You are on page 1of 7

Kinetics of the Gas-Phase Reaction Between Nitric Oxide.

Ammonia and Oxygen


W. DUO', K . DAM-JOHANSEN' and K. fiSTERGAARD
Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 229, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark
For the purpose of developing a simple and quantitativedescription of the rate of reactions occurring in the Thermal
DeNOx process, the kinetics of the homogeneous reaction between NO and NH, with excess of O2 has been studied
in an isothermal plug flow reactor.
Temperature windows of NO reduction were observed with the optimum temperature decreasing with increasing resi-
dence time. The degree of reduction of NO increases with residence time at lower temperatures but is sensitive to resi-
dence time only at very short residence times at higher temperatures. The degree of conversion of N H I increases with
both temperature and residence time.
A simple model has been proposed to describe the reaction rates:
NO = k,,, "41 - k,- "H,I "01

~ N H ,= -k,,, "H31 - k,. "H,I "01


The two rate constants in the model were estimated based on the experimental data obtained in the present plug flow
reactor at about 4% (vol.) oxygen:
k,,, = (2.21 5 0.33) x 10'' exp (-(38160 +_ 1 7 0 ) / T ] ,I/s

k,. = (2.45 F 0.49) x exp { -(29400 k 2 5 0 ) i T ) . mT/mol . s


It is verified that the kinetic model can give a satisfactory prediction of the experimental results under different conditions.

Afin de mettre au point un modele de description simple et quantitatif de la vitesse des reactions survenant dans le
processus thermique DeNOx, on a ktudit la rkaction homogkne entre NO et NH, avec exces de 0: dans un rkacteur
a Ccoulement piston isotherme.
Les gammes de temperatures pour la rkduction du NO ont i t 6 observees, et on a constate que la temperature optiniale
diminuait avec I'augmentation du temps de sejour. Le degre de reduction du NO augmente avec le temps de sejour
aux tem$ratures infkrieures mais cette sensibilitk s'observe seulernent h des temps de sejour trks courts et des temphtures
klevees. Le degre de conversion du NH, augmente a la fois avec la tenipkrature et le temps de se.jour.
On propose un modkle simple pour decrire les vitesses de reaction:
rNO = k,,, "H,I - k,. "H,I "01

rNH, = -k,,, "Hjl - k,- "H3I


"01
Les deux constantes de vitesse du modkle ont i t 6 estimees B partir des donntes experimentalesobtenues avec le rkacteur
icoulement piston utilisi ici B environ 4% (volume) d'oxygkne:
k,>, = (2.21 0,33) x 10'' exp { -(38160 170)/Tj, 11s

k, = (2,45 _+ 0.49) X 10" exp -(29400 k 250)/T], m'/mol .s


On a pu dklnontrer que le modkle cinetique peut predire de manikre satisfaisante les resultats expkrimentaux dan:,
di ffkrentes conditions.

Keywords: gas-phase reaction, nitric oxide, ammonia, kinetic model.

quantities of ammonia (NH3) to the combustion products.


T he emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from stationary
combustion installations such as utility boilers are
important sources of air pollution and need to be controlled.
This process could rapidly and efficiently reduce nitric oxide
(NO) to nitrogen (N2) and water (H20) around 1250 K.
The conventional control techniques entail combustion Since then a number of investigations have been published
modifications to limit the formation of NOx. An alternative, in this field, including experimental observations with
and more effective recipe for a low emission of NOx espe- different flow reactors and mathematical niodelling (Muzio.
cially for a coal-fired system, is flue gas treatment to remove et al., 1977; Lyon and Benn, 1978; Lucas and Brown. 1982;
NOx already formed. For a practical combustion system Dean et al., 1982; Kimball-Linne and Hanson. 1986; Miller
which operates with excess oxygen (02) selective reduction and Bowman, 1989).
of NOx is desired. Thus, the Selective Catalytic Reduction Simple kinetic models were proposed based on the overall
(SCR) of NOx and Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNR) reaction (Lyon and Benn, 1978; Fenimore, 1980), while
of NOx have received much attention. complex models were based on detailed elementary reactions
Lyon (1976) discovered that the SNR reaction could occur (Kimball-Linne and Hanson, 1986; Dean et al., 1982; Miller
in the presence of excess O2 by the addition of small et al., 1981; Branch et al., 1982).
A kinetic model based on elementary reactions is theoret-
ically more tenable. In principle, a mechanism should incor-
'Current address: Department of Cheniical and Process Engineering.
U;ivcrsity of Surrey, Guildford. Surrey GU2 5XH. UK. porate all elementary reactions possibly occurring in the
-To whom correspondence should be addressed. +
system. For the system NH3 + NO 02.reaction schemes

I014 THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING. VOLUME 70. OCTOBER. 1992
published are complex. For example, the models of Miller
et al. ( 1983) and Miller and Bowman (1989) contained 98
and 73 chain radical reactions, respectively. It has been 2
difficult to use those models since the rate constants of many
reactions incorporated are not available.
The simplification of a mechanism is often done through
sensitivity analysis by selecting the most significant reactions
(Dean et al., 1982; Branch et al., 1982; Kimball-Linne and
Hanson, 1986). The simplified mechanisms are different
from each other in how many reactions and which reactions
are selected. Unfortunately, the reactions with unknown rate
constants were found to be significant and the modelling
results were sensitive to their values.
In the model of Miller et al. (1981) the values of the
unknown rate constants were estimated on purely theoret-
ical grounds. However, that is only a qualitative and explana-
tory model (Miller et al., 1981; Lyon, 1987; Duo et al.,
1990b). The model of Dean et al. (1982) has been demon- 5
-24.0

strated to be more predictive (Duo et al., 1990b), although


it is a semi-empirical model in which the rate constants of
a: Reactor design b Temperature profile
reactions that are uncertain and sensitive were adjusted to
fit the experimental data. Figure I - Reactor design and temperature profile along the reactor
A kinetic model based on the overall reactions is mainly a: Reactor design. I . flow reactor (tube); 2 . main stream inlet: 3.
empirical but perhaps more useful for quantitative predic- four injectors; 4. preheating zone; 5. outlet (tube) for reacted gases:
tions, since it is simpler and easier to be combined with flow 6. cooling zone; 7 . small extension (nozzle); 8. thermocouple: 9.
and transportation models. Based on the experimental results neck of the vessel; 10. cooling gas inlet; I I . preheating zone: b:
for [ NH3]; > > [NO] !, Lyon and Benn (1978) found that Temperature profile.
the rate of NO reduction was related to [NO] in first order
and to [NH3] in half order. However, the values of The upper end of the reactor tube is open and serves as inlet
P ( = [ NH3] ; / [NO] ;) they used were much higher than for the preheated gas mixture. Above the reactor tube there
those practically required by the SNR process. Furthermore, are four injectors (3) which are joined together just above
that study only covered the lower part of the temperature the open end of the reactor tube to form a small extension
range of interest for the SNR process. (7) inserted into the mouth of the reactor tube. The end of
Fenimore (1980) observed a critical concentration of NO, the extension is closed but on its side wall there are several
[NO] (..He proposed that the ratio of [NO] to [OH] was small holes. In this design the gas streams from the preheating
equal to the ratio of oxidation rate to reduction rate. An zone and the injectors, respectively. meet at the entrance to
integral form of the kinetics of the reactions was deduced the reactor tube in crossflow with high velocities due to the
by assuming the above ratio was 10 k 5 and was indepen- narrowed gas paths. It is expected that strong turbulence
dent of reaction time. Although that relation covered a wide should occur in the region and complete mixing be obtained.
temperature range it did not clearly demonstrate any tem- The vessel was housed in a three zone controlled electri-
perature dependency of [NO] <, nor of [NO] / [OH I . cally heated oven. A uniform temperature profile (within
In the present study, the kinetics of the homogeneous reac- 5°C) in the reaction zone was attained, as typically shown
tion between NO and NH3 in the presence of excess 0 2 is in Figure 1b. The ordinate axis in Figure 1 is common to
investigated in an isothermal plug flow reactor over the tem- a and b.
perature range of interest for the SNR process. The main NO and O2 were measured on line by Hartmann & Braun
purpose of the study is to develop a simple, quantitative gas analyzers, Radas 1G utilizing the UV resonance absorp-
description of the rate of the reaction. tion principle and Magnos 3 utilizing the paramagnetic nature
of O2 respectively (accuracy +_2%).A batch chemical
Experimental method was used to determine NH3 concentration. Samples
were collected by bubbling the gas mixture to be analyzed
The experimental equipment and procedures have been through distilled water and the measurement was performed
described previously (Duo, 1990; Duo et al., 1989), and only with a Tecator flow injection analyzer (FIAstar 5020). the
a brief description will be given here. Reaction gas mixtures accuracy of which is +2%. The analysis is based on the reac-
were compounded using pure (N2, 02)and mixture tions NH; + +
OH- = NH3(g) H 2 0 and NHI + HI =
(NO/N2, NH3/N2) cylinder gases. N2, as diluent, and 0 2 NH: +
I - occurring, respectively, in two streams of
were mixed before they were introduced into the reactor aqueous solutions separated by a gas (NH,) permeable
through the main stream inlet (2 in Figure la). NH3 and NO membrane. A colour shift is measured photometrically.
were separately injected through the in,jectors(3 in Figure la) Measured NH:, concentrations were normally about 5 O/c
on the top of the reactor. lower than calculated based on the concentration of NH3 in
The design of the quartz flow reactor is shown in the gas cylinder.
Figure la. Reactions proceed in the reactor tube (1) of inside Experiments were carried out at different temperatures in
diameter 0.51 cm and length 13.5 cm. The inside diameter the range between 1140 and 1335 K at the constant initial
of the outlet tube (5) is 0.19 cm. Outside the reactor tube concentrations of 5.16 X mol/ni3 of NO.
which is located at the centerline of the overall vessel is 8.45 x lo-' mol/m' of NH3 and 0.405 mob? of 0:. The
annular space (4) for preheating the mixture of N2 + 0 2 . volume fractions vary (as mass flow rates of the dilucnt gas.

THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, VOLUME 70. OCTOBER. 1992 101s
* * * * * t=0.039 s
s ..=.. t=0.102 s
tz0.151
0 0 ~ 0 0
AAAA ty0.227
s
S

0.80
1.oo

0.75 0.60

0 6
0.50 0.40
0 0
z z

0.25
0.20

0.00
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400
t, s T. K
Figure 2 - Variation of NO reduction with residence time Figure 4 - Variation of NO reduction with temperature
Inlet (mol/m3):NO, 5.15 x lo-,; NH,, 8.45 x O,, 0.405. Inlet (mol/m3):NO, 5.15 X lo-'; NH,. 8.45 X 10 j; 0,. 0.405.

* * * * * T=1142 K Symbols:
OOOOO T=1190 K experimental to zero. The lines in these figures are the results calculated
mmmm. T=1235 K Lines: based on the present kinetic model which is to be shown.
It is seen that both the NO reduction rate and NH, con-
1.oo
version rate are markedly dependent on temperature. At
lower temperatures a heavy NH3 breakthrough occurs even
for a residence time as long as 0.23 s. NH3 conversion rate
0.75 increases with temperature. At very high temperatures no
NH3 breakthrough is observed.
6 A series of curves, or temperature windows. of NO reduc-
0.50 tion by NH3 with excess O2 were observed in the prcscnt
2z
study as shown in Figure 4 in which each curve is only a
function of temperature, holding the residence time and the
0.25 initial molar concentrations of the reactants constant, while
their initial volume fractions for each curve vary with tem-
0.00
- peratures. This is of significance since kinetics of a reaction
I- I I I I I i m l l l I IisInormally expressed in terms of molar concentrations rather
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 than volume fractions.
t, s Similar temperature windows were also demonstrated in
Figure 3 - Variation of NH, conversion with residence time other investigations (Muzio et al., 1977; Lucas and Brown.
Inlet (mol/m3):NO, 5.15 x 10-j; NH,, 8.45 x O,, 0.405. 1982; Duo et al., 1989). As mentioned earlier, however. in
those previous experiments the total mass flow rates of gas
N,, were adjusted) with temperature, corresponding to 507 mixtures and the volume fractions of the reactant species were
ppmv NO, 830 ppmv NH, and 4.1% (vol.) O2 at 1235 K. held constant. Consequently, both molar concentrations of
The residence times in the experiments varied between 0.039 reactants and residence times were changed when the tem-
and 0.227 s at each temperature. This procedure is different perature varied. This means that each temperature window
from that employed by previous studies (Muzio et al., 1977; in those illustrations was a function of temperature, residence
Lucas and Brown, 1982; Duo et al., 1989) in which the mass time and initial molar concentrations of the reactants.
flow rates of all the components (including inerts like N2) With the present experimental procedure the comparison
of the reaction gas mixtures were kept constant while of experimental results under different conditions is
changing temperatures. facilitated.
It is seen from Figure 4 that the optimum temperatures
Results are decreased and the maximum degrees of NO reduction
are increased as residence time is prolonged. Comparison
The fraction of NO remaining after reaction, y l of Figure 3 and Figure 4 may lead to a conclusion that a
(= [NO] / [NO J ;), and the fraction of NH, breakthrough, longer residence time shifts both the optimum reduction tem-
y2 ( = [NH3] I [NH,] ;), as a function of residence time are perature of NO and the complete conversion temperature of
shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. At lower tem- NH3 downwards to the same extent.
peratures, the degree of NO reduction, 1 - y I , and the Figure 4 also demonstrates that the variation of residence
degree of NH3 conversion, 1 - y2, increase with residence time results in a significant change of the degree of NO reduc-
time, whereas at high temperatures they are sensitive to resi- tion only up to the optimum temperature above which the
