Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The authors point out in this paper that initially coned characteristics plotted in Fig. 3. The present formulas are
annular-disk springs of uniform cross section may be shown to be reliable for prediction of load-deflection curves.
proportioned to give a wide variety of load-deflection Le.ck of information on true stresses does not detract from their
curves not readily obtainable with the more conventional utility. Computed permissible maximum stresses for static
forms of springs, and that, although the versatility of this Joe.ding are quite high, in the neighborhood of 220,000 lb per
type spring has long been indicated, the formulas avail- sq in., but experience indicates that these values may be used
able have not been presented in a manner to disclose for design purposes when using pie.in carbon steel. In dynamic
readily the effect of spring proportions on characteristics. applications, fatigue tests are required.
Therefore the authors lulve derived the formulas presented Fig. ·1 shows the type of load-deflection curve given by the
in this paper with the intention that the formulas will aid diaphragm spring found in the ordinary oil can. It will be
the designer in arriving at suitable characteristics by recalled that, as the oil-can bottom is deflected, we must at first
choice of spring geometry. These new formulas have exert considerable pressure and that, subsequently, the pressure
been in use for several years at the General Motors Cor- required decreases in a.manner similar to that shown in Fig. 1.
poration research laboratories section, and their re-
liability has been checked by tests of springs used in a
variety of special test equipment.
,v - -~ i0..
N ADDITION to compactness along the axis of loading, the •
I initially coned, annular-disk spring of uniform cross section
may be proportioned to give a wide variety of load-deflection
characteristics not readily obtainable with the more conventional
-0
c
....0
Vo ', I',.._
'
'· - __.......
i.....-·
v.B ''
,,, '
The maximum stress in the upper edge is In calculating the curves shown in Fig. 3, the load was aesumed
applied in the direction indicated. Another group of curves
S - (l -!:)Mas [ Ci ( h - ~) + C,t J can be obtained from the same springs by applying the load in
the opposite direction, as shown, for example, in Fig. 8:
Springs having load-deflection curves of the type h - 0.141 in.
The maximum stress in the lower edge is shown in Fig. 3 and the lower curve in Fig. ··s, are often very
useful inasmuch as they have a deflection range in which the
s- Eo
(1-.,.s)Mas
[c1 (h-!)·-cst]
2
load changes only very slightly, that is, a deflection range of
8000
.tl
-'~&ooot--~t--~-t--~-t-~-+>""::+-f~~t--~+---i
"O
0
.a 3000 j4ooor-~1-~-i-:7:>"""1""~-+~--1~~t--~+----t
..,
1:SZOOOt-~i-:::;:;::::f--f---j-;f--j'---,f-~-tf-~-ht-._-J
0
....0
0
o 0.02 0.04 O.OG O.Of> 0.10 0.1'2 0.14 0.1&
Deflection,ln .
Flo. 6 LoAI>-D.11FL.110TION Cuav11: or " TmOJt Din 8PBJNG
-10000 O
.I 0.'2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.G 0.7 0.8
Deflect-ion,In.
Flo. 3 COMPUTED CHARAC71'J:BIBTIC LOAI>-DllFLJ:CTION CUBvmB OF
Sec DIB:it SPBINGB IDENTICAL ExcmPT FOB FB111, H11IGHT h
..C J
! l aozo• ...1..
"O
80 0 r---i---:;:1;--q;;-=:---t---t---+--i--t----1
80 t ... -~:.~~---1__.J---1--+rr--1 3
0
400t--r-t-~+-~-t--~-t-~""""~-+~--t~--!1-7'L.,,1
O
o 0.004- o.oo& o.orz 0.016 o.ozo 0.024 o.oia 0.032
Def lee-ti on ,In.
1200
Flo. 4 LoAI>-D.IIFLJ:CTION CUBV.11 FOB AN INITIALLY FLA.or DI8Jt
8PBING
..c
...I
or lower surface, 6 = axial deflection, E .- modulus of elasticity, 15
0
er - Poieson's ratio, M, Ci, Cs - constants given in a function j 4001-""""".:~:.._-t--~-t-~-+~~:;L=f~--l~---'-l
of outside-diameter-inside-diameter ratios. The values of these
constants are given in Fig. 18.
The derivation of these approximate formulas and the manner 0.2 0.3 0.4
in which they are used is discussed in detail in Appendixes 1 and 2. Def I ecti on, ln.
LoAI>-DEFLECTION CBARACl'ERIBTICS
Flo. 7· LoAI>-D.11FL.11CTioN Ct1Bv.11s OF A DIB:it BPBING HAVING "
LABO.II OU'J'BJDII-DlilB'l'IIB-INBIDII-DIAMllTll:B RATIO
Fig. 3 shows load-deflection curves calculated for a series of
springs having the same diameter and thickness but varying low spring rate. This type curve is obtained when h is of the
in initial cone height h. order of t vf2. By making h somewhat greater than t v2, a
That these theoretical characteristics are obtainable in prac- region of slight negative rate is obtained, which increases the
tice is shown by Figs. 4 to 7, inclusive, which cover outside total deflection range of low spring rate. Where permissible,
diameters from 1 in. to 121/ , in.; outside-diameter-inside- this is a useful expedient. When such low-rate springs are used,
diameter ratios from 1.7 to 4.25; and cone height-thickness they permit fairly wide tolerances in the preload deflection
ratios from O to 2.5. The agreement between theory and test without alteration of load. As discussed later in this paper,
is noteworthy. the actual load given by the spring may, if necessary, be readily
RESEARCH PAPERS RP-58-10 307
"Cl
g1zool---V/--l,...::;...l:====l====-l--~l=:::::~l----l
..J O
o o.04 o.oe 0.12 0.1& o.w 0.24 o.ze
Deflection, In
FIG. 10 LOAD-DEFLECTION CURVES OF A Dru: SPRING LOADl:D AT
V ARIOU8 DIAMETERS
2.0
Deflec+ion ,In.
FIG. 8 LOAD-DEFLECTION CURVES OF A DISK SPRING LOADED IN
Two DIRECTIONS
800
~6001---t---t---t---:;l.,-::$,=E::::;:;:::::~::::..+--+-----I
..I
]400t---t--"Y"'75.~--+--+---t~--1f--~t----1
0
..I
.2001---,.":,i&"---f---+--f---+---f---+----i---1
0.34t----+------
t.he friction hysteresis loop resulting from the slight slip that ....
occurs between the loading ring and the $pring, and between ll, 0.18 t----r-=--+----t--+--...;....--1----l'--1
the spring and the supporting ring, when these members are
rigid. The width of the loop appears to bear no fixed relation Ql 4 L~O-..,...,.--:-'::---::c"'::-~2~.6:-~3~.0.,......~3~~.,......-3~.8,,_..,
to the load, as found aillo in other tests. Disk springs loaded Outside Diameter
in parallel have interspring friction, whereas springs loaded in ]n&1dc Oiamet-er
series have friction at the loading and support points only. FIG. 12 INFLUENCE OF OUTSIDE-DIAM&T&R-INSID&-DIAMIDTl:11
Hence, the amount of friction damping may be varied by a se- RATIO ON THE FLEXIBILITY (DEFLIICTION-LOAD) OF AN INITIALLY
lection of series or parallel combinations. FLAT D1sx: SPRING UNDER 4000-LB LoAD ·
(The tbickneae of the epring bu been varied to m&intaiD a computed mazi·
Fiit. 11 shows load-deflection curve.~ obtained by stacking mum atreu or 200,000 lb per •q in.) ·
308 TRANSACTION8 OF Tllli AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
-!!!!~====~---t--=1~==-1-~1w,ooo
2000.1---'_i--..
c
1600 -,"'--.---1---1-----.1 96,ooo-;.
1/)
~ ~
...11200t---+---+--:~--+:::....;;.c.,.-...c...--i:?C:~t----i72,000 t
~ ~
~ ....
