Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Typical bulb
installation
Representation of ASFM operation
Transducer path 1
Transducer path 2
Acoustic Scintillation
Typical Arrangement
Courtesy of Turboinstitut,
Courtesy of COE, USA
Slovenia
Turbine flow measurement in short intakes
Comparison between Current meters
and Acoustic scintillation
Acoustic
Current meter scintillation
Portable and flexible NO YES
Non-intrusive and non-
vulnerable NO YES
Suitable for shortest intakes YES YES
Minimal maintenance and
calibration NO YES
Low cost NO YES
Repeatable YES YES
Accurate YES YES
Stream Flow
Measurement
EDDY E3
S5
SPILLWAY
MAIN FLOW
S6
S1
S2
S3
S4
0 100 m
N
KEENLEYSIDE EDDY E1
EDDY E4
Grid mesh for numerical model of the
area downstream of Keenleyside Dam
Measured and modelled
flows at Keenleyside Dam
KEENLEYSIDE DAM, COLUMBIA RIVER
EDDY E5
200 cm/s
BEACH EDDY E2 SIMULATED WITH COCRIM-ASL
EDDY E3
0 100 m
N
KEENLEYSIDE EDDY E1
EDDY E4
Confluence of the Columbia
and Pend d’Oreille Rivers
Waneta
Eddy
Flow measured in the Pend d’Oreille,
using the unmanned vessel and 1200 kHz Acoustic
Doppler Current Profiler
542820
0
C u r re n t s a t 2 .0 m d e p t h
W a n e ta D is c h a rg e = 1 8 0 0 0 c fs
542815
U 0
T
M
N 542810
0
o
r
t
h
I 542805
0
n
g
m
542800
0
V e l. S c a le
5 m / se c
542795
0 45475 45480 45485 45490 45495 45500
0 0 0U T M E a s 0tin g m 0 0
Model Flow at the Confluence
Spillway Flow Measurements
Introduction
Why?
Alvkarleby, Swed Power
Le Coteau, Hydro Quebec
Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD)
River Transects
Future Flow Measurements
Spillway Discharge Measurements by
Acoustic Scintillation Flow Meter in Spillway B
at Mellanfallet Dam, Alvkarleby Hydro
Alvkarleby, Continued Installation of ASFM
SPS
RX
TX
Rx9
MSE
Rx8
Rx7
Rx6
Rx5 Tx9
Rx4 Tx8
Rx3 Tx7
Rx2 Tx6
RX1 Tx5
Tx4
Tx3
TX2
Tx1
Small opening
Medium opening
Full gate
Profile Opening Flow Max Elevation for Elevation
(m) (m3/s) ASFM
measurements (m)
free
surface (m)
Le Coteau Spillway
#12 0.55 31 All 4.5 Flow Values
#4 0.57 28 All 4.5
#5 0.75 30 All 4.5
#6 0.97 31 All 4.5
#8 1.30 37 3.650 4.5 Summary:
#9 1.30 40 3.865 4.5
#10 1.87 84 2.068 4.2
Results not consistent
#11 FG 4.50 264* 2.068 4.2 Unable to make
accurate measurements
* This flow has a large uncertainty associated with it since at larger openings
velocities in the top half of the flow area were not measured
No inter-comparison
method to evaluate
possible bias
Three Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over
Spillways Dr. L Bouhadji Email: lbouhadji@aslenv.com
ABSTRACT: Turbulent flows over a spillway structure are investigated
using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Simulations are carried out to validate
two and three dimensional CFD models in these structures. The numerical results are
compared to available experimental data published by the US Army Corps of
Engineers
Turbulence models and multi-phase models are used to simulate multiple fluid
streams, bubbles, droplets, solid particles and free surface flows.
Topology
CFD Results
Summary: