Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jamon Matson
Ever taken a walk down a hiking trail and seen a deer jump through the woods in the
distance, or heard birds chirping in the trees? Ever wondered how them and their land is so calm
and peaceful when the whole rest of the world is changing? Conservation efforts funded by
hunters is one of the main reasons they are there and their land has not changed. Many people
believe that hunting negatively impacts animals and their environment. It is actually the opposite,
hunting positively impacts both animals and us in more ways than we might think, whether it’s
through population control, research and habitat development funded by hunters or just being a
huge boost to the economy through the money and jobs created.
People have hunted for almost as long as mankind has been around. Hunting is an
essential part of who we are as humans. Some people hunt for food; others hunt for sport. People
try to claim that hunting is bad and there is no good that comes out of hunting. One of the biggest
arguments that people bring up when they try to argue against hunting is that it causes extinction.
An article from Sciencing talks about how hunting has caused around 23 percent of extinctions
(Turtenwald). That is the biggest cause of extinction. With all the new regulations and efforts put
forth from hunters, this isn’t very relevant to our recent era. There is a very small chance that we
are causing extinctions through hunting now, but most of the species that have gone extinct,
Matson, 2
where caused from over-hunting when there wasn’t much for hunting regulations. New
fast these days; we can better monitor a species and make sure that they don’t go extinct. With
all the new advances in technology and hunting we can keep up with populations of species and
when they become too low they limit or even ban hunting on that animal.
Hunting is one of those activities people take for granted. A lot of people hunt and don’t
even realize that they’re benefiting people and the animals by doing so. One of the most widely
known benefits of hunting is it’s uses for population control Also, when a species population gets
to large hunting can be used to keep the population at a good size so that the animals don't
overpopulate their habitat. Jennifer Bove in ThoughtCo. talks about how hunting can help
endangered animals, how people are opening their lands for hunting, which in turn, land owners
are more accepting of the animals on their property. Jennifer talks about how before, some of the
animals were considered a nuisance but now that the locals can make money from the hunting,
the land owners are allowing them to roam and live on their land (Bove). Through the locals
opening their land for the hunters, they made for more area for the animals to live and find food
which made so that the animals could support a larger population. This is just one way that
hunting helps animals that are otherwise running out of land to live on or going extinct from
other reasons.
Hunting can be used to manage the population and reproduction of a species. The
problem with letting animals just keep reproducing and there being more and more is that they
soon outgrow their food sources. This isn’t good and can cause a food shortage for the animals,
and in turn, will kill the animals because of lack of food or not enough space for them all.
Matson, 3
Imagine if there was no hunting and the populations of animals where not controlled. It would
end up with the land dying and animals dying because they have nothing to live on. An article
from ExtensionDaily talked about why we need to monitor deer populations. Meredith Johnson
talked about how when we don’t hunt deer and watch the population, they will get
overpopulated. This will make for fewer plants for the deer to eat because there are too many for
the area to be able to provide for. When that happens, both the animals and the land suffer
(Johnson). That is why controlling the population of animals is one way that hunting positively
impacts animals. Through using hunting as a population control for an animal species, we can
make sure that they stay at a healthy number that is still able to thrive and grow. When a species
gets to overpopulated, a state will sell more tags, a license or permission from the state to harvest
a specific animal species, which will lower the population back to a good amount. The opposite
is done when there is not enough of a species or a species is getting dangerously low. When this
happens, they will lower the number of hunting tags sold for that animal or shut it down all
together.
Another way hunting is used for population control is when an invasive species, a species
not native to the land it is in, is destroying crops or ruining an ecosystem that was once stable.
When this is required, a state will use hunting to try and get rid of that animal. One example is
hunting wild hogs, or also known as wild boars, in Texas. An article on Slate about wild boars
talked about how they are not native to the United States and are ruining the farmers land land.
