Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The author focuses on learning historical architectural theories and how issues are resolved as a
base for new possibilities. In my opinion, architects should have to work within the network of these
intentions and be adaptable to different natures of society during its period of occurrence. Modern
architecture should be dependent on the existence of symbol-systems and conserve the same structural
principles practiced in the past. Once we understand the importance of historical continuity, modernism
could act as a connecting bridge between tradition, context and future modernism. It is about everchanging
growth in new architectural ways. While the author is persistent of being against the modernist movement,
the fact that the movement provides and solve society’s needs was acknowledged. This was due to the
understanding of human nature rather than just referring to the history’s motives itself, while causing a lack
of formality where the style can be overcome in various methods. Perhaps this could be due to the lack of
scale and context despite it is being a liveable condition for society.
While it is important to note that the author is not implying for a complete revival of history itself but
not a disregard to the historical precedents as well, my opinion would be that architecture should revisit its
core of solving issues in consideration to culture and context. In conclusion, I agree with the writer’s
approach in architecture.