You are on page 1of 2

FYP Evaluation Guidelines for Advisor/EC members

Activity/Stage Grade Grader(s) Grading Evaluation Criteria (FYP-1)


Relevance of presented idea for FYP
As individual Workability of the idea
Proposal Pres. 10% EC
student Originality of the idea
Clarity of the plan - Perspective on future work
Overall review of work completed so far
Details of Proposed idea
As individual
Mid Pres. 10% EC Literature Review/Model Development/Review of avaiable information
student
Analysis of issues in Literature/available information
Quality of Presentation (clarity, time management)
Overall review of work completed so far
Development of Research Question/Situational Analysis
As individual
Final Pres. 10% EC Thesis - Research plan/Literature Review (completed)
student
Project - Company & Industry information (completed)/initial framework for key functions
Quality of Presentation (clarity, time management)

Quality of Preparation for the formal meeting with advisor


As individual Completion or progress of previously assigned work/tasks
Consultation 20% Advisor
student Understanding of work at hand
Cooperating with other team members
As individual Based on the attendance in formal meetings with advisor
Attendance 10% Advisor
student (In every formal meeting, ALL group members are required to be present)

Following provided report structure & guidelines


Grammar, Spellings & Expression
Referencing
Initial Draft 15% EC As Group
Content quality - Quality of information/data
Content quality - Relevance of literature/information
Content quality - Strength of Content structure
Rectification of Errors & issues (provided on Initial Draft)
Final Report 25% Advisor As Group
Other points to be checked as per guidelines of 'Initial Draft'

IMPORTANT:
For presentations evaluation & progress review of specific type of project, Annexure B of FYP Guidelines should be consulted
Annexure B of FYP Guidelines stipulates recommended delivery schedule for each type of FY Thesis/Project
FYP Evaluation Guidelines for Advisor/EC members
Activity/Stage Grade Grader(s) Grading Evaluation Criteria (FYP-2)

Proposal Pres. - NA NA Not to be conducted in FYP-2

Overall review of work completed so far


As individual Data collection & Analyses
Mid Pres. 15% EC
student Discussion on alternative options & solutions
Quality of Presentation (clarity, time management)
Results/Implementation/Recommendations
As individual Limitations/Further Direction/Industry Applications
Final Pres. 15% EC
student Overall review of project
Quality of Presentation (clarity, time management)

Quality of Preparation for the formal meeting with advisor


As individual Completion or progress of previously assigned work/tasks
Consultation 20% Advisor
student Understanding of work at hand
Cooperating with other team members
As individual Based on the attendance in formal meetings with advisor
Attendance 10% Advisor
student (In every formal meeting, ALL group members are required to be present)

Following provided report structure & guidelines


Grammar, Spellings & Expression
Referencing
Initial Draft 15% EC As Group
Content quality - Quality of information/data & Analysis
Content quality - Relevance of Results, Conclusions & implications
Content quality - Strength of Content structure
Rectification of Errors & issues (provided on Initial Draft)
Final Report 25% Advisor As Group
Other points to be checked as per guidelines of 'Initial Draft'

IMPORTANT:
For presentations evaluation & progress review, Annexure B of FYP Guidelines should be consulted
Annexure B of FYP Guidelines stipulates recommended delivery schedule for each type of FY Thesis/Project