Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Where to file:
RESIDENT – Court of First Instance of last residence
NON-RESIDENT – Court of First Instance of the place where the estate is situated
*Instance where an escheat proceeding is proper even if the decedent died testate:
Even if the decedent died testate but his will was not allowed to probate, it is as if he died
intestate. In such case, if he has no known heirs and there are no persons entitled to his
property, the same can still be escheated.
Doctrine: The five-year period is not a device capriciously conjured by the State to
defraud any claimant; on the contrary, it is decidedly prescribed to encourage
would-be claimants to be punctilious in asserting their claims, otherwise, they may
lose them forever in a final judgment.
CHAPTER 4
GUARDIANSHIP
*Rules 92 to 97 of the Rules of Court limit its application only to guardianship of
incompetents who are not minors pursuant to Administrative Circular No. 03-02-05-SC
otherwise known as “The Rule on Guardianship of Minors.”
Definition of Guardian:
- A person in whom the law has entrusted the custody and control of the person or
estate or both of an infant, insane or other person incapable of managing his own
affairs.
Doctrine: Sec. 7 of rule 93 of the Revised Rules of Court confirms the designation of the
parents as ipso facto guardian of their minor children without the need of a court
appointment and only for good reason may another person be named. (Vancil v. Belmes
GR. 132223)
Note: If no notice is given to the next of kin of the ward, the case will be dismissed. The
notice to the next of kin required by Section 2 of this rule is jurisdictional.
(Singco, et al. v. Longa, et al., 51 Phil. 507)
1. Have the care and custody of the person of the ward, and the management of his
estate, or the management of the estate only, as the case may be (Sec. 1);
2. Pay the debts of ward (Sec. 2);
3. Settle accounts, collect debts and appear in actions for ward (Sec. 3);
4. Manage the estate of the ward frugally, and apply the proceeds to maintenance of
the ward (Sec. 4);
5. May be authorized to join in partition proceedings after hearing (Sec. 5);
6. Render verified inventory within three months after his appointment and annually
thereafter upon application of interested persons (Sec. 7);
7. Must present his account to the court for settlement and allowance (Sec. 8).
Note: A guardian just like a trustee, is prohibited under Art 736 of the Civil Cold from
making donation of the properties entrusted to him (Araneta v. Perez, L-18872,
July 15, 1966).
Doctrine: In custody disputes, it is axiomatic that the paramount criterion is the welfare
and well-being of the child. In arriving at its decision as to whom custody of the
minor should be given, the court must take into account the respective resources
and social and moral situations of the contending parents.
* The father and the mother shall jointly exercise legal guardianship over the person and
property of their minor without the necessity of a court appointment.
When and how a guardian of the property for non-resident minor is appointed;
notice (Sec.12)
- Any relative or friend of such minor, or anyone interested in the property may
petition for the appointment of a guardian over the property. Notice of hearing
shall be given to the minor by publication or any other means.
*Note: As the natural guardian of the minor under parental authority, parents have
the power to administer his property. Administration includes all acts for
the preservation of the property and the receipt of fruits according to the
natural purpose of the thing. Any act of disposition or alienation, or any
reduction in the substance of the patrimony of the child, exceeds the limits
of administration.
*Note: The authority to sell or encumber shall not extend beyond one year, unless
renewed by the court.
*Note:
a. Upon the removal or resignation of the guardian, the court shall appoint a
new one.
b. No motion for removal or resignation shall be granted unless the guardian
has submitted the proper accounting of the property of the ward and the
court has approved the same.
Concept of Trust :
In special proceeding a trust is a confidence reposed n one person called TRUSTEE, for
the benefit of another, called the CESTUI QUE TRUST, with respect to property held by the
former of the benefit of the latter.
Cestui Que Trust- is the person entitled to an equitable , as opposed to a legal, estate. If land is
granted to the use of A in trust for B, A is cestui que trust. And B is the trustee or use.
Trustor- a person creating the trust.
Trustee- a person whom confidence is reposed as regards to property for the benefit of
another. It has legal title to the property.
There are TWO KINDS OF TRUST:
EXPRESS TRUST- is one created by the direct and positive acts of the parties, by some
writing or deed , will or by the words evidencing an Intention to create trust.
IMPLIED TRUST- is one being express, is deducible from the nature of the transaction
as a matter of intent, or which are super induced on the transaction by operation of law as
matters of equity, independent of the particular intention of the parties.
In Rule 98 it DOES NOT APPLY IMPLIED TRUST. Only Express Trust, one which is
created by a will or written instrument.
(i) a former Filipino citizen who seeks to adopt a relative within the fourth (4th)
degree of consanguinity or affinity; or
(ii) one who seeks to adopt the legitimate son/daughter of his/her Filipino
spouse; or
(iii) one who is married to a Filipino citizen and seeks to adopt jointly with
his/her spouse a relative within the fourth (4th) degree of consanguinity or
affinity of the Filipino spouses; or
(c) The guardian with respect to the ward after the termination of the guardianship and
clearance of his/her financial accountabilities.
Husband and wife shall jointly adopt, except in the following cases:
(i) if one spouse seeks to adopt the legitimate son/daughter of the other; or
(ii) if one spouse seeks to adopt his/her own illegitimate son/daughter: Provided,
however, That the other spouse has signified his/her consent thereto; or
In case husband and wife jointly adopt, or one spouse adopts the illegitimate son/daughter of the other,
joint parental authority shall be exercised by the spouses.
Who may be adopted
(a) Any person below eighteen (18) years of age who has been administratively or judicially
declared available for adoption;
(b) The legitimate son/daughter of one spouse by the other spouse;
(c) An illegitimate son/daughter by a qualified adopter to improve his/her status to that of
legitimacy;
(d) A person of legal age if, prior to the adoption, said person has been consistently considered
and treated by the adopter(s) as his/her own child since minority;
(e) A child whose adoption has been previously rescinded; or
(f) A child whose biological or adoptive parent(s) has died: Provided, That no proceedings shall
be initiated within six (6) months from the time of death of said parent(s).
Husband and wife shall jointly adopt, except in the following cases:
(i) if one spouse seeks to adopt the legitimate son/daughter of the other; or
(ii) if one spouse seeks to adopt his/her own illegitimate son/daughter: Provided,
however, That the other spouse has signified his/her consent thereto; or
In case husband and wife jointly adopt, or one spouse adopts the illegitimate
son/daughter of the other, joint parental authority shall be exercised by the spouses.
The use of the word shall in the above-quoted provision means that joint adoption by the husband and
the wife is mandatory. This is in consonance with the concept of joint parental authority over the child
which is the ideal situation. As the child to be adopted is elevated to the level of a legitimate child, it is
but natural to require the spouses to adopt jointly. The rule also insures harmony between the
spouses.[12]
The law is clear. There is no room for ambiguity. Petitioner, having remarried at the time the petitions
for adoption were filed, must jointly adopt. Since the petitions for adoption were filed only by petitioner
herself, without joining her husband, Olario, the trial court was correct in denying the petitions for
adoption on this ground.
Neither does petitioner fall under any of the three exceptions enumerated in Section 7. First, the
children to be adopted are not the legitimate children of petitioner or of her husband Olario. Second,
the children are not the illegitimate children of petitioner. And third, petitioner and Olario are not
legally separated from each other.
