Man Bahadur

LUMANTI SUPPORT GROUP FOR SHELTER
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
Man Bahadur Maharjan
Siddhipur,Lalitpur
Designed By: Rajib Maharjan
NEC Reg.no: 6096
Na. Pa Reg.no:336
2017/05/09
Table of Contents
1. BACKGROUND
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 PROJECT INFORMATION
3. ASSUMPTION OF DATA
3.1 UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIAL
3.2 LOADS
 LIVE LOAD
 DEAD LOAD
 SESMIC LOAD
3.3 LOAD COMBINATION

 DESIGN LOAD COMBINATION
4. DESIGN
4.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN
4.2 SLAB DESIGN
4.3 COLUMN DESIGN
4.4 BEAM DESIGN
4.5 STAIRCASE DESIGN
5. CONCLUSION
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Structural Analysis Report

Page 1
1. BACKGROUND
Kathmandu valley is seismic prone city and the risk it faces from earthquake is very high. So,
the design of earthquake resistant structures is important. Nepal lies in the Vth zone which is at
high risk of vulnerability. So, there is high demand for the earthquake resistant design of the
building for saving from these devastating disasters.
Earthquake is a shaking of the earth surface caused by the waves originated underneath and on
the surface of earth. Earthquake causes are volcanic eruption, slipping of faults, tectonic
activities, explosion etc…..
Structural design with the sound knowledge of structural engineering determines the sizes of
members like beam, column, rebar arrangements and others. These structures are subjected to
various loads like concentrated loads, uniformly distributed loads, uniformly varying loads,
random loads, internal or earthquake load and dynamic forces. The structure transfers its load to
the support and ultimately to the ground. While transferring the loads acting on the structures,
the members of the structures are subjected to internal forces like axial force, shear force,
bending and torsion moments. Structural analysis deals with analyzing these internal forces in
the members of the structures.
Since the site is located at Kathmandu, According to IS893-2002, Kathmandu lies in Vth zone,
the severest one. Hence, the effects of earthquake is pre-dominant than the wind load. So, the
building is analyzed for earthquake as lateral load.
2. INTRODUCTION
The structure design of commercial building has been carried out using ETABS (Structure
Analysis and Design Software) by Limit State Method of Design.
The report has been prepared in complete conformity with various stipulations in Indian
Standards, codes of practice concrete to IS SP 16, criteria earthquake resistant design structure
IS 1893:2002 ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces-
codes of practice IS 13920-1993, handbook or concrete reinforced and detailing IS: SP 34. Use
of these codes have emphasized on providing sufficient safety, economy, strength and ductility
besides satisfactory serviceability requirements of cracking deflection in concrete structures.
These codes are based on principles of Limit State of design.
3. ASSUMPTION OF DATA
3.1. UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIAL
As per IS 875:
Reinforced Cement Concrete = 25 KN/m3
Cement Plaster/Screeding = 20.40 KN/m3

Page 2
Marble Finishing = 26.70 KN/m3
3.2. Loads
 DEAD LOAD
Dead Load on the structure comprise the self weight of the member; weight of the
finishes and partition walls. These are usually dependent upon the constructional
features and have to be assumed in order to design various structural concrete
members. The loads on the beams due to the slabs were calculated according to
clause 23.5 of IS 456-2000. The wall is taken for thickness of either 230mm or
110mm as per architectural drawing and suitable reduction is made for window and
door opening. As the software, we have used, generates the self weight of the
structural member by itself, we have not calculated the self weight.
 LIVE LOAD
The Live Load for the building is extracted from IS code 875 part II-1987 for
different occupancies.
I. 1.5 KN/m2 for accessed terrace and 0.75 KN/m2 for non accessed terrace.
II. 2.0 KNm2 for rooms
III. 3.0 KN/m2 for stairs, passage, lobby, etc
 SESMIC LOAD
Assessment of Lateral Loads
It is the load acting horizontally in accordance with storey masses of building.
Seismic weight is the total dead load plus appropriate amount of specified imposed
load. While computing the seismic load weight of each floor, the weight of columns
and walls in any storey shall be equally distributed to the floors above and below
the storey. The seismic weight of the whole building is the sum of the seismic
weights of all floors. It has been calculated according to IS: 1893-(Part I)-2002.
IS: 1893 - (Part I) - 2002 states that for the calculation of the design seismic forces
of the structure the imposed load on roof need not be considered.
The wind load and earthquake loads are assumed not to act simultaneously. A
building is design for the worst condition of two loads. In our case, earthquake
forces govern Lateral load. Thus, assignment of lateral load is carried out according