_3 800 48,000 .:
_, Fro. 15 COMPUTED STRESS DISTRIBUTION OVER THE WIDTH OF A
0.0 DISK SPRING. SPRING OF FIG. 14 DEFLECTED TO FLAT POSITION
400 1--#-+---+---lf---+---l---J.--,1--l 24,000 f
....Cl)
at t~e two edges of the inner diameter only since, except in
!---,Q~o~s,.......~~~,--~~,s~-o~..---o-2~s--o~.3--o~3-s-o~~o special cases, the limiting stress occurs at one or the other of
Deflec+ion,In.. these locations. H we assume a maximum permissible stress
Fm. 14 LoAI>-DEFLJ:Cl'ION CURVE OF A D1si SPRING HAVING A
of 200,000 lb per sq in., it will be noted that, for the spring
WIDE ZERO-RATE RANGE proportions shown in Figs. 3 and 13, this stress is first reached
in tension on the lower inner edge except for the spring having a
stressed to 200,000 lb per sq in. maximum under a 4000-lb load, free height of h - 0.350 in. which has a higher compressive stres11
the spring thickness being varied as shown to maintain these at the upper inside edge between 0.3 in. and 0.6 in. deflection.
conditions. It will be seen that the maximum flexibility is In addition to the load-deflection curve, Fig. 14 shows a
obtained when the outside diameter is approximately twice the calculated_stress-deflection curve for a so-called zero-rate spring
inside diameter. These are also approximately the proportions (h = t ,12). These stress values are for the upper edge of the
for best resiliency or the maximum ratio of energy storage to inside circumference.
spring weight. The resiliency of uniform-section disk springs In Fig. 15, the diagram shows in qualitative manner the stress
is somewhat lower than for most other forms of springs due to ~istr!bution across the radial width of the disk spring shown
the nonuniform stress distribution. Somewhat better resiliency m Fig. 14 when deflected to the fiat position. l,'ote from Fig.
can be obtained from disk springs with radially tapered sections 15 that the upper surface is stressed in compression and that the
as shown by Brecht and WahP but the added resiliency of such maximum stress occurs at the edge of the inside diameter. The
springs is obtained at the expense of increased cost. As a rough lower surface is stressed in tension but nowhere is the tension
approximation, it may be said that the .uniform-section disk stress as great as the maximum compression stress on the upper
spring has a resiliency one half that of a coil spring. surface. The stress in the central cone B-B is ai8o shown
mainly to call attention to the fact that in springs of thill t ~
• "The Radially Tapered Disk Spring," by W. A. Brecht and A. the central cone is not a neutral surface. The basis for the
M. Wahl, Trans. A.S.M.E., vol. 52, part 1, 1930, paper APM-57-4, stress distribution as shown in Fig. 15 will be apparent from
pp. 45-55. Fig. 17 and from Appendix 1 where the formulas are derived.
RESEARCH PAPERS ;RP-58-10
Fig. 16 shows the stress distribution acrOBB the thickness at 1oaded, the stress in the more highly stressed regions o:ibe:diiit -
the inner circumference for this same spring and for the same spring were redistributed as a result of yield, it folio~ tmUie ··
conditions as for Fig. 15. The stress at the upper and lower unloaded spring will have residual stresses. This a IIJmilR. _
edges will, of course, be the same as for Fig. 15. The stress at
intermediate points is represented by the line joining these
tie.ted by the fact that tests show a sme.11 initial loss m
height. The stress distribution, as shown by Figs. 1i ad :Ji,
=-
extremes. suggests that important increase in fatigue life should nsult~
It must be noted from Fig. 15 that the streBS distribution careful rounding of the corners of disk springs. I...imi;ed ~
for other springs will be different from that shown and will also de.ta support this view.
be different for other deflections of the same spring as may be seen The safe stress of disk springs will, of course, vaiy 1litb 12
from Fig. 13. type of service. There are not sufficient data now a~'lllt
In the practical design of disk springs, it is found that they fix stress limits for dynamic applications. The f ~ U!D
.A which have been run indicate that, for a moderate stn:91 DJW!f,.
a computed maximum stress of 180,000 lb per sq m. ~ iie
~
lf :~
used. Only fatigue tests on actual springs can finally cke1 1w
the true working limits .
about point O which resists the moment created by the extern.al and that of the deflected one
forces.
sin (P - ,p)
Calculating the tangential stress due to the radial displacement
and first, we can write: c-:c
The length of section d:r: before deflection Hence the qhange of curvature
11 ""'d8 [c-:ccos Pl
sin p - sin (P - rp)
After deflection "' = c-:z;
l.., d8 lc-:z;cos (ti-,.)]