Since the primary consideration in adoption is the best interest of the child, it follows that the financial
capacity of prospective parents should also
be carefully evaluated and considered. Certainly, the adopter should be in a position to support the
would-be adopted child or children, in keeping with the means of the family.
According to the Adoption Home Study Report[49] forwarded by the Department of Public Health &
Social Services of the Government of Guam to the DSWD, petitioner is no longer supporting her
legitimate children, as the latter are already adults, have individual lives and families. At the time of the
filing of the petition, petitioner was 57 years old, employed on a part-time basis as a waitress, earning
$5.15 an hour and tips of around $1,000 a month. Petitioners main intention in adopting the children is
to bring the latter to Guam, USA. She has a house at Quitugua Subdivision in Yigo, Guam, but the same is
still being amortized. Petitioner likewise knows that the limited income might be a hindrance to the
adoption proceedings.
Given these limited facts, it is indeed doubtful whether petitioner will be able to sufficiently handle the
financial aspect of rearing the three children in the US. She only has a part-time job, and she is rather of
age. While petitioner claims that she has the financial support and backing of her children and siblings,
the OSG is correct in stating that the ability to support the adoptees is personal to the adopter, as
adoption only creates a legal relation between the former and the latter. Moreover, the records do not
prove nor support petitioners allegation that her siblings and her children are financially able and that
they are willing to support the minors herein
Isabelta S. Lahom vs. Jose Melvin Sibulo
G.R. 143989, July 14, 2003
Issue:
Whether or not the refusal of the adoptee to change his surname from Sibulo to Lahom is a
ground for rescission and revocation of adoption
Ruling:
Section 19 of Article VI of R.A. No. 8552 now reads:
SEC. 19. Grounds for Rescission of Adoption. Upon petition of the adoptee, with the assistance of the
Department if a minor or if over eighteen (18) years of age but is incapacitated, as guardian/counsel, the
adoption may be rescinded on any of the following grounds committed by the adopter(s): (a) repeated
physical and verbal maltreatment by the adopter(s) despite having undergone counseling; (b) attempt
on the life of the adoptee; (c) sexual assault or violence; or (d) abandonment and failure to comply with
parental obligations.
Adoption, being in the best interest of the child, shall not be subject to rescission by the
adopter(s). However, the adopter(s) may disinherit the adoptee for causes provided in Article 919 of
the Civil Code.
While R.A. No. 8552 has unqualifiedly withdrawn from an adopter a consequential right to rescind the
adoption decree even in cases where the adoption might clearly turn out to be undesirable, it remains,
nevertheless, the bounden duty of the Court to apply the law. Dura lexsedlex would be the hackneyed
truism that those caught in the law have to live with. It is still noteworthy, however, that an adopter,
while barred from severing the legal ties of adoption, can always for valid reasons cause the forfeiture of
certain benefits otherwise accruing to an undeserving child. For instance, upon the grounds recognized
by law, an adopter may deny to an adopted child his legitime and, by a will and testament, may freely
exclude him from having a share in the disposable portion of his estate.
The Rule on Custody of Minors and the Writ of Habeas Corpus in Relation To custody of Minors.
Requisites for the valid grant of the writ where rightful custody over a minor is withheld from a person
lawfully entitled there in are as follows ;
The petitioner for has the right of custody over the minor child
The rightful custody over the minor is being withheld by the respondent
That serves the best interest of the minor child to be in the custody of the petitioner rather than
with the respondent.
Who may file the Petition for the rightful custody of a minor?
- A verified petition for rightful custody of a minor may be filed by any person claiming such right.
Where o file the petition?
- The petition for custody of minors shall be filed with the Family Court of the Province or the city
where the petitioner resides or where the minor may be found.
What are the contents of the petition?
- The personal circumstances of the petitioner and of the respondent
- The name,age, and present whereabouts of the minor and his or her relationship to the petitioner
and the respondent;
- The material operative facts constituting deprivation of custody; and
- Such other matters which are relevant to the custody of the minor.
The verified petition shall be accompanied by certificate against forum shopping which the petitioner
must sign personally.
Is the filing of a motion to dismiss allowed?
- No, except on the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties.
What is the period to file an answer to the petition?
- The respondent shall file a petition, personally verified by him within five days after service of
summons and a copy of petition. Upon the filling of the verified answer to file it, the court my
order a social worker to make a case study of the minor and parties to submit a report and
recommendation to the court at least three days before the sched. Pre trial.
Is Pre- Trial Mandatory?
Yes, within 15 days after filing of the answer or the expiration of the period to file an answer, the
court shall issue an order;
- Fixing a date for the pre-trial conference.
- Directing the parties to file and serve their respective pre-trial briefs in such manner as shall
ensure receipt thereof by adverse party at least three days before the date of the Pre-trial.
- Requiring the respondent to present the minor before the court.
If the petitioner fails to appear at the Pre-Trial the case shall be dismissed. Exception : His counsel or a
duly authorize representative appears in court and proves a valid excuse for the non-appearance of the
petitioner.
RULE 102
HABEAS CORPUS
The writ of habeas corpus is a writ directed to the person detaining another, commanding him to produce
the body of the prisoner at a designated time and place, with the day and cause of his caption and
detention, to do, submit to, and receive whatever the court or judge awarding the writ shall consider in
that behalf.
Actual physical restraint is not required; any restraint which will prejudice freedom of action is sufficient.
The Writ may be allowed as a post-conviction remedy when the proceedings leading to the
conviction were attended by any of the following circumstances:
1. There has been a deprivation of a constitutional right resulting in restraint of person;
2. The court had no jurisdiction to impose the sentence;
3. An excessive penalty has been imposed, the sentence being void as to the excess;
4. Where the law is amended, as when the penalty is lowered.
NATURE
Alimpoos v. CA, 106 SCRA 159 (1981)
Petition for habeas corpus is LIKE A PROCEEDING IN REM because it is an inquisition by the
government, at the suggestion and instance of an individual, most probably, but still in the name and
capacity of the sovereign. It is also instituted for the purpose of fixing the status of a person and that there
can be no judgment entered against anybody since there is no real plaintiff and defendant.
PURPOSE
Moncupa v. Enrile, 141 SCRA 233 (1986)
The essential object and purpose of the writ of habeas corpus is to inquire into all manner of involuntary
restraint as distinguished from voluntary, and to relieve a person there from if such restraint is illegal.
Manguila v Judge Pangilinan - is has been ruled that the object of the Writ of Habeas Corpus is to
inquire into the legality of detention and if the detention is found to be illegal, to require the release of the
detainee
VOLUNTARY RESTRAINT
GENERAL RULE: Writ not available if restraint is voluntary.
EXCEPTION: Writ will lie to enable the parents (or person having substituted parental authority) to
recover custody of a minor child although she is in the custody of a 3rd person on her own volition.
Voluntariness is viewed from the point of view of the person entitled to custody.
GIATE COUR
JURISDICITON IN CASES OF HABEAS CORPUS WITH RESPECT TO CUSTODY OF MINORS
Although the Family Court where the petitioner resides or where the minor may be found has exclusive
and original jurisdiction to hear petitions for habeas corpus with respect to custody of minors, the
Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals can take cognizance of such petition in order that it can be
enforceable within the Philippines. However, the return can be heard in the FC/RTC (if there is no FC in
the judicial region) and there is no need to file a separate petition for custody because the issue can be
ventilated in the petition for writ.
