Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2004 ) 1 (3
Mariwan A. Rasheed
Department of Physics, College of Science, Sulaimani University.Kurdistan Reign
Iraq.
Abstract
Cadmium Selinide (CdSe) thin films have been deposited on clean glass substrates
using vacuum thermal evaporation technique. The optical constants namely refractive
index – n , extinction coefficient – k, and dielectric constants – ε1 and ε2 for four
thicknesses of 346, 472, 621,and 957nm of CdSe films were studied at a substrate
temperature 373K and annealed under a high vacuum at 473K. The extinction
coefficient and the imaginary part of the dielectric constant decrease as the thickness
increase in certain range of wavelengths.
Keywords: CdSe, thin films, Optical constants, refractive index, extinction coefficient, dielectric
constants.
1
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
2
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
TM and Tm are the transmission maximum the real and imaginary parts of the
and minimum respectively on the dielectric constant respectively.
envelope at a certain wavelength. S and TS at σ = 0 , k becomes zero ,we get:
are the refractive index and transmittance n2 = ε 1 ………….….(14)
of the clean substrate respectively. Substituting the value of (α) of eq.(7) in
eq.(6) then the relation between k, λ, and
The extinction coefficient k can be
d can evaluate as:
determined by using the relation
λ x
αλ k= [ −log ( )]
k= 4π d
4π ………
…(6) or
where α is the absorption coefficient λ d
k= log ( )
which can be written as: 4π x ……….(15)
x From eqs.(10 & 11) and neglecting the (-)
α = − log( ) ive sign in solving k a new relation will
d …………
be obtained as :
…(7) (x) is the absorbance and will be 2
obtained from the relation: - ε1 + ε
k = 2
( )
1
2
Em Em 2 2
− (n − 1) (n − S ) 2 4 2 2 ………………(16)
x= Then from eqs.(15 &16) a relation can be
(n − 1) 3 (n − S 2 ) ... obtained for calculating ε as;
...(8)where:
λ2 d
8n S ε =[ log 2 ( ) + ε 1 ]1 2
( )( )
2
Em = − n2 − 1 n2 − S3
8π
2
x
Tm …..
..…(9) (17)
For calculating the dielectric constant
the following relations were obtained Results and discussion
from the electromagnetic theory: The optimized optical constants of
CdSe films were calculated using
ε = ε1 − iε 2 …. transmittance spectra, as shown in
Fig.(1).All spectra reveal very
(10)
n 2 − k 2 = ε1 pronounced interference effects or photon
energies below the fundamental
…………(11)
2 nk = ε 2 absorption edge. Such behavior of the
………….(12) spectra is evidence of thickness
σ uniformity of the films, otherwise the
2nk = interference fringes would have been
wε o … ……..
destroyed, resulting in smooth
transmission curves ..[5]
(13) Where (σ) is the electrical
Fig.(2) shows the observed and
conductivity and (εo) is the dielectric calculated transmission spectra of CdSe
constant of a free space, (ε1)and (ε2) are films as a function of wavelength along
3
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
with the envelope of TM and Tm for all ε1, ε2) respectively on the thickness for
films investigated. However, this method different values of λ for CdSe films.
has been used successfully for calculating From the figures it is clear also that for
refractive index, extinction coefficient, as different values of thickness the decrease
well as the dielectric constants of thin in n leads to the decrease in ε for each
1
films[5][13][15].
Fig.(3) shows that the wavelength wavelength . The increase in k leads to an
dependent of refractive index for various increase in ε2 for each value of
thicknesses of CdSe films. wavelength .
Fig.(4) shows the extinction coefficient It is obvious that decrease in n leads to
of the films as a function of wavelength decreasing ε1 for each values of λ.
for the thicknesses mentioned above. It is As shown in fig.(7) for wavelengths less
shown from the figure that the extinction than 1000 nm the refractive indices
coefficients are increasing with increasing increase with increasing the thickness for
the wavelength in the range of (750– the samples 346,472 and 621 nm. And
1100nm). This figure also indicates that, also the real part of dielectric constant
the extinction coefficient depends on increases with increasing the thickness for
thickness. It can be seen from the figure the same samples for wave lengths less
that for a thicker film the coefficient is than 1000 nm. But the thickness 957 nm is
smaller than that for the thinner one. A more photo responsible for wavelengths
higher wavelengths region are produce more than 1000 nm .
smaller values of k and then Conclusion
consequently increases the radiation
transparency.
1-The envelope technique for the optical
Fig.(5) shows the real part of the dielectric
transmissions successfully applicable for
constant (ε1) for films having different measuring optical constants in CdSe films
thicknesses. prepared by thermal evaporation
The imaginary part of the dielectric technique
constant for the wave length 2-The optical constants found for CdSe
ranges (750-1100nm) for the films at thin film found to be sensitive to is
different thicknesses are shown in fig.(6). thickness.
This figure shows that the imaginary part 3-The wavelength depend on these
of dielectric constant decreases with constants are more sensitive in the lower
increasing thickness of the films. wave length than that for the higher.
