审题思路：双方观点，弱强让步结构，给自己观点

Body paragraph 大纲：

B1: 建更多体育餐厅有好处—增加人们锻炼机会提高免疫能力—提
高公众健康水平—但是不能治病，也不能保持公众心理健康
B2: 政府还应该建医院—提供更多看病机会—从而保障公众身体健
康政府还需要丰富公众文化生活—举办活动建设娱乐场所—让
公众解压保持心理健康
Con：建体育场馆并不最好，作用有限，应该与建医院、丰富精神生
活一起进行，提高公民的身心健康。

It is widely thought that improving public health is the government’s

priority. However there are disputes about the value of constructing more
sports facilities on raising the level of public health. Some people think it
is the best way while others against it and stress other solutions are needed.
As for me, I support the second opinion.

There is no doubt that increasing the amount of sports facilities can be

effective. With more access to sports facilities, individuals can stay away
from the sedentary lifestyle and increase the possibility of doing physical
exercise as well as strengthening immune function; therefore, the public
health can be improved by raising people’s physical condition. However
building more sports facilities can only improve people’s physical health
but it cannot neither heal people’s illness nor care about their mental health.

One option is that the government need to give financial support to build
more medical institutions. Take country with huge population like China
as example, people usually have difficulty in finding medical service. With
more access to receive medical treatment, public health can be improved
as a result. Another solution is government to enrich people’s spiritual life
such as holding more cultural activities and making more room for
amusement centers, which can provide an oasis for individuals from high-
pressure life and keep their mental healthy.

In conclusion, in my opinion, increasing the number of sports facilities may

exert limited benefits on public health. Only building more medical
institutions, sports facilities and enriching spiritual life simultaneously can
improve both public physical health and psychological health significantly.