REQUISITES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE WRIT IN CASES WHERE THE RIGHTFUL CUSTODY
OVER THE PERSON OF A MINOR IS WITHHELD FROM THE PERSON ENTITLED THERETO:
1. that the petitioner has the right to the custody over the minor;
2. that the rightful custody of the minor is being withheld from the petitioner by the respondent;
3. that it is to the best interest of the minor concerned to be in the custody of the petitioner and not that of
respondent. (Sombong v. CA, January 31, 1996)
Section 14. When person lawfully imprisoned recommitted, and when let to bail
Section 15. When prisoner discharged if no appeal
If one is unlawfully imprisoned, court shall order his discharge but such discharge shall not be effective
until a copy of the order has been served on the officer or person detaining the prisoner. If person
detaining him does not appeal, the prisoner shall be released.
PERIOD OF APPEAL
Within 48 hours from notice of the judgment or final order appealed from (Section 39 BP 129). Form of
appeal is NOTICE OF APPEAL.
Section 16. Penalty for refusing to issue writ, or for disobeying the same
Section 17. Person discharged not to be again imprisoned
We hold that such a reservation is repugnant to the government of laws and not of men principle. Under
this principle, the moment a person is acquitted on a criminal charge he can no longer be detained or
rearrested for the same offense. (Moncupa vs. Enrile,)
Section 18. When prisoner may be removed from one custody to another
1. By legal process;
2. Prisoner is delivered to an inferior officer to carry to jail;
3. By order of proper court or judge directing that he be removed from one place to another within the
Philippines for trial;
4. In case of fire, epidemic, insurrection or other necessary or public calamity.
Section 19. Record of writ, fees and costs
When does court acquire jurisdiction over person of respondent?
The writ itself plays the role of summons in ordinary actions; court acquires jurisdiction over the person of
the respondent BY MERE SERVICE OF WRIT.
.
RULE ON CUSTODY OF MINORS AND WRIT OF HABAES CORPUS I
N RELATION TO THE CUSTODY OF MINORS (A.M. No.03-04-04-SC)
Definition of Terms
Writ of Amparo.It is a remedy available to any person whose right to life, liberty and security
has been violated or is threatened with violation by an unlawful act or omission of a public
official or employee, or of a private individual or entity. It is intended to address extralegal
killings and enforced disappearances or threats thereof.
Extralegal Killings.These are killings committed without due process of law. i.e., without legal
safeguards or judicial proceedings.
Writ of Amparo
It is confined only to cases of extralegal killings and enforced disappearances.
It is a not a civil nor a criminal action but a special proceeding, hence, the revised rules
on summary procedure is NOT applicable in amparo proceedings.
The petitions and issuance of a writ of amparo is governed by The Rule on the Writ of
Amparo(A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC) which was approved by the Supreme Court on September 25,
2007. The Rule took effect on October 24, 2007 (Please see attached copy of the rule).
The hearing on the petition shall be summary. However, the court, justice or judge may call
for a preliminary conference to simplify the issues and determine the possibility of obtaining
stipulations and admissions from the parties.
If the respondent is a private individual or entity, he must prove that ordinary diligence
as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations was observed in the performance of duty.
When a criminal action and a separate civil action are filed subsequent to a petition for
writ of amparo, the petition (writ of amparo) shall be consolidated with the criminal action.
The court shall render judgment within ten (10) days from the time the petition is submitted
for decision.
SECTION 1.Petition. – The petition for a writ of amparo is a remedy available to any person
whose right to life, liberty and security is violated or threatened with violation by an unlawful act
or omission of a public official or employee, or of a private individual or entity. The writ shall
cover extralegal killings and enforced disappearances or threats thereof.
SEC. 2.Who May File. The petition may be filed by the aggrieved party or by any qualified
person or entity in the following order:
(a) Any member of the immediate family, namely: the spouse, children and parents of
the aggrieved party;
(b) Any ascendant, descendant or collateral relative of the aggrieved party within the fourth civil
degree of consanguinity or affinity, in default of those mentioned in the preceding paragraph; or
(c) Any concerned citizen, organization, association or institution, if there is no known member
of the immediate family or relative of the aggrieved party.
The filing of a petition by the aggrieved party suspends the right of all other authorized parties
to file similar petitions. Likewise, the filing of the petition by an authorized party on behalf of
the aggrieved party suspends the right of all others, observing the order established herein.
SEC. 3.Where to File. The petition may be filed on any day and at any time with the Regional
Trial Court of the place where the threat, act or omission was committed or any of its elements
occurred, or with the Sandiganbayan, the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court, or any justice of
such courts. The writ shall be enforceable anywhere in the Philippines.
When issued by a Regional Trial Court or any judge thereof, the writ shall be returnable before
such court or judge.
When issued by the Sandiganbayan or the Court of Appeals or any of their justices, it may be
returnable before such court or any justice thereof, or to any Regional Trial Court of the place
where the threat, act or omission was committed or any of its elements occurred.
When issued by the Supreme Court or any of its justices, it may be returnable before such Court
or any justice thereof, or before the Sandiganbayan or the Court of Appeals or any of their
justices, or to any Regional Trial Court of the place where the threat, act or omission was
committed or any of its elements occurred.
SEC. 4.No Docket Fees. The petitioner shall be exempted from the payment of the docket and
other lawful fees when filing the petition. The court, justice or judge shall docket the petition
and act upon it immediately.
SEC. 5.Contents of Petition. The petition shall be signed and verified and shall allege
the following:
(a) The personal circumstances of the petitioner;
(b) The name and personal circumstances of the respondent responsible for the threat, act
or omission, or, if the name is unknown or uncertain, the respondent may be described
by an assumed appellation;
(c) The right to life, liberty and security of the aggrieved party violated or threatened with
violation by an unlawful act or omission of the respondent, and how such threat or
violation is committed with the attendant circumstances detailed in supporting
affidavits;
(d) The investigation conducted, if any, specifying the names, personal circumstances, and
addresses of the investigating authority or individuals, as well as the manner and
conduct of the investigation, together with any report;
(e) The actions and recourses taken by the petitioner to determine the fate or whereabouts
of the aggrieved party and the identity of the person responsible for the threat, act or
omission; and
(f) The relief prayed for the petition may include a general prayer for other just and equitable
reliefs.
SEC. 6.Issuance of the Writ. Upon the filing of the petition, the court, justice or judge shall
immediately order the issuance of the writ if on its face it ought to issue. The clerk of court shall
issue the writ under the seal of the court; or in case of urgent necessity, the justice or the judge
may issue the writ under his or her own hand, and may deputize any officer or person to serve it.
The writ shall also set the date and time for summary hearing of the petition which shall not be
later than seven (7) days from the date of its issuance.
SEC. 7.Penalty for Refusing to Issue or Serve the Writ. A clerk of court who refuses to issue the
writ after its allowance, or a deputized person who refuses to serve the same, shall be punished
by the court, justice or judge for contempt without prejudice to other disciplinary actions.
SEC. 8.How the Writ is Served. The writ shall be served upon the respondent by a judicial
officer or by a person deputized by the court, justice or judge who shall retain a copy on which to
make a return of service. In case the writ cannot be served personally on the respondent, the
rules on substituted service shall apply.
