Showing half the design
n Tips
– Different positions
– Details
n Photographs
 ’01, ‘02, Max Ciccarelli
Taking
Design
Patents to
Max Ciccarelli
the Next
THOMPSON & KNIGHT L.L.P.

Level max@tklaw .com

 ‘01, ’02, Max Ciccarelli

You might also like