You are on page 1of 2

F H WA

Policy Brief
Office of
Transportation
Policy Studies

OCTOBER 2013

Minimizing Excavation Through Coordination

Executive Order: Accelerating Dig Once Defined practices that minimize excavation (23
Broadband Infrastructure CFR, Part 645, Subpart B). The agency
Deployment Policies and/or practices that also strongly encourages states to work
minimize the number and scale of with service providers on joint highway
On June 14, 2012, President Obama
excavations when installing tele- and utility planning and to consider the
signed an Executive Order to facilitate
communications infrastructure in use of innovative practices and tech-
the deployment of broadband technol-
highway rights-of-way. nologies that help to minimize excava-
ogy on Federal lands, buildings, rights
of way, federally-assisted highways and tion of the roadway.
tribal lands. The Order required the
Dig Once Application On Federal-Aid highways, each state is
USDOT-FHWA to review “dig once” required by the FHWA to have a policy
requirements in existing programs, as it In most cases, telecommunication infra- for the accommodation and relocation
relates to the placement of below- structure is installed above ground due of utilities. Once a State’s policy is ap-
ground fiber optic cable along highway to costs associated with trenching and proved by the Division Administrator,
and roadway rights-of-way (ROW). maintenance. In areas where terrain any utility installation proposed on Fed-
issues would make excavation difficult, eral-Aid highway projects in accordance
What is Dig Once? wireless installations are preferred. In with the State policy may be approved
According to the Federal Communica- rural areas, burying fiber optic cable in by the State without referral to the
tions Commission (FCC), the largest the highway ROW is less likely to occur FHWA (23 CFR 645.211).
cost element for deploying broadband is under the roadbed due to the availability
burying fiber optic cables and conduit of space, unlike in urban areas where
underground. Similarly, the FHWA has there may be space limitations. Fre-
indicated that ninety percent of the cost quent construction in urban areas also
of deploying broadband is when the adds to traffic disruption. As such, Dig
work requires significant excavation of Once policies and practices are more
the roadway. Coordinating highway applicable to urban areas with high-
construction projects with the installa- density development.
tion of broadband facilities may save on
costs incurred by repeated excavation in Is there a federal Dig Once policy?
areas where the entire ROW is paved or
developed. Coordination also helps to FHWA does not have a Dig Once pol-
reduce deployment time by preventing icy, but has policies and procedures for
the need to acquire duplicative federal accommodating utility facilities and Conduit being installed
reviews and permits for work done at private lines on federally-aided highway along I-80 in Utah.
the same location. projects which support installation
Minimizing Excavation Through Coordination
PAGE 2

Do states and local areas have Dig Once policies? Dig Once Strategies
Policies and/or practices related to Dig Once that have been
There are very few states that have implemented a state-
proposed or put into effect by state and local planning or trans-
wide Dig Once policy. Given that requests for utility per-
portation agencies include the following:
mits to install or conduct work on existing facilities are pri-
marily the responsibility of counties and cities, Dig Once  Joint-trench agreements (a.k.a. “joint use” or “joint build”)
policies and practices are usually more applicable at the to improve coordination with telecommunication providers
local rather than at the state level. when plans are made for opening the ground. Joint use
means requiring that all providers of broadband services (in
State and local Dig Once strategies that do exist most often some cases, all utilities) install their infrastructure at the
involve formal coordination between state DOTs and utility same time, in the same trench, or in the same conduit, and
companies. Joint-use of trenches is a practice that is recog- in most cases, share the cost of installing the infrastructure.
nized as a sensible solution to expedite the deployment of
 Moratoriums on street excavation to preserve new roadway
fiber along main routes. Some localities have instituted a
construction.
moratorium on street excavation to preserve new roadway
construction, while others have little problem with multiple  Installation of empty conduit in ROW during new construc-
excavations as long as benefits can be achieved, such as tion to prepare for future broadband needs, or an analysis
having the street repaired or the ability to gain additional
“To catch the reader's attention, place an
thereof.
interesting sentence or quote from the story

fiber. There are also very few states that have required the
here.”

installation of conduit as part of a road construction project.  Use of trenchless technologies, such as horizontal direc-
In general, initiatives that are favored by state and local tional drilling or microtrenching.
agencies support approaches that encourage cooperation,
but do not prevent excavation when needed. Micro-trenching in-
volves digging a small
City of Boston, Dig Once Case Example trench just inches under
the road surface along
the curb line to install
In an effort to minimize excavations on the busy fiber optic lines.
streets of Boston, the City adopted a policy in
1994 that mandated all telecoms to install their
underground conduits “in the same trench, at the Dig Once Policy Considerations
same time on a shared-cost basis.” The “joint
build” policy that was created put the local tele- Implementing Dig Once policies at the local, rather than at the
coms in a leading role for planning and providing statewide or national level, would be more effective given the
complexities of implementing a policy that spans jurisdictions.
telecommunication services for the City. Under
Federal, state and local infrastructures, for instance, are subject
this policy, a “lead company” is established. The
to different laws regulating build-out plans for deploying broad-
lead company is any company (telecom provider, band. In addition, most work for managing and maintaining
or not) that approaches the City first for a build- utility facilities on roadways are the responsibility of counties
out request and takes the lead in coordinating the and cities, including requests for utility permits to install and
construction. The lead company and participat- conduct work on existing facilities.
ing telecoms work together to draft the engineer-
An approach that encourages cooperation, but does not prevent
ing plans, estimate construction costs and submit
excavation when needed is most supported by federal, state and
the build-out application for review and approval. local agencies when implemented as part of the cooperative
This approach has worked well in Boston to mini- planning process.
mize street excavation and expedite the broad-
band deployment process. Web: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/exeorder.cfm

You might also like