Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The method of Craig Geffen Morse CGM developed in 1955 is still considered as one of the best metho
of prediction of the behavior of the injection of water into a 5 spot.
This excel sheet was developed and validated using examples from books (Ahmed 2nd Edition) and pa
It was used in a study of a subject to water injection. SOLVER was used in the calculations of water saturation.
The model is based on the Buckley-Leverett and Welge solution of the fractional-flow equation.
It accounts for areal sweep efficiency based on correlations developed in the laboratory.
It also takes into account variations in the mobility ratio after water breakthrough.
Water injection rate is corrected based on the conductance ratio correlation developed by Caudle and Witte.
This model assumes incompressible fluids and homogeneous five-spot patterns. Also, it ignores gravity effects a
En 1996 A. H . El-Banbi y colaboradores modificaron el metodo, se tiene planeado revisar estas modif
y proceder a mejorar esta hoja.
Nota : Se disponen de otras hojas excel desarrolladas como: 1. Metodos de Balance de Materiales
para diferentes tipos de yacimientos y mecanismos de empuje, 2. pruebas de consistencia de PVT
para crudo negro, volatil y condensado. 3. Metodo de CGM para prediccion de inyeccion de agua.
4.Otros metodos de prediccion de inyeccion de agua. 5 Correlaciones PVT
Se consideran material para ser usados por estudiantes y profesionales de cierta experiencias
Estas herrameintas estan disponible y me pueden contactar a luisaizarragmail.com
La idea es intercambiar programas excel, conocimeintos, material didacticos, experticias.
de Balance de Materiales
as de consistencia de PVT
on de inyeccion de agua.
de cierta experiencias
cos, experticias.
T Austin en 1972 ;
CURVAS DE FLUJO FRACCIONAL
Problema Ahmed 14-11
fw = 1/(1+ (kro/krw)*(μw /μo))
. DATOS uw= 0.5 cp
uo= 1 cp
determinando ecuacion de fw vs Sw y luego se obtiene la derivada analitica para calcular dfw/dSw y comparar
Kro/Krw vs Sw
6.000 0.8
f(x)
5.000= 1.7778691079x^3 + 0.1389643197x^2 + 0.1050216301x - 0.0147664262
R² = 0.9995816846 0.6
4.000 fw
1.2000
3.000 0.4
Kro/Krw
1.0000
2.000
0.2 0.8000
1.000
0.6000
w
Kro/Krw vs Sw
6.000 0.8
f(x)
5.000= 1.7778691079x^3 + 0.1389643197x^2 + 0.1050216301x - 0.0147664262
R² = 0.9995816846 0.6
4.000 fw
1.2000
3.000 0.4
Kro/Krw
1.0000
2.000
0.2 0.8000
1.000
0.6000
0.000 0
dw
0 0.1 0.2 KrolKrw
0.3 vs0.4
Sw 0.5 0.6krolkrw
0.7calculado
0.8 0.4000
Sw 2
krolkrw calculado Krw
0.2000
1.500
fwf=fwbt
1.000 dfw/dSw a Sw
0.500
0.000
0.45 0.5 dfwldsw
0.55vs Sw0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85
dfwldSw2 vs Sw2 worksheet
Sw
dfwlSw calculado porfraccion
der. ecuacion fw vs Sw
0.800
2.605
0.530
1.280
calcule fw y plotee fw vs Sw
Ecuacion de fw vs Sw
44.677 x4 -87.398 x3 56.641 x2 -11.715 x
178.708 x3 -262.194 x2 113.282 x -11.715
fw vs Sw
fw vs Sw fw2 vs Sw2 Column I
1.2000
1.0000
0.8000
0.6000
w
fw vs Sw
fw vs Sw fw2 vs Sw2 Column I
1.2000
1.0000
0.8000
0.6000
dw
0.4000
0.2000
0.0000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sw 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
0.563
0.469
0.798
2.17762626
-37.7627226
ok
Ea aumenta, no pasa de 1 por definicion
Continuacion de calculos