SEC. 9.Return Contents. Within seventy-two (72) hours after service of the writ, the respondent
shall file a verified written return together with supporting affidavits which shall, among other
things, contain the following:
(a) The lawful defenses to show that the respondent did not violate or threaten with
violation the right to life, liberty and security of the aggrieved party, through any act or
omission;]
(b) The steps or actions taken by the respondent to determine the fate or whereabouts of the
aggrieved party and the person or persons responsible for the threat, act or omission;
(c) All relevant information in the possession of the respondent pertaining to the threat, act
or omission against the aggrieved party; and
(d) If the respondent is a public official or employee, the return shall further state the
actions that have been or will still be taken:
The return shall also state other matters relevant to the investigation, its resolution and
the prosecution of the case.
SEC. 11.Prohibited Pleadings and Motions. The following pleadings and motions are
prohibited:
(a) Motion to dismiss;
(b) Motion for extension of time to file return, opposition, affidavit, position paper and other
pleadings;
(c) Dilatory motion for postponement;
(d) Motion for a bill of particulars;
(e) Counterclaim or cross-claim;
(f) Third-party complaint;
(g) Reply;
(h) Motion to declare respondent in default;
(i) Intervention;
(j) Memorandum;
(k) Motion for reconsideration of interlocutory orders or interim relief orders; and
(l) Petition for certiorari, mandamus or prohibition against any interlocutory order.
SEC. 12.Effect of Failure to File Return. In case the respondent fails to file a return, the court,
justice or judge shall proceed to hear the petition ex parte.
SEC. 13.Summary Hearing. The hearing on the petition shall be summary. However, the court,
justice or judge may call for a preliminary conference to simplify the issues and determine the
possibility of obtaining stipulations and admissions from the parties.
The hearing shall be from day to day until completed and given the same priority as petitions for
habeas corpus.
SEC. 14.Interim Reliefs. Upon filing of the petition or at any time before final judgment, the
court, justice or judge may grant any of the following reliefs:
(a) Temporary Protection Order. The court, justice or judge, upon motion or motuproprio,
may order that the petitioner or the aggrieved party and any member of the immediate
family be protected in a government agency or by an accredited person or private
institution capable of keeping and securing their safety. If the petitioner is an
organization, association or institution referred to in Section 3(c) of this Rule, the
protection may be extended to the officers involved.
The Supreme Court shall accredit the persons and private institutions that shall extend
temporary protection to the petitioner or the aggrieved party and any member of the immediate
family, in accordance with guidelines which it shall issue.
The accredited persons and private institutions shall comply with the rules andconditions that
may be imposed by the court, justice or judge.
(b) Inspection Order. The court, justice or judge, upon verified motion and after due
hearing, may order any person in possession or control of a designated land or other
property, to permit entry for the purpose of inspecting, measuring, surveying, or
photographing the property or any relevant object or operation thereon.
The motion shall state in detail the place or places to be inspected. It shall be supported by
affidavits or testimonies of witnesses having personal knowledge of the enforced disappearance
or whereabouts of the aggrieved party.
If the motion is opposed on the ground of national security or of the privileged nature of the
information, the court, justice or judge may conduct a hearing in chambers to determine the
merit of the opposition. The movant must show that the inspection order is necessary to
establish the right of the aggrieved party alleged to be threatened or violated.
The inspection order shall specify the person or persons authorized to make the inspection and
the date, time, place and manner of making the inspection and may prescribe other conditions
to protect the constitutional rights of all parties. The order shall expire five (5) days after the
date of its issuance, unless extended for justifiable reasons.
(c) Production Order. The court, justice or judge, upon verified motion and after due
hearing, may order any person in possession, custody or control of any designated
documents, papers, books, accounts, letters, photographs, objects or tangible things, or
objects in digitized or electronic form, which constitute or contain evidence relevant to
the petition or the return, to produce and permit their inspection, copying or
photographing by or on behalf of the movant.
The motion may be opposed on the ground of national security or of the privileged nature of the
information, in which case the court, justice or judge may conduct a hearing in chambers to
determine the merit of the opposition.
The court, justice or judge shall prescribe other conditions to protect the constitutional rights of
all the parties.
(d) Witness Protection Order. The court, justice or judge, upon motion or motuproprio, may
refer the witnesses to the Department of Justice for admission to the Witness Protection,
Security and Benefit Program, pursuant to Republic Act No. 6981. The court, justice or
judge may also refer the witnesses to other government agencies, or to accredited
persons or private institutions capable of keeping and securing their safety.
SEC. 15.Availability of Interim Reliefs to Respondent. Upon verified motion of the respondent
and after due hearing, the court, justice or judge may issue an inspection order or production
order under paragraphs (b) and (c) of the preceding section. A motion for inspection order
under this section shall be supported by affidavits or testimonies of witnesses having personal
knowledge of the defenses of the respondent.
SEC. 16.Contempt. The court, justice or judge may order the respondent who refuses to make a
return, or who makes a false return, or any person who otherwise disobeys or resists a lawful
process or order of the court to be punished for contempt. The contemnor may be imprisoned or
imposed a fine.
SEC. 17.Burden of Proof and Standard of Diligence Required. The parties shall establish their
claims by substantial evidence. The respondent who is a private individual or entity must prove
that ordinary diligence as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations was observed in the
performance of duty. The respondent who is a public official or employee must prove that
extraordinary diligence as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations was observed in the
performance of duty. The respondent public official or employee cannot invoke the presumption
that official duty has been regularly performed to evade responsibility or liability.
SEC. 18.Judgment. The court shall render judgment within ten (10) days from the time the
petition is submitted for decision. If the allegations in the petition are proven by substantial
evidence, the court shall grant the privilege of the writ and such reliefs as may be proper and
appropriate; otherwise, the privilege shall be denied.
SEC. 19.Appeal. Any party may appeal from the final judgment or order to the Supreme Court
under Rule 45. The appeal may raise questions of fact or law or both. The period of appeal shall
be five (5) working days from the date of notice of the adverse judgment. The appeal shall be
given the same priority as in habeas corpus cases.
SEC. 20.Archiving and Revival of Cases. The court shall not dismiss the petition, butshall
archive it, if upon its determination it cannot proceed for a valid cause such as the failure of
petitioner or witnesses to appear due to threats on their lives.
A periodic review of the archived cases shall be made by the amparo court that shall,
motuproprio or upon motion by any party, order their revival when ready for further
proceedings. The petition shall be dismissed with prejudice upon failure to prosecute the case
after the lapse of two (2) years from notice to the petitioner of the order archiving the case.
The clerks of court shall submit to the Office of the Court Administrator a consolidated list of
archived cases under this Rule not later than the first week of January of every year.
SEC. 21.Institution of Separate Actions. This Rule shall not preclude the filing of separate
criminal, civil or administrative actions.
SEC. 22.Effect of Filing of a Criminal Action.When a criminal action has been commenced, no
separate petition for the writ shall be filed. The reliefs under the writ shall be available by
motion in the criminal case.
The procedure under this Rule shall govern the disposition of the reliefs available underthe writ
of amparo.
SEC. 23.Consolidation. When a criminal action is filed subsequent to the filing of a petition for
the writ, the latter shall be consolidated with the criminal action.
When a criminal action and a separate civil action are filed subsequent to a petition for a writ of
amparo, the latter shall be consolidated with the criminal action. After consolidation, the
procedure under this Rule shall continue to apply to the disposition of the reliefs in the petition.
