Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16.6.2015
BENEDICTE AIMEE JOHANSEN
PER BUCHARDT ARKITEKTER
COPENHAGEN SCHOOL OF DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY
SPRING SEMESTER 2015
PREFACE
This report is documentation on my internship at Per Buchardt Arkitekter during the spring
semester of 2015, from the 2nd of February till 29th of June.
The internship takes place during the 6th semester, and is a mandatory part of the Bachelor of
Architectural Technology and Construction Management (BATCM) at Copenhagen School of
Design and Technology.
In this report you will read about my internship goals, my role and tasks at an architectural design
studio and an analysis of how they go together with my education and future career.
Lastly, I would like to thank my colleagues at the internship office for their patience and
willingness to sharing their knowledge with me.
________________________
Benedicte Aimee Johansen
Contents
INTERNSHIP REPORT ............................................................................... 1
PREFACE ................................................................................................ 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................ 3
1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 4
2.1 ACCOUNT OF THE INTERNSHIP ................................................................ 5
2.1.1 THE COMPANY ............................................................................... 5
2.1.2 THE ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGIST ................................................ 5
2.1.3 PERSONAL LEARNING GOALS ............................................................ 6
2.1.4 RESULT ......................................................................................... 7
3.1 GRØNDAL CENTER ............................................................................... 9
3.1.1 THE CASE ...................................................................................... 9
*Pics changed according to Per Buchardts wishes. .................................................11
3.1.2 THE SUGGESTION ...........................................................................11
3.1.3 THE WORKS ..................................................................................13
3.2 Examples of work done during the internship. (*added according to Per Buchardts suggestion)
...........................................................................................................14
3.2.1 MAT1, Matthæusgade 1. ......................................................................14
3.2.2 TS, Merchandise and food stand for Tingbjerg stadion ......................................14
3.2.3 Various interior fittings ........................................................................15
3.2.4 CG UB, Youth housing for Grøndal center ...................................................15
4.1 CONCLUSION .....................................................................................18
APPENDIXES: ..........................................................................................20
Some of the projects I got to be responsible for has been for the commune, and has involved
design, registering/surveying, contracts and budgets, and countless meetings. Some of the
projects I started are now waiting to go into bid, and others are still awaiting final approval on
budget. Some of the other projects the office has, that I got to help with included sitting in on
meetings with contractors, handing over projects after building completion (this also included
creating the “as build” folder for the client), writing bid proposals, writing contracts for the
contractors, and budgets. Everything has been done under guidance of the employees at the
company.
The purpose if this internship is to give me, the student, an insight and working knowledge
about what goes on in the field. How the construction site works, how to deal with clients, how
to deal with contractors, how to formulate contracts and bids, how to formulate budgets, and last
but not least, how to structure the work one does. What to do first, what to do second, and on
wards. How to decide what is important and what is not. These are skills that are maybe hard to
get a grip on unless one has experience in the field.
In the following chapters of this report I will explain further what I have done during my
internship, and what my reflections on what I got to do and the role of the architectural
technologist in the working process are.
Located right behind Statens Museum for Kunst is Per Buchardt Arkitekter; one of Copenhagens
many small drawing offices. The office consists of the owner, Per Buchardt, one full time
employee, Mia, and up to two interns. The offices are shared with a graphic designer and
photographer that mostly work out of the house. Both Per and Mia graduated from Kea
(Konstruktørskolen) as constructing architects and building managers before becoming
architects. This gives them both an advantage in dealing with the smaller, as well as the
bigger projects they are commissioned. The company does not focus on architectural
competition, but on word of mouth and competing with quality in execution and pricing.
The office takes on tasks of every size: from small private design tasks to renovations of greater
Copenhagen communes’ institutions and offices. Their biggest current projects include the
renovation of Dansk Energi’s main offices on Frederiksberg, the renovation of Copenhagens
biggest sports- and activities centre, Grøndal Center, and also the new offices for
Borgerservice +65.
The Role:
The architectural technologist’s role in a drawing office is to be the specialist on not only
architecture, building design or construction, but on all of them. Working closely with the
architects and designers, and the engineers the architectural technologist ensures that the
architect’s vision gets put into reality.
The technical side of design is the architectural technologist’s main concern, and it is her
responsibility to ensure that the building not only performs successfully, but also that it is
attractive. She makes sure that the materials that are “right for the job” are used, and that the
building is up to code.
The technologist also helps lead the project from beginning to end by monitoring quality assurance,
costs, and deadlines.
Before starting the internship some goals and learning objectives were agreed upon by the intern
and the company. Here is a short description of those together with some examples on how
they were dealt with throughout the internship.
2.1.4 RESULT
The preliminary phases and the execution phase was the phases that got the most attention during
this internship; meeting with clients, surveying, drawing, designing, researching, and
creating budgets were the main tasks. Yes, some document work was done, to the extent
where it was made clear what the role of the document was, how and when it was to be
implemented, and how it was to be written. But the main focus was on the architectural parts
of the work.