As shown in figures (3 & 5), the decrease
in (n) leads to the decrease in ε1 Acknowledgement
according to (eq. 14). But the increase in k The author sincerely thanks Dr. Najeeb
leads to an increase in ε2 according to Toma, in the Physics Department, College
(eq.12) as shown in figures(4 & 6). of Science, Salahaddin University for his
Figures (7, 8, 9 , and 10) explain the keen interest in the progress of this work
dependence of the optical constants (n , k, as well as offering necessary facilities.
2
4
2
0.9
T sample 2
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
0.9
T
0.8 sam ple3
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
400 600 800 1000 1200
0.9
T
0.8 sam ple 1
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
400 600 800 1000 1200
0.8
T
sam ple 4
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
5
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
0.9
TM sam ple 2
0.8 Tm
0.7 T
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
0.9
0.8 TM sam ple 4
0.7 Tm
0.6 T
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
500 700 900 1100 1300
0.9
TM sam ple 1
0.8
Tm
0.7 T
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
0.9
0.8 TM sam ple 3
0.7 Tm
T
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
6
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
7
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
20
E11
E12
E13
E14
15
10
5
700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150
Wave length(nm)
8
between (n) and (d) of CdSe films at different wavelengths
Fig.(8): The relation between (1) and (d) of CdSe films at different wavelength
k
0.25
E21
E22
E23
0. 2 E24
0.15
0. 1
0.05
0
700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150
Wave length(nm)
3
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.6
1100 nm 1075 nm
1050 nm 1025 nm
2.5 1000 nm 975 nm
950 nm 925 nm
900 nm 850 nm
2.4
2.3
250 350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050
8.5
8
0.056
7.5
0.25
0.049
1100 nm 1075 nm
7 1050 nm 1025 nm 1100 nm 1075 nm
0.042 1000 nm 975 nm 0.2 1050 nm 1025 nm
6.5
950 nmnm
1100 9251075
nm nm 1000 nm 975 nm
0.035 900 nm 850 nm 950 nm 925 nm
6 1050 nm 1025 nm
0.15 900 nm 850 nm
0.028 1000 nm 975 nm
5.5
950 nm 925 nm
0.021 5 900 nm 850 nm 0.1
0.014 4.5
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
0.05
0.007
0 0
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 200 400 600 800 1000
9
d (nm)
n between (k) and (d) of CdSe films at different wavelengths
References
n between (1)[1] Soriaga
and (d) M.
of , Stickney J., Bottomley
CdSe films L., and Kim
at different Y., "Thin films preparation-
wavelengths
characterization , application", 2002, Kluwer academic, Plenum publisher,
New York,96.
[2] Cassgnol E. , "Semiconductors",1966, Physics and electronics , Philips
Technical Library, Netherlands.
[3] Ray B., "II-VI Compounds", 1969, pergamom press.
[4] Weimer p.,Phy. Thinfilms,2, 1964,147.
[5] Soliman L. and Ibraheem A., Fizika , 1997,A6,4,181-189.
[6] Rentzsch .R and Bergek H.,"Thin solid film",1976, V.37, 235-239.
[7] Chopra K., "Thin film Phenomena" , 1969, Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.
[8] Elliott S. , "Physics of amorphous materials",1990, 2nd edition, Copublished in
the United States, With John Wiely And Sons Inc.
[9] Elizalde E. and Rueda F. ,"Solar energy materials",1986, 13,407 – 418 .
[10] Nesheva D. , Aroora D. , Ionov R., "Journal of the electrochem. Soc." , 1993,
V. 140, ; P. 2987-97.
[11] Nair M., Zingora P. , "journal of Appl, phys",1993 , 74, 2987-2294.
[12] Shaalan M., Muller R. , "Solar cells",1990, . 28,; ISS.3 ; P. 185.
[13] Swanepoel R. , "J. Phys. Instrum." , 1983, 19-6, Printed in Great Britain.
[14] Rassam N. , "Structure, electrical and optical transport properties of
evaporated CdSe1-xTex thin films",2000, Ph.D. thesis, Baghdad university,
College of education, (Ibn Al-haitham), Physics department,.
[15] Makadsi M., Suhail M. and Rassam B. , "Iraqi journal of science",1997,38,
1.
[16] Ahmad A. , " Some investigations on thermally evaporated CdS thin films",
10
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
ثوختة
الخلصة
رسب كادميوم سيلينايد بأسماك مختلفة على ارضيات نظيفة من الزجاج
بإستخدام تقنية التبخير الحرارى فى الفراغ .تمت دراسة الثوابت البصرية )
معامل النكسار ,معامل الخمود ,وثابتى العزل ( لربعة اسماك مختلفة )
(nm 346,472,621,957من) (CdSeعند درجة حرارة ) (K 373للغشية والتى
لدنت الى ) . (K 473ووجدت نقصان كل من معامل الخمود والجزء الخيالى
من ثابت العزل عند زيادة سمك الغشية فى مديات معينة من الطوال
11
(KAJ) Kurdistan Academicians Journal, 2004, 3(1) Part A
2004 ) 1 (3
. الموجية
12