An Embedded Real-Time

Finger-Vein Recognition
System
for Mobile Devices

PRESENTED BY
N.LAKSHMI SHAMILI
III B.TECH,ECE
SVEW
 BIOMETRICS
 Unique measurable characteristics of a human being that
can be used to automatically recognize an individual or
verify an individual identity.
 Used for security authentication.
 FINGER VEIN
AUTHENTICATION
TECHNOLOGY
 A promising biometric
pattern for personal
identification in terms
of its security and
convenience.

 Uses DSP platform.

 Takes only about 0.8

seconds to verify one
input finger- vein
sample.
 VEIN RECOGNITION
 A system for
Identification using
a person’s unique
vein patterns.
 Veins as a
biometrics tool
involve the
measurement of
the blood vessels
on the back of
your palm or a
single finger of
hand.
OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED
SYSTEM
 IMAGE
ACQUISITION

 PROCESSING

 HUMAN-MACHINE
COMMUNICATION
MODULE
 IMAGE ACQUISITION

It uses four modules

 NIR light source

 Transparent acryl
 Daylight cut-off
filters
 Monochromatic
camera
FLOW CHART OF PROPOSED
RECOGNITION ALGORITHM
Input finger-vein Input finger-vein
images with images with
corresponding ID corresponding ID

Segmentation and Segmentation and

Alignment Alignment

Enhancement Enhancement

Feature Extraction Feature Extraction

Feature Templates Matching

Accept or reject
IMAGE SEGMENTATION &
ALIGNMENT
Segmentation Alignment

Between
two joints

Normalization
Canny
operator

Midline

Rotate
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT:
 Enhanced to
improve its
contrast.

 Resized

 Histogram
equalization
FEATURE EXTRACTION & MATCHING

 Lacunarity

 Quantify the denseness

 Spatial heterogeneity

 Matching (hamming distance)

 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

DATA SET:
 100 subjects (55% male and 45%female)
 Images from the forefinger, middle
finger, and ring finger.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
 Two types of errors
FALSE • which claims a
REJECTION genuine pair as
RATE(FRR) impostor

FALSE • which claims an

ACCEPTANCE impostor pair as
RATE(FAR) genuine

FRR FAR EER

APPLICATION AREAS
 CONCLUSION
 Highly Secure
 Low power consumption
 Low computational complexity
 High Accuracy
 Less Expensive
 Small size
 Quick response(0.8s)
 Low EER (0.07%)