Professional Documents
Culture Documents
acquisition.
Ran Bachrach* and Amos Nur, Stanford University
experimentally. The effective bulk and shear moduli in then is: why is there such a separation in the frequency
vacuum are given by K C and G C respectively. domain between groundroll and the shallow reflections?
The P- and S-wave velocities are given by: What is the physical reason that enables us to suppress the
groundroll and yet retain the reflections?
To answer this question, we will go back to the basic
K U + 43 G U GU attenuation mechanism of groundroll. We will limit the
Vp = , Vs = (2)
ρ ρ discussion to Rayleigh waves.
3
Depth (m)
4
B
6 Vs Vp
8
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Velocity (m/sec)
β = α 0 f (aω / VR )
B
where
Air wave δ 2 a 2 ω5
α0 = ,
πVR5
π 2 VR 4 1 VR 2 − 2 VR 2 −1
Reflection f (aω / VR ) ≅ 2
( ) (1 − 2
) (1 − )
R VS 2 VS VP 2
VS 2 1 VS 2 1 aω
× (1 − 2 )( − ) + , << 1 (3)
VP 2 VP 2 32 VR
VS 2 VR aω
× (1 − 2 ) 2 1 / 2 , >> 1
VP π aω VR
C VP , VS and VR are the P-, S- and Rayleigh- wave
Raw Data velocities in the sediment, respectively, and ω is the
angular frequency. [The complete expression can be found
in Maradudin and Mills, (1976)].
For most unconsolidated sediments with Poisson ratio of
0.1-0.2, the Rayleigh wave velocity is VR ≅ 0.9VS Note
also that β is related to the amplitude of the surface
roughness squared ( δ 2 ), the correlation length squared
( a 2 ), and the Rayleigh wavelength to the power of (-5)
( λ−R5 ). The attenuation length β is plotted as a function
of different surface roughness amplitude and different shear
wave velocities in Fig. 5. Fig. 6 shows a 300Hz wavelet
D
transmitted in a medium which has 0.5m correlation length
and δ of 2cm. Note that in the low velocity material the
A ir w a v e
wavelet is almost totally attenuated. Note also that for
higher velocities, the attenuation coefficient is much
smaller.
Conclusions
significant for the attenuation of the surface wave even at and other attenuation mechanisms). Some of these surface
very short offsets. parameters are difficult to estimate. However, the near
surface velocity profile in unconsolidated materials is
constrained. Thus, the wavelength of the groundroll at
high frequencies is small and will always be more
Attenuation parameter beta attenuated than the reflected wave. The reflection energy
5 can be separated from the groundroll, as we observed in
our experiments.
Vs=150m/s
4 Vs=300m/s
Vs=450m/s Acknowledgements
3
This work was supported by the Stanford Rock Physics
β
1 References
Fig. 5 Attenuation parameter for 3 different media with VP and Bachrach, R., J. Dvorkin,. and A. Nur., 1998, Elasticity of
VS of: (A). 240m/s and 150m/s, (B). 480m/s and 300m/s, and shallow, unconsolidated sediments, In preparation.
(C). 720m/s and 450m/s.
Hunter, J. A., S. E. Pullan, R. A. Burns, R. Gagne, and R.
Good, 1984, Shallow reflection mapping of the overburden
bedrock interface with engineering seismograph- Some
simple techniques, Geophysics, 49, 1381-1385.
300Hz wavelets
1
Vs=450m/s Maradudin, A. A., and D. L. Mills, 1976, The attenuation
Vs=300m/s of Rayleigh surface waves by surface roughness, Annals of
Vs=150m/s
0.5 Physics, 1000, 262-309.
-1
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
Time (sec)