dence time only at very short residence times beyond which reduction curves at shorter residence times tend to join those
[NO] remains at a constant value and [NH3] approaches at longer residence times. At sufficiently high temperatures

1016 THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING. V O L U M E 70. OCTOBE3l. I902


all the curves are merged into one line which may be consi-
dered as the asymptote of NO reduction for the value of 6 * * * * * Estimated, k,,, s-'
Arrhenius correlation, k,,
used.
OCOOO Estimated, k,, m3 mol-' s - '
.._._
Arrhenius correlation, k,
The kinetic model 5.0

As generally accepted by many investigators (Lyon and


Benn, 1978; Rosenberg et al., 1980), the overall reactions
occurring in the SNR process may be described as two com- 3.0 4 \ 111.0
petitive (for NH3) or successive (for NO) reactions:

+ NO + 114 0 2 - N2 + 3/2 H20 . . . . . . . (1)


1 ,I
NHJ

NH3 + 5/40 2 -..NO + 3/2 H20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) I , , , , , ,,, , - , y > : , , , ,, , ,


-1.0 0.
7.0
Referring to the above reactions, a power law model is used
7.0 7.5 8.0 5 9.0 9.5
to describe the reaction kinetics. It is assumed that the reverse 10'xl/T, K-
of reactions (1) and (2) is negligible in the temperature range
concerned. Oxygen is present in the system in great excess Figure 5 - Dependencies of k,,, and k, on temperature
and its concentration must be constant during the process of
reaction. As a first approximation, further assume first order that the Arrhenius law may be used to describe the tempera-
oxidation of NH3 to NO and second order reduction of NO ture dependencies of the reaction rate coefficients, i.e.
to N2 which as shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 gives a good
data fit. Thus, a simple kinetic model describing the rates k, = Al . exp ( - E l IRT) lis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6)
of the gas phase reactions is obtained.
k, = A2 . exp ( - E 2 / R n m3/moI . s . . . . . . . . . . (7)
TNO = k, [NH3] - k, [NH3] [NO] . . . . . . . . . . . (3) The values of parameters A , , A2. E , and Ez may be obtained
from the data in Figure 5. Alternatively, the four parameters
may also be estimated directly by incorporating the
experimental data obtained at different temperatures into the
where k,, and k, may be dependent on temperature, the O2 same objective function of optimization. This was carried
concentration and the total pressure. In an isothermal plug out primarily by inserting Equations (6) and ( 7 ) into Equa-
flow system tions (3) and (4).
The estimation of parameters using the above two proce-
dures, i.e. two-parameter optimization and four-parameter
optimization, resulted in similar values of the two rate
constants:
with the following initial conditions
k, = (2.21 i 0.33) x 1014
[NO] = [NOIi, [NH,] = [NH3Ii at t = 0
exp [ -(317.3 k 1.4)/RT), I/s . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8)
The parameters k , and k, were estimated, using the least-
square method, based on the present experiment data shown k, = (2.45 _+ 0.49) X lOI4
in Figures 2 and 3. Considering that the experiments were
performed in an isothermal plug flow reactor (the reactions exp ( -(244.4 k 2.1)/RT), m'/mol .s . . . . . . (9)
should cause practically no thermal or hydrodynamic changes
to the reaction system due to the very low concentrations where the activation energies are measured in kJ/mol and the
of the reactants) and that heterogeneous reaction on quartz gas constant in kJlmo1 . K. Equations (8) and (9) are shown
surface was negligible due to the high temperatures and short by the straight lines in Figure 5. The maximum errors were
residence times applied (Dean et al., 1982; DUO,1990), the estimated by taking account of the experimental errors and
present data should be applicable. the deviations of the data in Figure 5 from the straight lines.

