Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Directions:
Choose one of the following nonfiction books. While reading, identify a key passage that
articulates the author’s central argument. Then, make a copy of the key passage and construct a
well-written paragraph that articulates the author’s central argument. Next, identify four
strategies the author is utilizing to support the central argument and, in paragraph format,
analyze how they contribute to the author’s central argument. While the assignment should be
scholarly and indicative of your ability as a sophisticated writer, this should not be a formal
essay. Paragraphs should be typed in 12 pt. Times New Roman font and double-spaced. Please
see the model key passage and analysis paragraphs, which are available online.
***Please note that while this model provides only two examples of strategies
Thoreau is utilizing to support his central argument, the assignment requires that
you identify and analyze four strategies utilized in your text.***
“I went into the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of
life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I
had not lived. I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear…I wanted to live deep
and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that
was not life…to drive life into a corner, and reduce it to its lowest terms…Our life is frittered
away by detail…simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say let your affairs be two or three, and not
a hundred or a thousand; instead of a million count a half dozen, and keep your accounts on your
Thoreau‟s argument centers on the idea that in order to live a fulfilling life, one must live simply.
In order to accomplish this, he suggests that it is imperative to eliminate all unnecessary burdens
including “details,” “affairs,” and “accounts.” By “reducing [life] to its lowest terms,” Thoreau
argues that a person can learn what life is really about whereas living an encumbered life leads to
just existing. To make certain that he simplifies his existence, Thoreau lives in the woods, next to
Walden Pond, essentially eliminating contact with anyone who could potentially complicate his
plan to “live deliberately.” Thoreau‟s allusion to the ancient Spartans emphasizes his desire to be
sternly disciplined and rigorously simple in order to learn “what [life has] to teach.” The fact that
Thoreau bases his lifestyle on this concept indicates his intention to “live [deeply]” in a life that
is not “frittered away by detail” in a way that abides by his central argument of “reducing life to
“When I first took up by abode in the woods, that is, began to spend my nights as well as days
there, which, by accident, was on Independence Day, or the Fourth of July, 1845, my house was
not finished for winter, but was merely a defense against the rain, without plastering or chimney,
the walls being of rough, weather-stained boards, with wide chinks, which made it cool at night.
The upright white hewn studs and freshly planed door and window casings give it a clean and
airy look, especially in the morning when its timbers were saturated with dew, so that I fancied
that by noon some sweet gum would exude from them. To my imagination it retained throughout
the day more or less of this auroral character, reminding me of a certain house on a mountain
3
which I had visited a year before. This was an airy and unplastered cabin, fit to entertain a
traveling God, and where a goddess might trail her garments. The winds which passed over my
dwelling were such as sweep over the ridges of mountains, bearing the broken strains, or
celestial parts only, of terrestrial music. The morning wind forever blows, the poem of creation is
uninterrupted; but few are the ears that hear it. Olympus is but outside of the earth everywhere”
(Thoreau 73).
In an effort to substantiate the claim Thoreau proposes in his central argument, he uses a
personal narrative to describe his attempt to live simply. Using imagery to depict the sparse
setting and unadorned home, Thoreau purports his ideas by creating a picturesque yet
uncomplicated lifestyle that the reader envies. In describing his home, Thoreau notes that it had a
“clean and airy look, especially in the morning when its timbers were saturated with dew, so
that…some sweet gum would exude from them.” The positive connotation of the specifically
chosen diction “sweet,” “clean,” and “airy” conveys a sense of charm that apparently
accompanies a simplistic lifestyle. Furthermore, Thoreau compares his home to one he had
recently visited. After analyzing the similarities, he associates the home with the Gods,
goddesses, and heaven subtly linking simplistic living with a higher being. Concluding the
personal narrative, Thoreau references the “poem of creation” and Mount Olympus as other
recipients of the wind that only blows by him and others who live by the dictates of a simplified
“Why should we live with such hurry and waste of life?...Hardly a man takes a half hour‟s nap
after dinner, but when he wakes up he holds up his head and asks, „What is the news?‟ as if the
rest of mankind had stood his sentinels. Some give directions to be waked every half hour,
doubtless for no other purpose…And I am sure that I never read any memorable news in a
newspaper. If we read of one man robbed, or murdered, or killed by accident…we never need
read of another. One is enough. If you are acquainted with the principle, what do you care for a
myriad instances and applications? To a philosopher, all news, as it is called, is gossip, and they
who edit and read it are old women over their tea…As for Spain, for instance, if you know how
to throw in Don Carlos and the Infanta, and Don Pedro, and Seville and Granada from time to
time in the right proportions…and serve up a bull fight when other entertainments fail, it will be
true to the letter, and give us as good an idea of the exact state or ruin of things as the most
Thoreau effectively uses point of view to comment on the absurdity of “news” in order to
substantiate his claim that life should be lived simply. Beginning with a rhetorical question
allows the author to answer it through various perspectives. He starts with the news-obsessed
common man who needs to be updated every thirty minutes yet ultimately gains no new
knowledge as a result of his efforts. Moving to first person point of view, Thoreau says, “I am
sure I never read any memorable news in a newspaper.” This allows Thoreau to make his point
that “memorable news” is practically non-existent as every “new instance” has already
happened, in some form or another, in the past. He emphasizes his point by shifting to the second
person and restating his thought in the form of a question: “If you are acquainted with the
principle, what do you care for a myriad of instances and applications?” Next, Thoreau
5
introduces yet another point of view-that of a philosopher, to demonstrate how an erudite and
scholarly person views the news as simply “gossip.” To conclude his claim concerning the
triviality of omnipresent news, Thoreau returns to the idea that news is redundant and ultimately
unimportant by saying that one can know the past and predict the future by knowing only a few
simple facts, or key points in the case of his Spain example, that can be thrown into a
conversation-“bull fighting,” “Seville,” “ Don Pedro”, etc. It is evident then, that frivolous news,
just like other burdensome and unnecessary trivialities in life, stands in the way of a life of
simplicity.