Substituting sin p - p ·
The change in length
sin (P - rp) - P - "
l1 - l. ., d8 [-:z; COS ti (1 - COS rp) + :C Bin p sin 9')
rp
Substituting for small angles
,,, Kt- --
C-Z
cos ti - 1; sin P-= P; sin" = ¥>i 1 - cos" - 2 sin1 rp -
2 Hence the moment
l1 - l. "" d8:z;rp (P - ,,/2) dM, ., E t• " d:r:
and the tangential strain will be approximately 12 (1 - a- 1) (c - :c)
11 - i. :z;" (ti - ,,/2)
.,---l1 C - :C
Then the tangential stress at the surfaces
, 6 dMt .Erp t
The tangential stress• S, - tJd:r: - (1 - a-t) (c - :c) 2· · · · · · · · · · [3 )
E
S's - 1
---O't
(•t + 0'<1) and at any point y distant from the neutral surface
Since it was assumed that the radial stresses are negligible, we S , , - (1 - a-t)
E"
(c - :c) II . . . . . . . . . . . • . l3a I
,can write
Ets Ezrp(p-rp/2) The radial component of the moments dM, in sector d8
S't-= - -1 = ( ( ) .. ... . . ... . [l)
l-a- 1-a-t) c-:z; d8 Et•rpd!J d:r:
dM1 == 2 dM,-
As a next step, we calculate the radial moment of the tangential ·2 12 (1 - a-t) (c - :c)
forces in the section a~ut point 0. Integrating for the whole sector from :z; - c - a to x .. c - b
dM1' -= S,'tdxdliz sin (P -
Substituting sin (p - rp) "" p - "and also Equation [l)
rp)
M ,
1
""'
Et'rpd/J
12 (1 - a-t)
f e-b
d:r:
;=-; ., 12 (1 -
Et•rpd!J
v') Jog
a
b· · · l4 J
dMi' = Etd8v, (ti - rp) (ti - ,,/2) :ct d:r: e-a
(1 - a- 1) (c - :c)
Summing the radial moments (Equatione [2 J and (41)
and integrating from :z; = c - a to :z; - c - b, we get the inter- the total radial moment
nal moment of the sector about 0. ·
1 - a- 1 2
Et•
dM, = DK: d:r: - ,c,d:z; or substituting S,' from Equation (1)
12 (1 - 0' 1)
e-b
The tangential curvature of the unloaded disk is approximately
sin fJ
f
e-a
c:z;d:r;:z; -o
c-:z;
from which we get
• "A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory o! Elasticity," third
edition, by A. E. H. Love, Cambridge University Preee, London,
c -a-b
- -a .... .. .. .. . ..... .. ... (6)
England, p, 533. log -
' Ibid., 1290, p. 533. b
RF.SEARCH PAPERS RP-SS-10 311
~ + ~J
Substituting this into the moment equation
M,-= - - -
1-
Erpde
a-'
{[! 2
(a 2 - b2 ) - 2 (a -
log
b)'
a
b
+ (a -
log b
b)2]
a
P = (I _!:,) a' [ (h - o) ( h -
. outside diameter
The external moment on sector d8 equals The value of M for vanous ratios of d are
insi e diameter
P (a- b) d8 plotted in Fig. 18.
2r (b) Mazimum Streu. The total tangential stress is the sum
This must equal the internal moment, hence of its two components St' and S,'. Adding Equations (1) and
[3a]
p.,. 2 ,rM,
(a- b) d8 8=81' +81'-
(1 .-
E,p
a- 1) (c-:z;)
[x({J-!)+r]··[8] 2
Substituting the expression for M1 and also
Its maximum value is reached at
h
fj-=a-b t
y - - and :z; - c - b
2
0
"'""a-b
a
S -= E ,p
(1- 1 )b a- [cc - (fJ - !) + 1]
b)
2 2
b- a .
or since h
[J .,. a _ b an
d
"' - 0
a-- -b
a(- -)1:g a ~
J" (-")' a- 1
= ..!_)
M)~ .. ... . . . 161 S-= Eo
(1-a-')a'
[(a-1
- - - 1 ) ( -a-) ( h--
loga a-1 .