SEC. 24.Substantive Rights. This Rule shall not diminish, increase or modify substantive rights
recognized and protected by the Constitution.
SEC. 25.Suppletory Application of the Rules of Court.– The Rules of Court shall apply
suppletorily insofar as it is not inconsistent with this Rule.
SEC. 26.Applicability to Pending Cases. – This Rule shall govern cases involving extralegal
killings and enforced disappearances or threats thereof pending in the trial and appellate courts.
SEC. 27.Effectivity. – This Rule shall take effect on October 24,2007, following its publication
in three (3) newspapers of general circulation.
The Supreme Court may adopt the Writ of Amparo in order to effectively shield a person
against the violation of human rights by arbitrary authorities.
No. However, when a criminal action has been commenced, no separate petition for the writ
shall be filed, but the reliefs under the writ shall be available by motion in the criminal case, and
the procedure under this Rule shall govern the disposition of the reliefs available under the writ
of habeas data.
When a criminal action and a separate civil action are filed subsequent to a petition for a writ of
habeas data, the petition shall be consolidated with the criminal action. After consolidation, the
procedure under this Rule shall continue to govern the disposition of the reliefs in the petition.
WRIT OFKALIKASAN
Governing A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC
Law
Definition It is a remedy available to a natural or juridical person, entity authorized by
law, people’s organization, non-governmental organization, or any public
interest group accredited by or registered with any government agency, on
behalf of persons whose constitutional right to a balanced and healthful
ecology is violated, or threatened with violation by an unlawful act or
omission of a public official or employee, or private individual or entity,
involving environmental damage of such magnitude as to prejudice the life,
health or property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces.
Effectivity April 13, 2010
Venue Supreme Court or with any of the stations of the Court of Appeals.
Docket Fees Exempt
Issuance of Within three (3) days from the date of filing of the petition, if the petition is
the Writ sufficient in form and substance, the court shall give an order: (a) issuing the
writ; and (b) requiring the respondent to file a verified return as provided in
Section 8 of this Rule. The clerk of court shall forthwith issue the writ under
the seal of the court including the issuance of a cease and desist order and
other temporary reliefs effective until further order.
Manner of The writ shall be served upon the respondent by a court officer or any person
Service deputized by the court, who shall retain a copy on which to make a return of
service. In case the writ cannot be served personally, the rule on substituted
service shall apply.
Penalties A clerk of court who unduly delays or refuses to issue the writ after its
allowance or a court officer or deputized person who unduly delays or refuses
to serve the same shall be punished by the court for contempt without
prejudice to other civil, criminal or administrative actions.
Return; Within a non-extendible period of ten (10) days after service of the writ, the
Contents respondent shall file a verified return which shall contain all defenses to show
that respondent did not violate or threaten to violate, or allow the violation of
any environmental law, rule or regulation or commit any act resulting to
environmental damage of such magnitude as to prejudice the life, health or
property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces.
All defenses not raised in the return shall be deemed waived.
The return shall include affidavits of witnesses, documentary evidence,
scientific or other expert studies, and if possible, object evidence, in support
of the defense of the respondent.
A general denial of allegations in the petition shall be considered as an
admission thereof.
Prohibited (a) Motion to dismiss;
pleadings and (b) Motion for extension of time to file return;
(c) Motion for postponement;
motions
(d) Motion for a bill of particulars;
(e) Counterclaim or cross-claim;
(f) Third-party complaint;
(g) Reply; and
(h) Motion to declare respondent in default.
Effect of In case the respondent fails to file a return, the court shall proceed to hear
failure to file the petition ex parte.
return
Hearing Upon receipt of the return of the respondent, the court may call a preliminary
conference to simplify the issues, determine the possibility of obtaining
stipulations or admissions from the parties, and set the petition for hearing.
The hearing including the preliminary conference shall not extend beyond
sixty (60) days and shall be given the same priority as petitions for the writs of
habeas corpus, amparo and habeas data.
Discovery A party may file a verified motion for the following reliefs:
Measures (a) Ocular Inspection; order — The motion must show that an ocular
inspection order is necessary to establish the magnitude of the
violation or the threat as to prejudice the life, health or property of
inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces. It shall state in detail
the place or places to be inspected. It shall be supported by affidavits
of witnesses having personal knowledge of the violation or threatened
violation of environmental law.
After hearing, the court may order any person in possession or control
of a designated land or other property to permit entry for the purpose
of inspecting or photographing the property or any relevant object or
operation thereon.
The order shall specify the person or persons authorized to make the
inspection and the date, time, place and manner of making the
inspection and may prescribe other conditions to protect the
constitutional rights of all parties.
(b) Production or inspection of documents or things; order – The
motion must show that a production order is necessary to establish
the magnitude of the violation or the threat as to prejudice the life,
health or property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces.
After hearing, the court may order any person in possession, custody
or control of any designated documents, papers, books, accounts,
letters, photographs, objects or tangible things, or objects in digitized
or electronic form, which constitute or contain evidence relevant to
the petition or the return, to produce and permit their inspection,
copying or photographing by or on behalf of the movant.
The production order shall specify the person or persons authorized to make
the production and the date, time, place and manner of making the
inspection or production and may prescribe other conditions to protect the
constitutional rights of all parties.
Judgment Within sixty (60) days from the time the petition is submitted for decision, the
court shall render judgment granting or denying the privilege of the writ of
kalikasan.
The reliefs that may be granted under the writ are the following:
(a) Directing respondent to permanently cease and desist from
committing acts or neglecting the performance of a duty in violation of
environmental laws resulting in environmental destruction or damage;
(b) Directing the respondent public official, government agency,
private person or entity to protect, preserve, rehabilitate or restore
the environment;
(c) Directing the respondent public official, government agency,
private person or entity to monitor strict compliance with the decision
and orders of the court;
(d) Directing the respondent public official, government agency, or
private person or entity to make periodic reports on the execution of
the final judgment; and
(e) Such other reliefs which relate to the right of the people to a
balanced and healthful ecology or to the protection, preservation,
rehabilitation or restoration of the
environment, except the award of damages to individual petitioners.
Appeal Within fifteen (15) days from the date of notice of the adverse judgment or
denial of motion for reconsideration, any party may appeal to the Supreme
Court under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court. The appeal may raise questions of
fact.
Consolidation The filing of a petition for the issuance of the writ of kalikasan shall not
preclude the filing of separate civil, criminal or administrative actions.
Names can be change in administrative proceedings but only to the matters relating to change
of first name under R.A. 9048 to be filed in the local Civil Registry office.
TO CORRECT vs TO CHANGE
To correct means “to make or set a right or to remove faults or errors.”
(Substantial corrections need the petition to be converted into a adversarial proceeding).
To Change means “to replace something with something else of the same kind or with
something that serves as a substitute.”
Right or Privilege
Change of name is NOT a matter of right it is a privilege. Hence, a person seeking change of
name must show proper or reasonable cause, or any compelling reason which may justify such
change.
Parties who already bear the surname desired by the applicant can object to the grant of
petition on the grounds of, not because he would thereby acquire certain family ties with them
but because the existence of such ties might be erroneously impressed on the public mind.