Page 3
to IS: 1893-(Part I)-2002. There are basically three methods to determine the
earthquake force in the building:
a. Seismic Coefficient Method or Static Method
b. Response Spectrum Method or Modal Analysis or Spectral Acceleration
Method or Dynamic Method
c. Time History Method
The Seismic Coefficient Method is generally applicable to building up to 40m height

and those are more or less symmetrical in plan and elevation. This method basically
consists of calculation of base shear VB. The base shear VB is given by the following
equation:
VB = Ah.W
Z I Sa I
Ah = (2) x (R) x( g ) Where, (R) ≤ 1
Where,
Ah = Horizontal seismic coefficient value
Z = Zone factor for max considered earthquake condition given in IS 1893 (part I)
: 2002 clause 6.4.2, table 2
R = Response reduction factor given in IS1893 (part I):2002 clause 6.4.2, table 7
Sa
= Spectral acceleration depending upon the period of vibration and damping as
g
given in IS: 1893 (part I): 2002 clause 6.4.2, figure 2

I = Post-disaster importance factor depending on the life and function of structure,
historical value or economic importance as IS 1893 (part I):2002, table 6
W = Seismic weight which include
a. Floor wise dead load consisting of weight of floor, beams, parapet, fixed
permanent equipment and half the wall and columns etc. above and below.
b. Reduce live load on the building (25% of live load for LL≤ 3.0 KN/m2 and
50% of LL for LL> 3.0 KN/m2)
T = Estimated natural or fundamental period of vibration building in second
= 0.075 x H 0.75For moment resisting concrete building

Page 4
H
= 0.09 1/2 for braced concrete building
Ds
H = Total height of building in m in a direction perpendicular to the earthquake

force
Ds = Dimension of building in m in a direction parallel to the applied earthquake
force
After calculating the base shear VB the distribution of earthquake force on different
floor is determined as follows;
Wh
Qi = ∑ Wi hi2 x VB
i i
Qi = Horizontal force acting at any floor

Wi = Weight of ith storey assumed to be lumped at ith floor
hi = Height of ith floor above base of frame
Once the floor loads are obtained the frame can be analyzed by Portal or Cantilever
Method or Stiffness Matrix Method.
The designed storey shear in any storey is distributed to the various elements of the
vertical lateral force resisting system in proportion to their rigidity considering the
rigidity of diaphragm.
 LOAD COMBINATION
Different load cases and load combination cases as per IS 875 are considered to
obtain most critical element stresses in structure in the course of analysis. There are
altogether five load cases considered for the structural analysis is mentioned as
below:
a. Dead Load (DL)
b. Live Load (LL)
c. Wall load (Super Dead)
d. Earthquake load in x-direction (EQx)
e. Earthquake load in x-direction (EQx)
The following load combination were adopted for design:
1. 1.5 (DL+ LL)

2. 1.2(DL+LL+EQx)

Page 5
3. 1.2(DL+LL-EQx)
4. 1.2(DL+LL+EQy)
5. 1.2(DL+LL-EQy)
6. 1.5 (DL+ EQx)
7. 1.5 (DL- EQx)
8. 1.5 (DL+ EQy)
9. 1.5 (DL- EQy)
10. 0.9DL+1.5EQx
11. 0.9DL-1.5EQx
12. 0.9DL+1.5EQy
13. 0.9DL-1.5EQy
25% of LL as reduced live load RLL is to be considered when combined with EQ Load. Similarly,
earthquake load is to be considered in two horizontal directions X and Y and in each direction, the
load will be reversible, i.e. in +X and +Y directions.
4. DESIGN
4.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN

The isolated, combine, strap, raft footing is designed using limit state method and depth of
foundation is checked against moment due to soil pressure and checked in one way shear.
Grade of concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 50mm.
4.2 SLAB DESIGN
The slabs are designed as two way slab by bending moment coefficient method for different
boundary condition which is as follows:
a. Interior panel
b. One short edge discontinuous
c. One long edge discontinuous
No bent up bars are used. Extra cut pieces are used for extra top bars. Grade
of concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 15mm.
4.3 COLUMN DESIGN

Page 6
Columns are designed with the help of ETABS. Sizes and reinforcement are provided as
instructed by ETABS checking it with the limit provided by IS 456:2000. Grade of concrete
and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 40mm.
4.4 BEAM DESIGN
Columns are designed with the help of ETABS. Sizes and reinforcement are provided as
instructed by ETABS checking it with the limit provided by IS 456:2000. Grade of concrete
and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 25mm.
4.5 STAIRCASE DESIGN
Either dog legged or open well staircase is designed for live load 2KN/m2 as per code. Grade
of concrete and steel are M20 and Fe500 with clear cover 20mm.
5. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION
The project has mainly been directed towards the structural analysis and design part only.
Nevertheless the attempts had been made in architectural planning and for the presentation
of the analysis and design result in tabular form with necessary drawings and details. The
fundamental principle and methodology applied while applied while analyzing and
designing the structure in is universally valid for any type of the framed structural buildings.
Design of beam, column and foundation was done with the help of ETABS 2016 and IS
codes for ductile design. After design of all members structural drawing is drawn as per
design and other detailing rule. Hence safe, stable and economical seismic design of the
building is done.
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY
A.K Chopra Dynamics of Structure.

Jain, A.K Reinforced Concrete Design.
Pankaj Agrawal and Manish Shrikhande. Earthquake resistance Design of Structure.
S.N. Sinha. Reinforced Concrete Design.
S.U. Pillai and D. Menon. Reinforced Concrete Design.

Page 7
Codes
1. Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice – IS 456:2000

2. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structure – IS 1893 (Part I):2000
3. Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete – SP 16
4. Ductility Detailing Code – IS 13920:1993
5. Design and Construction of Raft Foundation – IS 2950(Part I) - 1981
EARTHQUAKE LOAD CALCULATION

a) Manual calculation
Type of soil = medium

Height of building
(H) = 10.97 m
base dimenstion of building at the plinth level (d) in X-direction = 6.7 m
base dimenstion of building at the plinth level (d) in Y-direction = 6.14 m
Time Period in X-direction = 0.075H 0.75 = 0.452 clause IS

Page 8
1893:2002; 7.6.1
clause IS
Time Period in Y-direction = 0.075H 0.75 = 0.452 1893:2002; 7.6.1
clause IS
Sa/g (X-dir) = 2.500 1893:2002; 6.4.5
clause IS
Sa/g (Y-dir) = 2.500 1893:2002; 6.4.5
clause IS
Zone factor (Z) = 0.360 for Zone V 1893:2002; Table 2
Importance factor
(I)= 1.000
for special RCC clause IS
Response reduction factor (R)= 5 building 1893:2002; Table 7
1572.67
Seismic weight of the building (W)= KN
clause IS
Seismic coefficient (Ah) = (Z/2)*(I/R)*(Sa/g) = 0.09 1893:2002; 6.4.2
Base shear Vb = Ah X W = 141.54 KN
b) Program Calculated
Load Eccentricity Time Top Bottom Weight Base

Type
pattern % Period sec Story Story Used KN Shear KN
X Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26
X + Ecc. Y Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26
X - Ecc. Y Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26
Y Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26
Y + Ecc. X Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26
Y - Ecc. X Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26
Load case Definition

Name Type Self Weight Multiplier Auto Load
Dead Dead 1
Live Live 0
wall Dead 0
EQx Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
EQy Seismic 0 IS1893 2002

