Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Template
Table of Contents
STEP Standard 1 - Contextual Factors: Knowing Your School and Community .............................. 3
STEP Standard 2 - Writing Standards-Based Objectives and the Learning Goal ............................ 7
STEP Standard 3 - Assessment and Data Literacy ........................................................................... 8
STEP Standard 4 - Unit and Lesson Planning ................................................................................ 10
STEP Standard 5 - Implementation of Instructional Unit ............................................................. 14
STEP Standard 6 - Analysis of Student Learning ........................................................................... 15
STEP Standard 7 – Reflecting on Instruction to Improve Student Progress ................................. 18
B. District Demographics
Desert Sands Unified School District
Suburban
Free/reduced lunch: 70%
Grades K-12
34 schools in the district
Office address: 47-950 Dune Palms Road, La Quinta, CA 92253
Open enrollment policy
28,958 total students
C. School Demographics
K-5 public school
582 students total
Free/reduced lunch: 50%
Academic ranking: 4/5
All students are required to wear uniforms
Teacher to student ratio 25:1
Average teacher salary: $79,339 (state average: $70,989)
Disadvantaged students at this school are performing far better than other students in the
state.
Students at this school are making more academic progress from one grade to the next
compared to students at other schools in the state.
In the space below, discuss the possible affect these characteristics could have on the planning,
delivery, and assessment of your unit. Refrain from using student names.
CCSS 3.OA.B.5
Apply properties of operations as strategies to multiply and divide.2 Examples: If 6 × 4 = 24 is
known, then 4 × 6 = 24 is also known. (Commutative property of multiplication.)
Learning Goal
SWBAT understand that when using commutative property of multiplication, they will still get
the same answer, regardless of the order of the numbers. They will learn four different ways to
get their answers (Grouping, Array, Repeated Addition, and Number Line).
Measurable Objectives
Three out of three of the students in the third grade SDC math group will be able to use, create,
and understand equal groups correctly when given a worksheet.
Three out of three of the students in the third grade SDC math group will be able to use, create,
and understand number line correctly when given a worksheet.
Three out of three of the students in the third grade SDC math group will be able to use, create,
and understand array correctly when given a worksheet.
Three out of three of the students in the third grade SDC math group will be able to use, create,
and understand repeated addition when given a worksheet.
Pre-Assessment - Copy and paste the pre-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’
knowledge of the topic prior to implementing the unit lessons. Include the scoring criteria used
to determine whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the learning
goal and measurable objectives.
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students: 6
Exceeds 94-100% 1
Meets 75-93% 1
Approaches 66-74% 0
Based on this data, I do not plan to change my selection of the standards, goals, or objectives. After this
unit, the other four students will meet or exceed my expectations.
This pre-assessment data is helpful because it narrows down what I might need to spend more time
explaining. I will need to be careful and slowly go over arrays and repeated addition. I plan on using
three different worksheets for learning arrays on day three. The students will typically do two different
worksheets each day to practice their strategies. I plan to use different types of assistive technology, so it
helps the students understand the concepts. On day five, the students will play a Kahoot review game
(most likely more than once) to practice in a fun way. By day five, they should master the four different
strategies and know what commutative property means.
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge
of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-
assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the
learning goal and measurable objectives.
Note: When implementing the unit of study, you will be choosing one of these activities to video record, review, and reflect on your teaching later
in the STEP process,
Number Line
Summary of Because this is a Because this is a Because this is a Because this is a Because this is a
Instruction and small SDC math small SDC math small SDC math small SDC math small SDC math
Implement the unit you have designed including the pre-assessment, all lesson activities,
correlating formative assessments, and summative post-assessment. Choose one of the activities
to video record, review, and reflect on your teaching. Have your cooperating teacher/mentor
review the recording and provide feedback, if possible.