1. The petition and the copy of the order indicating the date and place of the hearing must be
published
2. The publication must be at least once a week for three successive weeks.
3. Publication must be in some newspaper in general circulation published in the province, as
the court shall deem best. Another validation ingredient relates to the caveatagainst the
petitioner being heard within 30 days prior to an election or within four (4) months after the
last publication of the notice of the hearing.
REPUBLIC v. COSETENG-MAGPAYO
Facts:
The petitioner alleges that his parents were not legally married, thus he file a petition to change
his name changing the surname he currently bares. The RTC grant the petition and order the
civil registry to delete the entry of marriage of the persons concern and to delete the entry of
father in the records of the petitioner’s birth certificate.
The republic of the Philippines through the Office of the Solicitor General assailed the decision
contending that the deletion of the parents in the birth certificate affects his status from being
legitimate to illegitimate, thus, it should be made through appropriate adversarial proceedings.
REPUBLIC v. CAPOTE
HELD:
The petitioner is entitled to change his name as he was never recognized by his father while his
mother has always recognized him as her child. A change of name will erase the impression that
he was ever recognized by his father. It is also to his best interest as it will facilitates his
mother’s intended petition to have him join her in the United States. This court will not stand in
the way in the reunification of mother and son.
HELD:
In the case at bar, the only reason advance by the petitioner for the dropping of his middle
name is convenience. However, how such change of name would make his integration in
Singaporean society easier and convenient is not clearly established. That his continued use of
his middle name would cause confusion and difficulty does not constitute proper and
reasonable cause to drop it from his registered full name.
RULE 105 : JUDICIAL APPROVAL OF VOLUNTARY RECOGNITION OF
MINOR NATURAL CHILDREN
Sec. 3. Order for hearing. - Upon the filing of the petition, the court, by an order
reciting the purpose of the same, shall fix the date and place for the hearing
thereof, which date shall not be more than six (6) months after the entry of the
order, and shall, moreover, cause a copy of the order to be served personally or by
mail upon the interested parties, and published once a week for three (3)
consecutive weeks, in a newspaper or newspapers of general circulation in the
province.
Sec. 4. Opposition. - Any interested party must, within fifteen (15) days from
service, or from the last date of publication, of the order referred to in the next
preceding section, file his opposition to the petition, stating the grounds or reasons
therefor.
Sec. 5. Judgment. - If, from the evidence presented during the hearing, the court is
satisfied that the recognition of the minor natural child was willingly and
voluntarily made by the parent or parents concerned, and that the recognition is for
the best interest of the child, it shall render judgment granting judicial approval of
such recognition.
Sec. 6. Service of judgment upon civil registrar. - A copy of the judgment rendered
in accordance with the preceding section shall be served upon the civil registrar
whose duty it shall be to enter the same in the register.
RULE 106
CONSTITUTION OF FAMILY HOME
Family Home- constituted jointly by the husband and the wife or by an unmarried head of the
family, is the dwelling house where they and their family reside, and the land on which it is
situated.
The Family Home must be established on the properties of:
a. Absolute Community; or
b. Conjugal Partnership; or
c. Exclusive Property of either spouse with the consent of the other
Note: It cannot be established on property held in co-ownership with third persons.
There are two modes of constitution:
A. Extrajudicial- Civil Code
B. Judicial- Rule 106 of Rules of Court
These rules find application in the Care of Spouses AracelisOlivio-De Mesa and Ernesto
De Mesa vs. Spouses Claudio and RufinaAcero, Gr No. 185064, Jan. 16, 2012.
When and who may object the petition- those interested parties within a period of not less
than thirty (30) days from receipt of notice or from the date of last publication.
Order (Section 5)
a. The court finds that the actual value of the proposed family home does not exceed
twenty thousand pesos; or thirty thousand in chartered cities; and
b. That no third person is prejudiced or that creditors have been given sufficient security
for their credits
Registration of Order (Section 6)
Basis of Registration- a certified copy of the order of the court approving the establishment of
the family home and shall be furnished the register of deeds who shall record the same in the
registry of property.
Jurisdiction
-Regional Trial Court (RTC)
-Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court (if in the City of Manila)
Venue
-place where the absentee resided before his disappearance
CONTENTS OF PETITION
ž ž The petition for the appointment of representative, or for the declaration of absence and the
appointment of trustee or an administrator must show the following:
ž (a) jurisdictional facts
(b) The names, ages and residences of the heirs instituted in the will, copy of which shall be
presented and of the relatives who would succeed by the law of intestacy;
ž (c) The names and residences of creditors and others who may have adverse interest over the
property of the absentee;
(d) The probable value, location and character of the property belonging to the absentee.
TIME OF HEARING (for the appointment of representative, or for the declaration of absence and the
appointment of a trustee or administrator)
ž -When the petition is filed, the court shall fix a date and place where all concerned may appear to
contest the petition.
NOTICE
at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing, copies of the notice of the time and place fixed for
the hearing shall be served upon the known heirs, legatees, devisees, creditors and other interested
persons
PUBLICATION
once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks prior to the time designated for the hearing, in the
newspaper of general circulation in the province or city where the absentee resides, as the court shall
deem best
OPPOSITION
ž Anyone appearing to contest the petition shall state in writing his grounds therefore, and serve a copy
thereof on the petitioner and other interested parties on or before the date designated by the hearing.
PROOF OF HEARING; ORDER
ž At hearing, the compliance with the provisions of section 4 (Time of hearing, notice and publication) of
this rule must first be shown, upon satisfactory proof of the allegations in the petition, the court shall
issue an order granting the same and appointing the representative, trustee or administrator for the
absentee. The judge shall take the necessary measures to safeguard the rights and interest of the
absentee and shall specify the powers, obligations and remuneration of his representative, trustee or
administrator, regulating them by the rules concerning guardians.
ž In case of declaration of absence, the same shall not take effect until six (6) months after its
publications in a newspaper of general circulation designated by the court and in the Official Gazzette.
WHO MAY BE APPOINTED
1. the spouse present shall be preferred when there is no legal separation (In the appointment of the
representative)
2. any competent person may be appointed by the court (if the absentee left no spouse, or if the
spouse present is a minor or otherwise incompetent)
3. the trustee or administrator of the absentees property shall be appointed ( In case of declaration of
absence)
TERMINATION OF ADMINISTRATION
ž ž The trusteeship or administration of the property of the absentee shall cease upon order of the court
in any of the following cases:
(a) When the absentee appears personally or by means of an agent;
(b)When the death of the absentee is proved and his testate or intestate heirs appear;
(c) When a third person appears, showing by a proper document that he has acquired the absentees
property by purchase or by title.
REASON BEHIND THE REQUISITE JUDICIAL DECRLARATION OF PRESUMPTIVE DEATH OF THE ABSENT
SPOUSE
It is intended to protect him/her from a criminal prosecution of bigamy under Article 349 of the Revised
Penal Code which might come into play if he/she would prematurely remarry sans the court’s
declaration.
THE REQUISITES FOR THE DECLARATION OF PRESUMPTIVE DEATH
1) That the absent spouse has been missing for four consecutive years, or two consecutive years if the
disappearance occurred where there is danger of death under circumstance laid down in Article 391.
2) That the present spouse wishes to remarry;
3) That the present spouse has a well-founded belief that the absentee is dead;
4) That the present spouse files a summary proceeding for the declaration of presumptive death of the
absentee.