Page 9
Load Calculations
A DEAD LOAD
. CALCULATION
1 Unit Weights of materials

kN/m
3
Brick masonry 19.2
kN/m
3
Screed 22
kN/m
3
Mosaic 22
kN/m
3
Marble 26.7
kN/m
3
Reinforced Concrete 24.5
kN/m
3
Cement plaster 20.4
Heights of Beams, Walls &

2 Parapet Walls
Depth of Beam in
Longitudinal Direction 0.23 m
Depth of Beam in Transverse

Direction 0.3 m
Height of Building 2.74 m
Height of Parapet Wall 0.5 m
3 Dead Loads of Walls

with
inside and
Dead load of 230 mm thick
outside
wall
11.08 plaster 25 1.28 KN/ Tot 12.3 KN/
a) 4 kN/m mm 0 m al 6 m
with
inside and
outside
wall with 40 % opening
plaster 25 0.89 KN/ Tot KN/
c) 6.650 kN/m mm 6 m al 7.55 m

Page 10
with
inside and
outside
wall
d plaster 12 1.28 KN/ Tot KN/
) 5.542 kN/m mm 0 m al 6.82 m
with
inside and
Dead Load of 115 mm wall
outside
(4") with 40% opening
plaster 25 1.28 KN/ Tot KN/
e) 3.325 kN/m mm 0 m al 4.61 m
with
inside and
Dead load of parapet wall of
outside
0.5m height
g plaster 25 KN/ Tot KN/
) 1.104 kN/m mm 0.26 m al 1.36 m
4 Floor Loads
Thickness of slab 0.125 m
Thickness of tile with plaster 0.020 m
Thickness of Marble 0.020 m
Thickness of Screed for
Marble 0.025 m
Thickness of Screed without
marble/tile 0.050 m
kN/m
Dead load of structural slab 3.063 2
kN/m
2
Dead load of Tile 0.440
kN/m
2
Dead load of Marble 0.534
Dead load of screed for kN/m
2
marble/tile 0.550
Dead load of screed without kN/m
2
marble 1.100
Dead load of light partition kN/m
2
walls 1.000
Take
for other than light partition
need to be calculated
Total dead load with
marble 5.147 5.200 kN/m2
Total dead load with tile 5.053 5.100 kN/m2
Total Dead load with only 4.16 4.200 kN/m2

Page 11
Screed
B
. Live Load Calculation
For Institutional Building
Floors
kN/m
2
Live load for Bed, living kN/m

2
Rooms etc. 2
Live load for Kitchen & kN/m
2
Dining Room 2
kN/m
2
Live load for Toilet Floors 2
Live load for corridor,
passage, staircase, balconies
floor 3
kN/m
2
Roof
KN/m access
Live Load for Roof 1.5 2 provided
access not
0.75 provided

Page 12
3 Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called Etabs 2016. It provides
the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze, design, and
optimize the structural elements in a building model.
The building geometry based on architectural drawings been generated using above named
software. The dead load, live load and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as
per standard code of practices. Several analysis run were performed to achieve the best
result to meet the design and service requirements.
3.1 Modeling of the building:
i. 3D view with beams and column Assignment