")
2
1
+--
a-1
2
1
and - log a
6
--
a-1
= -
N
2.4
(a al)' t]
/ 2.3
Let us caJI
v
v
,I
2.2. (~ - 1) (-" )'
log a a - 1
M - (" -
log a
l- 1)-6. - ,r log a
C1
:t.S'
1.0
v 2. 1
2.0 c
."tl
and
a-
-2-1 ( - a )'
- M-a - 1
- - -6- - 3 (a - 1)
-c
0.9
I rtl
1.9 :t.J" a- 1 2 ,r log a .,,. log a
2
/ .:/!.
• 0.8 I.B § where M "' N = -6- (a-1)'
.·+0.1
:t: v .....
,
II'
v t .,,. log a
- - from Equation [6]
a
c
ts
"ti O.G
,114i- v vv /
v 1.7 5
v Then
i
c
0.5
I 7
7
1.6
1.5
+
b
a,
.r:
s= (l _!,; Ma' [ c, (h-D + c.e]. .. .. .. [9J
GJ I Ce ,/ 1.4 ~ Values of C1 and C~ are plotted against outside-diameter/
~ 0.4
b 03 I I/ / ~ 1.3 ~
inside-diameter ratio in Fig. 18.
" . I I /v
:,
If the maximum stress in the lower edge is sought, evidently
- t/2 has to be substituted into 8 and the stress equation becomes
j 0.2 I .2
I/ 1//
r//0. 1 I.I
0
S =- (l -~'; Ma' [ C1 (h-0 - C,t]. . .. . . 10]
0
i.o 1.4 1.s 2 :2. Vo 3.0 3.4 3.8 4 .2 4 .6
Ou'l"side Diame+er
sl Both Equations 19J and (10 J represent compressive stresses
Ins ide Diameter as long as the bracketed quantity is positive. Obviously, both
F10. 18 LoAD AND STRl:88 CONSTANTS FOR CALCULATING DIS!!. can become negative at some deflection, in which case the stress is
SPRINGS tension.
312 TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
h'
By equating Equations [9) and (10) it can be shown that the
numerical value of the stress in the lower edge reaches that of H
4 > 2 t' or h > t vs ... ......... .{18)
the upper edge at a deflection o "" 2 h. It follows that at o < 2 h
. deflections, Equation [9 J baa to be used representing compressive then the load-deflection curve intersects the zero-load axis, that is,
stress in the upper edge, while at o > 2 h deflections, Equation we have a buckling spring, one which would snap into a new posi-
110 J will give the greater value giving the tension stress in the tion once deflected beyond a certain point. H 0 < ~ < y8
lower edge of the spring. t
Because in some cases the maximum working deflection is past we shall have a spring with negative spring rate, but one which
the point where Equation (9) would give its greatest value, it is will not buckle.
advisable in doubtful cases to plot the stress-deflection curve for (d) Initially Fla/. Disk Spriw;s. The equations for initially
both upper and lower inner edges of the spring. flat springs can be derived by substituting h = 0 into those de-
As seen, for instance, on the last curve A in Fig. 13, the com- veloped for initially coned springs. Thus we have for the load
pressive stress in the upper inner edge exceeds the maximum per-
missible stress, say 200,000 lb per sq in. at a deflection of o - 0.25
in., whereas in the deflection range of 0.67 to 0.72 in. both Equa- p = (1-
- E
u 1)
o Ma' 2 t (o' + t' ) . . . . . ... . .. [l 9 J
tions 19 Jand 110 J would give lower values than 200,000 lb per sq in.
If the maximum working deflection is between the two limits men- for the maximum stress
tioned, the calculated stre&< value at that point would not indi-
cate that the permissible stress limit baa already been exceeded·
at a much smaller deflection.
S= ( EO
1 - u 1) Ma•
(c1 ~ ; C,t)_. .. .. ....
2
[20)
(c) Spriw; Rate. Differentiating Equation [7] gives an ex- which in this case is always tension in the lower inner edge of the
pression for the spring rate at any poipt of the load-deflection spring.
curve. Designating spring rate by r, we have From Equation [19 J, the deflection can be expressed as
1 - .,.,
(h 1 - 3 oh ~ ~ o'
PMa 2
r = Et1 +t 1) . .•• • Ill J 0 ..
Et 1
(1 - u ) Ma 1 2 1 + 0.5!'t1
Equating the bracketed expression to zero, we can find the
deflections at which the spring rate equals zero, i.e., where deflec- The rate becomes
tion may be increased without change in load.
These are r - - -'Et
-1 - -1 -
(1 -:- u ) Ma
(3 o• + t'). .... . . . ...
2
[21 I
o- h + ~f- t ................
2
[12] (e) ReBilience of Disk Spri111JB,
tion is
The strain energy for odeflec-
f
h1 1 I
When - > -2 t or h > t yZ ... . . . . . . .. ... . . .. . . .. [13)
3 3 . V - Pdli ... . . ... . .. . ..... .. [22)
there will be two real values of ocorresponding to maximum and 0
minimum values of P and the spring rate is negative between
H we substitute into this P from Equation [7) and integrate, we
them, Fig. 6. If h = t y2, a spring is obtained which has
have
only one point where the rate is zero and that at a deflection
o = h,, i.e., when the spring is flattened, Fig. 14. In cases where
h < t y2, the spring rate is always positive. V = 2 (I~:') Ma2 [t (h-~)1 + t•J. ... ...(23]
If the condition for the so-called zero-rate spring
The volume of the spring may be written as (a' - b') ,r t -
o= h = t y2 ........... . .. . . .. . . [14] 1
a' a' - 1r t so the resilience or the strain energy per unit volume
is substituted into Equation 17], we get a'
P =
yr
2
(1- u 1) Ma'
E
I' . . .... . .... . ... [15) r -= 2 1r
0
(1 ~ :,) Ma' (a2 i) [( a' h- ~y + t2 ] . • [24]
which is the load carried by such a spring at the point of zero H the resilience for a given maximum permissible stress is sought,
spring rate. The corresponding stress from Equation [9 J the corresponding value of o may be computed from Equations
[9) or (10).
·
S =
1
t ,v2E
(1 - u') Ma'
(v2
-
2
C1 + 01 ) .. .. . .. .. [16)
Appendix 2--Calculation of Disk Springs
TI Jl're is a further significant relationship. Considering Equa- INITIALLY CONED DISK SPRINGS
l i, ,r: :7 1, the load P may become zero if the bracketed quantity
nrn,,i,,·~. Thus writing When calculating disk springs with large deflections, the
formulas given in Appendix 1 do not lend themselves to an eMy
(h - o) ( h -0 + t t•_- o
evaluation of the dimensions. In most cases of practical cal-
culation, the load, outside and inside diameters of the spring,
the maximum permissible stress, and a general type of load-
Rnd ~olving for o deflection curve are given which leaves the deflection, thickness,
o= ~ h + ~~ 2 t' .. . ... . .. ....... {17]
and free height to be calculated.
Deflection Equation [7 I does not lend itself to ready 110lution
RESEARCH PAPERS RP-58-10 313
even when the thickness and free cone height are known- as the C, t
equation is cubic; therefore, it is recommended that the following S 2 + C1 6
.,,_ = = A' or
method of approach be employed.
AB, in most cases, a low spring rate is desirable, assume that
the desired load is carried by the spring when it has its lowest
p !~o +
2
(!.)'
o
rate, that is, when o = h, or when the spring is flattened. Equa-
tion (7) then simplifies to A = o ~l-.........,........ [26]
[H + G)'J
The ratio of h/t has to be assumed now, bearing in mind that
as shown in Appendix 1 if (h/t) < V2
we get a spring with posi- p = (1 -~~; Ma' or
tive, though variable, rate as shown in Fig. 5. If (h/t) = V2
the spring will have a point of zero rate as shown in Fig. 14. If Eo'
p = (1 - cr2) Ma' BZ . . . . .. ..... .... (27]
(h/t) > V2 it will have a range of negative rate as shown in
where
Fig. 6. Finally, if (h/t) > VB it becomes a buckling spring.
