Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FEDSM2012-72282
Y. Jiang
Simerics Inc.
Bellevue, Washington, USA
yj@simerics.com
The pump was tested in a closed loop test rig. The test was
done as part of an upgrade to improve NPSH3. The water used
in the test was not deaerated. Figure 8 shows the test rig with
the pump mounted.
Figure 10: Fluid domain with seal leakage gaps and
balance holes
The first NPSHr prediction is for the cases with 682.5 m3/h
flow rate. Table 2 records detailed information of a sequence of
simulations. Since the normal head of this flow rate is already
known from the previous performance simulation, the Step 0
simulation is not needed. A 2.3E-5 mass fraction of air
(corresponding to about 2% volume fraction under room
condition) was used for these simulations.
3
Table 2: NPSHr prediction steps for 682.2 m /h flow with
2% air
Step Outlet Flow Mass Head NPSH Head
PS rate Flow drop
From the results, it shows that with only 3 simulation steps, bar m3/h Kg/s m m %
the NPSHr prediction has already reached the 3.3% head drop
1 8.32 682.5 187.0 69.2 17.4 0.0
point which is close enough for most engineering purposes.
2 6.43 682.5 176.4 64.1 3.1 7.5
Please note there is a small difference (~2%) between the 100%
3 6.73 723.7 188.2 66.9 3.4 3.3
head from step 1 and the incompressible transient simulation
Figure 17: The head drop curve at 682.5 m3/h flow rate
CONCLUSIONS
An innovative NPSHr prediction approach is presented in
this paper. The principal of the method is fully explained. The
Figure 15: Cavitation pattern at step 3
complete procedure is laid out in detail. Important issues
pertaining to the new method are identified with suggested
The two plots shows that the simulation results with 2% air
solution strategies. Compared with the traditional approach, the
contents consistently underpredict the NPSH compared to the
proposed approach introduces a very predictable and
experimental results for the same flow rate and pump head.
controllable simulation procedure with significant savings in
Since this pump was tested on a closed loop without deaeration,
the number of simulation runs and simulation time. The new
there could be more than 2% air in the water. It is well known
method is applied to the NPSHr study of an industrial
that extra air can degrade pump NPSHr characteristics (Budris
centrifugal pump. The NPSHr is predicted with reasonable
and Mayleben, 1998). Additional simulations with more air
accuracy in as little as three simulations for one flow rate. With
contents were carried out to investigate effects of the air
demonstrated efficiency and robustness against real engineer
contents on pump NPSHr performance for the flow rate of
application, the new method could be used effectively for pump
682.5m3/h. The results from those additional simulations are
NPSH performance study.
also plotted in Figure 17 and Figure 18. Results show that with
8% of air (9.2E-5 mass fraction), the CFD predicted NPSHr is
much closer to the experiment measurement. More
investigations are needed to better understand the NPSHr
REFERENCES
Budris, A.R., and Mayleben, P.A. 1998 "Effects of entrained
air, NPSH margin, and suction piping on cavitation in
centrifugal pumps", Proceedings of the Fifteenth
International Pump Users Symposium, Turbomachinery
Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station,
Texas, USA, pp. 99-108.
Ding, H., Visser, F.C., Jiang, Y. and Furmanczyk, M. 2011
“Demonstration and validation of a 3D CFD simulation
tool predicting pump performance and cavitation for
industrial applications", J. Fluids Eng. – Trans ASME,
133(1), 011101.
Dupont, P. and Okamura, T. 2003, “Cavitating flow calculations
in industry,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 9, pp. 163-170.
Jiang, Y., Zhang, D., Furmanczyk, M., Lowry, S. and Perng, C.
2008, “A three-dimensional design tool for crescent oil
pumps,” SAE World Congress, April 14-17, Detroit, MI,
Paper No. SAE-2008-01-0003.
Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B. 1974 “The numerical
computation of turbulent flows,” Comput. Methods Appl.
Mech. Eng., 3, pp. 269-289.
Schiavello, B. and Visser, F.C. 2009 “Pump cavitation –
various NPSHR criteria, NPSHA margins, and impeller
life expectancy,” Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth
International Pump Users Symposium, Turbomachinery
Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station,
Texas, USA, pp. 113-144.
Singhal, A.K., Athavale, M.M., Li, H.Y. and Jiang, Y. 2002
“Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation
model", J. Fluids Eng. – Trans ASME, 124(3), pp. 617-
624.
Visser, F.C. 2001 “Some user experience demonstrating the use
of CFX-TASCflow computational fluid dynamics for
cavitation inception (NPSH) analysis and head
performance prediction of centrifugal pump impellers,”
ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting,
May 29 – June 1, New Orleans, LA, Paper No.
FEDSM2001-18087.