Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hussein Basma
Lebanese American University
Material selection.
Geometric layout.
Torque transmission
Shaft stresses
Now we can take the acquired von Mises stresses and use
these values in any of the known fatigue failure criteria to
evaluate the factor of safety n or, for design purposes, the
diameter d.
Plugging in the values of the von Mises stresses will yield the
following equations, one solved for n and one for d :
DE-Gerber
DE-ASME Elliptic
DE-Soderberg
Shaft Design for Stress
(a) Determine the fatigue factor of safety of the design using each
of the fatigue failure criteria described in this section.
(a) D/d = 42/28 = 1.50, r/d 2.8/28= 0.10, 𝐾𝑡 = 1.68 (Fig. A–15–9).
𝑘𝑐 = 𝑘𝑑 = 𝑘𝑓 =1
Shaft Design for Stress
Solution:
1 1
1 16 [4 1.58× 142.4 2 ]2 [3 1.39× 124.3 2 ]2
= 3 { + }= 0.615
𝑛 𝜋(0.028) 205× 106 735× 106
n=1.62
Similarly, plugging the values of the mean and amplitude of
the torque and bending moment in the equations of the different
failure criteria, we get:
32×1.58×142.4 2 16×1.39×124.3 2 1
σ′max = [ +3 ]2 = 125.4 MPa
𝜋 0.028 3 𝜋 0.028 3
574
𝑛𝑦 = = 4.85
125.4
Shaft Design for Stress
Estimating Stress Concentration:
Solving for the roots of this system will yield the following
relation:
Critical Speeds of Shafts
If we had one mass 𝑚1 , the critical speed denoted by ω11 will
1
be expressed as 2 = 𝑚1 𝛿11
ω11
1 1
Similarly, = 𝑚2 𝛿22 and = 𝑚3 𝛿33
ω22 2 ω33 2
1 1 1
≫ + since ω1 is way smaller than ω2 and ω3
ω1 2 ω2 2 ω3 2
Critical Speeds of Shafts
This will simplify to:
πd4 π(25)4
a) I = 64 = 64 = 19175 𝑚𝑚4
9.81(315.3)×10−3
ω= = 117 rad/s
226.5×10−6
1 𝑤1 1 𝑤1 175×0.00119×10−3
c) ω11 2
= 𝑚 𝛿
1 11 , and 𝑚 1 =
𝑔
, then:
ω11 2
= 𝛿 =
𝑔 11 9.81
1 1 1
= + = 7.863× 10−5
ω1 2 2172 1322
175(0.00119)
𝑤1𝑐 = = 85.3 N
0.00244
275(0.00204)
𝑤2𝑐 = = 229.9 N
0.00244
𝑔 9.81
Then, ω = = = 112.9 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠
δ𝑐𝑐 𝑤𝑖𝑐 0.00244(85.3+229.9)10−3
Critical Speeds of Shafts
Method Rayleigh Dunkerly Superposition
First Critical Speed 117 rad/sec 113 rad/sec 112.9 rad / sec