The thickness and free height can now be computed and since
o = h, the deflection is also known. These values have to be B = ~H+G)'
substituted now in Equations (9 J or (10) as explained in Appen-
dix I, and the maximum stress computed. If that is too high, The various values of A and B are plotted on a logarithmic scale
~-
a lower value for h/t has to be chosen meaning, of course, an against t/o in Fig. 19. The procedure is that of trial and error.
increased spring rate in the .flattened position. A few trial
calculations are usually sufficient. e.o
/
If a low spring rate has to be maintained at the specified )~ 6.0
loading, four courses arfl open: (1) Change the outside-diameter- /
inside-diameter ratio so that it will lie between 1.6 and 2.4;
] 4.0
--...~ v
.o
~ ~~
......_
(2) increase the outside diameter; (3) decrease the load on each :~
spring by using two or more springs in parallel; and (4) increase • I/) 2.0 /
+- Oufs_1ae D(ame-ter Raf/o. , <; .
deflection by using several springs in series. c: Inside Diameter • .,.- :-:r / ,'
tl 4.0------ --- ,, ,' ,'
Example. Calculate a spring with the following data: Load in 1.0 3.0- - . ..__
P .. 1000 lb, maximum permissible stress S = 200,000 lb per
sq in., outside diameter -2a = 6 in., inside diameter 2b = 3 in.
From Fig. 18, M = 0.69, C, = 1.225, and C1 - 1.38; also.
1 - cr1 ... 0.91 if er = 0.3. ~
g o.ei
U 0.6
Q)
0.4
2.4--
2.0·
1.6···-
1.2---
.Zr> v
---- --..,
v
17
--
.--
2 0.2
v
vv
~
~ /P(l - cr1 ) Ma1 _ ~ /1000 X 0.69 X 9 X 0.91 _
t '"' " v2E
.
- " 1.414 X 30 X 10• - O.l07 m.
o.r
0.01 0.02 --
/
..
0.040.060:0f>O.I 0.2 0.4 0.60.8LO 'l .O
Ro-tio of ...t. Thickne_ss
6 Deflec-t,on
h • 0.151 in. - o
The maximum stress from Equation (9 J FIG. 19 CONSTANTS FOB C.~LCULA.TlNG INITIALLY FLAT DIBX
8PBINGS
Eo
8 = (1 - cr1) Ma 1
(c 2 + c )
1
h
it
30 x x
10•
,,. 0.69 X 9 X 0.91 (1.
0.151
225 Assuming that the load, the maximum permissible stress, and out-
side and inside diameters are given, we proceed by taking first an
arbitrary value for the deflection oand calculate the value A from
X 0.076 + 1.38 X 0.107) ... 198,000 lb per sq in.
Equation (26 J. The value of B on the same vertical scale can
Now the load-deflection curve can be pl~tted assuming various then be read off the curve given in Fig. 19, and substituted in
values of o and calculating P from Equation (7]. Equation (27] which then gives a value for the load. If this is
higher than the desired load, a smaller deflection has to be as-
INITIALLY FLAT SPRINGS . sumed and the process repeated. Vice versa, too small a load
calla for an increase of o. After several trials, one can usually
The procedure used for initially coned disk springs cannot obtain the desired load, then read from Fig. 19 the value t/o
be used when dealing with initially flat springs. hi this case, corresponding to the value of B used last, This gives all the
the following method is applicable. Equations (19) and (20) relevant information.
for the calculation of load and minimum stress are Example. Find thickness and deflection for a spring with the
p -
(1 -
Eo
cr 1) Ma'
(o't +t•)
-
2
following data: Load P = 2000 lb, maximum permissible 11tre1111
S = 200,000 lb per sq in., outside diameter 2a = 6 in., inside
diameter 2b = 3 in.
Then from Fig. 18 the load constant M - 0.69.
Eo ( o Assume 8 = 0.4 in., then from Equation (26 J
S
- (1-cr') Ma' C, 2 + C,t )
, _ /200,000
Dividing the two equations and simplifying, we have n. "" 0.4 " · 2000 = 0.4 X 10 = 4
314 TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
From Fig. 19, B = 0.21. Again, take ti = 0.16. Then A "" 1.6, B = 0.76
From Equation (23]
-and
p = 30 X 10• X 0.4 4 X 0.211 _ l p - 30 x 10• x 0.16 4 x 0.76 1 -
0.91 X 0.69 X 31 6000 b - 0.91 X 0.69 X 31 2010 lb