iw=269,1 bpd
(20) (21) (22) (23) (24)
Sw2 avg Krw a Sw2 avg M movilidad CR ecuac iw
igual a (9) o Fig 14-42 CR*iw
1 0.561 0.402 0.8033 0.88 236.4
2 0.576 0.432 0.8640 0.91 244.9
3 0.588 0.457 0.9132 0.94 252.8
4 0.598 0.477 0.9546 0.97 260.2
5 0.606 0.495 0.9904 0.99 267.3
6 0.613 0.511 1.0221 1.01 272.6
7 0.621 0.529 1.0574 1.04 279.3
8 0.625 0.538 1.0765 1.05 283.1
9 0.630 0.550 1.1002 1.07 288.1
10 0.634 0.561 1.1220 1.09 293.0
11 0.638 0.571 1.1423 1.10 297.2
12 0.647 0.594 1.1879 1.14 306.6
13 0.655 0.614 1.2277 1.17 314.9
14 0.668 0.648 1.2956 1.22 329.3
15 0.679 0.676 1.3527 1.27 341.6
ok ok ok ok ok
ecuacion de Krw
1.7779 x3 0.139 x2 0.105
-0.0148
Kro aSwi 1
start to interference
nterference to Fill up
Fill up to BT
rmance of a producing WOR of 30 stb/stb
extrapola a las otras capas, al final se suma y se tiene el resultado final deseado
ok
por agua en el momento de la ruptura BT
bilidades Relativas
o de inyeccion:
up 3, Antes de Ruptura en el pozo productor 4 Hasta el limite economico
Ruptura o BT
qo=iw/(Bo + Bw*WORs)
qw=qo*WORs
(25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30)
iw avg Δwinj Δt dias t tiempo qo qw qo *
bpd bpd (26)/(25) ΣΔt dias bopd bapd qo modificada
337.6 87.1 131.8 87.1
240.65 20553 85.4 423.0 74.7 155.3 74.7
248.84 20553 82.6 505.6 66.2 173.3 66.2
256.45 20553 80.1 585.7 59.9 188.2 59.9
263.71 20553 77.9 663.7 55.1 201.1 55.1
269.92 20553 76.1 739.8 51.0 211.4 51.0
275.92 25691 93.1 832.9 46.8 223.1 46.8
281.20 15415 54.8 887.7 44.7 229.4 44.7
285.63 20553 72.0 959.7 42.4 237.3 42.4
290.56 20553 70.7 1030.4 40.3 244.6 40.3
295.10 20553 69.6 1100.1 14.7 279.5 34.9
301.91 51382 170.2 1270.2 13.7 290.2 28.9
310.79 51382 165.3 1435.6 13.1 299.3 24.1
322.15 102765 319.0 1754.6 11.9 315.1 17.0
335.48 102765 306.3 2060.9 11.1 328.4 12.1
ok
q o B N D calcu lad o
signado como 2)
Swbtavg 0.563
(13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (19)
WORs Ed qo tasa de oil qw tasa agua Prod, Agua Prod, Oil chequeo
(Sw2avg-Swi-Sgi) bopd bwpd acumulada for ahmed qw
/ (1-Swi-Sgi) qo qw Wp Bbls Np bbls (b) bnpd
1.51 0.415 87.11 131.8 0 46466 131.8
2.08 0.435 74.69 155.3 10215 55462 155.3
2.62 0.451 66.19 173.3 21533 63158 173.3
3.14 0.464 59.93 188.2 33995 69901 188.2
3.65 0.474 55.12 201.1 47334 75912 201.1
4.14 0.484 51.01 211.4 61368 81345 211.4
4.77 0.494 46.80 223.1 79680 87495 223.1
5.13 0.499 44.74 229.4 91018 90892 229.4
5.60 0.506 42.37 237.3 106478 95136 237.3
6.06 0.512 40.35 244.6 122278 99096 244.6
18.96 0.518 14.74 279.5 141255 100410 279.5
21.24 0.530 13.66 290.2 189798 102776 290.2
22.92 0.540 13.06 299.3 238758 104795 299.3
26.54 0.558 11.87 315.1 337506 108142 315.1
29.71 0.572 11.05 328.4 437007 110863 328.4
ok ok Wp a Bt =0 ok
ok
Se modificaron las valores de qo obtenidos para Ea >1
ya que mostraron comportamiento anormal
iniciativa…..
q w B N D calcu lad o
qw bnd vs t dias
350.0
300.0
250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
mpo dias
0.0
0 1200.0 1400.0 1600.0 1800.0 2000.0 2200.0
+$D$172*E126)*POTENCIA(E145;($D$173+$D$174*E126))+$D$175*(E145/E126)*(E145/E126)+$D$176*E145))
ww
w
w
w Sw
22
21
2
=+−
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
Sw2
f
ae
w
w
o
bSw
2
1
12
=
+
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
μ
μ
fk
k
w
w
o
ro
rw
2
1
1
=
#NAME?