(Landers). The wild boars dig up the earth to try and get food, which ruins the farmer’s lands and
does not let plants grow that other animals need to survive. If the wild boars are not dealt with,
they will just spread and destroy even more land. The wild boars don’t bring any benefit to the
farmers and need to be dealt with somehow. Hunting is used because it’s effective and doesn’t
Matson, 4
negatively effect the native animals. Hunting has been the largest and cheapest way for farmers
to get them off their fields and to try keep the population at bay. They reproduce so fast that
states have opened the limit on wild boars and now you can pretty much harvest as many as you
can get because they are so invasive (Landers). The wild boars are like normal pigs and have a
lot of babies at once that grow fast. This isn’t good because they are invasive and very harmful
for the farmer’s crops. It’s also very hard to get rid of an animal that reproduces very fast.
Hunting is very useful in this situation and critical to keeping the native animals and their
environment healthy.
By limiting the population of predators, we can also keep the deer population and other
animal populations from getting driven out of an area or killed off in a specific area. When we
don’t limit the population of the predators, the population of the other animals can become too
low, and then there has to be a limit on hunting for those animals. The predator/prey balance is
one that is very crucial and states usually have very specific limits on each for hunting to make
sure that it all does not go out of balance. One example of why people need to be able to hunt
predators is with coyotes and livestock. People hunt coyotes because they kill their livestock
which makes the farmers lose profit. Hunting is required for controlling the population of
predators to keep them out of our livestock. When predators get into our livestock, they can kill a
bunch of them which will make for less food and profit we can get out of them. An article on
How Stuff Works, says “65 percent of all cattle and calf losses in 2000 were attributed to
coyotes” (Edmonds). With that high a number of cattle being lost to predators, which is
something we can easy keep track of and prevent. Controlling the population of predators, is the
easiest and most effect way to make sure the cattle can stay healthy and don’t get killed off.
Keeping the population of the coyotes from growing out of hand, can help save the farmers cattle
Matson, 5
and make for a more profitable year and helps the farmer and also other prey animals because it
lets more of them be around and increases the population of the prey animals.
The funds from hunting is one of the main ways that science can be used to better
improve animal’s habitats and research into ways to help different species. Hunters spend
billions of dollars every year on everything they need from guns, hunting tags, equipment, and
more. A magazine called Hunting in America: An Economic Force for Conservation gives a lot
of good data on how much money spent by hunters is put into animal conservation. It says
“hunters contribute over $1.6 billion annually to conservation” (Allen 6). That’s a lot of money,
and that’s just in one year. That shows that hunting is one of the largest funding’s for research
for conservation. This money then gets spent by the states to regrow habitats, or fund research
into a disease a species may be having. There are so many ways that the money spent is put back
Hunting creates a large amount of money for states. A lot of states are putting the money
back into the state and helping out the animals and their habitat. Wildlife refuges is one way that
the money from hunters is being spent. Wildlife refuges create a specific area for animals to
thrive in and create their homes. With all the new big cities that keep growing, it is making a lot
less land for the animals to live in. With a wildlife refuge, they have a designated area that
cannot be taken over by houses and is kept there for animals. There are many wildlife refuges all
across the United States. Wildlife refuges provide an area for both animals to live and people to
hunt at. With the creation of wildlife refuges, it also makes for more jobs
Not only does the money that hunters spend help the animals and the land they live in,
but the money can also helps us out. People in the United States spend a quite a bit of money
Matson, 6
every year on everything having to do with hunting. Most hunting equipment cost a lot of money
and there’s quite a few things that are needed for a hunting trip also. So, when people go hunting,
they spend a lot of money, which can help out the economy. On OutsideOnline, there is an article
about how much Americans alone spend on hunting and fishing. They claim Americans spent
around $145 billion dollars on both hunting and fishing (Spring). That makes hunting one of the
largest industries in the United States and helps everyone not just hunters. Hunting puts money
into the economy which makes more people want to get into the industry and can also create
jobs.