THE BURDEN TO PROVE THAT THE ABSENT SPOUSE IS DEAD
-Spouse present is burdened to prove that his spouse has been absent and that he has a well founded
belief that the absent spouse is already dead before the present spouse may contract a subsequent
marriage.
THE BASIS OF THE WELL-FOUNDED BELIEF THAT THE ABSENT SPOUSE IS DEAD.
The belief of the present spouse must be the result of proper and honest to goodness inquiries and
efforts to ascertain the whereabouts of the present spouse and whether absent spouse is still alive or is
already dead.
JUDGEMENT IN A PETITION FOR DECLARATION OF PRESUMPTIVE DEATH IMMEDIATELY FINAL AND
EXECUTORY.
The hearing of a petition for the declaration of presumptive death is a summary of proceeding under
the Family Code and is thus governed by the Title XI thereof. Article 247 of the Family Code provides
that the judgment of the trial court in summary court proceedings shall be immediately final and
executory. Thus, there is no reglementary period within which to perfect an appeal. Nonetheless, it
goes without saying that an aggrieved party may file a petition for certiorari to question abuse of
discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction (Republic v. Narceda, GR No. 182760, April 10, 2013)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MARIA FE ESPINOSA CANTOR (GR No. 184621, December 10, 2013)
DOCTRINE: In sum , the Court viewed that the respondent merely engaged in a “ passive search” where
she relied on uncorroborated inquiries from her in-laws, neighbors and friends. She failed to conduct a
diligent search because her alleged efforts are insufficient to form a well-founded belief that her
husband was already dead.
REPUBLIC v. COURT OF APPEALS (GR No. 163604, May 5, 2005)
Doctrine: There is no doubt that the petition of Apolinaria Jamoc is a summary proceeding under the
Family Code and not a special proceeding under the Revised Rules of Court which requires a record on
appeal. It being a summary ordinary proceeding, the filing of a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
order sufficed.
RULE 108
CANCELATION OR CORRECTION OF ENTRIES IN THE CIVIL REGISTRY
Procedure for cancellation or correction of entriesunder Rule 108
1. Petition for Cancellation or Correction of any entry relating to an act, event order or decree
concerning the civil status;
3. Publication of the court order at least once a week for 3 successive weeks in a newspaper of
general circulation, with reasonable notice given to persons named in the petition;
4. Filing of opposition by the civil registrar and any person having/claiming interest under the entry
whose cancellation/correction is sought, within 15 days from notice of the petition or from the last
date of publication of the notice;
6. Judgment granting/denying the petition. Copy of the judgment shall be served upon the civil
registrar, who shall annotate the same.
Any person interested in any act, event, order or decree concerning the civil status of persons recorded in
the civil registry.
Where filed: RTC of the province where the corresponding civil registrar is located.
1. Summary – when the correction sought to be made is a mere clerical error (now governed by R.A.
No. 9048).
2. Adversarial - where the rectification affects civil status, citizenship or nationality of a party or any
other substantial change.
1. Petition is filed before the court having jurisdiction over the impleaded civil registrar and all
interested parties; (Sec.3)
2. The order of the hearing must be published once a week for three consecutive weeks;
3. Notice thereof must be given to the Civil Registrar and all parties affected thereby;
4. The civil registrar and any person having or claiming any interest under the entry whose
cancellation or correction is sought may, within 15 days from notice of the petition or from the last
date of publication of such notice, file his opposition thereto;
Proceedings for the correction of entries should not be considered as establishing one’s status in a manner
conclusively beyond dispute. The status corrected would not have a superior quality for evidentiary
purposes. Thereis no increase or diminution of substantive right (Chiao Ben Lim v. Zosa, G.R. No. L-
40252, December 29, 1986).
Even substantial errors in a civil registry may be correctedand the true facts established provided the
partiesaggrieved by the error avail themselves of the appropriateadversary proceedings (Republic of the
Philippines v.Valencia, G.R. No. L-32181, March 5, 1986).
Adversarial proceeding
One that has opposing parties; contested as distinguishedfrom an ex parte application, one of which the
partyseeking relief has given legal warning to the other party,and afforded the latter an opportunity to
contest it(Republic v. Valencia, supra).
Rule 108, when all the procedural requirementsthereunder are followed, is the appropriate
adversaryproceeding to effect substantial correction and changes inentries of the civil register (Lee v. Court
of Appeals, G.R.No. L-118387, Oct. 11, 2001).
Whether a petition under Rule 108 can be granted byreason of “sex change” or “sex
reassignment”: No.
Since the statutory language of the Civil Register Law wasenacted in the early 1900s and remains
unchanged, itcannot be argued that the terms “sex” as used then issomething alterable through surgery or
something thatallows a post-operative male-to-female transsexual to beincluded in the category of “female”
(Silverio v. Republic ofthe Philippines, G.R. No. 174689, October 22, 2007).
1. Where the person is biologically or naturally intersex, the determining factor in his gender
classification would be what the individual, having reached the age of majority, with good reason
thinks of his/her sex; sexual development in cases of intersex persons makes the gender
classification at birth inconclusive – it is at maturity that the gender of such persons is fixed.
2. To the person with CAH belongs the human right to the pursuit of happiness and of health, and to
him should belong the primordial choice of what courses of action to take along the path of his
sexual development and maturation.
3. There is merit in the change of name of a person with CAH where the same is the consequence of
the recognition of his preferred gender.
SECTION 3. PARTIES
1. Civil registrar;
2. All persons who have or claim any interest which wouldbe affected thereby.
Order of hearing shall be published once a week for 3 consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general
circulation in the province and all persons named in the petition shall be notified.
SECTION 5. OPPOSITION
2. Any person having or claiming any interest under the entry whose cancellation or correction is
sought. Within 15 days from notice of the petition or from date of last publication.
SECTION 7. ORDER
The Civil Registrar shall be given a copy of the judgment and annotate the same on his record.
Republic Act No. 9048 or the “Clerical Error Act” which was passed by Congress on February 8, 2001
amended Articles 376 and 412 of the New Civil Code. Republic Act No. 10172 or “An Act Further
Authorizing the City or Municipal Civil Registrar or the Consul General to Correct Clerical or Typographical
Errors in the Day and Month in the Date of Birth or Sex of a Person Appearing in the Civil Register Without
Need of a Judicial Order amended Sections 1, 2, 5 and 8 of Republic Act No. 9048.
Cases Covered:
General Rule: No entry in a civil register shall be changedor corrected without a judicial order.
Exception: Clerical or typographical errors and change offirst name or nickname which can be corrected
orchanged by the concerned city or municipal civil registraror consul general in accordance with the
provisions of thisAct and its implementing rules and regulations.
A mistake committed in the performance of clerical work inwriting, copying, transcribing or typing an entry in
the civilregister that is harmless and innocuous, such as amisspelled name or misspelled place of birth or
the like,which is visible to the eyes or obvious to theunderstanding, and can be corrected or changed only
byreference to other existing record or records: Provided,however, That no correction must involve the
change ofnationality, age or status of the petitioner (Sec. 2 [3] R.A.No. 9048, as amended by Sec. 2 R.A.
No. 10172).
Note: It may be very well said that Republic Act No. 9048is Congress' response to the confusion wrought
by thefailure to delineate as to what exactly is that socalledsummary procedure for changes or corrections
of aharmless or innocuous nature as distinguished fromthat appropriate adversary proceeding for changes
orcorrections of a substantial kind. The obvious effect is toremove from the ambit of Rule 108 the correction
orchanging of clerical or typographical errors in entries ofthe civil register. Hence, what are left for the
scope ofoperation of Rule 108 are substantial changes andcorrections in entries of the civil register (Lee v.
