Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Elda Yockman Sue Bozgoz Rule 59 Motion To Federal Judge Ronald B. Leighton For Lying, Manipulating and Protecting Former Employee Lesley J. Fleming Disbar Them Both

    Uploaded by

    Christopher King
    1K views17 pages
    http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2018/02/kingcast-sees-old-pals-federal-judge.html 27 February 2018 KingCast Sees Old Pals Federal Judge Ronald B. Leighton & Zurich Insurance Attorney Lesley J. Fleming Caught on Ethics Probe. Love me some Roger Federer.... hate me some Zurich. Now if you'll excuse me I have some Notices to prepare for dozens of elected officials, especially those on the Justice Committees. KingCast Mortgage Movies see Zurich Insurance checking in on their investment in crime with Judge Ronald B. Leighton and Lesley J. Fleming Get your background here. As noted, Pierce County Judge Stanley Rumbaugh ran roughshod over the Constitution, Free Press and Civil Rights laws and principles on two (2) distinct cases I started following a year or so ago. In one of them he screwed a family after their matriarch sustained a broken neck because of a contracted Pierce County driver. The family -- by and through a PTSD military-background advocate -- noted collusion in the case and filed a RICO Action in the Seattle Federal District Court to escape the oppression coming from the dirtiest County in the State, right. But alas, the hillbilly Justice mavens manifest this time through Judge Ronald B. Leighton, who has abused his discretion in recent history by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. This guy went and cherry-picked the case and brought it right back down to his home turf where he basically stomped it out and dismissed the entire thing, taking not to give her leave to amend, because that's where he fucked up in Sheidler v. Avery, 599 Fed.Appx. 688 (2015). He did this because Zurich defense Counsel Lesley Fleming is an old friend of his, a former law clerk. The same Lesley Fleming who wagged her finger in my face as noted in the video, right. The two of them have some nerve, and they almost got away clean. But not quite. This is going to leave a mark, and multiple people will be filing Ethics Complaints on both of them. From Sheidler: "However, the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the first amended complaint without leave to amend. See U.S. v. Corinthian Colleges, 655 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2011) (“[D]ismissal without leave to amend is improper unless it is clear, upon de novo review, that the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)). See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir.2012) (“A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore reverse and remand to allow Scheidler an opportunity to amend his complaint. Moreover, the district court did not address the merits of Scheidler's petition for review of the Board of Tax Appeal's September 6, 2012 decision, which Scheidler incorporated by reference into his amended complaint. Nor did the district court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. See City of Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 168–69, 118 S.Ct. 523, 139 L.Ed.2d 525 (1997) (supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 extends to review of state administrative agency determinations). We therefore reverse *690 and remand for review of the agency decision." .....Anyway, in this case for them to have the nerve to run a game like that, and nearly get away clean, is just a study in abject horror. The funny part of course is that in her research about incestuous deals like this where the appearance of impropriety has been shattered, Ms. Bozgoz found the forced recusal of one Landa B. McCafferty that I caused on a First Amendment case several years ago as noted in the video. I had sued Kelly Ayotte during her ascension to her one-term as U.S. Senator because she threw me out of a publicly-advertised fundraiser that was clearly a public event. On-duty regular Nashua, NH PD were there to cover it -- not Detail co

    Original Title

    Elda Yockman Sue Bozgoz Rule 59 Motion to Federal Judge Ronald B. Leighton for Lying, Manipulating and Protecting Former Employee Lesley J. Fleming Disbar Them Both

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2018/02/kingcast-sees-old-pals-federal-judge.html 27 February 2018 KingCast Sees Old Pals Federal Judge Ronald B. Leighton & Zurich Insurance Attorney Lesley J. Fleming Caught on Ethics Probe. Love me some Roger Federer.... hate me some Zurich. Now if you'll excuse me I have some Notices to prepare for dozens of elected officials, especially those on the Justice Committees. KingCast Mortgage Movies see Zurich Insurance checking in on their investment in crime with Judge Ronald B. Leighton and Lesley J. Fleming Get your background here. As noted, Pierce County Judge Stanley Rumbaugh ran roughshod over the Constitution, Free Press and Civil Rights laws and principles on two (2) distinct cases I started following a year or so ago. In one of them he screwed a family after their matriarch sustained a broken neck because of a contracted Pierce County driver. The family -- by and through a PTSD military-background advocate -- noted collusion in the case and filed a RICO Action in the Seattle Federal District Court to escape the oppression coming from the dirtiest County in the State, right. But alas, the hillbilly Justice mavens manifest this time through Judge Ronald B. Leighton, who has abused his discretion in recent history by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. This guy went and cherry-picked the case and brought it right back down to his home turf where he basically stomped it out and dismissed the entire thing, taking not to give her leave to amend, because that's where he fucked up in Sheidler v. Avery, 599 Fed.Appx. 688 (2015). He did this because Zurich defense Counsel Lesley Fleming is an old friend of his, a former law clerk. The same Lesley Fleming who wagged her finger in my face as noted in the video, right. The two of them have some nerve, and they almost got away clean. But not quite. This is going to leave a mark, and multiple people will be filing Ethics Complaints on both of them. From Sheidler: "However, the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the first amended complaint without leave to amend. See U.S. v. Corinthian Colleges, 655 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2011) (“[D]ismissal without leave to amend is improper unless it is clear, upon de novo review, that the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)). See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir.2012) (“A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore reverse and remand to allow Scheidler an opportunity to amend his complaint. Moreover, the district court did not address the merits of Scheidler's petition for review of the Board of Tax Appeal's September 6, 2012 decision, which Scheidler incorporated by reference into his amended complaint. Nor did the district court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. See City of Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 168–69, 118 S.Ct. 523, 139 L.Ed.2d 525 (1997) (supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 extends to review of state administrative agency determinations). We therefore reverse *690 and remand for review of the agency decision." .....Anyway, in this case for them to have the nerve to run a game like that, and nearly get away clean, is just a study in abject horror. The funny part of course is that in her research about incestuous deals like this where the appearance of impropriety has been shattered, Ms. Bozgoz found the forced recusal of one Landa B. McCafferty that I caused on a First Amendment case several years ago as noted in the video. I had sued Kelly Ayotte during her ascension to her one-term as U.S. Senator because she threw me out of a publicly-advertised fundraiser that was clearly a public event. On-duty regular Nashua, NH PD were there to cover it -- not Detail co