Another way that hunting helps humans is by creating jobs. There’s a lot of things
hunters buy for hunting. Guns, camping gear, food, gas, and a lot more. With all the purchases
that come with hunting, it creates a lot of jobs. According to stats on an article from NSSF.
“Hunting supports more than 680,000 jobs each year in the United States” (Allen 4). 680,000
jobs are about the amount as the population of a small city. New jobs are always good for the
economy because it means that more people are working and getting money.
A lot of the jobs that are funded from hunting are with the Department of Wildlife. The
money from hunting is spent by the states to keep our forests and public lands open and running
smoothly. The United States Department of Fish and Wildlife (USDFW) is the United States
main department specifically created to oversee all public lands and keep the wildlife and their
lands healthy. An interview with James Matson, a lifelong hunter and hunter safety teacher who
spends a lot of time working with Washington’s Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFS) talked
about his experience of what the WDFS does. He talked about how each state has their own sub
group that runs that states lands. These departments are funded through hunting (Matson). An
Matson, 7
article on TheAlternativeDaily stated “Ninety percent of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife
Commission’s revenue comes from hunting licenses” (Carey). By hunters funding the states
wildlife and parks groups, it creates a loop where hunters help the states and the states help the
hunters. Most states are the same way, with almost all their funding coming from hunting and
fishing license sales (Allen 5). People believe that the sales of these license go to the state to help
fund all different state projects like roads and bridges but that’s not true. The money spent on
these licenses goes right back into improving the very thing the hunters are spending their money
on, the land and the animals through the parks and animal conservation programs.
Outside of the United States, people use hunting to increase their economy and help
endangered animals. One way they do that is through trophy hunting, hunting high prized
animals. It is probably the most controversial part of hunting and something people are arguing
over all the time. People say there’s no way that killing endangered animals can help save them.
An article on Anthropocene talks about “the fees derived from legalized trophy hunting can fund
important conservation efforts on the ground” (Goldman). The way it’s done is by selling special
tags to people for a specific animal, whether it’s a lion, an elephant, pretty much any exotic
animal. The tags usually cost a lot of money and the money that is spent on the tag goes into
funding to help save the animals with research and development of habits for the animals to
thrive in. Usually the animals that are picked for the trophy hunters are ones that are getting to
old to reproduce, or some other reason for them to be unfit for benefiting the species (Goldman).
By picking animals that cannot reproduce or are slowly dying anyway, it doesn’t affect the
species much and creates a large revenue for the area. Some of the revenue can go back into
helping the rest of the species. This leaves the healthy animals to thrive and grow the species
even more.
Matson, 8
Trophy hunting is used to boost the economy in foreign countries through the sale of tags
and the jobs that the hunt creates. When they sell the hunting tags, a lot of different people get
shares of the paycheck. Trophy hunting can be very helpful for the locals of the area that the hunt
is at. Trophy hunting can help the people living there a lot just through the jobs and money it
provides them. According to Jason Goldman from Anthropocene, the locals can be hired to help
which creates jobs (Goldman). When the locals can help, it gives them a job and they can get
paid for their work. He also said that one trophy hunt can make them more money than twelve
tourists can (Goldman). Just one trophy hunt can help a small village and brings in a lot of
revenue and boost the economy in that area more than tourism.
Trophy hunting can also provide people with food. Most of the people that trophy hunt,
hunt for the trophy of the animal, hence the name. A journal article from PLOS ONE, talks about
the benefits of trophy hunting for the small villages in the area. One of the largest benefits is that
it provides meat for the rural communities (White and Belant 2). With the larger animals like an
elephant, the hunter most likely won’t take all the meat with them because there’s just so much
of it. The small villages can benefit from this because it gives them a lot of meat for food and can
supply a lot of the village. According to White and Belant, the “estimated 129,771 kg’s of fresh
game meat for 2013-2014” (White and Belant 1). That is about 143 US tons of meat, which is a
lot of meat to supply the small villages for a while during their food shortages. Without the
trophy hunting, the animals might be hunted illegally for food and then they’re not as useful
Hunting can also be great because it provides people with food. There is a very large
number of people who hunt in the United States, myself included. According to OutsideOnline
Matson, 9
and NSSF there was an estimated 13.7 million people who hunted in 2011 (Allen 5) (Spring).