Court ofAppeals, G.R. No. 118387, October 11, 2001).
Petition for change of name (Rule 103) and petition forcancellation or correction of entries (Rule 108)
aredistinct proceedings. Hence, a party cannot change hisname and correct an entry in a single petition
withoutsatisfying the jurisdictional requirements (Herrera, p.564).
The cancellation or correction of entries in the CivilRegistry is a proceeding in rem. Strict compliance with
all jurisdictional requirements, particularly on publication, is essential in order to vest the court with
jurisdiction (Regalado, p. 193).
Grounds:
1. The petitioner finds the first name or nickname to be ridiculous, tainted with dishonor or extremely
difficult to write or pronounce;
2. The new first name or nickname has been habitually and continuously used by the petitioner and
he has been publicly known by the first name or nickname in the community; or
Who may file: Any person of legal age, having direct andpersonal interest in the correction of a clerical
ortypographical error in an entry and/or change of first nameor nickname in the civil register (Sec. 3).
3. Any other person duly authorized by law or by theowner of the document sought to be corrected.
Provided, that when a person is a minor or physically ormentally incapacitated: petition may be filed on his
behalfby his spouse, or any of his children, parents, brothers,sisters, grandparents, guardians, or persons
dulyauthorized by law (Sec. 3).
Where to file:
1. Local civil registry office or Clerk of the Shari’a Court where the record being sought to be
corrected or changed is kept;
2. If petitioner has already migrated to another place in the country: petition-receiving civil registrar of
the place where the interested party is presently residing or domiciled (Rule 4, Implementing Rules
& Regulations);
3. Citizens of the Philippines who are presently residing or domiciled in foreign countries: nearest
Philippine Consulates (Sec. 3).
Contents of the petition: The petition shall be in the form of an affidavit, subscribed and sworn to before
any person authorized by the law to administer oaths and shall set forth:
1. The facts necessary to establish the merits of the petition;
4. All names by which petitioner is known (SecanKok v. Republic of the Philippines, supra).
1. A certified true copy of the certificate or of the page ofthe registry book containing the entries
sought to becorrected or changed;
2. At least 2 public or private documents showing thecorrect entries upon which correction or change
shall bebased;
3. Other documents which the petitioner or the city ormunicipal civil registrar or the consul general
mayconsider relevant and necessary for the approval of thepetition;
4. For correction of erroneous entry of date of birth or thesex of a person: earliest school record or
earliest schooldocuments such as, but not limited to, medical records,baptismal certificate and
other documents issued byreligious authorities;
5. For change of gender corrected: certification issued byan accredited government physician
attesting to the factthat the petitioner has not undergone sex change or sex transplant;
6. Certification from appropriate law enforcement agenciesthat the petitioner has no pending case or
no criminalrecord (Sec. 5 as amended by Sec. 3, R.A. No. 10172).
Publication requirement: The petition must be publishedat least once a week for 2 consecutive weeks in
anewspaper of general circulation.
Copies of the petition shall be given to: the city or municipal civil registrar, or the consul general; the Office
of the Civil Registrar General; and the petitioner (Sec. 5).
The change shall be reflected in the birth certificate byway of marginal annotation. In case there are other
civilregistry records of the same person which are affected bysuch change, the decision of approving the
change of firstname in the birth certificate, upon becoming final andexecutory, shall be sufficient to be used
as basis in changing the first name of the same person in his otheraffected records without need for filing a
similar petition. Insuch a case, the successful petitioner shall file a requestin writing with the concerned
LCR or Consul to make suchmarginal annotation (Rule 12, Implementing Rules &Regulations 9048, July
24, 2001).
Availment of the privilege: The correction of clerical or typographical error shall be availed of only once
withrespect to a particular entry or entries in the same civil registry record. In case of change of first name
or nickname in the birth certificate, the privilege shall be availed of only once, subject to the provisions of
Rule 12 of the Implementing Rules & Regulations (Rule 7, IRR 9048).
Payment of Fees: The city or municipal civil registrar or the consul general shall be authorized to collect
reasonable fees as a condition for accepting the petition.
An indigent petitioner shall be exempt from the payment of said fee. (Sec. 8 as amended by Sec. 4, R.A.
No. 10172)
RA10172
Entries in the Birth Certificate that can be corrected:
A. Clerical or typographical errors and change of first name or nickname; and
Definition
Supporting Documents
(1) A certified true machine copy of the certificate or of the page of the
registry book containing the entry or entries sought to be corrected or
changed;
(2) At least two (2) public or private documents showing the correct entry
or entries upon which the correction or change shall be based; and
(3) Other documents which the petitioner or the city or municipal civil
registrar or the consul general may consider relevant and necessary for
the approval of the petition.
B. Day and month in the date of birth or sex of a person where it is patently
clear that there was a clerical or typographical error or mistake in the
entry
Requirements
(1) The petition is accompanied by earliest school record or earliest school
documents such as, but not limited to, medical records, baptismal
certificate and other documents issued by religious authorities; and in
case of change of gender, the petition is accompanied by a certification
issued by an accredited government physician attesting to the fact that
the petitioner has not undergone sex change or sex transplant.
(2) The petition for change of first name or nickname, or for correction of
erroneous entry concerning the day and month in the date of birth or
the sex of a person, as the case may be, shall be published at least once
a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general
circulation.
(3) The petitioner shall submit a certification from the appropriate law
enforcements, agencies that he has no pending case or no criminal
record.
(4) The petition and its supporting papers shall be filed in three (3) copies to
be distributed as follows: first copy to the concerned city or municipal
civil registrar, or the consul general; second copy to the Office of the
Civil Registrar General; and third copy to the petitioner.”
Entries in the Birth Certificate that cannot be changed:
1. Nationality;
2. Age; or
3. Status of the petitioner
RULE 109
APPEALS IN SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
Sec. 1. Orders or judgments from which appeals may be taken. - An interested person may
appeal in special proceedings from an order or judgment rendered by a Court of First Instance
or a Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, where such order or judgment:
(a) Allows or disallows a will;
(b) Determines who are the lawful heirs of a deceased person, or the distributive share of the
estate to which such person is entitled;
(c) Allows or disallows, in whole or in part, any claim against the estate of a deceased person, or
any claim presented on behalf of the estate in offset to a claim against it;
(d) Settles the account of an executor, administrator, trustee or guardian;
(e) Constitutes, in proceedings relating to the settlement of the estate of a deceased person, or
the administration of a trustee or guardian, a final determination in the lower court of the
rights of the party appealing, except that no appeal shall be allowed from the appointment of a
special administrator; and
(f) Is the final order or judgment rendered in the case, and affects the substantial rights of the
person appealing, unless it be an order granting or denying a motion for a new trial or for
reconsideration.
Sec. 2. Advance distribution in special proceedings. - Notwithstanding a pending controversy
or appeal in proceedings to settle the estate of a decedent, the court may, in its discretion and
upon such terms as it may deem proper and just, permit that such part of the estate as may not
be affected by the controversy or appeal be distributed among the heirs or legatees, upon
compliance with the conditions set forth in Rule 90 of these rules.