μ
$176*E145))
Example 14-24 Assume that the reservoir has an additional four layers that are characterized
by the following properties
example 14-24 use los resultados del ejemplo 14-16
Layer k, md h ft Ø porosidad
Capa base 1 31.5 5 0.20
2 20.5 5 0.18
3 16.0 4 0.15
4 13.0 3 0.14
5 10.9 2 0.10
calcule Np,Wp, Winj, Qo,Qw, Iw para las capas remanentes a un tiempo de t=730 dias
tiempo Winj iw Np Wp qo
dias bbls bwpd bbls bbls bopd
1 337.6 102765 236.4 46466 0 87.11
2 423.0 123318 244.9 55462 10215 74.69
3 505.6 143871 252.8 63158 21533 66.19
4 585.7 164424 260.2 69901 33995 59.93
5 663.7 184977 267.3 75912 47334 55.12
6 739.8 205530 272.6 81345 61368 51.01
7 959.7 267189 288.1 95136 106478 42.37
8 1100.1 308295 297.2 100410 141255 34.89
9 1435.6 411060 314.9 104795 238758 24.12
10 1754.6 513825 329.3 108142 337506 16.98
11 2060.9 616590 341.6 110863 437007 12.12
2. Se plotea Wi, Np,Wp, qo, qw, iw vs tiempo ( SEIS GRAFICO…MEJOR BUSCAR ECUACIONES DE LAS CU
Ecuaciones
qo bpd = 126,26e-0,0014 t dias qw = 113,8Ln(t dias) - 534,49
Np bbls = -0,0327x2 + 112,6196x + 14482,2407 -0.0327
Wp bbls = 0,0686x2 + 93,782x - 43153 0.06860
Iw bapd = -1,90628E-05x2 + 1,05335E-01x + 2,04322E+02 -1.91E-05
W inj bbls = 0,0296x2 + 228,28x + 21145 0.0296
700.0
600.0
500.0
qo qw bps
400.0
300.0
200.0
100.0
0.0
800.0 qo bopd total 5 capas qw
700.0
600.0
500.0
qo qw bps
400.0
300.0
200.0
100.0
0.0
tiempo dias
200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.01200.01400.01600.01800.
layers that are characterized
o de t=730 dias Ahmed lo hace solo para un solo dia: 730 dias
Aquí se hace para varios dias
qw
bwpd
131.8
155.3
173.3
188.2
201.1
211.4
237.3
279.5
299.3 los valores de 0,651 0,406 0,250 0,138
315.1 se obtienen usando (kh)i/(Kh)n
328.4
218.4 ok perfecto
k*h (k*h)i/(K*h)1
157.50 1.000
102.50 0.651
64.00 0.406
39.00 0.248
21.80 0.138
nota importante
BUSCAR ECUACIONES DE LAS CURVAS) als tasas qo qw iw se cacularon con
la relacion (k*h)i ( (k*h)1 es mas logica
ecuaciones basicas
112.6196 14482.2407 ti*=t ((k/Ø)i / (k/Ø)n)
93.782 -43153 Np= (Np*) * ((Ø*h)i / (Ø*h)n)
0.105335 204.322 Wp= (Wp*) * ((Ø*h)i / (Ø*h)n)
228.28 21145 Wi = (Wi*) * ((Ø*h)i / (Ø*h)n)
Iw = (iw)* (k*h)i /(k*h)n
qo = qo* (k*h)i /(k*h)n
qw = qiw* (k*h)i /(k*h)n
een los valores de Np*,Wp*.y asi
qw iw
bwpd bwpd Np Wp Wij total 5 caps
0.0 564.9
155.3 491.9 1600000.0 Np total 5 capas Wp total 5 capas winj total 5 capas
262.6 517.5 1400000.0
368.5 539.6 1200000.0
434.2 559.3 1000000.0
462.3 576.1 800000.0
530.3 619.8 600000.0
595.6 673.2 400000.0
200000.0
659.1 716.8
0.0
707.8 752.6
747.5 782.6 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
tiempo dias
486.2 649.2 perfecto
462.3 576.1
tiempo dias
00.0 1000.01200.01400.01600.01800.02000.02200.0
nto capa 2 qo qw iw
0 0 0
0 0. 0 0. 0 0.
18 20 22
Np Wp Winj Wi para capa base n
Np vs t para capa base n Polynomial (Np vs t para capa base n ) Wp para capa base
Polynomial (Wp para capa base) Winj en capa bse Polynomial (Winj en capa bse)
tasa iny iw Polynomial (tasa iny iw)
700000 400.0
350.0
600000 f(x) = 0.0296x^2 + 228.4291x + 21079.3457
f(x)
R² ==1.0000
- 1.91258529637881E-05x^2 + 0.1054998312x + 204.2571405379
R² = 0.9992193737
300.0
500000
250.0
f(x) = 0.0688123933x^2 + 93.3482169125x - 42978.3682934542
400000
Np Wp Winj bbls
R² = 0.9994296191
300000
150.0
200000
100.0
0 0.0
0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0
tiempo dias