The design phase with the tender drawings and bidding works, even though not dwelled upon that
long a period of time, was thoroughly explained and the knowledge of the contract
specifications, how to perform bids, and how to pen the legal documents necessary in
Danish drawing offices has been learned.
In countries outside of Denmark that also has the architectural technologist degree as a field of work
the internship is usually done after completing the degree. The model of having the
internship as a necessary part of the degree must be seen as an advantage. The student gets
the chance to see how things that they are thought in school functions in real life; what is to
be weighted, what is to be taken into consideration and what that is actually not that
important.
At KEA one learns the RIBA-stage system when it comes to project phases, and even though this is
a very common system in the English speaking/international world, Denmark uses its own
phase system. In the beginning of working in a Danish drawing office one might be
confused to the new expressions and names for stages and phases, but when it’s broken
down and explained, one can easily see that the Danish system and the RIBA-stages overlap
when it comes to what is actually done during them.
As an architectural technologist with specialisation in architecture, there were some differences in
what gets done at school, and what gets done in real life. Working one get’s to put the most
attention to research, designing, redesigning, meeting with clients, more research, and more
redesigning and drawing. One gets to see that some of the stages that at KEA are “rushed”
through, the preliminary phases, are the stages that are the most critical to starting the
project, and can take anything from a couple of days/weeks to months before they are ready
to be moved on from. The better one is at recognising and understanding the clients wants
and needs, the faster one can move on from these stages.
One also gets to experience that it is important to recognise and respect what skills and what
knowledge the craftsmen that are involved in the different projects have. Not everything
needs to be controlled and drawn down to the smallest detail, simply because one knows that
these things are things that the craftsmen know best themselves. Some examples of this
might be with demolition work; in written specifications one mention what is the different
contractors and sub-contractors responsibilities, and in the drawings one just mark what
needs to be demolished. One trusts the contractor/sub-contractor knowing how to demolish
the element that is marked, and that it isn’t necessary to create detail drawings for them.
This is also true for smaller details in smaller/simpler construction works.
The way drawings and papers are named and numbered one gets to experience differs from
company to company, and from project to project. In smaller companies/drawing offices
they usually have their own numbering system that for them make sense in the projects, with
the numbering, drawing levels and element numbers. It’s not a given that all studios and
projects use the bips and/or the SfB system, but all systems used, even the in house systems
should be transferable to the industry standard.
The Centre's ground floor contains mainly eight sports halls for various activities. In addition to
them, it has a large median area, which among other things includes access to the different
facilities.
The central area is designed with two main double-height corridors with skylights, which acts as
the centers main walkways. The passageways are very characteristic with its green tropical
vegetation along the sides.
The main walkways appear with the original surface tiles. Clay coating is uneven and offers
tripping hazards. The coating is very inconvenient for transport and for cleanliness.
The information booth is placed with its back against the arrival
area in a niche next to the main entrance. The information
handles all customer relations with information, ticket
sales and rental of equipment, sale of different type of
merchandise, and monitoring and control of the entire
Center.
On the 1st floor there is one additional dance room, a canteen room, a conference hall, offices
and one area that is at the moment not in use.
PHASE X:
CONCEPT AND COORDINATION
Transforming the two long hallways separated by massive volumes to an opens space of 3600m2
with inviting functions divided into 4 groups: the entrance/information, a new café,
Grøndal sports lounge, and physiotherapy.
The phase is to ensure the overall goal for the design, construction, colour, lighting and quality,
as implemented in the 5 execution phases.
In this phase: Lighting concept, acoustic concept design concept: materials, elements, plants,
colours, furniture, space and zones will be coordinated. Overall plans for floors, walls, and
ceilings will be made here.
PHASE 2:
Floors, glass doors and WCs
In phase 2 new glass panels at both ends of the two through-passageways will be put up. These
glass panels will provide daylight and create a visual connection with the surroundings.
The brick flooring will be removed and establishes new floors in the same design as the
entrance: Polyurethane with a field sharing of aluminium mouldings. The edges to flower
beds will be replaced.
Toilet-core at the back of the building will be renovated.
PHASE 3:
Café and ballroom
The stage includes two main activities:
- Moving the cafe area into the main entrance and open it visually, functionally and with light.
The café's serving area will be a natural and unifying part of the new compact area on the
ground floor. With new counters and buffet, and more facilities for the café it will be
improved and upgraded.
- Gathering the dance rooms and dance clubs activities on the first floor with two dance halls
connected by a walkway.
PHASE 4:
Sports Lounge and physiotherapy clinic
Establish a central area under the skylight to the Center's rental courts to 2V2 soccer, table
tennis and mini golf. The centre of this area is designed as a sports lounge where you can
meet and compete - or take have a go at the climbing wall.
New rooms to rent to for physiotherapy and other tenants that have relevance to the activities of
the Center will be built.
PHASE 5:
Hallway area
In this phase the hallway area will have its walls, walkways etc. renovated. New signs and
“way-finding” will be placed. New energy efficient lighting concept will be implemented.
New technical installations, including new heating system in the ceiling also goes under
this phase.