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1K views17 pages

    Elda Yockman Sue Bozgoz Rule 59 Motion To Federal Judge Ronald B. Leighton For Lying, Manipulating and Protecting Former Employee Lesley J. Fleming Disbar Them Both

    Uploaded by

    Christopher King
    http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2018/02/kingcast-sees-old-pals-federal-judge.html 27 February 2018 KingCast Sees Old Pals Federal Judge Ronald B. Leighton & Zurich Insurance Attorney Lesley J. Fleming Caught on Ethics Probe. Love me some Roger Federer.... hate me some Zurich. Now if you'll excuse me I have some Notices to prepare for dozens of elected officials, especially those on the Justice Committees. KingCast Mortgage Movies see Zurich Insurance checking in on their investment in crime with Judge Ronald B. Leighton and Lesley J. Fleming Get your background here. As noted, Pierce County Judge Stanley Rumbaugh ran roughshod over the Constitution, Free Press and Civil Rights laws and principles on two (2) distinct cases I started following a year or so ago. In one of them he screwed a family after their matriarch sustained a broken neck because of a contracted Pierce County driver. The family -- by and through a PTSD military-background advocate -- noted collusion in the case and filed a RICO Action in the Seattle Federal District Court to escape the oppression coming from the dirtiest County in the State, right. But alas, the hillbilly Justice mavens manifest this time through Judge Ronald B. Leighton, who has abused his discretion in recent history by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. This guy went and cherry-picked the case and brought it right back down to his home turf where he basically stomped it out and dismissed the entire thing, taking not to give her leave to amend, because that's where he fucked up in Sheidler v. Avery, 599 Fed.Appx. 688 (2015). He did this because Zurich defense Counsel Lesley Fleming is an old friend of his, a former law clerk. The same Lesley Fleming who wagged her finger in my face as noted in the video, right. The two of them have some nerve, and they almost got away clean. But not quite. This is going to leave a mark, and multiple people will be filing Ethics Complaints on both of them. From Sheidler: "However, the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the first amended complaint without leave to amend. See U.S. v. Corinthian Colleges, 655 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2011) (“[D]ismissal without leave to amend is improper unless it is clear, upon de novo review, that the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)). See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir.2012) (“A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore reverse and remand to allow Scheidler an opportunity to amend his complaint. Moreover, the district court did not address the merits of Scheidler's petition for review of the Board of Tax Appeal's September 6, 2012 decision, which Scheidler incorporated by reference into his amended complaint. Nor did the district court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. See City of Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 168–69, 118 S.Ct. 523, 139 L.Ed.2d 525 (1997) (supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 extends to review of state administrative agency determinations). We therefore reverse *690 and remand for review of the agency decision." .....Anyway, in this case for them to have the nerve to run a game like that, and nearly get away clean, is just a study in abject horror. The funny part of course is that in her research about incestuous deals like this where the appearance of impropriety has been shattered, Ms. Bozgoz found the forced recusal of one Landa B. McCafferty that I caused on a First Amendment case several years ago as noted in the video. I had sued Kelly Ayotte during her ascension to her one-term as U.S. Senator because she threw me out of a publicly-advertised fundraiser that was clearly a public event. On-duty regular Nashua, NH PD were there to cover it -- not Detail co

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 17

    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 17

    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 2 of 17


    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 3 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 4 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 5 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 6 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 7 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 8 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 9 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 10 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 11 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 12 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 13 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 14 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 15 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 16 of 17
    Case 3:17-cv-05832-RBL Document 36 Filed 03/02/18 Page 17 of 17

    You might also like