ii. Wall load assignment
iii. Dead load assignment
iv. Live load assignment

Page 13
3D view with beams and column Assignment

Page 14
Wall Load Assignment

Page 15
Dead Load Assignment

Page 16
Live Load Assignment

Page 17
Page 18
Analysis Results
1) Maximum Storey Drift: within the limit of 0.004
Load
Directio X Y Z
Story Case/Co Drift Label
n m m m
mbo
Story4 EQx 1 X 0.001047 39 2.105 2.665 10.9728
Story4 EQx 2 X 0.001032 39 2.105 2.665 10.9728
Story4 EQx 3 X 0.001062 39 2.105 2.665 10.9728
Story4 EQy 1 Y 0.000189 4 6.7056 6.1468 10.9728
Story4 EQy 2 Y 0.000202 4 6.7056 6.1468 10.9728
Story4 EQy 3 Y 0.000176 4 6.7056 6.1468 10.9728
Story3 EQx 1 X 0.00115 7 2.1082 0 8.2296
Story3 EQx 2 X 0.001103 7 2.1082 0 8.2296
Story3 EQx 3 X 0.001196 7 2.1082 0 8.2296
Story3 EQy 1 Y 0.000768 2 6.7056 0 8.2296
Story3 EQy 2 Y 0.000826 2 6.7056 0 8.2296
Story3 EQy 3 Y 0.000709 2 6.7056 0 8.2296
Story2 EQx 1 X 0.001162 7 2.1082 0 5.4864
Story2 EQx 2 X 0.001112 7 2.1082 0 5.4864
Story2 EQx 3 X 0.001212 7 2.1082 0 5.4864
Story2 EQy 1 Y 0.000856 4 6.7056 6.1468 5.4864
Story2 EQy 2 Y 0.000919 4 6.7056 6.1468 5.4864
Story2 EQy 3 Y 0.000793 4 6.7056 6.1468 5.4864
Story1 EQx 1 X 0.001112 7 2.1082 0 2.7432

Page 19
Story1 EQx 2 X 0.001063 7 2.1082 0 2.7432
Story1 EQx 3 X 0.001161 7 2.1082 0 2.7432
Story1 EQy 1 Y 0.000812 4 6.7056 6.1468 2.7432
Story1 EQy 2 Y 0.00087 4 6.7056 6.1468 2.7432
Story1 EQy 3 Y 0.000755 4 6.7056 6.1468 2.7432
2) Base Reactions
Load
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
Case/Comb
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
o
Dead -0.1257 1.5718 862.0225 2763.556 -3467.6552 3.3401
Live 1.4659 1.6709 249.8816 878.7491 -878.0569 -2.3399
Wall -0.1594 1.4223 990.6713 3330.289 -4372.4137 3.1462
EQx 1 -144.449 -5.1682 1.275E-05 42.8566 -979.4686 462.1103
EQx 2 -143.0907 -2.9705 1.312E-05 28.0074 -979.5903 492.5686
EQx 3 -145.8073 -7.3659 1.236E-05 57.7057 -979.3469 431.652
EQy 1 22.2572 -108.829 -4.378E-06 448.4618 -4.1964 -620.6386
EQy 2 20.9101 -111.0085 -4.754E-06 463.1883 -4.0758 -650.8452
EQy 3 23.6042 -106.6494 -4.013E-06 433.7354 -4.3171 -590.432
-
DCon1 -0.4276 4.4912 2779.0407 9140.7676 9.7296
11760.1034
-
DCon2 1.7712 6.9976 3153.8631 10458.8913 6.2197
13077.1888
-
DCon3 Max -170.2919 2.0334 2523.0905 8436.3599 596.0581
11636.9674
-
DCon3 Min -173.5519 -3.241 2523.0905 8400.7219 522.9581
11637.2594
DCon4 Max 176.3858 14.4371 2523.0905 8333.5041 -9286.2427 -513.0066
DCon4 Min 173.1258 9.1627 2523.0905 8297.8661 -9286.5347 -586.1066
-
DCon5 Max 29.742 -122.3813 2523.0905 8922.9389 -703.5427
10466.6419
-
DCon5 Min 26.509 -127.6121 2523.0905 8887.5955 -776.0385
10466.9316
-
DCon6 Max -23.6751 138.8082 2523.0905 7846.6305 785.9901
10456.5705
DCon6 Min -26.9081 133.5774 2523.0905 7811.2871 - 713.4942

Page 20
Load
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
Case/Comb
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
o
10456.8601
-
DCon7 Max -215.0637 0.0354 2779.0407 9227.3262 748.5825
13229.1238
-
DCon7 Min -219.1386 -6.5577 2779.0407 9182.7787 657.2075
13229.4889
DCon8 Max 218.2834 15.54 2779.0407 9098.7564 -10290.718 -637.7484
DCon8 Min 214.2085 8.947 2779.0407 9054.2089 -10291.083 -729.1233
DCon9 Max 34.9787 -155.4829 2779.0407 9835.55 -11766.217 -875.9185
-
DCon9 Min 30.9375 -162.0215 2779.0407 9791.3707 -966.5383
11766.5791
DCon10 -
-31.7927 171.0039 2779.0407 8490.1644 985.9974
Max 11753.6277
DCon10 -
-35.834 164.4653 2779.0407 8445.9852 895.3776
Min 11753.9898
DCon11
-214.8927 -1.7611 1667.4245 5571.0192 -8525.0824 744.6906
Max
DCon11
-218.9676 -8.3541 1667.4244 5526.4717 -8525.4475 653.3157
Min
DCon12
218.4544 13.7436 1667.4244 5442.4494 -5586.6766 -641.6402
Max
DCon12
214.3795 7.1505 1667.4244 5397.9019 -5587.0416 -733.0152
Min
DCon13
35.1498 -157.2794 1667.4244 6179.243 -7062.1757 -879.8103
Max
DCon13
31.1085 -163.818 1667.4244 6135.0637 -7062.5377 -970.4301
Min
DCon14
-31.6217 169.2074 1667.4244 4833.8574 -7049.5864 982.1056
Max
DCon14
-35.6629 162.6689 1667.4244 4789.6781 -7049.9484 891.4858
Min
3) Modal Mass Participation Ratios
Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 1 of 2)
Period Sum Sum

Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UZ
sec UX UY
Modal 1 0.563 0.7645 0.0407 0 0.7645 0.0407 0

Page 21
Period Sum Sum
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UZ
sec UX UY
Modal 2 0.504 0.0597 0.3565 0 0.8241 0.3972 0
Modal 3 0.167 0.0088 0.1368 0 0.8329 0.5341 0
Modal 4 0.143 0.0016 0.3534 0 0.8345 0.8874 0
Modal 5 0.094 0.0005 0.0351 0 0.835 0.9225 0
Modal 6 0.066 0.0828 0.0117 0 0.9178 0.9342 0
Modal 7 0.046 0.0024 0.0425 0 0.9202 0.9767 0
Modal 8 0.042 0.054 0.0014 0 0.9742 0.9781 0
Modal 9 0.037 0.0014 0.0209 0 0.9756 0.9989 0
Modal 10 0.021 0.0135 0.0008 0 0.9891 0.9997 0
Modal 11 0.018 0.0099 0.0002 0 0.999 0.9999 0
Modal 12 0.012 0.0009 0.0001 0 1 1 0
Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 2 of 2)
Case Mode RX RY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ

Modal 1 0.0114 0.2543 0.0253 0.0114 0.2543 0.0253
Modal 2 0.108 0.0707 0.4276 0.1194 0.325 0.4529
Modal 3 0.3114 0.0369 0.2349 0.4307 0.3619 0.6878
Modal 4 0.0007 0.0074 0.1339 0.4315 0.3693 0.8217
Modal 5 0.2539 0.0013 0.0677 0.6854 0.3706 0.8894
Modal 6 0.0216 0.3157 0.0169 0.707 0.6863 0.9062
Modal 7 0.1675 0.0091 0.006 0.8745 0.6954 0.9122
2.946E-
Modal 8 0.2062 0.0315 0.8746 0.9016 0.9438
05
Modal 9 0.1202 0.0052 0.0475 0.9948 0.9069 0.9913
Modal 10 0.0048 0.051 0.0076 0.9996 0.9578 0.999
4.185E-
Modal 11 0.0003 0.0383 0.9999 0.9962 0.999
05
Modal 12 0.0001 0.0037 0.001 1 0.9999 1

Page 22
Elevation view B-B Mode Shape (Modal)- Mode 1-Period 0.563

Page 23
Base View Restraint Reaction [Comb1](KN,KN-m)

Page 24
FORCE MOMENT DIAGRAMS
Axial Force (Envelope) (C-C)

Page 25
Shear Diagram 2-2 (Envelope)

Page 26
Moment Diagram 3-3 (Envelope)

Page 27
Design of Elements
The design of all structural elements is done using ‘Limit State Method’. All relevant Limit State is
considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability.
The design includes design for durability, construction and use in service should be considered as a
whole. The realization of design objectives requires compliance with clearly defined standards for
materials, production, workmanship, and also maintenance and use of structure in service.
This section includes all the design process of sample calculation for a single element as column,
beam, slab and foundation.
1) Design of Critical Column
Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story4 C4 37 Col 1'X1' DCon7 0 2743.2 1
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
300 300 60 30
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3 (Part 1 of 2)
Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm²

Page 28
Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm²
78.2576 -23.97 35.7033 1.5652 1.5652 1082
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3 (Part 2 of 2)
Rebar %
%
1.2
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major
2.260222 2443.2 12.6904 3.9774 1.5652
Bend(M3)
Minor
1.750254 2443.2 -8.634 2.385 1.5652
Bend(M2)
Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 26.8351 45.3251 28.8002 26.8351 332.53
Minor, Vu3 17.893 45.3251 28.8002 17.893 332.53
Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
900 10.8 1418.3046 339.966 78.2576 1
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 1 of 2)

Page 29
Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.891 300 18.407 12 Yes
Minor Bending (M2
Yes 0.891 300 14.254 12 Yes
)
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 2 of 2)

Ma
Moment (kN-m)
3.9774
2.385
2) Design of Critical Beam
Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Beam
Story1 B15 66 DCon8 25.4 4597.4 1
9''X12''
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
230 300 230 0 60 60
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Factored Forces and Moments

Page 30
Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-56.5429 0.4856 53.888 0.2385
Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-56.5429 0.6583 0 -57.2012
Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -57.2012 682 0 682 170
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 341 0 95 341
Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
67.2763 36.8411 33.8134 25.6193 390.42
Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
0.4856 53.888 130 200 350.41
Reinforcement Details along Grid B-B

Page 31
Reinforcement Details along Grid C-C

Page 32
Reinforcement Details Base (Z=0 m)

Page 33
Reinforcement Details Base (Z=2.74 m)

Page 34

Page 35

Page 36
Page 37
SAMPLE DESIGNS
1) Slab Design
2) Foundation Design
a) Design of Strap Footing

Page 38

Man Bahadur

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Man Bahadur

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LUMANTI SUPPORT GROUP FOR SHELTER

2.1 PROJECT INFORMATION

3.1 UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIAL

3.3 LOAD COMBINATION

4.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN

4.2 SLAB DESIGN

4.3 COLUMN DESIGN

4.4 BEAM DESIGN

4.5 STAIRCASE DESIGN

Structural Analysis Report

Reinforced Cement Concrete = 25 KN/m3

Cement Plaster/Screeding = 20.40 KN/m3

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Analysis Report

The Seismic Coefficient Method is generally applicable to building up to 40m height

given in IS: 1893 (part I): 2002 clause 6.4.2, figure 2

Structural Analysis Report

H = Total height of building in m in a direction perpendicular to the earthquake

Qi = Horizontal force acting at any floor

The following load combination were adopted for design:

1. 1.5 (DL+ LL)

Structural Analysis Report

4.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN

4.3 COLUMN DESIGN

Structural Analysis Report

4.4 BEAM DESIGN

4.5 STAIRCASE DESIGN

5. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

A.K Chopra Dynamics of Structure.

Structural Analysis Report

1. Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice – IS 456:2000

EARTHQUAKE LOAD CALCULATION

Type of soil = medium

Structural Analysis Report

Load Eccentricity Time Top Bottom Weight Base

X Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26

X + Ecc. Y Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26

X - Ecc. Y Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26

Y Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26

Y + Ecc. X Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26

Y - Ecc. X Seismic 5 0.452 Story 4 Base 1636.27 147.26

Load case Definition

Structural Analysis Report

1 Unit Weights of materials

Heights of Beams, Walls &

Depth of Beam in Transverse

Height of Parapet Wall 0.5 m

3 Dead Loads of Walls

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Analysis Report

Live load for Bed, living kN/m

Structural Analysis Report

optimize the structural elements in a building model.

result to meet the design and service requirements.

3.1 Modeling of the building:

i. 3D view with beams and column Assignment

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Analysis Report

1) Maximum Storey Drift: within the limit of 0.004

Story4 EQx 2 X 0.001032 39 2.105 2.665 10.9728

Story4 EQx 3 X 0.001062 39 2.105 2.665 10.9728