With that many people hunting and a lot of them harvesting animals, hunting helps a lot of
people out with providing food for them. The best part of harvesting an animal is knowing
exactly where the food is coming from instead of going to a store and having no clue what they
There is no doubt about it that hunting brings a greater appreciation for animals and their
environment, which in turn, makes them more likely to help keep their population and the land
healthy. I am an avid hunter and have always liked animals. I hunt to help feed my family and
because I find it enjoyable. Whenever I go on a hunting trip I am going through the woods and
marvel at how amazing it is. I see the animals and hear the birds chirping in the trees and I know
that I never want to see that go away. While interviewing James, he talked about how people are
always coming back with their kids to the hunter safety classes because they want to get their
kids out there show that what it’s like (Matson). You must go through a hunter safety class
before you can hunt and use a rifle. With the people experiencing the hunt and wanting to help
and make sure that the tradition lives on. This is good because without hunters bringing in and
raising up their kids to hunt, the tradition would die out and we would have a lot of problems
I know from personal experience, that going hunting increases a person’s want to protect
the area and help improve it in the best way possible. John Pauley wrote a great article titled
“The Value of Hunting”. In the article, he talks about how hunting brings one closer the animals
(Pauley). When out hunting, and connecting to the animals, there is a greater connection because
one witnesses a lot more than if they just went to a zoo, for instance. Also, when seeing how
Matson, 10
truly amazing they are, it gives a person a greater appreciation and drive to keep the animals
In the end, there will always be people who are against hunting. That doesn’t mean that
it’s totally unethical and there is no reason it should ever be done. Hunting can positively impact
the animals and their habitat by controlling the population of animals, funding research to further
improve their environment, and by just bring you closer to nature, which in turn, makes you
more aware and likely to help improve their habitats. Also, hunting helps people too by boosting
the economy and providing food. A lot of times hunting is criticized by people who say that
there’s nothing good that can come out of it, but that’s just not true. There will always be people
the people that don’t agree with hunting and think that it should never be allowed, but hunting is
a crucial part of keeping us and the animals thriving. So, the next time out taking a hike, look
around at the beauty of it all and thank a hunter for their efforts in helping keep that area nice.
Matson, 11
Work cited
Allen, Tom, Et Al “Hunting in America: An Economic Force for Conservation” NSSF, (2011):
Bove, Jennifer. “Can Hunting Help Save Endangered Species?” ThoughtCo. (2017, March 28):
Carey, Ian. “Is It Okay to Kill Bears and Mountain Lions to Save Deer?” TheAlternativeDaily,
Edmonds, Molly. “How Predator Hunting Works” HowStuffWorks, (2008, December 12): Web.
19 June, 2017.
Goldman, Jason G. “What’s the Price to Pay for Banning Trophy Hunting in Africa?”
Johnson, Maredith. “Oh Deer: The Benefits of Hunting.” ExtensionDaily. (2015, November 16):
Landers, Jackson. “Want to Help the Environment? Go Shoot a Pig.” Slate, (2012, August 9)
Pauley, John A. “The Value of Hunting.” Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (2003): 233-244.
Spring, Joe. “Americans Spent a Lot of Money on Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife Watching in
Turtenwald, Kimberly. “How Does Hunting Effect the Environment?” Sciencing, (No Date):
White, Paula A., and Belant, Jerrold L. “Provisioning of Game Meat to Rural Communities as a
Benefit of Sport Hunting in Zambia.” PLOS ONE, (2015, February 18): EBSCOhost. 19
June, 2017.