Estimation of the rate constants Prediction of experimental results

The estimation of the parameters in the differential equa- To verify the kinetic model, a more extensive investiga-
tions was performed by adjusting parameters utilizing the tion has been carried out to compare the model with the
Simplex method of optimization. Detailed descriptions of the experimental results other than those based on which the
procedure are presented in Duo (1990). parameters were estimated. Three examples are presented
The values of k,,., and k, were estimated at 5 different tem- in the following.
peratures between 1140 and 1335 K, at atmospheric pres-
sure and about 4% (vol.) 0 2 . The fitting results are A TEMPERATURE WINDOW
satisfactory, as shown in Figure 2 for NO and in Figure 3
for NH,. The plots for Ink,, and Ink, versus 1/T approxi- The observed temperature window of NO reduction and
mately obey a linear relation, as shown in Figure 5 , indicating the curve of NH3 conversion (Duo et al., 1990a) could be

THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, VOLUME 70, OCTOBER. 1992 1017
1.00 ,
1
4j
0 a. I **. Experimental
Predicted
0.75
I

\-
\

I
0.75
0-
z \

2 0.50 0
,? 0.50
z
0
z
0.25
0.25
a
0.00 1 1 I , , , I , , , \ I , , , , , , 1 )
* a
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 0.00 ~
T, K 0 1 2 3 4 5
NHJNO,
Figure 7 - Effect of [ NH,] , / [NO], on NO reduction
Inlet: 507 ppmv NO, 4% (vol.) O,, varying N H 3 concentrations
1 A b.
T = 1213 K: 7 = 0.077 s.
0.75 4 \t
TABLEI
Comparison of the Model With Pilot Plant Experiments
(Temperature at NH1 Injector: 1223 K )
“01, dT1dt “01 1 “01, “HI1 1 “HI],
0.25
i-
-
A\
A
ppmv 0 Kls 7. s exp. model exp. model

- A
A
390 1.22 -227 0.088 0.372 0.408
0.22 0.356 0.349
0.038
0.01
0.160
0.049
0.00 I I I 1 I l l I 1 I I I 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 I

440 1.30 -248 0.32 0.216 0.283 0.01 0.04


520 1.23 -165 0.36 0.283 0.260 0.003 0.01
Figure 6 - a. Temperature window of NO reduction
b. Curve of NH, conversion
Inlet: 507 ppmv NO, 832 ppmv NH,, 4% (vol.) 0,; 7 = 93.3/Ts where values of Constant are shown in Table 1 . Table 1
Symbols: experimental; Lines: predicted. demonstrates that the present model gives a satisfactory
prediction of the NO reductions and a reasonably good
predicted by the model. Variations of 7 , [NO] and [ NH3] prediction of NH3 conversions.
with temperature were considered. The comparisons of the The overestimations of NH3 breakthrough may be
predictions with the experimental results are shown in explained by the pilot experimental conditions being different
Figure 6(a,b). from the conditions of laboratory experiments using synthetic
gases. For example, H20 vapour, combustion ash. unburnt
EFFECTOF [ NH3] ; / [NO] ; ON NO REDUCTION fragments of fuel, CO, CO?, byproduct gases. etc. must be
present in the flue gas through the pilot reactor. In addition,
The observation that degree of NO reduction increases with the pilot reactor was assumed as a plug flow reactor in the
increasing the [NH3]; / [NO] ; molar ratio (Duo et al., present predictions and the radial temperature profile in it
1989) was quantitatively predicted by the simple kinetic was not considered.
model with a good agreement, as shown in Figure 7.
Simulation of the effect of additives
PILOT PLANT EXPERIMENTS
The observation that combustible additives shift both NO
SNR experiments were carried out in a pilot plant at NEFO reduction temperature and NH3 conversion temperature
power plant, Aalborg, Denmark (Jadal et al., 1990). The downwards to the same extent indicates that the presence of
pilot plant is a stainless steel tube of inside diameter 0.3 m additives leads to the ignition of the reaction mixture at a
and length 15 m, which is built as an integrated part of a lower temperature (Duo et al., 1989; 1990a). That is. the
coal-fired boiler of 135 MWe. A flue gas stream of about addition of additives can lower the activation energies of the
0,083-0.194 kg/s was passed through the pilot reactor with SNR reactions. The analysis of bond strengths of NH3 and
a constant temperature gradient of 20 K/m. One set of the additives supports the hypothesis (Duo, 1990; Duo et al.,
pilot plant experimental data are listed in Table I (by courtesy 1989). Based on this idea, the expressions of rate constants
of Aalborg Ciserv International). In the prediction, the are modified as follows:
non-uniform temperature profile in the pilot reactor was
considered by coupling Equations (3), (4) and (5) with = A , -exp [ - ( E l - E , , , ) / R T ] , 11s . . . . . . (6a)
Equation (lo),

dTldt = Constant K l s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... (10) k, = A2 . exp [ -(E2 - E2(,)I R T ] , ni’imol .s . (74

1018 THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING. VOLUME 70. OCTOBER. I W


000.0 Experimental, 21 1 ppm CH,
Predicted, 211 ppm CH,
00000 Experimental, 105 p p m CZHB
Predicted, 105 ppm CzHe

1.oo 0

0.75 4 0

\\
0 a.

i
0-
z
\ 0.50
0
z
0.25
0 100 200 300
CPHBI ppm
0.00
Figure 9 - Concentration dependencies of E,,, and E?,,.
950 1050 1150 1250 1350
T. K
those by the addition of CH4 at the same carbon content.
1.00 ,
i
I The results are in accordance with the differences of the
b. C-H bond strengths in alkanes (Duo et al., 1990a). For the
same additive, an increased concentration causes greater
values of E l , and Ell,, as shown for CIH6 in Figure 9.
Attempts have been made to model the SNR experimental
z results obtained in a 12 MW coal-fired circulating fluidized
z bed boiler (Leckner et al., 1990) using the present model.
\ 0.50
32
z NH3 or NH3 together with additives was injected before or
after the cyclone of the boiler. The preliminary results have
0.25 demonstrated that the predictions are in quantitative agree-
ment with the experimental results in the absence of addi-
tives and in qualitative agreement with those in the presence
of additives.
950 1050 1150 1250 1350
T, K Discussions and conclusions

Figure 8 - Effect of additives The relationship between [ NH3] and [NO] during the
a. on NO reduction; b. on NH, conversion reactions in plug flow reactors may be explicitly expressed
Inlet: 507 ppmv NO, 832 ppmv NH,, 4% (vol.) 0,; T = 93.3/T s in an integral form of the kinetic model. Combine Equations
Additive: 21 1 ppmv CH, or 105 ppmv C,H,. (3) and (4) with Equation (5).For the period of reaction time
considered within which [ NH31 > 0, dividing Equation (4)
TABLE2 by Equation (3) eliminates t from the resultant equation,
Activation Energies Lowered by Alkane Additives
(El = 317.3 W/mol, E2 = 244.4 kJ/mol)
d “H31 “01
Concentration El,, E2U
Additive PPmv kJ/mol W/mol
CH, 21 1 9.47 5.37 = 1 + 2k,,, / ( k r [NO] - k(,,) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 1 I)
C?H, 105 21.6 14.I
C,H, 21 1 30.0 18.6 let K = k , ik,, the solution to Equation ( 1 1) under the ini-
C4H 10 53 20.8 13.9 tial conditions, [NH,] = [ NH31 I when [ N O ] = [ N O ] I
is obtained:

where E l , and Eltr are activation energies lowered due to (“H3jf - “ H ~ ] ) / K= (“01, - “OI)/K
the presence of additives, depending on both the species and
concentrations of additives. For no additive addition, E l , + ~ ~ ( ( [ N O ] , - K ) / ( [ N O-] K)) . . . . . . . . . . (12)
and E l , equal zero. With additives present, E l , and El[,
were estimated via a two-parameter optimization to fit the Although the kinetic model, Equations (3), (4) and ( 5 ) ,
experimental data. The estimated values of E l , and EZafor was not based on elementary reactions and hence essentially
alkane addition are shown in Table 2, and the fitting results empirical, the integrated expression of the model, Equa-
for CH4 at 21 1 ppmv and for C2H6 at 105 ppmv are illus- tion (12), has the same form as that derived by Fenimore
trated in Figure 8(a,b). (1980) based on a simple mechanism consisting of 6 elemen
It is seen from Table 2 that the activation energies lowered tary reactions. The parameter K was defined by Fenimore
by the addition of C2Hhand C4Hla at a constant carbon con- (1980) and Lyon and Benn (1978) as the steady state con-
tent are approximately the same but substantially greater than centration of NO, which increases with temperature.

THE CANADlAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, VOLUME 70, OCTOBER, 1992 1019
The present kinetic model may only be used for Dean, A. M., J. E. Hardy and R. K. Lyon. “Kinetics and
engineering calculations. Complex nitrogen chemistry Mechanism of NH3 Oxidation”, Nineteenth Symposium {lnt.)
involved in the process and the influence of additives on on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh. PA ( 1982).
nitrogen chemistry have been explained in details (Dean et pp. 97-105.
al., 1982; Miller and Bowman, 1989; Duo et al., 1990a). DUO,W., “Kinetic Studies of the Reactions Involved in Selective
It should be noticed that [ 0 2 1 involved in the present study Non-Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide“, Ph.D. thesis, Tech-
nical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark (1990).
was about 50 times higher than [ NH3] and about 200 times Duo, W., K. Dam-Johansen and K. astergaard, “The Influence
higher than the concentrations of the alkanes and the reduc- of Additives on Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide
tion of NO by NH, must be selective in the both absence with Ammonia”, paper Presented at ACHEMASIA ‘89. Beijing,
and presence of additives. China, Oct. 11-17 (1989).
The following conclusions may be drawn from the present Duo, W., K. Dam-Johansen and K. gstergaard, “Widening the
study: Temperature Range of the Thermal DeNOx Process. An
The kinetics of the reactions occurring in the SNR process Experimental Investigation”, Twenty-Third Symposium (Int.)
can be described by a simple model assuming first order oxi- on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pitisburg. PA ( I W a ) ,
dation of NH3 to NO and second order reduction of NO to pp. 297-303.
Duo, W., K. Dam-Johansen and K . $stergaard. ”Kinetic Model-
NZ.The two rate constants in the model were estimated and ling of the SNR Process”, paper presented at the Second Nordic
expressed in the Arrhenius form. Conference on “NOx-SOX Reduction in Combustion of Solid
The experimentally observed curves of NO reduction and Fuels”, Lyngby, Denmark, Nov. 12-13 (1990b).
NH3 conversion, and effect of /3 on the rate of N O reduc- Fenimore, C . P., “Destruction of NO by NH, in Lean Burnt
tion can be quantitatively predicted by the model; the Gas”, Combust. Flame 37, 245-250 (1980).
influences of combustible additives can be simulated using Jflal, M., C. Nielsen, T. Hulgaard and K. Dam-Johansen, “Pilot-
reduced activation energies in the rate constants; the model Scale Experiments with Ammonia and Urea as Reductanth in
can also give a reasonably good prediction of the results Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide”. Twenty-
obtained in pilot experiments. Third Symposium (Int.) on Combustion, The Combustion Insti-
tute, Pittsburgh, PA (1990), pp. 237-243.
Kimball-Linne, M. A. and R. K. Hanson. “Combustion-Driven
Acknowledgements Flow Reactor Studies of Thermal DeNOx Reaction Kinetics”.
Combust. Flame 64,337-351 (1986).
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Leckner, B., M. Karlsson, K. Dam-Johansen, C. Weinell. P. Kil-
Energy Ministry of Denmark and valuable discussions with pinen and M. Hupa, “Influence of Additives on Selective Non-
colleagues in the Department. The authors would also like to thank catalytic Reduction of NO with NH, in Circulating Fluidized
Aalborg Ciserv International for providing the pilot plant Bed Boilers”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30. 2396-2404. 1991.
experimental data. Lucas, D., and N. J. Brown, “Characterization of the Selective
Reduction of NO by NH,“, Combust. Flanie 47. 219-234
Nomenclature (1982).
Lyon, R. K., “The NH,-NO-0, Reaction”, Int. J. Cheni. Kin.
A, = pre-exponential factor of rate constant k,>,,, s 8, 315-318 (1976).
A2 = pre-exponential factor of rate constant k,, m3/mol . s Lyon, R. K., “Kinetics and Mechanism of Thermal DeNOx: A
El, E, = activation energies of rate constants k,,, and k,., Review”, Prepr. Pap. - Am. Chem. SOC.,Div. Fuel Chem. 32.
kJ/mol 433-443 (1987).
E,,, = activation energies lowered by additives, kJ/mol Lyon, R. K. and D. Benn, “Kinetics of the NO-NH\-02 Reac-
k ,r = rate constant related to the oxidation of NH, to NO, s tion”, Seventeenth Symposium (Int.) on Combustion. The Com-
kr
= rate constant related to the reduction of NO, m3/mol . s bustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1978), pp. 601-610.
r, = rate of reaction: formation rate of species X, Miller, J. A. and C. T. Bowman, “Mechanism and Modeling of
mol/m3 . s Nitrogen Chemistry in Combustion”, Prog. Energy Combust.
R = gas constant, 8.314 x 10-? kJ/mol . K Sci. 15, 287-338 (1989).
f = reaction time, s Miller, J . A , , M. C. Branch and R. J. Kee, “ A Chemical Kinetic
T = temperature, K Model for the Selective Reduction of Nitric Oxide by Ammonia”.
[XI = concentration of any species X , mol/m’ Combust. Flame 43, 81-98 (1981).
Yi = [NO]/[NO], Miller, 1. A., M. D. Smooke, R. M. Green and R. J. Kee, “Kinetic
?’> [NH,I/ “H,l I Modeling the Oxidation of Ammonia in Flames”. Combust. Sci.
Technol. 34, 149-176 (1983).
Greek letters Muzio, L. J., J. K. Arand and D. P. Teixeira, “Gas Phase Deconi-
position of Nitric Oxide in Combustion Products”, Sixteenth
P = initial molar ratio of NH3 to NO, [NH,] , / [NO]{ Symposium (Int.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute.
K = “steady state” concentration of NO, k,,.r/ k r , mol/m. Pittsburgh, PA (l977), pp. 199-208.
7 = gas residence time, s Rosenberg, H. S . , L. M. Curran, A. V . Slack, J. Ando and J . H.
Oxley, “Post Combustion Methods for Control of NOx Emis-
Subscripts sions”, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 6, 287-302 (1980).

I = initial

References
Branch, M. C., R. J. Kee, and J. A. Miller, “A Theoretical Inves- Manuscript received January 22, 199 1; revi\ed manuscript
tigation of Mixing Effects in the Selective Reduction of Nitric received November 26. 1991; accepted for publication March 25.
Oxide by Ammonia”, Combust. Sci. Technol. 29, 147-165 1992.
(1982).

I020 THE CANADlAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING. VOLUMI-. 70, OCTOBER. 1992

You might also like