*I was not able to video record a portion of my unit in the special education classroom. I will do so in the
general education classroom.*
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Exceeds 1 2
Meets 1 1
Approaches 0 0
The three higher level students had no problem understanding the concepts. I would model two
to three problems each day and have the students complete the rest of their work individually. I
would check their work when completed and call them over to ask clarifying questions about
problems. One of the students that was in this group went from falling far below to exceeding
expectations. The other two both stayed at exceeding and meeting their expectations. The other
three lower students continued to stay in the falling far below column. Originally, I was not going
to have them do this unit, but my cooperating teacher suggested that I do the unit with all six of
the SDC third graders. Even though one of these students continued to fall far below, they still
improved because they went from twenty percent to a forty percent. The other two students were
not able to finish their test and, personally, I believe that they would have had a higher score than
they did with more time to be able to master these concepts. If my student teaching didn’t have to
end so soon, I feel like I would have been able to reach all of them eventually. The results did not
upset me because several students missed days of school (both the higher students and the lower
students) and they were at least exposed to multiplication. I believe the parents will be happy to
see their students participating in this level of mathematics because I know I was.
I believe my instruction was effective and the students did really well on their worksheets that
were accompanied with each day. Being in small groups, I can interact with the students more
than I would be able to in a classroom with thirty students. I wish the students had more time in
their day to work on math because they only get about an hour and a half of time throughout the
day. Because the students are at two different levels, I had to teach them by groups. It took me a
long time to teach this unit. Plus, time got taken away from the groups when I had to micro
manage other students that come in and out of the classroom (kinder and first grade). My
assessment could have been modified better. I should have given the lower group only one math
five square to do rather than two. They also could have used more time to do it and practice with
I choose to do girls verses boys for my subgroup population analysis. I already spoke about the
two different levels of students in the classroom earlier. I also cannot divide them into ELLs and
non-ELLs because all of the SDC third graders are considered ELLs. They all have IEPs, and
none of them are classified as gifted.
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup: Girls
Exceeds 0 0
Meets 1 1
Approaches 0 0
Although it does not mention percentages, one of the girls went from an 80% to a 90%. She only
missed one question out of ten on the final test, where on the pre-test she missed one out of five
questions. She improved and full understood the concept. The other girl in our group did not
improve on her score at all, however, she did really well on her worksheets. I believe she simply
needed more time to practice with her peers. I also could have modeled the assessment for her
and the others by possibly doing one problem with them and by having them do the second
problem on their own.
I believe I could have had the student that fell far below practice more on the whiteboard. I also
should have modeled one of the post-test questions before having her do the second one on her
own. She might have needed that to refresh her memory. It was difficult to teach the entire lower
group the different ways to model and do multiplication when they have a hard time counting to
fifty without messing up. They also did not know how to skip count (2s, 5s, 10s, 100s). I think if I
knew about this prior, I could have had other lessons prepared to help them practice these skills.
Both of these girls missed a day of school, so I had to fly through some concepts with them. The
student that met the goal needed more practice with Arrays. The lower level student needed more
practice with Arrays and Number Line. These concepts coincide with their absences.
Meets 0 0
Approaches 0 0
One of the boys improved drastically and went from having a 60% on the pre-test, to having a 100% on
the post-test. The other student that exceeded expectations with a 100% before, still got a 100% after the
unit. Although two of the students continued to fall far below, one of them did improve their score from a
20% to a 40%. I was very proud of that particular student. I was disappointed by the score of the third
boy who fell far below, because he did really well on the worksheets. I think it would have been a good
idea to model the test for the lower group. I was unsure, at the time, on how much assistance to give them.
Both boys who fell far below missed a day of my unit. This contributed to their lack of gained knowledge.
I believe if I had more time to work with them, they would have done well on their assessment. Looking
at this data, I would say that the girls and boys were evenly matched. Two boys and one girl are in the
lower math group and these three students still fell far below. The three students that were in the higher-
level math group, two boys and one girl, all either met or exceeded my expectations. I believe due to the
fact that I originally planned on only doing the unit with the higher group, I would call these results a win.
I am still happy with the lower student’s results because I know some of the information stuck, even
though it was not proven on the post-assessment. They had fun doing the math unit with me and were
exposed to grade level content either way.
If my student teaching was not ending, I would build upon this unit by continuing to work with
the students on their multiplication skills. I would expose the higher-level group to word
problems and have them use their favorite multiplication strategy to solve the problems. I would
continue to work with the lower math group on simple one-digit multiplication because they need
more repetition, time, and practice with the four different multiplication strategies we learned.
2. Learn how to get SDC students to Research and observe/interview other special
answer and ask questions. (I would educators.
typically get blank stares when asking
not only academic questions, but non-
academic as well.
3. Learn how to set up appropriate Research and observe/interview other special
consequences for students with educators.
behaviors without making situations
worse.