Plaintiff alleges that by reason of these acts Satan has deprived him of his constitutional rights. We question whether plaintiff may obtain personal jurisdiction over the defendant in this district. If such action were allowed we would also face the question of whether it may be maintained as a class action.
Plaintiff alleges that by reason of these acts Satan has deprived him of his constitutional rights. We question whether plaintiff may obtain personal jurisdiction over the defendant in this district. If such action were allowed we would also face the question of whether it may be maintained as a class action.
Plaintiff alleges that by reason of these acts Satan has deprived him of his constitutional rights. We question whether plaintiff may obtain personal jurisdiction over the defendant in this district. If such action were allowed we would also face the question of whether it may be maintained as a class action.
United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. Plaintiff alleges that by reason of these acts Satan UNITED STATES ex rel. Gerald MAYO has deprived him of his constitutional rights. v. SATAN AND HIS STAFF. We feel that the application to file and proceed in forma pauperis must be denied. Even if plaintiff's Misc. No. 5357. complaint reveals a prima facie recital of the infringement of the civil rights of a citizen of the Dec. 3, 1971. United States, the Court has serious doubts that the complaint reveals a cause of action upon which relief can be granted by the court. We question whether Civil rights action against Satan and his servants plaintiff may obtain personal jurisdiction over the who allegedly placed deliberate obstacles in defendant in this judicial district. The complaint plaintiff's path and caused his downfall, wherein contains no allegation of residence in this district. plaintiff prayed for leave to proceed in forma While the official reports disclose no case where this pauperis. The District Court, Weber, J., held that defendant has appeared as defendant there is an plaintiff would not be granted leave to proceed in unofficial account of a trial in New Hampshire where forma pauperis who in view of questions of personal this defendant filed an action of mortgage foreclosure jurisdiction over defendant, propriety of class action, as plaintiff. The defendant in that action was and plaintiff's failure to include instructions for represented by the preeminent advocate of that day, directions as to service of process. and raised the defense that the plaintiff was a foreign prince with no standing to sue in an American Court. Prayer denied. This defense was overcome by overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Whether or not this would West Headnotes raise an estoppel in the present case we are unable to determine at this time. Federal Civil Procedure 2734 170Ak2734 Most Cited Cases If such action were to be allowed we would also face Plaintiff would not be granted leave to proceed in the question of whether it may be maintained as a forma pauperis in civil rights action against Satan and class action. It appears to meet the requirements of his servants, who allegedly placed deliberate Fed.R. of Civ.P. 23 that the class is so numerous that obstacles in plaintiff's path and caused his downfall, joinder of all members is impracticable, there are in view of questions of personal jurisdiction over questions of law and fact common to the class, and defendant, propriety of class action, and plaintiff's the claims of the representative party is typical of the failure to include instructions for directions as to claims of the class. We cannot now determine if the service of process. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 23, 28 representative party will fairly protect the interests of U.S.C.A.; 18 U.S.C.A. § 241; 28 U.S.C.A. § 1343; the class. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. *282 Gerald Mayo, pro se. We note that the plaintiff has failed to include with his complaint the required form of instructions for the MEMORANDUM ORDER United States Marshal for directions as to service of process. WEBER, District Judge. For the foregoing reasons we must exercise our Plaintiff, alleging jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § discretion to refuse the prayer of plaintiff to proceed 241, 28 U.S.C. § 1343, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prays in forma pauperis. for leave to file a complaint for violation of his civil rights *283 in forma pauperis. He alleges that Satan It is ordered that the complaint be given a has on numerous occasions caused plaintiff misery miscellaneous docket number and leave to proceed in and unwarranted threats, against the will of plaintiff, forma pauperis be denied. that Satan has placed deliberate obstacles in his path
W. J. Estelle, JR., Director, Texas Department of Correstions v. William Wayne Justice, U. S. District Judge For The Eastern District of Texas, 426 U.S. 925 (1976)
How Embarrassing For The Third Circuit!! Why Didn't They Wait For The Ebia v. Arkison Case To Be Decided by The U.S. Supreme Court? Nov 2013 - This Appeal Is On Point.
Elizabeth v. Bagby v. Frank S. Beal, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Secy. of The Pa. Dept. of Public Welfare, Donald E. Downs and Thomas F. Brubaker, 606 F.2d 411, 3rd Cir. (1979)
Debro Siddig Abdul-Akbar v. Watson, Robert J. Darcy Watson Walter Redman Kay Jacobs U.S. District Court Delaware Department of Corrections, 901 F.2d 329, 3rd Cir. (1990)