Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
The main objective of power system is to generate power and distribute among the
different utilization points with high quality, reliability, and safety at passable econ-
omy. In deregulated power system, generation, transmission, and distributions are
responsible for economical and reliable operation of power system. Over the past,
utilities are less bothered about the reliability of distribution system, because of low
economical benefit as compared to generation and transmission. Therefore, 90% of
V. S. Bhadoria · N. S. Pal
Department of Electrical Engineering, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, India
e-mail: vikasbhadoria@gmail.com
N. S. Pal
e-mail: nidhi@gbu.ac.in
V. Shrivastava
Department of Electrical Engineering UEC, RTU, Kota, India
e-mail: shvivek@gmail.com
S. P. Jaiswal (B)
Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics Engineering,
Sharda University, Greater Noida, UP, India
e-mail: shivajaiswal@gmail.com
customer’s services are affected due to failure in distribution system [1]. Customers
are compelled to face permanent load shedding, momentarily load shedding, or volt-
age sag due to the fault. But competitive market of power forced utilities to satisfy
customer requirements by enhancing system adequacy and security. To minimize gap
between demand and supply of electricity, it is necessary for power industry to inte-
grate some equipment for loss minimization, reactive power compensation, power
quality improvement, enhancement of voltage profile, and cost reduction with high
level of customer’s satisfaction. Distribution systems have high I 2 R (up to 13%)
as compared to transmission line because of loss, low voltage, and high current.
The main problems of power utilities are high difference between peak load and
valley load, perverse network structure, lack of reactive power compensation, and
poor voltage regulation [2]. Reactive component of current in distribution network
causes energy loss, voltage drop, and low power transfer capability of lines. In lit-
erature, numbers of techniques are available to counter the above problems such as
distributed generation [3], Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices [4],
network reconfiguration, load balance, On Load Tap Changer (OLTC), generator
power factor control, power curtailment, energy storage, active filters, shun reactor
and capacitor bank [5]. Losses in distribution systems, which are about 33.7–64.9%
of the whole power system loss and poor power quality, are major problems. Higher
losses result in low transfer capability of line by limiting the thermal limits and volt-
age limits. To improve the reliability and minimize the energy loss, capacitor bank
is one of the best solutions for utilities. Capacitors are capable to reduce energy loss,
voltage correction with low investment as compared to other technique. Capacitors
are appearing to be a simple device which consist of two metal sheets separated by
a dielectric insulating material with no moving part. Actually, the power capacitor
is a complex device and technically developed with sophisticated manufacturing
technique. Power capacitors use very thin dielectric materials which are capable to
handle very high electric stresses. Due to the tremendous improvement in dielec-
tric material, capacitor size increases from 15–25 KVAR to 200–300 KVAR range.
Power capacitor manufacturers use all-film technology, which is more efficient than
previous Kraft paper base capacitors [6]. Inappropriate selection of size and location
of capacitor lead to uneconomical system and even imperil protection of distribution
system. Various capacitor fixing methodologies are available in the literature such
as analytical method which use mathematical model to find the suitable location and
size of capacitor, numerical method based on iterative methods, genetic-based tech-
nique, heuristic method, artificial intelligence, and fuzzy logic [7]. The aim of this
paper is to find the suitable size and location of capacitor using iterative technique
[8]. Objective function is to minimize the total line loss and voltage profile improve-
ment by reactive power optimization. Authors firstly minimize energy losses, and
then, it is shown that reliability indices of system are also improved.
Optimal Sitting and Sizing of Capacitor Using Iterative Search … 125
2 Problem Formulation
n
Si Pi + j Q i Vi Yik∗ Vk∗ (1)
k1
n
Si |Vi ||Vk |e jθik (G ik − j Bik ) (2)
k1
n
Si |Vi ||Vk |(cos θik + j sin θik )(G ik − j Bik ) (3)
k1
n
Pi PGi − PDi |Vi ||Vk |(G ik cos θik + Bik sin θik ) (4)
k1
n
Q i Q Gi − Q Di |Vi ||Vk |(G ik cos θik − Bik sin θik ) (5)
k1
The active and reactive loss in a line between the busses can be calculated by
Pm2 + Q 2m
Ploss (i.k) × Rm (6)
|Vi − Vk |2
P 2 + Q 2m
Q loss (i.k) m × Xm (7)
|Vi − Vk |2
From Eqs. (6) and (7), active and reactive loss of the system is equal to the addition
of all line power loss and given by
n
PT,loss Ploss (i, k) (8)
k1
n
Q T,loss Q loss (i, k) (9)
k1
Objective Function
In this paper, iterative method is used to find the optimal location and optimum size
of capacitor and objective is to minimize total losses. The mathematical expression
of objective function is given by
Minimize( f ) min ST,loss (11)
Reliability Indices
In this paper, a 34-bus radial distribution system is taken as a test case. Line data and
bus data as well as data required to calculate reliability indices, such as numbers of
customer, failure rate, and repair rate of each component, etc., are taken from [10].
