Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fahed Shehub
Abstract
The chapter “Terrorism in Israel and Palestine” focuses on the category of political terrorism
that has engulfed the two countries, the various factions and organizations involved with the
cause, a timeline of events, how terrorism, and the organizations associated with it, have
changed form and allegiance, and the methods used to encounter such terrorism. The term
terrorism has been defined in the context of both countries and the implications of terrorism
and related activities on a regional and global scale have been discussed. There is also a
discourse on the tactics used and the controversies associated with them. Finally, the shifting
aspects of the old situation with respect to new challenges, such as the rise of ISIS, have been
touched upon briefly. This last part of the chapter deals with the future possibilities into
which the Israel Palestine relation may morph itself. The reaction paper critically analyses the
aforementioned subjects and attempts to give a measured reaction on the status of conflict
and the use of terrorism to resolve the issues plaguing Israel and Palestine.
The Israel Palestine Conflict has been a long standing cause of distress in the
region for both the Arabs and Jews and has spanned over more than a century. It began with
the migration of Jews during the Zionist movement to the land of Palestine which was then a
part of the Ottoman Empire. At the end of World War I, Britain gained control of Palestine
from the Ottoman Empire and the area came to be known as British-mandate Palestine. At
that time, both the Arabs and the Jews lived in that territory. The British grant of territory
resulting in the formation of Jordan led to intercommunal violence leaving scores of Jews and
Arabs dead. In November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly recommended the
partition of British-mandate Palestine into two separate states for Jews and for Arabs which
unleashed a fresh wave of violence. While the Jews proclaimed the state of Israel, the Arabs
refused to accept the proposition and fights began between the newly established Israel and
its Arab neighbours. The umbrella organization known as the Palestine Liberation
Organization (PLO) was set up at the initiative of other countries in the Arab League in 1964
Use of Terrorism
Israelis tend to associate the origin of modern terrorism with the rise of the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO) and its leader Yasser Arafat (1929–2004). The conventional
narrative is that Palestinians began using terrorist attacks against Israel when it became
evident that Arab conventional forces could not defeat the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). The
other side of argument presents a diametrically opposite picture. Terrorism did not originate
with Palestinians; it began with two Zionist organizations in the 1930s—the Irgun Zvai
Leumi and the more militant Stern Gang. The future Israelis abandoned terrorism only when
they turned to Israel’s War of Independence (1948–1949). From this perspective, Israelis use
THE ISRAEL PALESTINE CONFLICT AND USE OF TERRORISM 4
terrorism as a tool for repression. Proponents of this argument point to Israel’s everyday
treatment of Palestinians and the massive casualties inflicted by the better armed IDF (White,
2017).
Through the author’s text, the two vastly different sides are quite clear. What is not
clear, however, is which side is correct- politically, ethically, and so on. The UN mandate
failed to effectively create two states for the Jews and Arabs causing displacement of
multitudes of Palestinians living in the disputed territory. This was certainly a cause of
misery for the Palestinians coupled with the treatment they got as “second class population.”
The author sketches the events of the Fatah and the 6 Day War wherein the Israeli Defence
Forces took the West Bank of the Jordan River, Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, the Sinai
Peninsula, and the Gaza Strip. The rise of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) with
Yasser Arafat at his helm is detailed. In the narrative of the chapter, the author does not
specify what inspired Israel to make a move for the 6 Day War in the first place. There are no
facts or speculation regarding the same. Further division of the PLO led to the Black
September group being formed that held hostage and murdered the Israeli athletes
participating in the Olympics at Germany. Since the terrorist group was based in Lebanon, it
New groups formed after the 1982 invasion of Lebanon. Unable to tolerate Israel’s
presence in the area, the Syrians rallied all local militias and accepted help from Iran. An
the Intifada, gave rise to a new group, Hamas which challenged the PLO for power (White,
2017). Multiple groups rose up in the wake of the conflict, namely, Hamas, Hezbollah, Force
17, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP),
Fatah, Palestine Liberation Front (PLF) and so on. Details about these groups have been
THE ISRAEL PALESTINE CONFLICT AND USE OF TERRORISM 5
enumerated by the author. These are succinct and illuminating to a student of terrorism and
counter terrorism.
It is important to know precisely which actions have been taken by each party in the
conflict that have been categorically termed terrorism by the other. The many splinter groups
of the Palestine movement have retaliated with militia and their terrorist actions have
included, rocket attacks and the most devastating of all, suicide bombers. The Israeli
retaliation has been firm and even excessive. The author gives a balanced view point on how
while the Israeli nationalists call the actions self defence, the observers point out that the
excessive use of force is overkill and the casualties are beyond justification. The Israeli
methods of bulldozing, building the wall, invasion of Lebanon have been effective, yet
questionable. The selected targeting and wholesale assassination of the Hamas leadership is
controversial but may be more acceptable if the Israeli judiciary were involved (Byman,
2006).
Conclusion
While strong tactics are needed to counter terrorism, the way forward is steeped in
darkness unless negotiations and dialogue are called into play. Israel holds the upper hand as
has been clearly demonstrated by its victories time and again. However, the political
terrorism and extremism will continue unless Israel recognizes the Palestinian statehood. On
the other hand, organizations such as Hamas have developed into political rather than terrorist
organizations that hold the power to change the future of the Palestinian people if only they
could drop their agenda of eradicating Israel and approach for dialogues. The advent of ISIS
has changed the equations in the region and the two countries face an enemy greater than
THE ISRAEL PALESTINE CONFLICT AND USE OF TERRORISM 6
their own rivalry. The peace can only be restored in the region of strife though a consolidated
References
1. Clauset, A., Heger, L., Young, M., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2010). The strategic calculus
2. http://pov-tc.pbs.org/pov/pdf/promiese/promises-timeline.pdf
3. Angeli, E., Wagner, J., Lawrick, E., Moore, K., Anderson, M., Soderlund, L., &
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
4. White, J.R. (2017). Terrorism and homeland security (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: