Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As we only allow hopping to neighboring directions (at rate Γ), only Γν,ν±1 are non-
vanishing (and equal to Γ), and the master equation reduces to
where the indices are taken modulo z. The entropy function of the system is simply
X Nν (t) Nν (t)
H(t) = − log . (3)
ν
N N
Since the equilibrium corresponds to Nν = N/z for all ν, the (equilibrium) entropy is
simply Hfinal = log z and we find for the difference
Vfinal
Hfinal − Hinitial = log(2) = log (6)
Vinitial
where we denote by V... the number of directions (i.e., the discrete phase space volume)
occupied in the initial and final distribution. If we identify V with the volume of an ideal
gas, then this corresponds directly to the ideal gas, where ∆S = N kB log(Vfinal /Vinitial ).
c) To find the time evolution of the system, we first need to solve the master equation (2)
which can easiest be done in Fourier space, where
z/2−1 z−1
X 2π 1X 2π
Nν (t) = Ñk (t)e−i z
kν
and Ñk (t) = Nν (t) ei z kν . (7)
z
k=−z/2 ν=0
1
with the solution
2πk
Ñk (t) = e−t/τk Ñk (0), τk−1 = 2Γ 1 − cos . (9)
z
We thus see that for every k 6= 0, the corresponding distortion away from the equilibrium
Ñ0 has its own decay time τk . Note that τi > τj for |i| < |j| (i, j ∈ {−z/2, . . . , z/2 − 1}),
i.e., the slowest decaying modes are k = ±1 with characteristic timescale τ1 = τ−1 .
If we now start with the initial state as given on the exercise sheet, we see that Ñk (0) = N/z
for all k. Hence, the time evolution of the polarization is
1 X 2πν
P (t) = Nν (t) cos (10)
N ν z
1 X X 2π 2πν
= Ñk (t) ei z kν cos (11)
N ν z
k
z
Ñ1 (t) + Ñ−1 (t) = e−t/τ1 ,
= (12)
2N
where we used that
z−1 ∞
i 2πν
X X
k
e z =z δk,mz ∀k ∈ Z.
ν=0 m=−∞
In our situation where k ∈ {−z/2, ..., z/2 − 1} the right hand side of the above equa-
tion simplifies to zδk,0 . The result in (12) shows that the polarization decays with the
characteristic timescale τ1 .
Looking at the entropy function for times t z 2 /Γ, only the constant and slowest decaying
modes (k = 0, ±1) need to be taken into account and we can approximate Nν by
N 2N 2πν −t/τ1 N
Nν (t) ≈ + cos e = (1 + δν (t)), (13)
z z z z
where the error term δν (t) := 2 cos 2πν −t/τ1 was introduced. Therefore, we find
z e
X Nν (t) Nν (t)
H(t) = − log
ν
N N
X 1
1
≈ − 1 + δν (t) log [1 + δν (t)]
ν
z z
X 1 h i
≈ − 1 + δν (t) − log(z) + δν (t) (14)
ν
z
1X
= log(z) − δν (t)2 , (15)
z ν
P
since ν δν (t) = 0. Hence, the entropy relaxes to its equilibrium value Hfinal = log(z)
as Hfinal − H(t) ∝ e−2t/τ1 . As was also seen in the script for the two level system, the
H-function approaches its equilibrium value twice as fast as the polarization.
d) Using the same initial distribution and the results of c), the occupation of direction ν is
z/2−1
N X 2π 2πk
Nν (t) = e−i z
kν
e2Γt(cos z
−1)
. (16)
z
k=−z/2
2
We now use the Jacobi–Anger expansion as given on the exercise sheet to substitute
∞
2πk X 2πk
e2Γt cos z = In (2Γt) ein z . (17)
n=−∞
we find
∞
X
Nν (t) = N e−2Γt Iν+mz (2Γt) (19)
m=−∞
z→∞ −2Γt
−→ N e Iν (2Γt). (20)
3
Exercise 1.2 Particle Current and Entropy Production
a) The master equation for this system is
for ν = 1, . . . , z − 1, and the stationary state is reached when Ṅν = 0 for all ν. From this
we can find recursively
N2 = 2N1 − NL
..
NR − NL
. =⇒ N1 = NL + . (29)
z
Nz = NR = zN1 − (z − 1)NL
and thus
ν
Nν = NL + (NR − NL ) . (30)
z
In the steady state, all occuption numbers are constant. Therefore the currents across all
bonds in the interior of the chain are equal, and using the boundary we find that
Γ
J1 = . . . = Jz = (NL − NR ) , (31)
z
since Ṅ0 = J0 + Γ (N1 − N0 ) = J0 − J1 .
b) Since Nν as given by (30) is a stationary state, Ṅν = 0, the H-function for the chain does
not change with time.
On the other hand,
dH(t) 1X N
ν Nν 0 Nν Nν 0
= Γνν 0 ln − ln − (32)
dt 2 0 N N N N
ν,ν
z−1
Γ X Nν
= ln (Nν − Nν+1 ) (33)
N Nν+1
ν=0
z−1
Γ X Nν
= (NL − NR ) ln (34)
Nz Nν+1
ν=0
Γ NL
= (NL − NR ) ln . (35)
Nz NR
shows that the entropy production is manifestly positive
4
c) Using the formula (31) for the current and the assumption that NL − NR = , we find that
Γ Γ
J= (NL − NR ) = ∝ . (38)
z z
On the other hand, the entropy production can be approximated by
ΓkB NR +
Ṡ(t) = ln (39)
z NR
ΓkB 2
≈ ∝ 2 . (40)
zNR
This has a very important consequence: The fact that the response (here a current) is still
proportional while the entropy only grows with 2 means, that even though we are strictly
speaking not in the equilibrium, it’s still a good starting point to calculate the response
as if we were in the equilibrium.