Table 1 demonstrates the results of the iterative technique. From results, it is clear
that installation of 3.3 MVAR capacitor with failure rare 0.1156 f/year and repair rate
3 h at bus number 8 will result in 23% loss reduction and significance improvement
of reliability indices.
Optimal Sitting and Sizing of Capacitor Using Iterative Search … 127
0.16
Without capacitor
0.14
With capacitor
0.12
Line Losses (MW)
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
Line Number
Fig. 1 Active power losses in each line with and without capacitor
0.03
Without capacitor
With capacitor
0.025
Line Losses (MVAR)
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
Line Number
Fig. 2 Reactive power losses in each line with and without capacitor
Figures 1 and 2 show that active and reactive power loss in each line is significantly
reduced by addition of capacitor; i.e., transfer capability of lines is also enhanced.
Installation of capacitor will also improve the voltage profile of the system. Voltage
profile of the system with and without capacitor is shown in Fig. 3.
128 V. S. Bhadoria et al.
1
Without Capacitor
0.99 With Capacitor
0.98
0.97
Voltage (pu)
0.96
0.95
0.94
0.93
0.92
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 3334
Bus Number
4 Conclusion
An iterative technique is used for the size and location optimization of capacitor in
34-bus distribution system. Results show the effectiveness of the algorithm. Improve-
ment in SAIDI and SAIFI shows that optimal installation of capacitor also improves
the overall reliability of the system. Although voltage parameter is not included in the
objective function during the optimization process, still this installation enhances the
voltage profile of the system. Overall, it can be concluded that optimum installation
of capacitor not only reduces the system losses but it enhances the reliability and
voltage profile of the system.
References
1. Esmaeilian, H., Darijany, O., Mohammadian, M.: Optimal placement and sizing of DGs and
capacitors simultaneously in radial distribution networks based on voltage stability security
margin. Turk. J. Elect. Eng. Comp. Sci. 1–14 (2014)
2. Mohammad, A., Masoum, S., Ladjevardi, M., Jafarian, A., Fuchs, E.F.: Optimal placement,
replacement and sizing of capacitor banks in distorted distribution networks by genetic algo-
rithms. IEEE Trans. Power Del. 19(4), 1794–1801 (2004)
3. Bhadoria, V.S., Pal, N.S., Shrivastava, V.: Installation of DG for Optimal Demand Compensa-
tion, ICICT, pp. 821–824 (2014)
Optimal Sitting and Sizing of Capacitor Using Iterative Search … 129
4. Jaiswal, S.P., Shrivastava, V.: Allocation of UPFC in distribution systems to minimize the
losses. In Computational Intelligence on Power, Energy and Controls With Their Impact on
Humanity (CIPECH), IEEE, pp. 202–205 (2014)
5. Chung-Fu, C.: Reconfiguration and capacitor placement for loss reduction of distribution sys-
tems by ant colony search algorithm. IEEE Trans. Power Sys. 23(4), 1747–1755 (2008)
6. Gonen, Y.: Application of capacitors to distribution systems (Chap. 8). In: Electric Power
Distribution System Engineering 2nd edn, pp. 371–493, CRC press (2007)
7. Da Silva, I.C., Carneiro, S., Sandoval, J., de Oliveira, E.J., de Souza, Costa J., Pereira, J.L.R.,
et al.: A heuristic constructive algorithm for capacitor placement on distribution systems. IEEE
Trans. Power Sys. 23(4), 1619–1626 (2008)
8. Bhadoria, V.S., Pal, N.S., Shrivastava, V.: Comparison of analytical and heuristic techniques
for multi-objective optimization in power system (Chap. 13). In Saxena, P., Singh, D., Pant, M.
(eds) Problem Solving and Uncertainty Modeling Through Optimization and Soft Computing
Applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global (2016). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9885-7.ch013
9. Billinton, R., Allan, R.N.: Distribution systems: basic techniques and radial networks (Chap. 7).
In: Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, 2nd edn, pp. 220–246. Plenum Press, New York,
London (1996)
10. Kumar, D., Samantaray, S.R., Kamwa, I., Sahoo, N.C.: Reliability-constrained based optimal
placement and sizing of multiple distributed generators in power distribution network using
cat swarm optimization. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 42(2), 149–164 (2014). https://doi.org/
10.1080/15325008.2013.853215